Abstract
We evaluated the usefulness of herbarium collection databases for assessing patterns of species diversity and distribution based on a dataset from the flowering plant families Moraceae and Myristicaceae from the Peruvian Amazon. For Moraceae, a total of 3523 collections were used representing 134 species. The Myristicaceae were represented by 2113 collections of 46 species. We evaluated the distribution of collections based on 252 grid cells (0.5° size) covering all lowland rainforest in the Peruvian Amazon. We found that collections were concentrated in a few cells and that species diversity clearly increases in relation to collection density. Moraceae were collected in only 45% and Myristicaceae in only 31% of the 252 grid cells. Fifty percent of the collections came from just six and three cells, respectively. Most species were represented by only a small number of collections and collected only in a few grid cells, meaning a few widespread common species tend to dominate the collection records. Not surprisingly, most collections were made close to towns and transport routes. We evaluated the usefulness of rarefaction curves and diversity estimators for comparing diversity between regions. These techniques seem to be of little use for botanical collections due to violations of underlying assumptions. Problems such as accuracy of geographic and taxonomic data and strong bias in the spatial representation of the whole dataset are important to consider when basing conservation analysis, planning, and decision-making on seemingly large databases of biodiversity collections and are discussed in detail.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. Azevedo-Rams and U. Galatti, Patterns of amphibian diversity in Brazilian Amazonia: conservation implications. Biol. Conserv. 103 (2002) 103-111
A. Balmford, J.L. Moore, T. Brooks, N. Burgess, L.A. Hansen, P. Williams and C. Rahbek, Conservation conflicts across Africa. Science 291 (2001) 2616-2619
BIODAMAZ. 2002. Peru Digital 1.0. Diversidad Biológica de la Amazonía Peruana (BIODAMAZ).
F.A. Bisby, The quiet revolution: biodiversity informatics and the internet. Science 289 (2000) 2309-2312
R.L. Chazdon, R.K. Colwell, J.S. Denslow and M.R. Guariguata, Statistical methods for estimating species richness of woody regeneration in primary and secondary rain forests of NE Costa Rica. In: F. Dallmeier and J.A. Comiskey (eds.) Forest Biodiversity ResearchMonitoring and Modeling: Conceptual Background and Old World Case Studies. Paris: Parthenon Publishing (1998) pp. 285-309
Colwell R.K. 2005. EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples. Version 7.5. URL: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates.
R.K. Colwell and J.A. Coddington, Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 345 (1994) 101-118
R. Condit, N. Pitman, E.G. Leigh, J. Chave, J. Terborgh, R.B. Foster, P. Nunez, S. Aguilar, R. Valencia, G. Villa, H.C. Muller-Landau, E. Losos and S.P. Hubbell, Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science 295 (2002) 666-669
S.D. Davis, V.H. Heywood and A.C. Hamilton, Centres of Plant Diversity: A Guide and Strategy for their Conservation. Cambridge, UK: World Wildlife Fund for Nature (WWF) and IUCN – World Conservation Union (1994).
J.L. Edwards, M.A. Lane and E.S. Nielsen, Interoperability of biodiversity databases: biodiversity information on every desktop. Science 289 (2000) 2312-2314
ArcGIS 8.3. Redlands: Environmental Systems Research InstituteInc. (2002).
S. Ferrier, G. Watson, J. Pearce and M. Drielsma, Extended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New South Wales. I. Species-level modelling. Biodivers. Conserv. 11 (2002) 2275-2307
E. Forero and S. Mori, The Organization for Flora Neotropica. Brittonia 47 (1995) 379-393
V.A. Funk, M.F. Zermoglio and N. Nasir, Testing the use of specimen collection data and GIS in biodiversity exploration and conservation decision making in Guyana. Biodivers. Conserv 8 (1999) 727-751
A.H. Gentry, Neotropical floristic diversity – phytogeographical connections between Central and South-Americapleistocene climatic fluctuations, or an accident of the Andean Orogeny. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 69 (1982) 557-593
A.H. Gentry, Tree species richness of upper Amazonian forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85 (1998) 156-159
N.J. Gotelli and R.K. Colwell, Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 4 (2001) 379-391
E.C. Honorio and C.R. Reynel, Vacíos en la colección de la flora de los Bosques Húmedos del Perú. Lima: Herbario de la Facultad de Ciencias Forestales Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina (2003).
INRENA. 2003. Mapa de Áreas Naturales Protegidas del Perú. Versión Digital. Instituto Nacional de Recursos Naturales.
W. Jetz and C. Rahbek, Geographic range size and determinants of avian species richness. Science 297 (2002) 1548-1551
W.J. Kress, W.R. Heyer, P. Acevedo, J. Coddington, D. Cole, T.L. Erwin, B.J. Meggers, M. Pogue, R.W. Thorington, R.P. Vari, M.J. Weitzman and S.H. Weitzman, Amazonian biodiversity: assessing conservation priorities with taxonomic data. Biodivers. Conserv. 7 (1998) 1577-1587
P. Laihonen, R. Kalliola and J. Salo, The biodiversity information clearing-house mechanism (CHM) as a global effort. Environ. Sci. Policy 7 (2004) 99-108
M.S.Y. Lee, A worrying systematic decline. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15 (2000) 346-346
B.A. Loiselle, C.A. Howell, C.H. Graham, J.M. Goerck, T. Brooks, K.G. Smith and P.H. Williams, Avoiding pitfalls of using species distribution models in conservation planning. Conserv. Biol. 17 (2003) 1591-1600
C.R. Margules, R.L. Pressey and P.H. Williams, Representing biodiversity: data and procedures for identifying priority areas for conservation. J. Biosci. 27 (2002) 309-326
R.A. Mittermeier, N. Myers, J.B. Thomsen, G.A.B. da Fonseca and S. Olivieri, Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conserv. Biol. 12 (1998) 516-520
S.A. Mori, Neotropical floristics and inventory: who will do the work?. Britonnia 44 (1992) 372-375
N. Myers, R.A. Mittermeier, C.G. Mittermeier, G.A.B. da Fonseca and J. Kent, Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403 (2000) 853-858
B.W. Nelson, C.A.C. Ferreira, M.F. Dasilva and M.L. Kawasaki, Endemism centers, refugia and botanical collection density in Brazilian Amazonia. Nature 345 (1990) 714-716
D.M. Olson, E. Dinerstein, E.D. Wikramanayake, N.D. Burgess, G.V.N. Powell, E.C. Underwood, J.A. D’Amico, I. Itoua, H.E. Strand, J.C. Morrison, C.J. Loucks, T.F. Allnutt, T.H. Ricketts, Y. Kura, J.F. Lamoreux, W.W. Wettengel, P. Hedao and K.R. Kassem, Terrestrial ecoregions of the worlds: a new map of life on Earth. Bioscience 51 (2001) 933-938
E. Pennisi, Taxonomic revival. Science 289 (2000) 2306-2308
F.T. Petersen, R. Meier and M. Nykjaer, Testing species richness estimation methods using museum label data on the Danish Asilidae. Biodivers. Conserv. 12 (2003) 687-701
O.L. Phillips and P.H. Raven, A strategy for sampling neotropical forests. In: A.C. Gibson (ed.) Neotropical Biodiversity and Conservation. Los Angeles: Mildred E. Mathias Botanical Garden,University of California (1997) pp. 141-165
N.C.A. Pitman, J.W. Terborgh, M.R. Silman, P. Nunez, D.A. Neill, C.E. Ceron, W.A. Palacios and M. Aulestia, Dominance and distribution of tree species in upper Amazonian terra firme forests. Ecology 82 (2001) 2101-2117
W.F. Ponder, G.A. Carter, P. Flemons and R.R. Chapman, Evaluation of museum collection data for use in biodiversity assessment. Conserv. Biol. 15 (2001) 648-657
G.T. Prance, Floristic inventory of the tropics: where do we stand?. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 64 (1977) 659-684
G.T. Prance, The use of phytogeographic data for conservation planning. In: P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries and R.I. Vane-Wright (eds.) Systematics and Conservation Evaluation. Oxford: Systematics and Conservation Evaluation (1994) pp. 145-163
G.T. Prance, H. Beentje, J. Dransfield and R. Johns, The tropical flora remains undercollected. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 87 (2000) 67-71
P.H. Raven, Tropical floristics tomorrow. Taxon 37 (1988) 549-560
S. Reddy and L.M. Davalos, Geographical sampling bias and its implications for conservation priorities in Africa. J. Biogeogr. 30 (2003) 1719-1727
Systematic Agenda 2000: Charting the Biosphere. New York, NY: American Museum of Natural History (1994).
J. Soberon and A.T. Peterson, Biodiversity informatics: managing and applying primary biodiversity data. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 359 (2004) 689-698
J.M. Soberon, J.B. Llorente and L. Onate, The use of specimen-label databases for conservation purposes: an example using Mexican Papilionid and Pierid butterflies. Biodivers. Conserv. 9 (2000) 1441-1466
H. ter Steege, M.J. Jansen-Jacobs and V.K. Datadin, Can botanical collections assist in a national protected area strategy in Guyana?. Biodivers. Conserv. 9 (2000a) 215-240
H. ter Steege, N. Pitman, D. Sabatier, H. Castellanos, P. Van der Hout, D.C. Daly, M. Silveira, O. Phillips, R. Vasquez, T. Van Andel, J. Duivenvoorden, A.A. De Oliveira, E.K. Renske, R. Lilwah, R. Thomas, J. Van Essen, C. Baider, P. Maas, S. Mori, J. Terborgh, P. Nuez, H. Mogollon and W. Morawetz, A spatial model of tree α-diversity and tree density for the Amazon. Biodivers. Conserv. 12 (2003) 2255-2277
H. ter Steege, D. Sabatier, H. Castellanos, T. Van Andel, J. Duivenvoorden, A.A. De Oliveira, R. Ek, R. Lilwah, P. Maas and S. Mori, An analysis of the floristic composition and diversity of Amazonian forests including those of the Guiana Shield. J. Tropical Ecol. 16 (2000b) 801-828
W.W. Thomas, Conservation and monographic research on the flora of Tropical America. Biodivers. Conserv. 8 (1999) 1007-1015
H. Tuomisto, K. Ruokolainen and M. Yli-Halla, Dispersal, environmentand floristic variation of western Amazonian forests. Science 299 (2003) 241-244
P.H. Williams, G.T. Prance, C.J. Humphries and K.S. Edwards, Promise and problems in applying quantitative complementary areas for representing the diversity of some neotropical plants (families DichapetalaceaeLecythidaceaeCaryocaraceaeChrysobalanaceae and Proteaceae). Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 58 (1996) 125-157
E.O. Wilson, A global biodiversity map. Science 289 (2000) 2279-2279
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tobler, M., Honorio, E., Janovec, J. et al. Implications of collection patterns of botanical specimens on their usefulness for conservation planning: an example of two neotropical plant families (Moraceae and Myristicaceae) in Peru. Biodivers Conserv 16, 659–677 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-3373-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-3373-9