Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 16, Issue 13, pp 3781–3802

Systematic landscape restoration in the rural–urban fringe: meeting conservation planning and policy goals

  • Neville D. Crossman
  • Brett A. Bryan
  • Bertram Ostendorf
  • Sally Collins
Original Paper

Abstract

Many landscapes that straddle the rural/urban divide suffer from low levels of species diversity following extensive clearing and fragmentation of native vegetation communities and conversion of land to agriculture. Further pressures are placed on remnant vegetation by encroaching urban expansion. These landscapes now exhibit a mosaic of small, patchy vegetation remnants that are under considerable pressure from housing and light-industrial development. Furthermore, agriculture in these landscapes tends to be of high economic value from uses such as intensive horticulture. Concerted and well-planned efforts are needed to balance the many conflicts of interest and competing demands for land with the need to restore landscapes for the protection of biodiversity. There has been a recent move in Australia toward regional biodiversity planning and goal setting, however specific detail on how to plan for achieving targets in complex landscapes is lacking. This paper applies a systematic landscape restoration model to a mixed-use, peri-urban landscape on the northern fringes of Adelaide, South Australia. The region contains fragments of remnant vegetation amongst a mosaic of high-value horticulture, light industry and urban development. Models produce maximally efficient solutions that meet comprehensive, adequate and representative conservation targets. Further constraints are added to the model to take into account the value of agricultural output, the biodiversity value of remnants, and property size and tenure. The effects on solution efficiencies as the number of constraints increase are investigated. This paper demonstrates the flexibility found in applying a systematic landscape restoration methodology. The process we present can be transferred to any rural–urban fringe region.

Keywords

Integer programming Geographic Information Systems Spatial optimisation Urban landscapes Landscape restoration 

References

  1. ABS (2001a) 2001 Census of population and housing. Australian Bureau of Statistics, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  2. ABS (2001b) 2001 Agricultural census. Australian Bureau of Statistics, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  3. Andren H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arthur JL, Camm JD, Haight RG, Montgomery CA, Polasky S (2004) Weighting conservation objectives: maximum expected coverage versus endangered species protection. Ecol Appl 14:1936–1945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (1995) National strategy for the conservation of Australia’s biological diversity. Department of Environment, Sport and Territories, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  6. Battisti C, Gippoliti S (2004) Conservation in the urban-countryside interface: a cautionary note from Italy. Conserv Biol 18:581–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ball IR, Possingham HP (2002) MARXAN version 1.8.6. The ecology centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane. Available from http://www.ecology.uq.edu.au/marxan, accessed on 1/10/2004Google Scholar
  8. Bedward M, Pressey RL, Keith DA (1992) A new approach for selecting fully representative reserve networks: addressing efficiency, reserve design and land suitability with an iterative analysis. Biol Conserv 62:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bellamy JA, McDonald GT, Syme GJ, Butterworth JE (1999) Evaluating integrated resource management. Soc Natur Resour 12:337–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bellamy JA, Walker DH, McDonald GT, Syme GJ (2001) A systems approach to the evaluation of natural resource management initiatives. J Environ Manage 63:407–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bengston DN, Fletcher JO, Nelson KC (2004) Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landscape Urban Plan 69:271–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bishop G, Colliver A (2000) Conserving Adelaide’s biodiversity: a planned approach. South Australian Urban Forest Biodiversity Program, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  13. Brody SD, Highfield W, Carrasco V (2004) Measuring the collective planning capabilities of local jurisdictions to manage ecological systems in southern Florida. Landscape Urban Plan 69:33–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bryan BA (2000) Strategic revegetation planning in an agricultural landscape: a spatial information technology approach. Doctoral Thesis, University of Adelaide, South AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  15. Bryan BA (2003) Physical environmental modeling, visualization and query for supporting landscape planning decisions. Landscape Urban Plan 65:237–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bunker R, Houston P (2003) Prospects for the rural–urban fringe in Australia: observations from a brief history of the landscapes around Sydney and Adelaide. Aust Geogr Stud 41:303–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cabeza M, Moilanen A (2003) Site selection algorithms and habitat loss. Conserv Biol 17:1402–1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cabeza M, Araújo MB, Wilson RJ, Thomas CD, Cowley MJR, Moilanen A (2004) Combining probabilities of occurrence with spatial reserve design. J Appl Ecol 41:252–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Council of Australian Governments (2000) Our vital resources: A National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality. URL: http://www.napswq.gov.au/publications/vital-resources.html, accessed on 29/09/2004Google Scholar
  20. Crossman ND, Bryan BA (2006) Systematic landscape restoration using integer programming. Biol Conserv 128:369–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crossman ND, Perry LM, Bryan BA, Ostendorf B (2007) CREDOS: a conservation reserve evaluation and design optimisation system. Environ Model Software 22:449–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Csuti B, Polasky S, Williams PH, Pressey RL, Camm JD, Kershaw M, Kiester AR, Downs B, Hamilton R, Huso M, Sohr K (1997) A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon. Biol Conserv 80:83–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Department for Environment and Heritage (2004) Plans for biodiversity conservation. URL: http://www.environment.sa.gov.au/biodiversity/bioplans.html, accessed on 28/09/2004Google Scholar
  24. Department for Environment and Heritage (2005) Floristic vegetation map of the Southern Mount Lofty Ranges. Department for Environment and Heritage, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  25. Diamond J (1987) Reflections on goals and on the relationship between theory and practice. In: Jordan WR, Gilpin ME, Aber JD (eds) Restoration ecology: a synthetic approach to ecological research. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Dobson A, Bradshaw AD (1997) Hopes for the future: restoration ecology and conservation biology. Science 227:515–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Edvardsson K (2004) Using goals in environmental management: The Swedish system of environmental objectives. Environ Manage 34:170–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. ESRI (2002) ArcGIS 8.3. ESRI: Redlands, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  29. Faith DP, Margules CR, Walker PA, Stein J, Natera G (2001) Practical application of biodiversity surrogates and percentage targets for conservation in Papua New Guinea. Pac Conserv Biol 6:289–303Google Scholar
  30. Fisher T (2003) Differentiation of growth processes in the peri-urban region: an Australian case study. Urban Stud 40:551–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ford T (1999) Understanding population growth in the peri-urban region. Int J Popul Geogr 5:297–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Freudenberger D, Harvey J, Drew A (2004) Predicting the biodiversity benefits of the Saltshaker Project, Boorowa, NSW. Ecol Manage Restor 5:5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gilbert OL, Anderson P (1998) Habitat creation and repair. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  34. Government of South Australia (2004) South Australia strategic plan. URL: http://www.stateplan.sa.gov.au/home.php, accessed on 15/09/2004Google Scholar
  35. Haight RG, ReVelle CS, Snyder SA (2000) An integer optimisation approach to a probabilistic reserve site selection problem. Oper Res 48:697–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haight RG, Snyder SA, ReVelle CS (2005) Metropolitan open-space protection with uncertain site availability. Conserv Biol 19:327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Halliday J, Coombes M (1995) In search of counterurbanisation: some evidence from Devon on the relationship between patterns of migration and motivation. J Rural Stud 11:433–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heimlich RE, Anderson WD (2001) Development at the urban fringe and beyond: impacts on agriculture and rural land. Agriculture Economic Report No. 803. Economic Research Service, US Department of AgricultureGoogle Scholar
  39. Hobbs RJ, Harris JA (2001) Restoration ecology: repairing the Earth’s ecosystems in the new millennium. Restor Ecol 9:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hobbs RJ, Norton DA (1996) Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restor Ecol 4:93–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hugo GJ (1989) Australia: the spatial concentration of the turnaround. In: Champion AG (ed) Counterurbanization – the changing pace and nature of population deconcentration. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. ILOG (2003) CPLEX 9.0 and OPL Studio 3.6. ILOG: Mountain View, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  43. Kraehenbuehl D (1996) Pre-European vegetation of Adelaide: s survey from the Gawler Ranges to Hallett Cove. Nature Conservation Society of South Australia, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  44. Kirkpatrick JB (1983) An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biol Conserv 25:127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lambeck RJ (1997) Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv Biol 11:849–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lindenmayer DB, Fischer JF (2003) The focal species approach: sound science or social hook. Landscape Urban Plan 62:149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD, Smith PL, Possingham HP, Fischer J, Oliver I, McCarthy MA (2002) The focal-species approach and landscape restoration: a critique. Conserv Biol 16:338–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Loyn RH (1987) Effects of patch areas and habitat on bird abundances, species numbers and tree health in fragmented Victorian forests. In: Saunders DA, Arnold GW, Burbidge AA, Hopkins AJM (eds) Nature conservation: the role of remnants of native vegetation. Surrey Beatty and Sons in association with CSIRO and Western Australian Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM), Chipping Norton, NSWGoogle Scholar
  49. Margules CR, Nicholls AO, Pressey RL (1988) Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biol Conserv 43:63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Margules CR, Pressey RL, Williams PH (2002) Representing biodiversity: data and procedures for identifying priority areas for conservation. J Biosci 27:309–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) (2001) Avian ecology in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  53. McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. URL: www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html, accessed on 15/08/2004Google Scholar
  54. McIntyre S, Hobbs R (1999) A framework for conceptualising human effects on landscapes and its relevance to management and research models. Conserv Biol 13:1282–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McIntyre S, Hobbs R (2000) Human impacts on landscapes: matrix condition and management priorities. In: Craig JL, Mitchell N, Saunders DA (eds) Nature conservation 5: conservation in production environments: managing the matrix. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Sydney, pp 301–307Google Scholar
  56. McKenzie F (1996) Beyond the suburbs: population change in the major regions of Australia. Australian Government Publishing Service, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  57. McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Miller JR, Hobbs RJ (2002) Conservation where people live and work. Conserv Biol 16:330–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moritz KN, Moss GL (2003) Regional native vegetation conservation strategy, Kangaroo Island. Department for Environment and Heritage, South AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  60. Mount Lofty Ranges Interim Integrated Natural Resource Management Group (2003a) Integrated natural resource management plan for the Mount Lofty Ranges and Greater Adelaide Region. URL: http://www.mlrcp.sa.gov.au/inrmplan.htm, accessed on 29/09/2004Google Scholar
  61. Mount Lofty Ranges Interim Integrated Natural Resource Management Group (2003b) Investment strategy for the integrated natural resource management plan for the Mount Lofty Ranges and Greater Adelaide Region. URL: http://www.mlrcp.sa.gov.au/investment.html, accessed on 29/09/2004Google Scholar
  62. National Land and Water Resources Audit (2001) Australian native vegetation assessment 2001. National Land and Water Resources Audit, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  63. Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council (2002) Framework for the implementation of the natural heritage trust extension. URL: http://www.nht.gov.au/nht2/index.html, accessed on 29/09/2004Google Scholar
  64. Newbold S, Eadie JM (2004) Using species-habitat models to target conservation: a case study with breeding mallards. Ecol Appl 14:1384–1393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Northern and Yorke Agricultural District Integrated Natural Resource Management Committee (2003) Integrated natural resource management plan for the Northern and Yorke Agricultural District. URL: http://www.dwlbc.sa.gov.au/nrm/delivery/plans/yorke.html, accessed on 29/09/2004Google Scholar
  66. Paton DC, Prescott AM, Davies RJ-P, Heard LM (2000) The distribution, status and threats to temperate woodlands in South Australia. In: Hobbs RJ, Yates CJ (eds) Temperate eucalypt woodlands in Australia. Biology, conservation, management and restoration. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, pp 57–85Google Scholar
  67. Paton DC, Rogers DJ, Harris W (2004) Birdscaping the environment: restoring the woodland systems of the Mt Lofty Region, South Australia. In: Lunney D (ed) Conservation of Australia’s forest fauna, 2 edn. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosmon, NSW, Australia, pp 331–358Google Scholar
  68. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Costanza R (2001) Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial, ecological, physical, and socio-economic components of metropolitan areas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:127–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Possingham HP (2001) The business of biodiversity. The Australian Conservation Foundation TELA Series No. 9. Available at http://www.acfonline.org.au/uploads/business_of_biodiversity.pdf, accessed on 10/11/2006Google Scholar
  70. Possingham HP, Ball I, Andelman S (2000) Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve retworks. In: Ferson S, Burgman M (eds) Quantitative methods for conservation biology. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. Pressey RL, Humphries CJ, Margules CR, Vane-Wright RI, Williams PH (1993) Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends Ecol Evol 8:124–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pressey RL, Nicholls AO (1989) Efficiency in conservation evaluation: scoring versus iterative approaches. Biol Conserv 50:199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. ReVelle CS, Williams JC, Boland JJ (2002) Counterpart models in facility location science and reserve selection science. Environ Model Assess 7:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Richardson EA, Kaiser MJ, Edwards-Jones G, Possingham HP (2006) Sensitivity of marine-reserve design to the spatial resolution of socioeconomic data. Conserv Biol 20:1191–1202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ruliffson JA, Haight RG, Gobster PH, Homans FR (2003) Metropolitan natural area protection to maximise public access and species representation. Environ Sci Policy 6:291–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sängar H, Jetschke G (2004) Are assembly rules apparent in the regeneration of a former uranium mining site? In: Temperton VM, Hobbs RJ, Nuttle T, Halle S (eds) Assembly rules and restoration ecology. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  77. Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ (eds) (1991) Nature conservation 2: the role of corridors. Surrey Beatty & Sons, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  78. Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ (1995) Habitat reconstruction: the revegetation imperative. In: Bradstock RA, Auld TD, Keith DA, Kingsford RT, Lunney D, Silvertsen DP (eds) Conserving biodiversity: threats and solutions. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, NSW, pp 104–112Google Scholar
  79. Slocombe DS (1998) Defining goals and criteria for ecosystem based management. Environ Manage 22:483–493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Snyder S, ReVelle C, Haight R (2004) One- and two-objective approaches to an area-constrained habitat reserve site selection problem. Biol Conserv 119:565–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stenhouse RN (2004) Local government conservation and management of native vegetation in urban Australia. Environ Manage 34:209–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stewart RR, Possingham HP (2005) Efficiency, costs and trade-offs in marine reserve system design. Environ Model Assess 10:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stoms DM, Chomitz KM, Davis FW (2004) TAMARIN: a landscape framework for evaluating economic incentives for rainforest restoration. Landscape Urban Plan 68:95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Suding KN, Gross KL, Houseman GR (2004) Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 19:46–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Theobald D (2005) Landscape patterns of exurban growth in the USA from 1980 to 2020. Ecology and Society 10(1):32. URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art32/ Google Scholar
  86. Turner MS (2001) Conserving Adelaide’s biodiversity: resources. South Australian Urban Forest Biodiversity Program, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  87. Turner WR, Nakamura T, Dinetti M (2004) Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. Bioscience 54:585–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. UFBP (2004) Urban forest resources. URL: http://www.urbanforest.on.net/resources.htm, accessed 20/09/2004Google Scholar
  89. Underhill LG (1994) Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms. Biol Conserv 70:85–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Walker DH, Cowell SG, Johnson AKL (2001) Integrating research results into decision making about natural resource management at a catchment scale. Agr Syst 69:85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Westphal MI, Field SA, Tyre AJ, Paton D, Possingham HP (2003a) Effects of landscape pattern on bird species distribution in the Mt. Lofty Ranges, South Australia. Landscape Ecol 18:413–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Westphal MI, Pickett M, Getz WM, Possingham HP (2003b) The use of stochastic dynamic programming in optimal landscape reconstruction for metapopulations. Ecol Appl 13:543–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Williams JC, Snyder S (2005) Restoring habitat corridors in fragmented landscapes using optimization and percolation models. Environ Model Assess 10:239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wood BC, Pullin AS (2002) Persistence of species in a fragmented urban landscape: the importance of dispersal ability and habitat availability for grassland butterflies. Biodiv Conserv 11:1451–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neville D. Crossman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Brett A. Bryan
    • 1
  • Bertram Ostendorf
    • 2
  • Sally Collins
    • 3
  1. 1.Policy and Economic Research UnitCSIRO Land and WaterGlen OsmondAustralia
  2. 2.School of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of AdelaideGlen OsmondAustralia
  3. 3.South Australian Urban Forest Biodiversity ProgramBlackwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations