Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 1187–1211 | Cite as

Stand-level management of plantations to improve biodiversity values

Original Paper

Abstract

As conservation reserves expand, the likelihood that they will capture areas degraded by previous land use increases. Ecological restoration of such areas will therefore play an increasing role in biodiversity conservation. On the New South Wales North Coast, recent expansion in the conservation estate has captured over 300 softwood and hardwood plantations, many with understoreys dominated by exotic weeds. Here we present an overview of the practices we have adopted in managing flooded gum (Eucalyptus grandis) plantations infested with lantana (Lantana camara) to enhance their biodiversity value. Experiments designed to overcome barriers limiting regeneration of native forest in conjunction with measurement of soil and plant responses yielded insights into the management of former timber plantations for biodiversity. Canonical Correspondence Analysis indicated that the level of canopy retention (or logging intensity) within sites consistently explained the greatest amount of variation in plant community composition (32–38% post-treatment). Thinning and burning stimulated regeneration of native species. Retained canopy cover was proportional to the richness or abundance of native woody shrubs, understorey trees and native perennial herbs, indicating that management intensity can be varied to promote a range of conservation values. A state-and-transition model summarising purported management actions and likely outcomes for these plantations is presented. This is the first time plantations have been managed solely for biodiversity. Logging income means that plantation restoration can be cost-neutral, and the positive influence of a cover crop of trees means that plantation management may generally be manipulated to promote biodiversity conservation.

Keywords

State-and-transition model Plantations Biodiversity conservation Restoration Eucalyptus grandis Lantana camara National park Australia 

References

  1. Attiwill PM (1994) The disturbance of forest ecosystems: the ecological basis for conservative management. For Ecol Manage 63:247–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauhus J, Aubin I, Messier C, Connell M (2001) Composition, structure, light attenuation and nutrient content of the understorey vegetation in a Eucalyptus sieberi regrowth stand 6 years after thinning and fertilisation. For Ecol Manage 144:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baur GN (1962) Forest vegetation in northeastern New South Wales. Forestry Commission NSW, Research Note No. 8Google Scholar
  4. Bureau of Meteorology (2002) Climate averages for Station: 059040 COFFS HARBOUR MO. Commonwealth Bureau of Meteorology, http://www.bom.gov.au
  5. Clarke PJ, Martin ARH (1999) Sphagnum peatlands of Kosciuszko National Park in relation to altitude, time and disturbance. Aust J Bot 47:519–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cropper SC (1993) Management of endangered plants. Australian Nature Conservation Agency. CSIRO Publishing, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  7. Cummings J (2004) Ecological restoration of Imperata cylindrica grasslands and Lantana camara infested Eucalyptus grandis plantations in Bongil Bongil National Park, north coast of NSW. Unpubl. PhD Thesis, University of New England, ArmidaleGoogle Scholar
  8. Cummings J, Reid N, Davies I, Grant C (2005) Adaptive restoration of sand-mined areas for biological conservation. J Appl Ecol 42:160–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cummings J, Reid N, Davies I, Grant C (2007) Experimental manipulation of restoration barriers in abandoned eucalypt plantations. Restor Ecol 15:156–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Curtin RA, Squire RH, Mackowski CM (1991) Management of native hardwood forests in state forests of North Coast New South Wales. In: McKinnell FH, Hopkins ER, Fox JED (eds) Forest management in Australia. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Sydney, pp 77–106Google Scholar
  11. de la Cretaz AL, Kelty MJ (2002) Development of tree regeneration in fern-dominated forest understories after reduction of deer browsing. Restor Ecol 10:416–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dudley N, Mansourian S, Vallauri D (2005) Forest landscape restoration in context. In: Dudley N, Mansourian S, Vallauri D (eds) Forest restoration in landscapes—beyond planting trees. Springer, New York, pp 3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dutton I, Specht A, Stewart B (1989) Rehabilitation of a littoral rainforest. Aust Parks Recreation 25:27–33Google Scholar
  14. Fensham RJ, Fairfax RJ, Cannell RJ (1994) The invasion of Lantana camara L. in Forty Mile Scrub National Park, north Queensland. Aust J Ecol 19:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Floyd AG (1966) Effect of fire upon weed seeds in the wet sclerophyll forests of northern New South Wales. Aust J Bot 14:243–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Floyd AG (1991) Natural regeneration of rainforest in NSW. In: Phillips S (ed) Rainforest remnants—proceedings of a workshop on rainforest rehabilitation. NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, Sydney, pp 20–25Google Scholar
  17. Fox BJ, Fox MD (1986) Resilience of animal and plant communities to human disturbance. In: Dell B, Hopkins AJM, Lamont BB (eds) Resilience in Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Dr W Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 39–64Google Scholar
  18. Friedel MH (1991) Range condition assessment and the concept of thresholds: a viewpoint. J Range Manage 44:422–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilmour AR, Gogel BG, Cullis BR, Welham SJ, Thompson R (2002) ASReml user guide. Release 1.0. VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. Haggar J, Wightman K, Fisher R (1997) The potential of plantations to foster woody regeneration within a deforested landscape in lowland Costa Rica. For Ecol Manage 99:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harrington RA, Ewel JJ (1997) Invasibility of tree plantations by native and non-indigenous plant species in Hawaii. For Ecol Manage 99:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hartley MJ (2002) Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. For Ecol Manage 155:81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hobbs RJ, Harris JA (2001) Restoration ecology: repairing the earth’s ecosystems in the new millennium. Restor Ecol 9:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hobbs RJ, Norton DA (1996) Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restor Ecol 4:93–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 5:299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19:101–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Keenan R, Lamb D, Woldring O, Irvine T, Jensen R (1997) Restoration of plant biodiversity beneath tropical tree plantations in northern Australia. For Ecol Manage 99:117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. King GC (1985) Natural regeneration in wet sclerophyll forest with an overstorey of Eucalyptus microcorys, E. saligna and Lophostemon confertus. Aust For 48:54–62Google Scholar
  30. Kooyman RM (1996) Growing rainforest—rainforest restoration and regeneration. Greening Australia, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  31. Lake PS (2001) On the maturing of restoration: linking ecological research and restoration. Ecol Manage Restor 2:110–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lamb D (2005) Restoring tropical moist broad-leaf forests. In: Dudley N, Mansourian S, Vallauri D (eds) Forest restoration in landscapes—beyond planting trees. Springer, New York, pp 291–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lavorel S, Touzard B, Lebreton J, Clement B (1998) Identifying functional groups for response to disturbance in an abandoned pasture. Acta Oecol 19:227–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindenmayer DB, Hobbs RJ, Salt D (2003) Plantation forests and biodiversity conservation. Aust For 66:62–66Google Scholar
  35. New South Wales National Parks, Wildlife Service (1999) Bongil Bongil National Park plan of management. NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  36. NSW Scientific Committee (2004a) Subtropical coastal floodplain forest of the NSW north coast bioregion—endangered ecological community determination—final. NSW Department of Environment and Conservation, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  37. NSW Scientific Committee (2004b) Littoral rainforest in the NSW north coast, Sydney basin and south east corner bioregions—endangered ecological community determination—final. NSW Department of Environment and Conservation, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  38. Parrotta JA (1995) Influence of overstorey composition on understorey colonization by native species in plantations on a degraded tropical site. J Veg Sci 6:627–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parrotta JA (1999) Productivity, nutrient cycling, and succession in single- and mixed-species plantations of Casuarina equisetifolia, Eucalyptus robusta, and Leucaena leucocephala in Puerto Rico. For Ecol Manage 124:45–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parrotta JA, Knowles OH, Wunderle JM Jr (1997) Development of floristic diversity in 10-year-old restoration forests on a bauxite mined site in Amazonia. For Ecol Manage 99:21–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Patterson HD, Thompson R (1971) Recovery of interblock information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58:545–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pharo EJ, Beattie AJ (2001) Management forest types as a surrogate for vascular plant, bryophyte and lichen diversity. Aust J Bot 49:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkav D (2003) The nlme package—linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. http://cran.r-project.org/
  44. Powers JS, Haggar JP, Fisher RF (1997) The effect of overstorey composition on understorey woody regeneration and species richness in 7-year-old plantations in Costa Rica. Forest Ecol Manag 99:43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Rayment GE, Higginson FR (1992) Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods. Inkata Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  47. Rubio A, Gavilan R, Escudero A (1999) Are soil characteristics and understorey composition controlled by forest management? For Ecol Manage 113:191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Scheffer M, Carpenter SR (2003) Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation. Trends Ecol Evol 18:648–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. State Forests of New South Wales (SFNSW) (1995) Proposed forestry operations in the Coffs Harbour and urunga management areas––environmental and fauna impact statement. State Forest of New South Wales. Coffs HarbourGoogle Scholar
  50. State Forests of New South Wales (n.d.) Ecologically sustainable forest management—native silvicultural manual. State Forests of New South Wales, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  51. ter Braak CJF (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (1998) CANOCO version 4. CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide to Canoco for Windows: software for canonical community ordination. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  53. ter Braak CJF, Verdonschot PFM (1995) Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat Sci 57:255–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thomas SC, Halpern CB, Falk DA, Liguori DA, Austin KA (1999) Plant diversity in managed forests: understorey responses to thinning and fertilization. Ecol Appl 9:864–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Totland Ø, Nyeko P, Bjerknes A, Hegland SJ, Nielsen A (2005) Does forest gap size affect population size, plant size, reproductive success and pollinator visitation in Lantana camara, a tropical invasive shrub? For Ecol Manage 215:329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tucker NIJ, Murphy TM (1997) The effects of ecological rehabilitation on vegetation recruitment: some observations from the Wet Tropics of North Queensland. For Ecol Manage 99:133–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Turton SM, Duff GA (1992) Light environments and floristic composition across an open forest-rainforest boundary in northeastern Queensland. Aust J Ecol 17:415–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  59. Villa Castillo B, Reid N, Cummings J, Corral Rivas JJ, Smith M, Storrie G (2005) Restoration of Eucalyptus saligna and Eucalyptus pilularisPaspalum plantations for biodiversity conservation in Bongil Bongil National Park, NSW, Australia. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference of the Society for Ecological Restoration, 24–26 August 2004. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  60. Webb LJ, Tracey JG, Williams WT (1972) Regeneration and pattern in subtropical rainforest. J Ecol 60:675–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Westoby MB, Walker B, Noy-Meir I (1989) Opportunistic management of rangelands not at equilibrium. J Range Manage 42:266–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wetzel S, Burgess D (2001) Understorey environment and vegetation response after partial cutting and site preparation in Pinus strobus L. stands. For Ecol Manage 151:43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Whisenant SG (1999) Repairing damaged wildlands—a process-orientated, landscape-scale approach. Cambridge University Press, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  64. Yirdaw E, Luukkanen O (2003) Indigenous woody species diversity in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. ssp. globulus plantations in the Ethiopian highlands. Biodivers Conserv 12:567–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecosystem ManagementUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  2. 2.Minerals Council of AustraliaKingstonAustralia

Personalised recommendations