Abstract
This paper argues that improving the communication between landholders and ecologists will result in better conservation outcomes for ecosystem management on private land. It examines a case study of ecological research on frogs undertaken on private, agricultural land in south-eastern Australia. The paper questions the traditional separation of ecological science from landholders specifically and the public in general. In addressing this issue the authors wish to improve the relevance of ecology for landholders, raise the profile of social science for ecologists working on private land and examine the implications of improving ecologist – landholder relationships. For landholders, an improved understanding of the ecological context of their agricultural activities may lead to sustainability gains. For ecologists, a deeper appreciation for the social context of their ecological research provides an opportunity to see how their work is perceived and/or acted upon in practice. For both parties, a communicative relationship may minimise future need for ecosystem repair. Such an approach (for both landholders and ecologists) can lead to the break down of stereotypes and/or a greater appreciation of the others’ perspectives, constraints and values with respect to conservation on private land. In the productive discussions arising from conversations between landholders and ecologists, new approaches to sustainable land management and nature conservation may emerge.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alrøe H.F. and Kristensen E.S. (2002). Towards a systemic research methodology in agriculture: rethinking the role of values in science. Agriculture and Human Values 19: 3–23
Arnstein S.R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. American Institute of Planners Journal 35: 216–224
Australian Anthropological Society 1998. Code of Ethics. Newsletter of the Australian Anthropological Society # 74.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2000). 2000 Year Book Australia. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra
Australian State of the Environment Committee (2001). Australian State of the Environment 2001. CSIRO Publishing, Canberra Australia
Bean M.J. and Wilcove D.S. (1997). The private-land problem. Conservation Biology 11: 1–2
Berkes F. and Folke C. (eds) (1998). Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge University Press, New York
Berkes F., Colding J. and Folke C. (eds) (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Brock M.A. and Jarman P.J. (2000). Wetland use and conservation in the agricultural environment: managing processes for the components. In: Craig, J.L., Mitchell, N. and Saunders, D.A. (eds) Nature Conservation 5: Nature Conservation in Production Environments, Managing the Matrix, pp 258–268. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Mosman, Sydney, Australia
Brewer C. (2001). Cultivating conservation literacy: `trickle-down’ education is not enough. Conservation Biology 15(5): 1203–1205
Carr A.J.L. (2002). Grass-roots and Green-tape: Principles and Practices of Environmental Stewardship. Federation Press, Sydney
Carr A.J.L. and Wilkinson R. (2005). Beyond participation: boundary organisations as a new space for farmers and scientists to interact. Society and Natural Resources 18(3): 255–265
Clark T. (2001). Developing policy orientated curricula for conservation biology: professional and leadership education in the public interest. Conservation Biology 15(1): 31–39
Collins H. and Pinch T. (1993). The golem: what everyone should know about science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cooper N.S. (2000). Speaking and listening to nature: ethics within ecology. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1009–1027
Couper D. (1993). What information do primary producers need from ecologists?. In: Saunders, D.A., Hobbs, R.J. and Ehrlich, P.R. (eds) Nature Conservation 3: Reconstruction of Fragmented Ecosystems, pp 215–223. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Mosman
Ehrlich P.R. (1993). Communication: how can ecologists get their message out?. In: Saunders, D.A., Hobbs, R.J. and Ehrlich, P.R. (eds) Nature Conservation 3: Reconstruction of Fragmented Ecosystems, pp 295–301. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Mosman
Fazey I. (2005). The role of experience in environmental conservation: An interim report of independent research conducted between February 2004 and February 2005. Centre for Resource and Environmental studies, Australian National University.
Folke C., Carpenter S., Elmqvist T., Gunderson L., Holling C.S., Walker B., Bengtsson J. and Berkes F. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. ICSU Series on Science for Sustainable Development 3: 1–74
Gross A.G. (1994). The roles of rhetoric in the public understanding of science. Public Understanding of Science 3(1994): 3–23
Hakfoort C. (1995). The historiography of scientism: a critical review. History of Science 23(1995): 375–395
Harrison C. and Burgess J. (2000). Valuing nature in context: the contribution of common-good approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1115–1130
Hazell D., Cunningham R., Lindenmayer D., Mackey B. and Osborne W. (2001). Use of farm dams as frog habitat in an Australian agricultural landscape: factors affecting species richness and distribution. Biological Conservation 102: 155–169
Hazell D., Osborne W. and Lindenmayer D. (2003). Impact of post-European stream change on frog habitat; south-eastern Australia. Biodiversity and Conservation 12: 301–320
Hazell D. (2004). Ecological research on private land: lessons from the farm. Pacific Conservation Biology 10: 164–172
Hess D.J. (1997). Science studies: an advanced introduction. New York University Press, New York
Knight R.L. (1999). Private lands: the neglected geography. Conservation Biology 13: 223–224
Krebs C.J. (1972). Ecology. Harper & Row, New York
Leopold A. (1966). A Sand County almanac: with other essays on conservation from Round River. Oxford University Press, New York
Luz F. (2000). Participatory landscape ecology – a basis for acceptance and implementation. Landscape and Urban Planning 50: 157–166
Mackay H. (1994). Why don’t people listen?. Pan Macmillan, Sydney
Norton D.A. (2000). Conservation biology and private land: shifting the focus. Conservation Biology 14: 1221–1223
Ostrom E. (2001). Foreword. In: Agrawal, A. and Gibson, C.C. (eds) Communities and the Environment: Ethnicity, Gender and the State in Community-Based Conservation, pp ix–xii. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ
Recher H.F. (1992). Simple journalists or simple scientists: are environmental issues too complex for the media?. Australian Zoologist 28: 19–23
Robertson A.I. (2000). Communicating about research. Ecological Restoration and Management 1(3): 161–162
Roe E. (1996). Why ecosystem management can’t work without social science: an example from the California northern spotted owl controversy. Environmental Management 20: 667–674
Sarantakos S. (1993). Social research. Macmillan Education Australia Pty Ltd., Melbourne
Saunders D. (1994). Can we integrate nature conservation with agricultural production?. Landscape and Urban Planning 28: 63–71
Saunders D.A. (1990). The landscape approach to conservation: community involvementthe only practical solution. Australian Zoologist 26: 49–53
Saunders D.A. and Hobbs R.J. (1995). Habitat reconstruction: the revegetation imperative. In: Bradstock, R.A., Auld, T.D., Keith, D.A., Kingsford, R.T., Lunney, D. and Siversten, D.P. (eds) Conserving Biodiversity: Threats and Solutions, pp 104–112. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, NSW
Stocklmayer S. (2001). Reaching the public – communicating the vision. In: Stocklmayer, S., Gore, M. and Bryant, C. (eds) Science Communication in Theory and Practice, pp 143–150. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Wills R. and Hobbs R. (eds) (1998). Ecology for Everyone: Communicating Ecology to Scientists, the Public and the Politicians. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, NSW
Wynne B. (1992). Public understanding of science research: new horizons or hall of mirrors?. Public Understanding of Science 1(1): 37–43
Yearley S. (1995). The environmental challenge to science studies. In: Jasanoff, S., Markle, G.E., Petersen, J.C. and Pinch, T. (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp 457–479. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carr, A., Hazell, D. Talking Frogs: The Role of Communication in Ecological Research on Private Land. Biodivers Conserv 15, 3177–3191 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-6969-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-6969-1