Skip to main content
Log in

What counts? Volunteers and their organisations in the recording and monitoring of biodiversity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a pressing need for volunteer amateur naturalists to participate in data collection for biodiversity monitoring programmes in Europe. It is being addressed in some countries, but less so in others. This paper discusses the results from qualitative research using semi-structured interviews, focus groups and participant observation within nine Participatory Monitoring Network (PMN) organisations in six European countries. The paper examines the features that facilitate recruitment, retention and motivations of volunteers to participate in biodiversity monitoring, including the social and cultural milieus in which they operate. The paper concludes that volunteers place a high degree of significance on their social experience within PMNs. Successful creation and management of PMNs thus requires that similar levels of attention be paid to social aspects of the organisation as are paid to the generation and management of data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Battersby JE, Greenwood JD (2004) Monitoring terrestrial mammals in the UK: past, present and future, using lessons from the bird world. Mammal Rev 34(1–2):3–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell S, Marzano M, Podjed D (in press) Inside monitoring: A comparison of bird monitoring groups in Slovenia and the United Kingdom. In: Lawrence A (ed) Taking stock of nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Burnett J, Copp C, Harding P (1995) Biological recording in the United Kingdom: Present practice and future development—Summary report. Department of the Environment, London

  • Danielsen F, Burgess ND, Balmford A (2005) Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodivers Conserv 14(11):2507–2542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWalt KM, DeWalt BR (2002) Participant observation: a guide for fieldworkers. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis C (2003) When volunteers pay to take a trip with scientists—Participatory Environmental Research Tourism (PERT). Hum Dimens Wildl 8(1):75–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis R, Waterton C (2005) Caught between the cartographic and the ethnographic imagination: The whereabouts of amateurs, professionals, and nature in knowing biodiversity. Environ Plan D 23(5):673–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL (1995) Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Altamira Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris KJ, Jerome NW, Fawcett SB (1997) Rapid assessment procedures: A review and critique. Hum Organ 56(3):375–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine N, JA Secord, Spray EC (eds) (1996) Cultures of natural history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton W, Holland DC, Bunting-Howarth K, Hannan E, Payne C (2001) Local environmental groups: a systematic enumeration in two geographical areas. Royal Sociology 66(4):557–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence A (2005) Reluctant citizens? The disjuncture between participatory biological monitoring and environmental governance. Paper presented at the International Sociology Association Conference ‘Environmental knowledge and democracy’, Luminy, France, 6–7 July 2005

  • Lawrence A, Turnhout C (2005) Personal meaning in the public space: The bureaucratisation of biodiversity data in the UK and the Netherlands. Paper presented at the RGS-IBG Annual conference, London, UK, 31 August 2005

  • McKelvey B (1975) Guidelines for the empirical classification of organisations. Adm Sci Q 20(4):509–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MESP (2002) Strategija ohranjanja biotske raznovrstnosti v Sloveniji. (Biodiversity Conservation Strategy of Slovenia). Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning of the Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana

  • Moss S (2004) A Bird in the bush: a social history of birdwatching. Aurum Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • PAMEB (2003) Policy Brief. Environmental Change Institute, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumar W, Renniger KA (2002) Building virtual communication: learning and change in cyberspace. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins RA (1992) Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure. McGill-Queen’s University Press, London and Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins RA (2001), New directions in the theory and research of serious leisure. Edwin Mellen Press, Lampeter

    Google Scholar 

  • Willets P (n.d) What is a non-governmental organization? UNESCO Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems, Section 1 Institutional And Infrastructure Resource Issues, Article 1.44.3.7, Non-Governmental Organizations

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Bell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bell, S., Marzano, M., Cent, J. et al. What counts? Volunteers and their organisations in the recording and monitoring of biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 17, 3443–3454 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9357-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9357-9

Keywords

Navigation