Skip to main content

Assessing extinction risk in the absence of species-level data: quantitative criteria for terrestrial ecosystems

Biodiversity and Conservation volume 16, pages 183–209 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

The conservation of individual plant and animal species has been advanced greatly by the World Conservation Union’s (IUCN) development of objective, repeatable, and transparent criteria for assessing extinction risk, which explicitly separate the process of risk assessment from priority-setting. Here we present an analogous procedure for assessing the extinction risk of terrestrial ecosystems, which may complement traditional species-specific risk assessments, or may provide an alternative when only landscape-level data are available. We developed four quantitative risk criteria, derived primarily from remotely sensed spatial data, information on one of which must be available to permit classification. Using a naming system analogous to the present IUCN species-specific system, our four criteria were: (A) reduction of land cover and continuing threat, (B) rapid rate of land cover change, (C) increased fragmentation, and (D) highly restricted geographical distribution. We applied these criteria to five ecosystems covering a range of spatial and temporal scales, regions of the world, and ecosystem types, and found that Indonesian Borneo’s lowland tropical forests and the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest were Critically Endangered, while South Africa’s grasslands and Brazil’s Mato Grosso were Vulnerable. Furthermore, at a finer grain of analysis, one region of Venezuela’s coastal dry forests (Margarita Island) qualified as Vulnerable, while another (the Guasare River watershed) was Critically Endangered. In northern Venezuela, deciduous forests were classified as Endangered, semi-deciduous forests Vulnerable, and evergreen forests of Least Concern. We conclude that adoption of such a standardized system will facilitate globally comparable, repeatable geographic analyses that clearly separate risk assessment (a fundamentally scientific process), from the definition of conservation priorities, which should take into account additional factors, such as ecological distinctiveness, costs, logistics, likelihood of success, and societal preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Agapow PM (2005) Species: demarcation and diversity. In: Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Brooks TM (eds) Phylogeny and conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 57–75

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alencar A, Nepstad DC, McGrath D, Moutinho P, Pacheco P, Diaz MDV, Soares-Filho B (2004) Desmatamento na Amazônia: Indo Além da Emergência Crônica. IPAM, Belém, Pará, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery M, Gibbons DW, Porter R, Tew T, Tucker G, Williams G (1995) Revising the British Red List for birds: the biological basis of U.K. conservation priorities. Ibis 137:S232–S239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillie JEM, Hilton-Taylor C, Stuart SN (2004) 2004 IUCN Red List of threatened species. A global species assessment. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, U.K

    Google Scholar 

  • Beier P, Noss RF (1998) Do habitat corridors provide connectivity? Conserv Biol 12:1241–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender DJ, Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2003) Using patch isolation metrics to predict animal movement in binary landscapes. Landscape Ecol 18:17–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson JS (2006) New South Wales vegetation classification and assessment: introduction – the classification, database, assessment of protected areas and threat status of plant communities. Cunninghamia 9:331–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson JS, Allen C, Togher C, Lemmon J (2006) New South Wales vegetation classification and assessment: part 1 plant communities of the NSW Western Plains. Cunninghamia 9:383–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Blab J, Riecken U, Ssymank A (1995) Proposal on a criteria system for a National Red Data Book of Biotopes. Landscape Ecol 10:41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blom A, van Zalinge R, Heitkonig IMA, Prins HHT (2005) Factors influencing the distribution of large mammals within a protected central African forest. Oryx 39:381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodmer RE, Robinson JG (2004) Evaluating the sustainability of hunting in the Neotropics. In: Silvius KM, Bodmer RE, Fragoso JMV (eds) People in nature. Wildlife conservation in South and Central America. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 299–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonn A, Gaston KJ (2005) Capturing biodiversity: selecting priority areas for conservation using different criteria. Biodivers Conserv 14:1083–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowne DR, Peles JD, Barrett GW (1999) Effects of landscape spatial structure on movement patterns of the hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus). Landscape Ecol 14:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brashares JS, Arcese P, Sam MK, Coppolillo PB, Sinclair ARE, Balmford A (2004) Bushmeat hunting, wildlife declines, and fish supply in west Africa. Science 306:1180–1183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brook BW, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL (2003) Catastrophic extinctions follow deforestation in Singapore. Nature 424:420–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks DM, Strahl SD (eds) (2000) Curassows, Guans and Chachalacas. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan for Cracids 2000–2004. IUCN – The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown KA, Brown GG (1992) Habitat alteration and species loss in Brazilian forests. In: Whitmore TC, Sayer JA (eds) Tropical deforestation and species extinction. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 119–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Butchart SHM, Stattersfield AJ, Baillie J, Bennun LA, Stuart SN, Akçakaya HR, Hilton-Taylor C, Mace GM (2005) Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond. Philos Trans Roy Soc B – Biol Sci 360:255–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butchart SHM, Stattersfield AJ, Bennun L, Shutes SM, Akçakaya RH, Baillie JEM, Stuart SN, Hilton-Taylor C, Mace GM (2004) Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: Red List Indices for birds. PLoS Biol 2:e383

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese JM, Fagan WF (2004) A comparison-shopper’s guide to connectivity metrics. Front Ecol Environ 2:529–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane M, Skole DL, Matricardi EAT, Barber C, Chomentowski WH (2004) Selective logging, forest fragmentation, and fire disturbance. In: Zarin DJ, Alavalapati JRR, Putz FE, Schmink M (eds) Working forests in the Neotropics: conservation through sustainable management? Columbia University Press, New York, USA, pp 310–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Curnutt J, Lockwood J, Luh HK, Nott P, Russell G (1994) Hotspots and species diversity. Nature 367:326–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran LM, Caniago I, Paoli GD, Astianti D, Kusneti M, Leighton M, Nirarita CE, Haeruman H (1999) Impact of El Niño and logging on canopy tree recruitment in Borneo. Science 286:2184–2188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curran LM, Trigg SN, McDonald AK, Astiani D, Hardiono YM, Siregar P, Caniago I, Kasischke E (2004) Lowland forest loss in protected areas of Indonesian Borneo. Science 303:1000–1003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • da Fonseca GAB (1985) The vanishing Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biol Conserv 34:17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinerstein E, Olson DM, Graham DJ, Webster AL, Primm SA, Bookbinder MP, Ledec G (1995) A conservation assessment of the terrestrial ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean. The World Bank, The World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukes JS, Chiariello NR, Cleland EE, Moore LA, Shaw MR, Thayer S, Tobeck T, Mooney HA, Field CB (2005) Responses of grassland production to single and multiple global environmental changes. Plos Biol 3:1829–1837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman JR (2003) Idrisi Kilimanjaro: Guide to GIS and image proccessing. Manual version 14.00. Clark Labs, Clark University, Worcester, Massachussets, USA

  • Eaton MA, Gregory RD, Noble DG, Robinson JA, Hughes J, Procter D, Brown AF, Gibbons DW (2005) Regional IUCN red listing: the process as applied to birds in the United Kingdom. Conservation Biol19:1557–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Law Institute (ELI) (1999) Protecting Delaware’s natural heritage: tools for biodiversity conservation. ELI, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajardo L, González V, Nassar JM, Lacabana P, Portillo CA, Carrasquel F, Rodríguez JP (2005) Tropical dry forests of Venezuela: characterization and current conservation status. Biotropica 37:531–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside P (1996) Brazil. In: Harcourt CS, Sayer JA (eds) The conservation Atlas of tropical forests: The Americas. Simon and Schuster, New York, pp 229–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraz G, Russell GJ, Stouffer PC, Bierregaard RO, Pimm SL, Lovejoy TE (2003) Rates of species loss from Amazonian forest fragments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:14069–14073

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier S (2002) Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: where to from here? Syst Biol 51:331–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R (2005) Genetics and extinction. Biol Conserv 126:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JF (1993) Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems or landscapes. Ecol Appl 3:202–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FWI/GFW (2002) The state of the forest: Indonesia. Forest Watch Indonesia and Global Forest Watch, Bogor, Indonesia, and Washington, DC, USA

  • Gärdenfors U, Hilton-Taylor C, Mace GM, Rodríguez JP (2001) The application of IUCN Red List criteria at regional levels. Conserv Biol 15:1206–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason HA (1926) The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull Torrey Bot Club 53:7–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green GM, Sussman RW (1990) Deforestation history of the Eastern Rain Forests of Madagascar from satellite images. Science 248:212–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory RD, Wilkinson NI, Noble DG, Robinson JA, Brown AF, Hughes J, Procter D, Gibbons DW, Galbraith C (2002) The population status of birds in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man: an analysis of conservation concern 2002–2007. British Birds 95:410–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson EJ (1998) Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1:143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall FG, Botkin DB, Strebel DE, Woods KD, Goetz SJ (1991) Large-scale patterns of forest succession as determined by remote-sensing. Ecology 72:628–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1991) Single-species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations. Biol J Linn Soc 42:17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1994) Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol 9:131–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds) (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends, vol 1. Findings of the condition and trends working group. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal G, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Salzman J, Boggs C, Hellman J, Hughes J, Kremen C, Ricketts T (2001) Protecting natural capital through ecosystem service districts. Stanford Environ Law J 20:333–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz Center (2002) The state of the Nation’s ecosystems: measuring the lands, waters, and living resources of the United States. Cambridge University Press for The H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics, and the Environment, New York, USA

  • Henle K, Davies KF, Kleyer M, Margules C, Settele J (2004) Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation. Biodivers Conserv 13:207–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra JM, Boucher TM, Ricketts TH, Roberts C (2005) Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecol Lett 8:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes D (2000) Deforestation in Indonesia: a review of the situation in 1999. World Bank, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes D (2002) The predicted extinction of lowland forests in Indonesia. In: Wikramanayake E, Dinerstein E, Loucks CJ, Olson DM, Morrison J, Lamoreux J, McKnight M, Hedao P (eds) Terrestrial ecoregions of the Indo-Pacific: a conservation assessment. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 7–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setala H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn HS (1975) Markovian properties of forest succession. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap Press, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp 196–211

    Google Scholar 

  • INPE (2006) Monitoring of the Brazilian Amazon forest by satellite: Project PRODES. http://www.obt.inpe.br/prodes/index.html

  • IUCN (1994) IUCN Red List categories. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List categories and criteria: version 3.1. Species Survival Commission, World Conservation Union (IUCN), Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2003) Guidelines for application of IUCN Red List criteria at regional levels: version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission. The World Conservation Union (IUCN), Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2004) Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Standards and Petitions Subcommittee of the IUCN Red List Committee. The World Conservation Union (IUCN), Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2006) Species action plans of IUCN Species Survival Commission. http://www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/publications/actionplans.htm. Cited 10 April 2006

  • Ivanauskas NM, Monteiro R, Rodrigues RR (2003) Alterations following a fire in a forest community of Alto Rio Xingu. Forest Ecol Manage 184:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen D (1988) Tropical dry forests: the most endangered major tropical ecosystem. In: Wilson EO (eds) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 130–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller V, Bollmann K (2004) From red lists to species of conservation concern. Conserv Biol 18:1636–1644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kier G, Mutke J, Dinerstein E, Ricketts TH, Kuper W, Kreft H, Barthlott W (2005) Global patterns of plant diversity and floristic knowledge. J Biogeogr 32:1107–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuper W, Sommer JH, Lovett JC, Mutke J, Linder HP, Beentje HJ, Van Rompaey R, Chatelain C, Sosef M, Barthlott W (2004) Africa’s hotspots of biodiversity redefined. Ann Missouri Bot Garden 91:525–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Laidlaw RK (2000) Effects of habitat disturbance and protected areas on mammals of peninsular Malaysia. Conserv Biol14:1639–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Lovejoy TE, Vasconcelos HL, Bruna EM, Didham RK, Stouffer PC, Gascon C, Bierregaard RO, Laurance SG, Sampaio E (2002) Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation. Conserv Biol 16:605–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen RM, Galatowitsch SM, Tester JR (1999) Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages. Wetlands 19:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins R (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull Entomol Soc Am 15:237–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin S (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Possingham HP (1996) Modelling the inter-relationships between habitat patchiness, dispersal capability and metapopulation persistence of the endangered species, Leadbeater’s possum, in south-eastern Australia. Landscape Ecol 11:79–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llamozas S, Duno de Stefano R, Meier W, Riina R, Stauffer F, Aymard G, Huber O, Ortiz R (2003) Libro Rojo de la Flora Venezolana. PROVITA, Fundación Polar y Fundación Instituto Botánico de Venezuela, Dr. Tobías Lasser, Caracas, Venezuela

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The Theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace G, Collar N, Cooke J, Gaston K, Ginsberg J, Leader Williams N, Maunder M, Milner-Gulland EJ (1992) The development of new criteria for listing species on the IUCN Red List. Species 19:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace G, Masundire H, Baillie J, Ricketts T, Brooks T, Hoffmann M, Stuart S, Balmford A, Purvis A, Reyers B, Wang J, Revenga C, Kennedy E, Naeem S, Alkemade R, Allnutt T, Bakarr M, Bond W, Chanson J, Cox N, Fonseca G, Hilton-Taylor C, Loucks C, Rodrigues A, Sechrest W, Stattersfield A, van Rensburg BJ, Whiteman C (2005) Biodiversity. In: Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends, vol 1. Findings of the condition and trends working group. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp 77–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace G, Stuart S (1994) Draft IUCN Red List categories, version 2.2. Species 21–22:13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace GM, Lande R (1991) Assessing extinction threats: toward a reevaluation of IUCN threatened species categories. Conserv Biol 5:148–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mader HJ (1984) Animal habitat isolation by roads and agricultural fields. Biol Conserv 29:81–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • May RM, Lawton JH, Stork NE (1995) Assessing extinction rates. In: Lawton JH, May RM (eds) Extinction rates. Oxford University Press, pp. 1–24

  • McGarigal K, Cushman SA (2002) Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecol Appl 12:335–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at the following web site: http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html

  • McMahon G, Wiken EB, Gauthier DA (2004) Toward a scientifically rigorous basis for developing mapped ecological regions. Environ Manage 34:S111–S124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miles L, Newton AC, DeFries RS, Ravilious C, May I, Blyth S, Kapos V, Gordon JE (2006) A global overview of the conservation status of tropical dry forests. J Biogeogr 33:491–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier RA, Myers N, Thomsen JB, da Fonseca GAB, Olivieri S (1998) Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conserv Biol 12:516–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A, Nieminen M (2002) Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Ecology 83:1131–1145

    Google Scholar 

  • Morellato LPC, Haddad CFB (2000) Introduction: the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biotropica 32:786–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy P, Lugo A (1995) Dry forests of Central America and the Caribbean. In: Bullock SH, Mooney HA, Medina E (eds) Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 9–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Decamps H, Pollock M (1993) The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecol Appl 3:209–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neke KS, Du Plessis MA (2004) The threat of transformation: quantifying the vulnerability of grasslands in South Africa. Conserv Biol 18:466–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijman V (2005) Decline of the endemic Hose’s langur Presbytis hosei in Kayan Mentarang National Park, east Borneo. Oryx 39:223–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris DR, Stutchbury BJM (2001) Extraterritorial movements of a forest songbird in a fragmented landscape. Conserv Biol 15:729–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF (1996) Ecosystems as conservation targets. Trends Ecol Evol 11:351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olson DM, Dinerstein E (1998) The global 200: a representation approach to conserving the earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conserv Biol 12:502–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GVN, Underwood EC, D’Amico JA, Itoua I, Strand HE, Morrison JC, Loucks CJ, Allnutt TF, Ricketts TH, Kura Y, Lamoreux JF, Wettengel WW, Hedao P, Kassem KR (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the worlds: a new map of life on Earth. BioScience 51:933–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orians GH (1993) Endangered at what level?. Ecol Appl 3:206–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AT, Navarro-Sigüenza AG (1999) Alternate species concepts as bases for determining priority conservation areas. Conserv Biol 13:427–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (2002) The ecosystem as a multidimensional concept: meaning, model, and metaphor. Ecosystems 5:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polishchuk LV (2002) Conservation priorities for Russian mammals. Science 297:1123–1123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Portillo CA (2004) Cuantificación del Riesgo de Extinción de los Hábitats terretres de la Zona Protectora de la Cuenca Baja de los Ríos Socuy, Guasare y Cachirí. Tesis de Licenciatura, Departmento de Biología, Facultad Experimental de Ciencias. La Universidad del Zulia, Maracaibo, p 88+xi

  • Precautionary Principle Project (2005) Guidelines for Applying the Precautionary Principle to Biodiversity Conservation and Natural Resource Management. The Precautionary Principle Project – a joint initiative of Fauna & Flora International, IUCN-The World Conservation Union, ResourceAfrica and TRAFFIC, Cambridge, UK

  • Prendergast JR, Quinn RM, Lawton JH, Eversham BC, Gibbons DW (1993) Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365:335–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston FW (1962a) The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity: part I. Ecology 43:185–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston FW (1962b) The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity: part II. Ecology 43:410–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PROVITA (2004) Diseño y Aplicación de Métodos Cuantitativos para Estimar el Riesgo de Amenaza de los Hábitats Terrestres de la Zona Centro-Norte de Venezuela. Informe Técnico enviado al Fondo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (Fonacit). Asociación Civil “Provita”, Caracas, Venezuela, p 34

  • Ranta P, Blom T, Niemela J, Joensuu E, Siitonen M (1998) The fragmented Atlantic rain forest of Brazil: size, shape and distribution of forest fragments. Biodivers Conserv 7:385–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo AG (1997) Conservation. In: Cowling RM, Richardson DM, Pierce SM (eds) Vegetation of southern Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp 571–589

  • Redford KH, Coppolillo P, Sanderson EW, Da Fonseca GAB, Dinerstein E, Groves C, Mace G, Maginnis S, Mittermeier RA, Noss R, Olson D, Robinson JG, Vedder A, Wright M (2003) Mapping the conservation landscape. Conserva Biol 17:116–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regan TJ, Master LL, Hammerson GA (2004) Capturing expert knowledge for threatened species assessments:a case study using NatureServe conservation status ranks. Acta Oecol 26:95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts TH, Dinerstein E, Boucher T, Brooks TM, Butchart SHM, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Morrison J, Parr M, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL, Sechrest W, Wallace GE, Berlin K, Bielby J, Burgess ND, Church DR, Cox N, Knox D, Loucks C, Luck GW, Master LL, Moore R, Naidoo R, Ridgely R, Schatz GE, Shire G, Strand H, Wettengel W, Wikramanayake E (2005) Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA:0509060102

  • Riitters KH, Oneill RV, Hunsaker CT, Wickham JD, Yankee DH, Timmins SP, Jones KB, Jackson BL (1995) A factor-analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecol 10:23–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ASL, Akcakaya HR, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI, Boitani L, Brooks TM, Chanson JS, Fishpool LDC, Da Fonseca GAB, Gaston KJ, Hoffmann M, Marquet PA, Pilgrim JD, Pressey RL, Schipper J, Sechrest W, Stuart SN, Underhill LG, Waller RW, Watts MEJ, Yan X (2004) Global gap analysis: priority regions for expanding the global protected-area network. Bioscience 54:1092–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ASL, Pilgrim JD, Lamoreux JF, Hoffmann M, Brooks TM (2006) The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 21:71–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez JP, Lazo R, Solórzano LA, Rojas-Suárez F (eds) (2004a) Cartografía Digital Básica de las Areas Naturales Protegidas de Venezuela: Parques Nacionales, Monumentos Naturales, Refugios de Fauna, Reservas de Fauna y Reservas de Biósfera. Versión 1.0, CD ROM y en-línea. Centro Internacional de Ecología Tropical (CIET), Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas (IVIC), Conservación Internacional Venezuela, UNESCO y Oficina Nacional de Diversidad Biológica del Ministerio del Ambiente y de los Recursos Naturales (MARN), Caracas, Venezuela. Disponible en Internet: http://www.ecosig.ivic.ve/anapro.htm

  • Rodríguez JP, Rojas-Suárez F (1996) Guidelines for the design of conservation strategies for the animals of Venezuela. Conserv Biol 10:1245–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez JP, Rojas-Suárez F, Sharpe CJ (2004b) Setting priorities for the conservation of Venezuela’s threatened birds. Oryx 38:373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Saatchi S, Agosti D, Alger K, Delabie J, Musinsky J (2001) Examining fragmentation and loss of primary forest in the southern Bahian Atlantic forest of Brazil with radar imagery. Conserv Biol 15:867–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Azofeifa GA, Kalacska N, Quesada M, Calvo-Alvarado JC, Nassar JM, Rodríguez JP (2005a) Need for integrated research for a sustainable future in tropical dry forests. Conserv Biol 19:285–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Azofeifa GA, Quesada M, Rodríguez JP, Nassar J, Stoner KE, Castillo A, Garvin T, Zent EL, Calvo-Alvarado JC, Kalacska MER, Fajardo L, Gamon JA, Cuevas-Reyes P (2005b) Research priorities for neotropical dry forests. Biotropica 37:477–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson EW, Redford KH, Chetkiewicz CLB, Medellín RA, Rabinowitz AR, Robinson JG, Taber AB (2002) Planning to save a species: the jaguar as a model. Conserv Biol 16:58–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DA, de Rebeira CP (1991) Values of corridors to avian populations in a fragmented landscape. In Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ (eds) Nature conservation: the role of corridors. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, Australia, pp 221–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Savitsky BG, Lacher Jr TE (eds) (1998) GIS methodologies for developing conservation strategiestropical forest recovery and willdlife management in Costa Rica. Columbia University Press, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JM, Davis F, Csuti B, Noss R, Butterfield B, Groves C, Anderson H, Caicco S, D’Erchia F, Edwards TC Jr, Ulliman J, Wright RG (1993) Gap analysis: a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monogr 123:1–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabloom EW, Dobson AP, Stoms DM (2002) Extinction rates under nonrandom patterns of habitat loss. Proceedings of the Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11229–11234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Servheen C, Herrero H, Peyton B (eds) (1999) Bears: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. Compiled by the IUCN/SSC Bear and Polar Bear Specialist Groups, World Conservation Union (IUCN), Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegert F, Ruecker G, Hinrichs A, Hoffmann AA (2001) Increased damage from fires in logged forests during droughts caused by El Niño. Nature 414:437–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder N, McGowan P, Gilardi J, Grajal A (eds) (2000) Parrots. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan 2000–2004. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares-Filho BS, Nepstad DC, Curran LM, Cerqueira GC, Garcia RA, Ramos CA, Voll E, McDonald A, Lefebvre P, Schlesinger P (2006) Modelling conservation in the Amazon basin. Nature 440:520–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spehn EM, Hector A, Joshi J, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schmid B, Bazeley-White E, Beierkuhnlein C, Caldeira MC, Diemer M, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Finn JA, Freitas H, Giller PS, Good J, Harris R, Hogberg P, Huss-Danell K, Jumpponen A, Koricheva J, Leadley PW, Loreau M, Minns A, Mulder CPH, O’Donovan G, Otway SJ, Palmborg C, Pereira JS, Pfisterer AB, Prinz A, Read DJ, Schulze ED, Siamantziouras ASD, Terry AC, Troumbis AY, Woodward FI, Yachi S, Lawton JH (2005) Ecosystem effects of biodiversity manipulations in European grasslands. Ecol Monogr 75:37–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stattersfield AJ, Crosby M, Long A, Wege D (eds) (1998) Endemic bird areas of the world: priorities for biodiversity conservation. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens SE, Koons DN, Rotella JJ, Willey DW (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on avian nesting success: a review of the evidence at multiple spatial scales. Biol Conserv 115:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, Fischman DL, Waller RW (2004) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306:1783–1786

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tansley AG (1935) The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology 16:284–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G (1993) Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68:571–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Nature Conservancy (TNC) (1997) Designing a geography of hope. TNC, Arlington, Virginia, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • The Nature Conservancy (TNC) (2001) Conservation by design: a framework for mission success. TNC, Arlington, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorbjarnarson J, Messel H, King FW, Ross JP (eds) (1992) Crocodiles: an Action Plan for their conservation. The World Conservation Union, Species Survival Commision, Crocodile Specialist Group

  • Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Reich PB, Knops JMH (2006) Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature 441:629–632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2000) On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 90:7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trakhtenbrot A, Nathan R, Perry G, Richardson DM (2005) The importance of long-distance dispersal in biodiversity conservation. Divers Distributions 11:173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker CJ, Townshend JRG (2000) Strategies for tropical forest deforestation assessment using satellite data. Int J Remote Sensing 21:1461–1472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viana VM, Tabanez AA, Batista JLF (1997) Dynamics and restoration of forest fragments in the Brazilian Atlantic moist forest. In: Laurance WF, Bierregaard RO Jr (eds) Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA, pp 351–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward TJ, Vanderklift MA, Nicholls AO, Kenchington RA (1999) Selecting marine reserves using habitats and species assemblages as surrogates for biological diversity. Ecol Appl 9:691–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1975) Communities and ecosystems. Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA, Milne BT (1989) Scaling of ‘landscapes’ in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle’s perspective. Landscape Ecol 3:87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA, Stenseth NC, Vanhorne B, Ims RA (1993) Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66:369–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikramanayake E, Dinerstein E, Loucks CJ, Olson DM, Morrison J, Lamoreux J, McKnight M, Hedao P (2002) Terrestrial ecoregions of the Indo-Pacific: a conservation assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove D (1994) Preserving biodiversity: species in landscapes—response. Ecol Appl 4:207–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove DS, Mclellan CH, Dobson AP (1986) Habitat fragmentation in the temperate zone. In: Soulé ME (eds) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA, pp 237–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox BA (1980) Insular ecology and conservation. In: Soulé ME, Wilcox BA (eds) Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA, pp 95–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P, Hannah L, Andelman S, Midgley G, Araujo M, Hughes G, Manne L, Martinez-Meyer E, Pearson R (2005) Planning for climate change: identifying minimum-dispersal corridors for the Cape proteaceae. Conserv Biol 19:1063–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1992) The diversity of life. W. W. Norton & Company, New York, USA, and London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfree R, Dushoff J, Crone EE, Schultz CB, Budny RV, Williams NM, Kremen C (2005) Testing simple indices of habitat proximity. Am Nat 165:707–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Fulbright Program, Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale’s Tropical Resources Institute, Fondo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (FONACIT, Agenda Biodiversidad, Segunda Fase), Fundación Polar, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas (IVIC), and Provita for their support. We also thank Larry Bonneau, Lisa Curran, Eric Dinerstein, Don Faber-Langendoen, Armando Hernández, Georgina Mace, Gary Meffe, Stuart Pimm, Carlos Portillo, David Skelly, Ron Smith, Dana Tomlin, and Jessica Wilkinson, for their valuable suggestions on earlier drafts of this manuscript. Our most sincere gratitude goes to Pablo Lacabana, Carlos Portillo, Fabián Carrasquel, and Alix Amaya for allowing us to use their land cover change analysis of northern central Venezuela. Carlos Portillo’s help was fundamental for assembling Table 4. Provita is a member of the Wildlife Trust Alliance.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jennifer K. Balch

    Present address: School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, Yale University, 205 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT, 06511-2186, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centro de Ecología, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Apartado 21827, Caracas, 1020-A, Venezuela

    Jon Paul Rodríguez, Jennifer K. Balch & Kathryn M. Rodríguez-Clark

  2. Provita, Apartado 47552, Caracas, 1041-A, Venezuela

    Jon Paul Rodríguez & Jennifer K. Balch

Authors
  1. Jon Paul Rodríguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jennifer K. Balch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kathryn M. Rodríguez-Clark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon Paul Rodríguez.

Additional information

Jon Paul Rodríguez and Jennifer K. Balch are contributed equally to this work

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodríguez, J.P., Balch, J.K. & Rodríguez-Clark, K.M. Assessing extinction risk in the absence of species-level data: quantitative criteria for terrestrial ecosystems. Biodivers Conserv 16, 183–209 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9102-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9102-1

Keywords

  • Endangered
  • Extinction risk
  • IUCN Red Lists
  • Land cover change
  • Remotely sensed data
  • Terrestrial ecosystems
  • Threatened