Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 57–68 | Cite as

Effects of Landscape Elements on the Distribution of the Rare Bumblebee Species Bombus muscorum in an Agricultural Landscape

  • Tim DiekötterEmail author
  • Kerstin Walther-Hellwig
  • Manuel Conradi
  • Matthias Suter
  • Robert Frankl


The regional distribution pattern of Bombus muscorum was studied in an agricultural landscape of central Germany, one of two remaining areas with the occurrence of this nationally endangered species in the Land Hesse. To determine the landscape characteristics that facilitate the occurrence of B. muscorum, grid-based observation records were analysed in a GIS environment at a regional scale. A significantly negative effect of the number of trees on the occurrence of B. muscorum and a significantly positive one of the proportion of arable land, strongly support the species’ preference for open landscapes. Yet, apart from open landscapes additional landscape features were shown to be important. A significantly positive effect of ditches in the final model revealed the importance of this landscape element for the occurrence of B. muscorum. This finding was additionally supported by recordings of nest-searching queens, nests, and flower visits along dithes. The positive effects of clover and fallow land indicate the species’ need for suitable food resources throughout the season. Because B. muscorum exhibits small foraging ranges, it is essential that landscape elements that provide nesting sites, foraging habitats and undisturbed hibernation structures are next to each other. The low numbers of individuals of B. muscorum recorded indicate that the supply of these habitat elements may have reached a critical threshold in the study region.


Distribution Endangered pollinators Floral resources Foraging behaviour Habitat fragmentation Spatial structure Landscape analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Backman, J.P.C., Tiainen, J. 2002Habitat quality of field margins in a Finnish farmland area for bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Bombus and Psithyrus)Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.895368Google Scholar
  2. Bhattacharya, M., Primack, R.B., Gerwein, J. 2003Are roads and railroads barriers to bumblebee movement in a temperate suburban conservation area?Biol. Conserv.1093745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchmann, S.L., Nabhan, G.P. 1996The Forgotten PollinatorsIsland Press/Shearwater BooksWashington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Carvell, C. 2002Habitat use and conservation of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) under different grassland management regimesBiol. Conserv.1033349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Croxton, P.J., Carvell, C., Mountford, J.O., Sparks, T.H. 2002A comparison of green lanes and field margins as bumblebee habitat in an arable landscapeBiol. Conserv.107365374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dylewska, M. 1957The distribution of the species of the genus Bombus Latr. in PolandActa Zool. Cracov.2259278Google Scholar
  7. Free, J.B. 1993Insect Pollination of CropsAcademic PressLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. Frommer, U. 2001Bestandsaufnahme der Bienenfauna im Mittleren Hessen (Hymenoptera, Apidae)Naturwissenschaftliche Veröffentlichungen Darmstadt/Bericht N.F.24129191Google Scholar
  9. Goulson, D. 2003Bumblebees. Their Behaviour and EcologyOxford University PressOxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Goverde, M., Schweizer, K., Baur, B., Erhardt, A. 2002Small-scale habitat fragmentation effects on pollinator behaviour: experimental evidence from the bumblebee Bombus veteranus on calcareous grasslandsBiol. Conserv.104293299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hagen, E. 1994Hummeln: Bestimmen, Ansiedeln, Vermehren, SchützenNaturbuch VerlagAugsburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  12. Hauck, W.W., Donner, A. 1977Wald’s test as applied to hypotheses in logit analysisJ. Am. Stat. Assoc.72851853Google Scholar
  13. Heinrich, B. 1979Bumblebee EconomicsHarvard University PressCambridge, MA and LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Hessisches Statistisches Landesamt2000Statistisches Handbuch Hessen 1999/2000LandesamtWiesbaden, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  15. Jedicke, E. eds. 1997Die Roten Listen: Gefährdete Pflanzen, Tiere, Pflanzengesellschaften und Biotope in Bund und LändernUlmerStuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  16. Jennersten, O., Loman, J., Møller, A.P., Robertson, J., Widén, B. 1993Conservation biology in agricultural habitat islandsHansson, L. eds. Ecological Principles of Nature Conservation: Applications in Temperate and Boreal EnvironmentsElsevier Applied ScienceLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Kells, A.R., Goulson, D. 2003Preferred nesting sites of bumblebee queens (Hymenoptera : Apidae) in agroecosystems in the UKBiol. Conserv.109165174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kreyer, D., Oed, A., Walther-Hellwig, K., Frankl, R. 2004Are forests potential landscape barriers for foraging bumblebees? Landscape scale experiments with Bombus terrestris agg. and Bombus pascuorum (Hymenoptera, Apidae)Biol. Conserv.116/1111118Google Scholar
  19. Meeus, J.H.A. 1993The transformation of agricultural landscapes in Western EuropeSci. Total Environ.129171190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Osborne, J.L., Clark, S.J., Morris, R.J., Williams, I.H., Riley, J.R., Smith, A.D., Reynolds, D.R., Edwards, A.S. 1999A landscape-scale study of bumblebee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radarJ. Appl. Ecol.36519533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Osborne, J.L., Corbet, S.A. 1994Managing habitats for pollinators in farmlandAspects Appl. Biol.40207215Google Scholar
  22. O’Toole, C. eds. 1993Diversity of Native Bees and AgroecosystemsCAB InternationalWallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. Pekkarinen, A., Teras, I. 1993Zoogeography of Bombus and Psithyrus in Northwestern Europe (Hymenoptera, Apidae)Ann. Zool. Fennici.30187208Google Scholar
  24. Peters G. 1972. Ursachen für den Rückgang der seltenen heimischen Hummelarten (Hym., Bombus et Psithyrus). Entomol. Berichte 85–90.Google Scholar
  25. Plowright, C.M.S., Plowright, R.C., Williams, P.H. 1997Replacement of Bombus muscorum by Bombus pascuorum in northern BritainCan. Entomol.129985990Google Scholar
  26. Ranta, E., Vepsalainen, K. 1981Why are there so many species – spatio-temporal heterogeneity and Northern bumblebee communitiesOikos.362834Google Scholar
  27. Rasmont, P. 1988Monographie écologique et zoogéographique des bourdons de France et de Belgique (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombinae)Faculté des Science Agronomique de l’ÈtatGembloux, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  28. Rasmont, P., Leclercq, J., Jacob-Remacle, A., Pauly, A., Gaspar, C. 1993The faunistic drift of Apoidea in BelgiumBruneau, E. eds. Bees for PollinationCommission of the European CommunitiesBrussels6587Google Scholar
  29. Reinig, W.F. 1970Ökologische Studien an mittel- und südosteuropäischen Hummeln (Bombus Latr., 1802) (Hym., Apidae)Mitteilungen der Münchner Entomologischen Gesellschaft.60156Google Scholar
  30. Riemann, H. 1987Bienen, Wespen und Ameisen (Hymenoptera Aculeata) als Besiedler von Böschungen an tiefliegenden EntwässerungsgräbenAbh. Naturwiss. Ver. Bremen.40333346Google Scholar
  31. Rittweger, H. 1997Spätquartäre Sedimente im Amöneburger Becken – Archive der Umweltgeschichte einer mittelhessischen AltsiedellandschaftHermann, F.-R. eds. Materialien zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte von HessenSelbstverlag des Landesamt für DenkmalpflegeWiesbaden, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  32. Söderström, B., Svensson, B., Vessby, K., Glimskär, A. 2001Plants, insects and birds in semi-natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factorsBiodiv. Conserv.1018391863Google Scholar
  33. Sotherton, N.W., Self, M.J. 1999Changes in plant and arthropod biodiversity on lowland farmland: an overviewAebischer, N.J.Evans, A.D.Grice, P.V.Vickery, J.A. eds. Ecology and Conservation of Lowland FarmbirdsBritish Ornithologists’ UnionTring2635Google Scholar
  34. Statistisches Bundesamt2002Statistisches Jahrbuch 2002 für die Bundesrepublik DeutschlandNeuster VerlagStuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  35. Steffan-Dewenter, I., Munzenberg, U., Burger, C., Thies, C., Tscharntke, T. 2002Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guildsEcology.8314211432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stoate, C. 1996The changing face of lowland farming and wildlifePart 2 1945Brit. Wildlife.7162172Google Scholar
  37. Stoate, C., Boatman, N.D., Borralho, R.J., Carvalho, C.R., Snoo, G.R., Eden, P. 2001Ecological impacts of arable intensification in EuropeJ. Environ. Manage.63337365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Svensson, B., Lagerlöf, J., Svensson, B.G. 2000Habitat preferences of nest-seeking bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in an agricultural landscapeAgric. Ecosyst. Environ.77247255Google Scholar
  39. Thomas, C.D., Cameron, A., Green, R.E., Bakkenes, M., Beaumont, L.J., Collingham, Y.C., Erasmus, B.F.N., Siqueira, M.F., Grainger, A., Hannah, L., Hughes, L., Huntley, B., Jaarsveld, A.S., Midgley, G.F., Miles, L., Ortega-Huerta, M.A., Peterson, A.T., Phillips, O.L., Williams, S.E. 2004Extinction risk from climate changeNature.427145148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Thomson, J.D. 1996Trapline foraging by bumblebees. 1. Persistence of flight-path geometryBehav. Ecol.7158164Google Scholar
  41. Tischendorf, S. 2001Wildbienen und Wespen (Hymenoptera: Apidae) im Oberrheinischen Auwaldgebiet “Kühkopf-Knoblauchsaue“ (Hessen)Hessische Faunistische Briefe.202142Google Scholar
  42. Treiber, R. 1998Verbreitung und Ökologie der Hummeln (Hymenoptera: Apidae) im Landkreis Freudenstadt (Baden-Württemberg).17155180Mit. bad. Landesver. Naturkunde und Naturschute, N.F.Google Scholar
  43. Wagner, R. 1971Die Veränderung der Hummelfauna Cuxhavens in diesem Jahrhundert. Der Versuch einer DeutungEntomologische Mitteilungen des Zoologischen Museums Hamburg.4207232Google Scholar
  44. Walther-Hellwig, K. 2001Untersuchungen zu Sammelflugweiten und Dichteverteilung von HonigbienenUnveröffentlichte Auftragsarbeit für den Landesverband Hess. Imker e.V., Kirchhain in Zusammenarbeit mit d. Hess. Dienstleistungszentrum f. Landwirtschaft, Gartenbau uGartenbau u. Naturschutz (HDLGN)Kirchhain, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  45. Walther-Hellwig, K., Frankl, R. 2000Foraging habitats and foraging distances of bumblebees, Bombus spp. (Hym., Apidae), in an agricultural landscapeJ. Appl. Entomol.124299306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Watanabe, M.E. 1994Pollination worries rise as honey bees declineScience.2561170Google Scholar
  47. Westrich, P. 1990Die Wildbienen Baden-WürttembergsUlmerStuttgart GermanyGoogle Scholar
  48. Westrich, P., Schwenninger, H.R., Dathe, H.H., Riemann, H., Saure, C., Voith, J., Weber, K. 1998Rote Liste der Bienen (Hymenoptera: Apidae)Schriftenreihe für Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz.55119129Google Scholar
  49. Williams, P.H. 1986Environmental change and the distributions of British bumble bees (Bombus Latr)Bee World.675061Google Scholar
  50. Williams, P.H. 1989Why are there so many species of bumble bees at DungenessBot. J. Linn. Soc.1013144Google Scholar
  51. Williams, I.H., Corbet, S.A., Osborne, J.L. 1991Bee-keeping, wild bees and pollination in the European CommunityBee World.72170180Google Scholar
  52. Wolf, H. 1985Veränderungen der Hummelfauna (Hymenoptera: Apidae) bei Frankfurt (Main) und Marburg (Lahn)Hessische Faunistische Briefe.56669Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim Diekötter
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kerstin Walther-Hellwig
    • 2
  • Manuel Conradi
    • 3
  • Matthias Suter
    • 3
  • Robert Frankl
    • 3
  1. 1.Geobotanical Institute ETH ZurichZürichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of General and Special Zoology – Animal EcologyUniversity GiessenGermany
  3. 3.Department of Biology, Nature ConservationUniversity MarburgGermany

Personalised recommendations