Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impacts of Community-based Conservation on Local Communities in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Approaches to the management of protected areas that involve the participation of local communities are now being widely promoted. However, the impacts of such community-based conservation initiatives on local communities remain poorly defined. This research examines the socio-economic impacts of community-based conservation within the Annapurna Conservation Area (ACA), Nepal, through semi-structured interviews and a questionnaire survey with local residents, situated both within and outside the protected area. Results indicate that local communities have received a number of benefits from conservation, including improvements in access to forest resources, improved basic infrastructure such as drinking water, trails and bridges, and improvements in health, sanitation and social services. However, relatively few people (14.9%) within ACA receive direct financial income from tourism. Local communities also experience a number of costs of being involved in conservation, the most significant of which is increased crop damage by wildlife. Eighty-four percent of respondents within ACA have experienced problems of crop damage, accounting for 6% (rice) to 23% (maize) of total production. Depredation of livestock by wildlife is also experienced; mean losses per household being the equivalent of £3.9 (Rs. 479.70) each year. However, 66% of respondents within ACA reported that they had never experienced this problem. These results indicate that the socio-economic benefits of community-based approaches to conservation can outweigh the costs, even though the latter are significant. However, a participatory approach to management of problematic animal species will need to be developed within ACA, if conflicts between local communities and protected area management are to be avoided in future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbot J.I.O. and Mace R. (1999). Managing protected woodlands: fuelwood collection and law enforcement in Lake Malawi National Park. Conserv. Biol. 13: 418–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams B. and Hulme D. (1998). Conservation and Communities: Changing Narratives, Policies and Practices in African Conservation. University of Manchester, Manchester, 31

    Google Scholar 

  • Akama J.S., Lant C.L. and Burnett G.W. (1995). Conflicting attitudes towards state wildlife conservation programmes in Kenya. Society Nat. Resour. 8: 133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajracharya S.B. (2004). Community Involvement in Conservation: An Assessment of Impacts and Implications in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, 314

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajracharya S.B., Furley P.A. and Newton A.C. 2005. Effectiveness of community involvement in delivering conservation benefits to the Annapurna Conservation AreaNepal. Environ. Conserv. (in press).

  • Banskota K. and Sharma B. (1995). Tourism for Mountain Community Development: Case Study Report on the Annapurna and Gorkha Regions of Nepal. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu, 233

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon K.E. and Wells M. (1992). Planning for people and parks: design dilemmas. World Develop. 20: 557–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R. (1997). Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, xx + 297

    Google Scholar 

  • DNPWC 1996. Annual Progress Report for Fiscal Year 2052–53. Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation/HMG, Kathmandu, Nepal.annexes + 34 pp.

  • Dudley N., Gujja B., Jackson B., Jeanrenaud J., Oviedo G., Phillips A., Rosable P., Stolton S. and Wells S. (1999). Challenges for protected areas in 21st century. In: Stolton, S. and Dudley, N. (eds) Partnerships for Protection, pp 3–12. WWF, IUCN and Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldmann F. (1994). Community environmental action: the national policy context. In: Western, D., Wright, M.R. and Strum, S. (eds) Natural Connection: Perspectives in Community-based Conservation, pp 393–402. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiallo E.A. and Jacobson S.K. (1995). Local communities and protected areas: attitudes of rural residents towards conservation and Machalilla National Park, Ecuador. Environ. Conserv. 22: 241–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin M.J. and Gagnon C. (1999). An assessment of social impacts of national parks on communities in Quebec, Canada. Environ. Conserv. 26: 200–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghimire K.B. (1997). Conservation and social development: an assessment of Wolong and other reserves in China. In: Ghimire, K.B. and Pimbert, M.P. (eds) Social Change and Conservation, pp 187–213. Earthscan Publications Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghimire K.B. and Pimbert M.P. (1997). Social change and conservation: an overview of issues and concepts. In: Ghimire, K.B. and Pimbert, M.P. (eds) Social Change and Conservation: Environmental Politics and Impacts of National Parks and Protected Areas, pp 1–45. Earthscan Publications Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson C.C. and Marks S.A. (1995). Transferring rural hunters into conservationists: an assessment of community-based wildlife management in Africa. World Develop. 23: 941–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurung G. (2005). Securing financial sustainability for Annapurna Conservation Area. In: Sharma, U.R. and Yonzon, P.B. (eds) People and Protected Areas in South Asia, pp 86–89. IUCN South Asia and Resources Himalaya Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurung C.P. and DeCoursey M.A. (1994). The Annapurna Conservation Area Project: a pioneering example of sustainable tourism?. In: Cater, E. and Lowman, G. (eds) Ecotourism: A Sustainable Option?, pp 177–194. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackel J.D. (1998). Community conservation and the future of Africa's wildlife. Conserv. Biol. 13: 726–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinen J.T. (1993). Park people relations in Kosi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal – a socio-economic analysis. Environ. Conserv. 20: 25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough J.L. (1988). Obstacles to effective management of conflicts between national parks and surrounding human communities in developing countries. Environ. Conserv. 15: 129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough J. (1991). Michiru Mountain Conservation Area: integrating conservation with human needs. In: West, P.C. and Brechin, S.R. (eds) Resident Peoples and National Parks: Social Dilemmas and Strategies in International Conservation, pp 130–137. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  • Infield M. and Namara A. (2001). Community attitudes and behaviour towards conservation: an assessment of a community conservation programme in around Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda. Oryx 35: 48–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inskipp C. and Inskipp T. 2001. A popular guide to the birds and mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area. KMTNC-Annapurna Conservation Area Project. Pokhara, Nepal, x+41 pp.

  • IUCN 1998. Towards Participatory Management of Protected Areas in Asia Region. IUCN.

  • IUCN 2002. 2002 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCNwww.redlist.org.

  • IUCN. (2003). Durban Action Plan. In: (eds) The Vth IUCN World Park Congress Available from www.iucn.org/themes/wcpa/wpc2003/, pp. IUCN, Durban, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Kangwana K. and Mako R.F. (2001). Conservation, livelihoods and the intrinsic value of wildlife: Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. In: Humle, D. and Murphree, M.W. (eds) African Wildlife and Livelihoods: the Promise and Performance of Community Conservation, pp. James Currey Limited, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim E. and Karky B.S. (2001). Water Resource Use in the Annapurna Conservation Area: Assessment of Micro-Hydropower Management in Sikles and Chhomrong. KMTNC-Annapurna Conservation Area Project, PokharaNepal, 34

    Google Scholar 

  • KMTNC-ACAP. (1997). A new approach in protected area management. KMTNC-Annapurna Conservation Area Project, PokharaNepal, 39

    Google Scholar 

  • KMTNC-ACAP 1999. Two Years Retrospective Report: 1996/97 & 1997/98. Published Report. KMTNC-Annapurna Conservation Area Project, Pokhara, 30 pp.

  • *KMTNC-ACAP 2001. Two Years Retrospective Report July 1998–July 2000. Published Report. KMTNC-Annapurna Conservation Area Project, Pokhara, 44 pp.

  • Lehmkuhl J.F., Upreti R.K. and Sharma U.R. (1988). National parks and local development: grasses and people in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Environ. Conserv. 15: 143–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D.M. and Alpert P. (1997). Trophy hunting and wildlife conservation in Zambia. Conserv. Biol. 11: 59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusigi W.J. 1982. Future directions for the Afrotropical realm. In: McNeely J.A. and Miller K.R. (eds), The Third World Congress on National Parks and Protected Areas. BaliIndonesia, 1984. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, DC, pp. 137–146.

  • Madhusudan M.D. (2003). Living amidst large wildlife: livestock and crop depredation by large mammals in the interior villages of Bhadra Tiger Reservesouth India. Environ. Manage. 31: 466–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McNeely J.A. (1995). Partnerships for conservation: an introduction. In: McNeely, J.A. (eds) Expanding Partnerships in Conservation, pp 1–10. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta J.N. and Heinen J.T. (2001). Does community-based conservation shape favourable attitudes among locals? An empirical study from Nepal. Environ. Manage. 28: 165–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta J.N. and Kellert S.R. (1998). Local attitudes toward community-based conservation policy and programmes in Nepal: a case study in the Makalu-Barun Conservation Area. Environ. Conserv. 25: 320–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe S. (1994). The Zimbabwe Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources (CAMPFIRE). In: Western, D. and Wright, R.M. (eds) Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-based Conservation, pp 161–192. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Miah D., Rahman L. and Ashan F. (2001). Assessment of crop damage by wildlife in Chunati Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh. Tigerpaper 28: 22–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra H. (1982a). Balancing human needs and conservation in Nepal's Royal Chitwan National Park. Ambio 11: 246–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra H.R. 1982b. A delicate balance: tigers, rhinoceros, tourists and park management vs. the needs of local people in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. In: McNeely J.A. and Miller K.R. (eds), The Third World Congress on National Parks and Protected Areas. BaliIndonesia, 1984. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, DC, pp. 197–205.

  • Murphree M.W. (1994). The role of institutions in community-based conservation. In: Western, D., Wright, R.M. and Strum, S.C. (eds) in Community-based Conservation, pp 403–427. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton-Treves L. (1997). Predicting patterns of crop damage by wildlife around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Conserv. Biol. 12: 156–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepal S. (2002). Linking parks and people: Nepal's experience in resolving conflicts in parks and protected areas. Int. J. Sustain. Develop. World Ecol. 9: 75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepal S.K., Kohler T. and Banzhaf B.R. (2002). Great Himalayas: Tourism and the Dynamics of Changes in Nepal. Swiss Foundation for Alpine Research in collaboration with the Centre for Development and Environment, University of Berne, Zurich, 92

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark W.D., Leonard N.L., Sariko H.I. and Gamassa D.G.M. (1993). Conservation attitudes of local people living adjacent to protected areas in Tanzania. Biol. Conserv. 63: 177–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn F.V. and Parker G.E. (2003). Towards an integrated approach for reducing the conflict between elephants and people: a review of current research. Oryx 37: 80–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviedo G. and Brown J. (1999). Building alliances with indigenous peoples to establish and manage protected areas. In: Stolton, S. and Dudley, N. (eds) Partnerships for Protection, pp 98–108. WWF, IUCN and Earthscan Publications Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry D. and Campbell B. (1992). Attitudes of rural communities to animal wildlife and its utilisation in Chobe Enclave and Mababe Depression, Bostwana. Environ. Conserv. 19: 245–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl M.C. (1994). Local initiatives and rewards for biodiversity conservation: Crater Mountain Wildlife Management Area, Papua New Guinea. In: Western, D. and Wright, M.R. (eds) Community-based Conservation, pp 193–214. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimbert M.P. and Pretty J.N. (1997). Parks, people and professionals: putting ‘participation’ protected-area management. In: Ghimire, K. and Pimbert, M.P. (eds) Social Change and Conservation, pp 297–330. Earthscan Publication Limited, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch K.F. (1998). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. SAGE Publications, London, xv + 319

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao K.S., Maikhuri R.K., Nautiyal S. and Saxena K.G. (2002a). Crop damage and livestock depredation by wildlife: a case study from Nanda Devi Biosphere ReserveIndia. J. Environ. Manage. 66: 317–327

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao M., Rabinowitz A. and Khaing S.T. (2002b). Status review of the protected area system in Myanmarwith recommendations for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 16: 360–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sah J.P. and Heinen J.T. (2001). Wetland resource use and conservation attitudes among indigenous and migrant peoples in Ghodaghodi Lake area, Nepal. Environ. Conserv. 28: 345–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salafsky N. and Wollenberg E. (2000). Linking livelihood and conservation: a conceptual framework and scale for assessing the integration of human needs and biodiversity. World Develop. 28: 1421–1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekhar N.U. (1998). Crop and livestock depredation caused by wild animals in protected areas: the case of Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan, India. Environ. Conserv. 25: 160–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma U.R. (1990). An overview of park–people interactions in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Landscape Urban Plan. 19: 133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma U.R. and Wells M.P. (1996). Nepal. In: Lutz, E. and Caldecott, J. (eds) Decentralisation and Biodiversity Conservation, pp 65–76. The World Bank, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherpa M.N., Coburn B. and Gurung C.P. (1986). Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal: Operational Plan. King Mahendra Trust for Nature Conservation and World Wildlife Fund, Kathmandu, xiii+Annexes+74

    Google Scholar 

  • Songorwa A.L., Buhrs T. and Hughey K.F.D. (2000). Community-based wildlife management in Africa: a critical assessment of the literature. Nat. Resour. J. 40: 603–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Spergel B. (1997). Compensation and substitute programmes. In: Borrini-Feyerbend, G. (eds) Seeking Social Sustainability in Conservation, pp 91–93. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • (1999). Partnerships for Protection. UK Earthscan Publication Ltd, London, xvii + 283

    Google Scholar 

  • Straede S. and Helles F. (2000). Park–people conflict resolution in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal: buying time at high cost?. Environ. Conserv. 27: 368–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Studsrod J.E. and Wegge P. (1995). Park–people relationships: the case of damage caused by park animals around the Royal Bardia National Park, Nepal. Environ. Conserv. 22: 133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh J. and Schaik C.V. (2002). Why the world needs parks. In: Terborgh, J., Schaik, C.V., Davenport, L. and Rao, M. (eds) Making Parks Work: Strategies for Preserving Tropical Nature, pp 3–14. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2002). Nepal Human Development Report 2001: Poverty Reduction and Governance. UNDP, Kathmandu, xii+154

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright C. and Wehrmeyer W. (1998). Success in integrating conservation and development? a study from Zambia. World Develop. 26: 933–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weladji R.B. and Tchamba M.N. (2003). Conflict between people and protected areas within the Benoue Wildlife Conservation Areanorth Cameroon. Oryx 37: 72–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells M. and Brandon K. (1992). People and Parks: Linking Protected Area Management with Local Communities. World Bank, World Wildlife Fund and USAID, Washington, DC, xii+98

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian C. Newton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bajracharya, S.B., Furley, P.A. & Newton, A.C. Impacts of Community-based Conservation on Local Communities in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Biodivers Conserv 15, 2765–2786 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-1343-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-1343-x

Keywords

Navigation