Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 807–816 | Cite as

BioBanking: an environmental scientist’s view of the role of biodiversity banking offsets in conservation

Original Paper


Offsets, first formalised in the United States of America in the 1970s for wetland mitigation, are now widely used globally with the aim to mitigate loss of biodiversity due to development. Embracing biodiversity offsets is one method of governments to meet their commitments under the Millennium Development Goals and the Convention on Biological Diversity. Resource extraction companies see them as a method of gaining access to land, while the community may perceive them as a way of enhancing environmental outcomes. In New South Wales, Australia, BioBanking legislation was introduced in late 2006 with the aim of ‘no net loss’ of biodiversity associated with development, particularly expanding urban and coastal development. The strengths of the legislation are that it aims to enhance threatened species conservation, and raise the profile of conservation of threatened species and habitats. Weaknesses include (1) the narrowness of the definition of biodiversity; (2) the concepts are based on a flawed logic and immature, imprecise and complex science which results in difficulties in determining biodiversity values; (3) likely problems with management and compliance; and (4) an overall lack of resources for implementation and long-term monitoring. It is concluded that the legislation is a concerted effort to deal with biodiversity loss, however, stakeholders have concerns with the process, and it is unworkable with the complexity of such ecosystems (compared for example to carbon credit trading), and underdeveloped disciplines such as restoration biology and ecology. Despite these criticisms, there is a need for all stakeholders to work to improve the outcomes.


Setasides Compensatory habitat Mitigation banks Threatened species Regulation Biodiversity value Environmental compliance 


  1. Anderson L (2008) Edge effects on skinks: their prey, predators and competitors in peri-urban remnants in north-western Sydney. PhD thesis, University of Western SydneyGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson L, Burgin S (2002) The influence of woodland remnant edges on small skinks (Richmond, New South Wales). Aust Ecol 27:630–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baiada A (2002) Determining biological indictors to define edge-zones within remnants of the Cumberland Plain. Bachelor of Landscape Management and Conservation (Honours), University of Western SydneyGoogle Scholar
  4. Banana A (2005) Pages managing Uganda’s forest in the face of uncertainty and competing demands: what is the precautionary approach? In: Dickson B, Cooney R (eds) Biodiversity and the precautionary principle: risk and uncertainty. Earthscan, London, pp 225–236, p 314Google Scholar
  5. BBOP (2007) Types of offset programs. Business and Biodiversity Offsets Program.
  6. BHP Billiton (2004) Conserving biodiversity at the Ravensthorpe Nickel Project.
  7. Breaux A (1999) Validity of performance criteria and a tentative model for regulatory use in compensatory wetland mitigation permitting. Environ Manag 24:327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown S, Veneman LM (2001) Effectiveness of compensatory wetland mitigation in Massachusetts, USA. Wetlands 21:508–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burgin S (1998) When ignorance may be bliss, but potentially damaging—a discussion on genetic factors underlying provenance biodiversity. In: Proceedings for the Provenance in Vegetation Management Forum, June 22, 1998. Parkroyal Parramatta. Hawkesbury–Nepean Catchment Management Trust, Windsor and Greening Australia New South Wales, Stanmore, pp 4–10Google Scholar
  10. Burgin S (2002) Tragic consequences for conservation of mis-defining the term ‘community’. In: Lunney D, Burgin S (eds) A clash of paradigms: community and research-based conservation. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  11. Burgin S, Carson J, Maheshwari B (2005) Local provenance in rehabilitation of degraded landscapes: a case study from the Hawkesbury—Nepean catchment, Australia. Area 37:324–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carruthers S, Paton DCP (2005) The conservation value of paddock trees. A review prepared for Land and Water Australia and the South Australian Native Vegetation Council. Native Vegetation R & D Program, Land and Water Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  13. Cunningham RB, Lindenmayer DB, Crane M, Michael D, MacGreggor C (2007) Reptiles and arboreal marsupial response to replanted vegetation in agricultural landsdcapes. Ecol Appl 17:609–619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cutter J, Hodder M (2002) Scattered tree clearance assessment in South Australia. Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  15. DEC (2006a) BioBanking: an investigation of market-based instruments to secure long-term instruments to secure long-term biodiversity objectives. Background Paper. Department of Environment and Conservation NSW, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  16. DEC (2006b) BioBanking: a biodiversity offsets and banking scheme: conserving and restoring biodiversity in NSW. Working Paper. Department of Environment and Conservation NSW, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  17. DEC (2006c) Biodiversity certification and BioBanking: a new initiative for threatened species protection. Information Sheet. Department of Environment and Conservation NSW, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  18. DEC (2006d) Avoiding and offsetting biodiversity loss: case studies. Department of Environment and Conservation NSW, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  19. EBI (2003) Integrating biodiversity conservation into oil and gas development: the energy and biodiversity initiative. The Center for Environmental Leadership in Business, Conservation International.
  20. Eco Trades (2007) Fast facts.
  21. Faehrmann C (2007) Environmental groups response to the biobanking bill. Letter to Members of Parliament from Environment Liaison Office, Sydney.
  22. Gibbons P, Lindenmayer DB (2002) Tree hollows and wildlife conservation in Australia. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, p 211Google Scholar
  23. Gibbons P, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Offsets for land clearing: no net loss or the tail wagging the dog? Ecol Manage Restor 8:26–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goldman Sachs (2004) Global energy: introducing the Golman Sachs energy environmental and social index. Energy Environmental and Social Report, ICMM, 2005Google Scholar
  25. Harper DJ, Quigley JT (2005) No net loss of fish habitat: a review and analysis of habitat compensation in Canada. Environ Manag 36:343–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hilderbrand RH, Watts AC, Randle AM (2005) The myths of restoration ecology. Ecol Soc 10:19. Google Scholar
  27. ICF (2007) A guide to biodiversity for the private sector. International Finance Corporation—World Bank Group.
  28. ICMM (2005) Biodiversity offsets: a briefing paper for the mining industry. International Council on Mining and Metals, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. IOC (2004) Community involvement and biodiversity stewardship. Iron Ore Company (Canada). Reveiw/common/pdfs/IOC.pdf
  30. Mac P (2006) ‘Biobank’ blots on the landscape. The Guardian.
  31. Manning C (2006) Community planning report: Ropes Creek Precinct. Elton Consulting, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  32. McManus P (2005) Vortex cities to sustainable cities: Australia’s urban challenge. University of New South Wales Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  33. Morton S, Bourne G, Crisofani P, Cullen P, Possingham H, Young M (2002) Sustaining our natural systems and biodiversity. An independent report to the Prime Minister’s Science and Engineering Innovation Council/Environment Australia and CSIRO, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  34. NCC Biodiversity banking. Fact Sheet, Nature Conservation Council of NSW, Sydney (accessed 15 September, 2007) (undated)Google Scholar
  35. NSW EPA (2002) Green offsets for sustainable development: concept paper. New South Wales Environmental Protection Authority, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  36. Prest J Biobanking hits the NSW Parliament. Environmental Defender’s Office (ACT). (accessed 15 September, 2007) (undated)
  37. Race M (1985) Critique of present wetland mitigation policies in the United States based on an analysis of past restoration projects in San Francisco Bay. Environ Manag 9:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Race M, Fonseca M (1996) Fixing compensatory mitigation: what will it take? Ecol Appl 6:94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. RMIT University (2007) Biodiversity planning in urban fringe landscapes.
  40. Rolfe J (2001) Mining and biodiversity: rehabilitating coal mine sites.
  41. Salzman J, Ruhl B (2002) Paying to protect watershed services: wetland banking in the United States. In: Pagiola S, Bishop PS, Landell-Mills N (eds) Selling forest environmental services: market-based mechanisms for conservation and development. Earthscan, London, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  42. Smithsonian Institution Biodiversity assessment and monitoiring in the Gamba Complex, Gabon: Partnerships for Science, Conservation and Sustainable Development. Gabon Biodiversity Project Briefing Paper # 1. Smithsonian Institution, Washington (accessed 15 September, 2007) (undated)Google Scholar
  43. Stoneman G, Chaudhri V, Ha A, Strappazzon L (2003) Auctions for conservation contracts: an empirical examination of Victoria’s bush tender trial. Aus J Agric Res Econ 47:477–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. ten Kate K, Bishop J, Bayon R (2004) Biodvesity offsets: views, experience, and the business case. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, Cambridge, and Insight Investment, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. WA EPA (2004) Environmental offsets: preliminary position statement, Number 9, Western Australia Environmental Protection Authority, PerthGoogle Scholar
  46. Walker J, Howard S (2002) Finding a way forward: how could voluntary action move mining towards sustainable development? Environmental Resources Management (ERM), International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Washington Biodiversity Project (2006) Bainbridge island selected for international biodiversity project. http://www.biodiversity.wa.ogv.ourbiodviersity/bainbridge.html
  48. Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists (2003) A new model for landscape conservation in New South Wales. World Wildlife Fund Australia, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  49. Wotherspoon D (2008) Ecology of the eastern bearded dragon Pogona barbata. PhD, University of Western Sydney, South Penrith, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  50. WSSD (2002) Sound management, investment in people, environmental stewardship crucial for development: US Secretary of State tells Summit. World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, 26 August–4 September, 2002.
  51. Xstrata (2005) McArthur River mine open cut project environmental impact assessment supplement. Xstrata Coal Australia Pty Ltd, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Health and ScienceUniversity of Western SydneySouth Penrith Distribution CentreAustralia

Personalised recommendations