Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Species turnover: the case of stream amphibians of rainforests in the Western Ghats, southern India

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined species turnover in stream amphibians in rainforest in two hill ranges (Ashambu and Anamalai Hills) in the Western Ghats in south India. In each hill range, six stream segments (100 m in length) belonging to three drainage or rivers were surveyed three to four times in three seasons over 1 year. Species turnover (using 1-Sorenson's index) was estimated between all possible pairs of sites at three spatial scales – within drainage, between drainage and between hill ranges. Similar matrices were also developed for altitudinal difference and geographic distance between sites. A total of 30 species in four families were recorded from 3681 individuals. The hill ranges differed significantly in the composition of the stream community at both the species and family levels. Within the hill range, species turnover was correlated with altitudinal difference and not with geographic distance. Anamalai Hills had a greater species turnover than Ashambu Hills, both within and between drainage. There was also a high turnover between these two hill ranges, with only two shared species. This turnover explains the fact that only 30–40 species have been reported from different hill ranges, although regional diversity is high with about 130 species. The turnover also predicts that several undetected species should occur in hill ranges and drainage that have not been surveyed. The conservation model for mammals and birds, consisting of a few large protected areas, may not adequately address the conservation requirements of amphibians. Protection of rainforest frogs may require many protected areas in different drainages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allmon W.D. (1991). A plot study of forest floor litter frogs, Central Amazon, Brazil. J. Trop. Ecol. 7: 503–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aravind N.A., Uma Shaanker R. and Ganeshiah K.N. (2004). Croak, croak, croak: are there more frogs to be discovered in the Western Ghats?. Current Sci. 86: 1471–1472

    Google Scholar 

  • Biju (2001). A synopsis of the frog fauna of the Western Ghats, India. Occasional Publication of the Indian Society for Conservation Biology 1: 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet E. and Van de Peer Y. (2002). zt: a Sofware tool for simple and partial mantel tests. J. Stat. Software 7(10).

  • Cincotta R.P., Wisnewski J. and Engelman R. (2000). Human population in the biodiversity hotspots. Nature 404: 990–992

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell R.K. 1997. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 5. User's Guide and application published at http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates.

  • Condit R., Pitman N., Chave J., Terborgh J., Foster R.B., Nunez P.V., Aguilar S., Valencia R., Villa G., Muller-Landau H.C., Losos E., Hubbell S.P. and Leigh E.G. (2002). Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science 295: 666–669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crist O.T., Veech J.A., Gering J.C. and Summerville K.S. (2003). Partitioning species diversity across landscapes and regions: a hierarchical analysis of α, β, and γ diversity. Am. Nat. 162(6): 734–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels R.J.R. (1992). Geographical distribution patterns of amphibians in the Western Ghats, India. J. Biogeogr. 19: 521–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duellman W.E. (1988). Patterns of species diversity in anuran amphibians in the American tropics. Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden 75: 79–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duellman W.E. (1999). Global distribution of amphibians: patterns, conservation and future challenges. In: Duellman, W.E. (eds) Patterns of Distribution of Amphibians: A Global Perspective, pp 1–30. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Easa P.S. (1998). Survey of Reptiles and Amphibians in Kerala part of Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve. Kerala Forest Research Institute, Kerala, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Harte J., McCarthy S., Taylor K., Kinzig A. and Fischer M.L. (1999). Estimating species-area relationships from plot to landscape scale using species spatial-turnover data. Oikos 86: 45–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell S.P. (2001). The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Inger R.F. (1999). Distribution of amphibians in Southern Asia and adjacent islands. In: Duellman, W.E. (eds) Patterns of Distribution of Amphibians: A Global Perspective, pp 445–481. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Inger R.F. and Stuebing R.B. (1992). The montane amphibian fauna of northwestern Borneo. Malayan Nature J. 46: 41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Inger R.F., Shaffer H.B., Koshy M. and Bakde R. (1987). Ecological structure of a herpetological assemblage in South India. Amphibia–Reptilia 8: 189–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsingh A.J.T. (2001). The Kalakad–Mundanthurai tiger reserve: a global heritage of biological diversity. Current Sci. 80: 378–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy S.V. (1999). Amphibian diversity in a few selected environs of Western Ghats. In: Hussain, S.A. and Achar, K.P. (eds) Biodiversity of Western Ghats complex of Karnataka, pp. Biodiversity Initiative Trust, Mangalore, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal J.P. (1988). Wet evergreen forests of the Western Ghats of India: ecology, structurefloristic composition and succession. Institut de Français, Pondichéry, Travaux de la section Scientifique et technique, Pondicherry, India, xx bis 345

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomisto H., Ruokolainen K. and Yli-Halla M. (2003). Dispersal, environment and floristic variation of Western Amazonian Forests. Science 299: 241–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vasudevan K. (2000). Amphibian Species Assemblages of the Wet Evergreen Forests of Southern Western Ghats of India and the Effect of Forest fragmentation on their diversity. Ph.D. thesis, Utkal University, Bhubaneshwar, ix  + 115 pp + vi appendices.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veech J.A., Summerville K.S., Crist T.O. and Gering J.C. (2002). The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea. Oikos 99: 3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voris H.K. and Inger R.F. (1995). Frog abundance along streams in Bornean forests. Conserv. Biol. 9: 679–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolda H. (1981). Similarity indices, sample size and diversity. Oecologia 50: 296–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker R.H. (1960). Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol. Monogr. 30: 279–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajith Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vasudevan, K., Kumar, A. & Chellam, R. Species turnover: the case of stream amphibians of rainforests in the Western Ghats, southern India. Biodivers Conserv 15, 3515–3525 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-3101-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-3101-x

Keywords

Navigation