Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 17, Issue 11, pp 2691–2700 | Cite as

Avian population trends in the vulnerable montane forests of the Northern Appalachians, USA

  • David I. KingEmail author
  • J. Daniel Lambert
  • John P. Buonaccorsi
  • Leighlan S. Prout
Original Paper


Declines in bird populations are an important issue facing conservationists. Although studies have documented bird declines in a variety of lowland habitats, montane habitats are generally under represented in these investigations. Nevertheless, montane habitats are vulnerable because of their restricted geographic distribution as well as their exposure to environmental stressors such as atmospheric deposition and climate change. We surveyed birds at 768 points on 42 transects in montane spruce-fir forests the White Mountains of New Hampshire from 1993–2003. We detected 17,479 individuals of 73 species during this period, of which 10 were abundant enough for analyses. Of these 10 species, three exhibited significant population declines during the survey period: Yellow-bellied Flycatcher (Empidonax flaviventris), Bicknell’s Thrush (Catharus bicknelli) and Magnolia Warbler (Dendroica magnolia). Two of these species (Yellow-bellied Flycatcher and Bicknell’s Thrush) are considered ecological indicator species for montane spruce-fir forest. Declines in these species are an indication that recent concern on the part of conservationists about montane spruce-fir forest and the birds that inhabit them are justified. Our observation that these trends were not reflected in the National Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) analyses, and that one high priority species, the Bicknell’s Thrush, did not occur on BBS routes in New Hampshire during the survey period, argues for the importance of continued efforts to monitor these habitats.


Bird Chemical deposition Climate Recreation Spruce-fir 



The population trend analysis was funded by the White Mountain National Forest and by the Stone House Farm Fund of the Upper Valley Community Foundation. Data were collected by the Audubon Society of New Hampshire and by US Forest Service staff. We thank J. E. Goetz and J. H. Rappole for their comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript.


  1. Able KP, Noon BR (1976) Avian community structure along elevational gradients in the northeastern United States. Oecologia 26:275–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Askins RA, Lynch JF, Greenberg R (1990) Population declines in migratory birds in eastern North America. Curr Ornithol 7:1–57Google Scholar
  3. Askins RA, Ewert DN, Norton RL (1992) Abundance of wintering in fragmented and continuous forests in the US Virgin Islands. In: Hagan JM III, Johnston DW (eds) Ecology and conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 197–206Google Scholar
  4. Atwood JL, Rimmer CC, McFarland KP, Tsai SH, Nagy LR (1996) Distribution of Bicknell’s Thrush in New England and New York. Wilson Bull 108:650–661Google Scholar
  5. Bart J, Burnham KP, Dunn EH, Francis CM (2004) Goals and strategies for estimating trends in landbird abundance. J Wildlife Manag 68:611–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bystrak D (1981) The North American breeding bird survey. Stud Avian Biol 6:34–41Google Scholar
  7. Chan HM, Scheuhammer AM, Ferran A, Loupelle C, Holloway J, Weech S (2003) Impacts of mercury on freshwater fish-eating wildlife and humans. Human Ecol Risk Assess 9:867–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole, DN (1996) Wilderness recreation use trends 1965 through 1994. Forest Service Research Paper INT-RP-488Google Scholar
  9. Dehayes DH, Schaberg PG, Hawley GJ, Strimbeck GR (1999) Acid rain impacts calcium nutrition and forest health. BioScience 49:789–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dettmers R (2003) Priority bird species in Bird Conservation Region 14. North American Bird Conservation Initiative, Arlington, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  11. Geissler PH, Sauer JR (1990) Topics in route-regression analysis. In: Sauer JR, Droege S (eds) Survey designs and statistical methods for the estimation of Avian population trends. US Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 90(1), pp 54–57Google Scholar
  12. Gutzwiller KJ, Anderson SH (1999) Spatial extent of human-intrusion effects on montane spruce-fir bird distributions. Condor 101:378–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hagan JM III, Johnston DW (1992) Ecology and conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Hall GA (1984) Population decline of Neotropical migrants in an Appalachian forest. Am Birds 8:14–18Google Scholar
  15. Hall, GA (1994) Magnolia Warbler (Dendroica magnolia). In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The birds of North America, No. 136. Philadelphia: The Academy of Natural Sciences. The American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  16. Hames RS, Rosenberg KV, Lowe JD, Barker SE, Dhondt AA (2002) Adverse effects of acid rain on the distribution of the Wood Thrush (Hylocichla mustelina) in North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11235–11240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hayhoe K, Wake CP, Huntington TG, Luo L, Schwartz, MD, Sheffield J, Wood E, Anderson B, Bradbury J, DeGaetano A, Troy TJ, Wolfe D (2006) Past and future changes in climate and hydrological indicators in the US Northeast. Clim Dyn 28:381–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hill NP, Hagan JM III (1991) Population trends of some northeastern North American landbirds A: half-century of data. Wilson Bull 103:165–182Google Scholar
  19. Holmes RT, Sherry TW (2001) Thirty-year bird population trends in an unfragmented temperate deciduous forest: the importance of habitat change Auk 118:589–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hussell DJT, Mather MH, Sinclair PH (1992) Trends in numbers of tropical and temperate-wintering migrant landbirds in migration at Long Point, Ontario, 1961–1988. In: Hagan JM III, Johnston DW (eds) Ecology and conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 101–114Google Scholar
  21. Link WA, Sauer JR (1994) Estimating equations estimates of trends. Bird Popul 2:23–32Google Scholar
  22. Miller SG, Knight RL, Miller CK (1998) Influence of recreational trails on breeding bird communities. Ecol Appl 8:162–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miller-Weeks M, Smoronk D (1993) Aerial assessment of red spruce and balsam fir condition in the Adirondack region of New York, the Green Mountains of Vermont, the White Mountains of New Hampshire, and the mountains of western Maine 1985–1986. Forest Service Northeastern Region US Department of Agriculture NA-TP-16–93Google Scholar
  24. Nixon EA (1999) Status report on Bicknell’s Thrush Catharus bicknelli in Canada. Unpublished report to Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Environment Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  25. Ornat LA, Greenberg R (1990) Sexual segregation by habitat in migratory warblers in Quintana Roo, Mexico. Auk 107:539–543Google Scholar
  26. Peterjohn BG, Sauer JR, Robbins CS (1995) Population trends from the North American breeding bird survey. In: Martin TE, Finch DM (eds) Migratory birds ecology and management of Neotropical migratory birds. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–39Google Scholar
  27. Ralph CJ, Sauer JR, Droege S (1995) Monitoring bird populations by point counts US. Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rept. PSW-GTR-149, pp 181Google Scholar
  28. Rappole JH (1995) The ecology of migrant birds: a Neotropical perspective. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  29. Rappole JH, Morton ES (1985) Effects of habitat alteration on a tropical forest community. Ornithol Monogr 6:1013–1023Google Scholar
  30. Rappole JH, Morton ES, Ramos MA (1992) Density, philopatry, and population estimates for songbird migrants wintering in Veracruz. In: Hagan JM III, Johnston DW (eds) Ecology and conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., pp 337–344Google Scholar
  31. Rich TD, Beardmore CJ, Berlanga H, Blancher PJ, Bradstreet MSW, Butcher GS, Demarest DW, Dunn EH, Hunter WC, Iñigo-Elias EE, Kennedy JA, Martell AM, Panjabi AO, Pashley DN, Rosenberg KV, Rustay CM, Wendt JS, Will TC (2004) Partners in flight North American landbird conservation plan. Cornell Lab of Ornithology Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  32. Rimmer CC, McFarland KP, Ellison WG, Goetz JE (2001) Bicknell’s Thrush (Catharus bicknelli). The Birds of North America, no. 592Google Scholar
  33. Rimmer CC, McFarland KP, Evers DC, Miller EK, Aubry Y, Busby D, Taylor RJ (2005) Mercury levels in Bicknell’s Thrush and other insectivorous passerines in montane forests of northeastern North America. Ecotoxicology 14:223–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rodenhouse NL, Matthews SN, McFarland KP, Lambert JD, Iverson LR, Prasad A, Sillett TS, Holmes RT (in press) Potential effects of climate change on birds of the Northeast. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob ChangeGoogle Scholar
  35. Sillett TS, Holmes RT (2002) Variation in survivorship of a migratory songbird throughout its annual cycle. J Anim Ecol 71:296–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stewart PA (1987) Decline in numbers of wood warblers in spring and autumn migration through Ohio. North Am Bird Bander 12:58–60Google Scholar
  37. Terborgh J (1989) Where have all the birds gone? Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  38. US Forest Service (2006) National visitor use monitoring results for the White Mountain National Forest.
  39. Whitcomb RF, Robbins CS, Lynch JF, Whitcomb BL, Klimkiewicz MK, Bystrak D (1981) Effects of forest fragmentation on avifauna in the eastern deciduous forest. In: Burgess RL, Sharpe DM (eds) Forest island dynamics in man-dominated landscapes. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 125-205Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • David I. King
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. Daniel Lambert
    • 2
  • John P. Buonaccorsi
    • 3
  • Leighlan S. Prout
    • 4
  1. 1.Northern Research Station, US Forest Service203 Holdsworth Natural Resources Center, University of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  2. 2.Vermont Institute of Natural ScienceQuecheeUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  4. 4.White Mountain National ForestLaconiaUSA

Personalised recommendations