Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 16, Issue 9, pp 2677–2694 | Cite as

Assessing environment and development outcomes in conservation landscapes

  • Jeffrey Sayer
  • Bruce Campbell
  • Lisa Petheram
  • Mark Aldrich
  • Manuel Ruiz Perez
  • Dominque Endamana
  • Zacharie-L Nzooh Dongmo
  • Louis Defo
  • Stephen Mariki
  • Nike Doggart
  • Neil Burgess
Original Paper

Abstract

An approach to assessing the environmental outcomes and changes in peoples’ livelihoods resulting from landscape-scale conservation interventions was developed for three locations in Africa. Simple sets of performance indicators were developed through participatory processes that included a variety of stakeholders. The selection of indicators was designed to reflect wider landscape processes, conservation objectives and as local peoples’ preferred scenarios. This framework, combined with the use of social learning techniques, helped stakeholders develop greater understandings of landscape system dynamics and the linkages between livelihood and conservation objectives. Large scale conservation and development interventions should use these approaches to explore linkages and improve shared understanding of tradeoffs and synergies between livelihood and conservation initiatives. Such approaches provide the basis for negotiating and measuring the outcomes of conservation initiatives and for adapting these to changing perspectives and circumstances.

Keywords

Adaptive management Conservation Evaluation Indicators Landscape performance Livelihoods Monitoring Tools 

Abbreviations

CAR

Central African Republic

DFID

Department for International Development

DFSR

Driving Force State Response Framework

FESLM

Framework for the Evaluation of Sustainable Land Management

NGO

Non Government Organisation

PSR

Pressure State Response

TFCG

Tanzania Forest Conservation Group

UNDP

United Nations Development Program

WWF

World Wide Fund for Nature

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bebbington A (1999) Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Devel 27:2021–2044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell S, Morse S (1999) Sustainability indicators–measuring the immeasurable. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell S, Morse S (2001) Breaking through the Glass Ceiling: who really cares about sustainability indicators? Local Environ 6(3):291–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell S, Morse S (2003) Measuring sustainability: learning by doing. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bossel H (2001) Assessing viability and sustainability: a systems-based approach for deriving comprehensive indicators sets. Cons Ecol 5(20):12Google Scholar
  6. Campbell B, Sayer JA, Frost P et al (2001) Assessing the performance of natural resource systems. Conserv Ecol 5(2):22Google Scholar
  7. Carney D (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: what contribution can we make? Department for International Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Carney D, Drinkwater M, Rusinow T et al (1999) Livelihood approaches compared: a brief comparison of the livelihoods approaches of DFID, CARE, Oxfam, and UNDP. DFID, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Carruthers G, Tinning G (2003) Where, and how, do monitoring and sustainability indicators fit into environmental management systems? Aust J Exp Agric 43:307–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Checkland P, Scholes J (1990) Soft systems methodology in action. John Wiley and Sons, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  11. Farina A (2006) Principles and methods of landscape ecology. Springer, Dordrecht, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  12. Freebairn DM, King CA (2003) Reflections on collectively working toward sustainability: indicators for indicators. Aust J Exp Agric 43:223–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. High Performance Systems Incorporated (2003) Version 8 for Windows. STELLA, Altura Software IncGoogle Scholar
  14. Jesinghaus, J (2000). The World Economic Forum’s Environmental Sustainability Index: Strong and weak points, European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy. Review posted on the internet, April 9 2000Google Scholar
  15. Meter K (1999) Neighbourhood sustainability indicators guidebook. Crossroads Resource Center, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  16. OECD (1993) OECD core set of indicators for environmental performance reviews. A synthesis report by the group on the state of the environment, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  17. OECD (1997). Environmental indicators for agriculture. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  18. Reed MS, Dougill AJ (2003) Facilitating grass-roots sustainable development through sustainability indicators: a Kalahari case study. In: Proceedings of the international conference on sustainability indicators, 6–8 November, Malta 2003Google Scholar
  19. Scoones I (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper No. 72. Institute for Development Studies, SussexGoogle Scholar
  20. Smyth AJ, Dumanski G (1995) A framework for evaluating sustainable land management. Can J of Soil Sci 75:401–406Google Scholar
  21. Stem C, Margoluis R, Salafsky N et al (2005) Monitoring and Evaluation in Conservation: A review of Trends and Approaches. Conserv Biol 19(2):295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. UNCSD (1996) Indicators of sustainable development: framework and methodologies, United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Wells MP, McShane TO, (eds) (2004) Getting biodiversity projects to work: towards more effective conservation and development. Columbia Uiversity Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey Sayer
    • 1
  • Bruce Campbell
    • 2
  • Lisa Petheram
    • 3
  • Mark Aldrich
    • 1
  • Manuel Ruiz Perez
    • 4
  • Dominque Endamana
    • 5
  • Zacharie-L Nzooh Dongmo
    • 6
  • Louis Defo
    • 7
  • Stephen Mariki
    • 8
  • Nike Doggart
    • 9
  • Neil Burgess
    • 10
  1. 1.World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) InternationalGlandSwitzerland
  2. 2.School for Environmental Research, Charles Darwin University, and Centre for International Forestry ResearchDarwinAustralia
  3. 3.School for Environmental ResearchCharles Darwin UniversityDarwinAustralia
  4. 4.Departmento de Ecologia-Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autonoma de MadridMadridSpain
  5. 5.WWF Northern Savannah ProjectYaoundeCameroon
  6. 6.Jengi South East Forest Project, WWF Cameroon Country Programme OfficeYaoundeCameroon
  7. 7.WWF South East Cameroon Forest ProgrammeYaoundeCameroon
  8. 8.WWF Tanzania Programme OfficeDar es SalaamTanzania
  9. 9.Tanzania Forest Conservation Group (TFCG)Dar es SalaamTanzania
  10. 10.Conservation Science program, WWFWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations