Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 399–418 | Cite as

The political culture of poaching: a case study from northern Greece

Article

Abstract

Poaching has deep social and cultural roots and its meanings are multi-layered. This article explores the meanings attached to the practice of illegal hunting and fishing around Lake Kerkini in northern Greece. Here poaching must be considered in the context of a disordered ecosystem, where the dominance of locally maligned fish and bird species results from economic and environmental policy designed to benefit distant farmers. We conclude that poaching cannot be understood only as an individual action, but as one where collective and personal identities are defended in the face of seemingly irrevocable economic and social decline. The discussion shows that poachers identify different kinds of poaching. Some of the most apparent forms of poaching, done by local inhabitants, may be less damaging than other commercially oriented forms, including by outsiders. Poaching is motivated through a complex mix of factors. Our data lead us to discuss two manifestations of poaching (a) poaching as a form of collective resistance; and (b) poaching as a violation of culturally valued types of human-nature interaction. Some people who admit undertaking what they perceive as least detrimental forms of poaching are antagonistic towards what they construe to be truly harmful forms. Such people appear willing to act and to support actions against types of poaching they agree to be threatening. This is a message with potential importance for environmental management strategy.

Keywords

Biodiversity Fisheries Fishing Greece Hunting Livelihoods Local culture Poaching Wetlands 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acheson J.M. (1984). Government regulation and the exploitive capacity: the case of the New England groundfishery. Hum. Org. 43(4): 319–329Google Scholar
  2. Bell S. 2004. Integrated Management of European Wetlands. Final Report July 2004. http://www.dur.ac.uk/imew.ecproject.
  3. Blom A., Yamindou J. and Prin H.H.T. (2004). Status of the protected areas of the Central African Republic. Biol. Conserv. 188(4): 479–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloor M. (2001). Focus Groups in Social Research. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Brehm J.W. (1966). A Theory of Psychological Reactance. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrithers M. (1992). Why Humans Have Cultures. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Carss D.N., Bregnballe T., Keller T.M. and Eerden M.R. (2003). Reducing the conflict between cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo and fisheries on a pan-European scale: REDCAFE opens for business. Vogelwelt 124(suppl): 299–307Google Scholar
  8. Catsadorakis G. and Malakou M. (1997). Conservation and management issues of Prespa National Park. Hydobiologica 351: 175–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen A. (1997). Sturgeon poaching and black market caviar: a case study. Environ. Biol. Fish. 48(1–4): 423–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crivelli A.J., Grillas P., Jerrentrup H. and Nazirides T. (1995). Effects on fisheries and waterbirds of raising water levels at kerkini reservoir, a Ramsar Site in Northern Greece. Environ. Manage. 19: 431–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Curcione N. (1992). Deviance as delight: party-boat poaching in southern California. Deviant Behav. 13: 33–57Google Scholar
  12. Drever E. (1995). Using Semi-structured Interviews in Small-scale Research: A Teacher’s Guide. Scottish Council for Research in Education, GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  13. Eliason S.L. (2003). Throwing the book versus cutting some slack: factors influencing the use of discretion by game wardens in Kentucky. Deviant Behav. 24(2): 129–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fern E.F. (2001). Advanced Focus Group Research. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Forsyth C.J., Gramling R. and Wooddell G. (1998). The game of poaching: folk crimes in Southwest California. Soc. Nat. Res. 11(1): 25–38Google Scholar
  16. Forsyth C.J. and Marckese T.A. ( 1993). Thrills and skills: a sociological analysis of poaching. Deviant Behav. 14(2): 157–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Franklin A. (1999). Animals and Modern Cultures: A Sociology of Human–Animal Relations in Modernity. Sage, London, California, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  18. Geertz C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Glasser B.G. and Strauss A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Gregorich L.J. (1992). Poaching and the Illegal Trade in Wildlife Parts in Canada. Canadian Wildlife Federation, OttowaGoogle Scholar
  21. Hammersley M. and Atkinson P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles and Practice. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Hampshire K., Bell S., Wallace G. and Stepukonis F. (2004). ‘Real’ poachers and predators: shades of meaning in local understandings of threats to fisheries. Soc. Nat. Res. 17: 305–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ingold T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Routledge, London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Kenney J.S., Smith J.L.D., Starfield A.M. and Dougall C.W. (1995). The long-term effects of tiger poaching on population viability. Conserv. Biol. 9(5): 1127–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maragou P. and Mantziou D. (2000). Assessment of the Greek Ramsar Wetlands. WWF, AthensGoogle Scholar
  26. McCay B.J. (1984). The pirates of piscary: Ethnohistory of illegal fishing in New Jersey. Ethnohistory 31(1): 17–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miles M.B. and Huberman A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage, Newbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  28. Morgan D.L. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  29. Musgrave R.S., Parker S. and Wolok M. (1993). The status of poaching in the United States – are we protecting our wildlife?. Nat Resour J. 33(4): 978–1014Google Scholar
  30. Muth R.M. (1998). The persistence of poaching in advanced industrial society: an introductory comment. Soc. Nat. Res. 11(1): 5–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Muth R.M. and Bowe J.F. (1998). Illegal harvest of renewable resources in North America: towards a typology of the motivations for poaching. Soc. Nat. Res. 11(1): 9–24Google Scholar
  32. Paolisso M. (2002). Blue crabs and controversy on the Chesapeake Bay: a cultural model for understanding watermen’s reasoning about blue crab management. Hum. Org. 61(3): 226–239Google Scholar
  33. Pendleton M.R. (1998). Taking the forest: the shared meaning of tree theft. Soc. Nat. Res. 11(1): 39–50Google Scholar
  34. Pratt D.G., Macmillan D.C. and Gordon I.J. (2004). Local community attitudes to wildlife utilisation in the changing economic and social context of Mongolia. Biodivers. Conserv. 13: 591–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pretty J.N., Guijt I., Thompson J. and Scoones I. (1995). Participatory Learning and Action: A Trainer’s Guide. IIED, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Sanjek R. (1990). Fieldnotes. Cornell University Press, Ithaca Google Scholar
  37. Skinner J. and Zalewski S. 1995. Function and values of Mediterranean Wetlands. Conservation of Mediterranean Wetlands. Medwet Tour du Valet.Google Scholar
  38. Stewart D.W. and Shamdasani P.N. (1990). Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Sage, Newbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  39. Stoll-Kleeman S. (2001). Barriers to nature conservation in Germany: a model explaining opposition to protected areas. J. Environ. Psychol. 21(4): 369–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tajfel H. (1978). Differentiation Between Social Groups. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Tajfell H. and Turner J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin, W.G. and Worchel, S. (eds) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, pp 33–47. Brooks-Cole, Monterey, CAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of DurhamDurhamUK
  2. 2.EKBYThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations