Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Linking ecological and social systems in cities: urban planning in Finland as a case

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The loss of urban green space as a result of urbanization threatens the overall biodiversity of urban areas, and prompts us to consider the importance of existing urban nature more carefully. Because urban ecological systems are in intense interaction with human-social systems, it is fruitful to create an interdisciplinary research and planning framework to ensure the maintenance of biodiversity in urban areas. For this purpose, we adapted a suitable theoretical and conceptual scheme for the setting of Finnish urban development, which provides an example of a situation where a lot of nature has so far remained inside and around urban area. The adapted scheme focuses on the land use change as a result of urban land use planning and development, and may provide a way to address the important variables and feedback mechanisms between information flowing from ecological systems and drivers from the social system. Furthermore, we outlined a more specific framework around the Finnish urban detailed planning process in order to study the interactions between these systems further. After addressing ecology-oriented questions of quantity, quality and needs of urban nature, and human-oriented drivers, such as flow and incorporation of information, knowledge, values and institutions, we identified several challenges in integrating the components of ecological and social systems. Creating common conceptual ground for different actors and disciplines, improving communication in the process, matching contradictory values and perceptions, and improving stakeholder participation would be in the best interest of nature and people of urban areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. Allen O. Bosch M. Kilvington J. Oliver M. Gilbert (2001) ArticleTitleBenefits of collaborative learning for environmental management: applying the integrated systems for knowledge management approach to support animal pest control Environmental Management 27 215–223

    Google Scholar 

  2. L.A. Baschak R.D. Brown (1995) ArticleTitleAn ecological framework for the planning, design and management of urban river greenways Landscape Urban Planning 33 211–225 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0169-2046(94)02019-C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. F. Berkes C. Folke (Eds) (1998a) Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience Cambridge University Press CambridgeUK

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Berkes C. Folke (1998b) Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability F. Berkes C. Folke (Eds) Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience Cambridge University Press CambridgeUK 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. Berkes J. Colding C. Folke (2000) ArticleTitleRediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management Ecological Applications 10 1251–1262

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Berkes J. Colding C. Folke (2003) Navigating Social Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change Cambridge University Press CambridgeUK

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.R. Berkowitz C.H. Nilon K.S. Hollweg (Eds) (2003) Understanding Urban Ecosystems: A New Frontier for Science and Education Springer-Verlag New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Breuste H. Feldman O. Uhlmann (Eds) (1998) Urban Ecology Springer-Verlag Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  9. L.E. Buck C.C. Geisler J. Schelhas E. Wollenberg (Eds) (2001) Biological Diversity: Balancing Interests through Adaptive Collaborative Management CRC Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Callon (1994) Society in the making: the study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis W. Bijker E. Hughes P. Thomas T. Pinch (Eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology Fifth printing, MIT Press CambridgeMassachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.L. Carles I.L. Barrio J.V. de Lucio (1999) ArticleTitleSound influence on landscape values Landscape Urban Plan. 43 191–200 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00112-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J.P. Collins A. Kinzig N.B. Grimm W.F. Fagan D. Hope J. Wu E.T. Borer (2000) ArticleTitleA new urban ecology American Scientist 88 416–425 Occurrence Handle10.1511/2000.5.416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Commission for Biological Diversity 1997. National action plan 1997–2005 for biological diversity in Finland. The Finnish Environment 137, Ministry of the EnvironmentLand Use DepartmentHelsinkiFinland [in Finnish with abstract in English].

  14. V.H. Dale S. Brown R.A. Haeuber N.T. Hobbs N. Huntly R.J. Naiman et al. (2000) ArticleTitleEcological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land Ecological Applications 10 639–670

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Devuyst L. Hens W. De Lannoy (Eds) (2001) How Green is the City? – Sustainability Assessment and the Management of Urban Environments Columbia University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Dijst P. Schot K. de Jong (Eds) (2003) Framing Land Use Dynamics: Reviewed Abstracts of International Conference 16–18 April, 2003 Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht University UtrechtThe Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  17. F. Duhme S. Pauleit (2000) A landscape ecological masterplan for the city of Munich J.O. Riley S.E. Page (Eds) Habitat Creation and Wildlife Conservation in Urban and Post-industrial Environments Packard Publishing ChichesterUK

    Google Scholar 

  18. P.J. Edwards N.R. Webb K.M. Urbanska R. Bornkamm (1997) Restoration ecology: sciencetechnology and society K.M. Urbanska N.R. Webb P.J. Edwards (Eds) Restoration Ecology and Sustainable Development Cambridge University Press CambridgeUK 381–390

    Google Scholar 

  19. P.R. Ehrlich (2002) ArticleTitleHuman natures, nature conservation, and environmental ethics BioScience 52 31–43

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Flores S.T.A. Pickett W.C. Zipperer R.V. Pouyat R. Pirani (1998) ArticleTitleAdopting a modern ecological view of the metropolitan landscape: the case of a greenspace system for the New York City region Landscape Urban Plan. 39 295–308

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. Folke F. Berkes J. Colding (1998) Ecological practices and social mechanisms for building resilience and sustainability F. Berkes C. Folke (Eds) Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience Cambridge University Press CambridgeUK 414–436

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Frey (1998) Comprehensive biotope mapping in the city of Mainz – a tool for integrated nature conservation and sustainable urban planning J. Breuste H. Feldman O. Uhlmann (Eds) Urban Ecology. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Germany 641–647

    Google Scholar 

  23. G.L.A. Fry (2001) ArticleTitleMultifunctional landscapes – towards transdisciplinary research Landscape Urban Planning 57 159–168

    Google Scholar 

  24. O.L. Gilbert (1989) The Ecology of Urban Habitats Chapman & Hall London

    Google Scholar 

  25. P. Grahn U.A. Stigsdotter (2003) ArticleTitleLandscape planning and stress Urban Forest. Urban Greening 2 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  26. N.B. Grimm J.M. Grove S.T.A. Pickett C.L. Redman (2000) ArticleTitleIntegrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems BioScience 50 571–584

    Google Scholar 

  27. P.M. Groffman G.E. Likens (Eds) (1994) Integrated Regional Models: Interaction Between Humans and their Environment Chapman & Hall New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. J.M. Grove (1997) New tools for exploring theory and methods in human ecosystem and landscape analysis: computer modeling, remote sensing and geographic information systems H.K. Cordell J.C. Bergstrom (Eds) Integrating Social Sciences and Ecosystem Management Sagamore Champaign, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gyllin M. 1999. Integrating biodiversity in urban planning. Communication in Urban Planning – Göteborg Conference Papers, June 03, http://www.arbeer.demon.co.uk/MAPweb/Goteb/got-mats.htm.

  30. R. Haeuber P. Ringold (1998) ArticleTitleEcology, the social sciences, and environmental policy Ecological Applications 8 330–331

    Google Scholar 

  31. Y. Haila (1990) Ekologinen tutkimus ja alueiden käytön suunnittelu Y. Haila (Eds) Vihreään aikaan – Kirjoituksia ihmisen ekologiasta Gummerus Jyväskylä, Finland 84–91

    Google Scholar 

  32. Y. Haila (1995) Kestävän kehityksen luontoperusta: Mitä päättäjien tulee tietää ekologiasta? Suomen Kuntaliitto Helsinki Finland

    Google Scholar 

  33. Y. Haila (1999) ArticleTitleSocioecologies Ecography 22 337–348

    Google Scholar 

  34. Y. Haila R. Levins (1992) Humanity and Nature Pluto Press London

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. Ilmonen (1997) Five approaches to segregation M. Ilmonen M. Lankinen H. Lehtonen J. Maury J. Päivinen (Eds) How Do You Address Yourself? Spatial Differentiation in the Helsinki Region, English Summaries Helsinki Finland 162–163

    Google Scholar 

  36. L.R. Iverson E.A. Cook (2000) ArticleTitleUrban forest cover of the Chicago region and its relation to household density and income Urban Ecosystems 4 105–124 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1011307327314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. P. Kansanen (1999) ArticleTitleKaupunkiekologia hallintokuntien välisessä yhteistyössä: tiedon hankintakoordinointi ja ylläpito Luonnon Tutkija 5/1999 210–211

    Google Scholar 

  38. T. Kendle S. Forbes (Eds) (1997) Urban Nature Conservation E & FN Spon London

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kilvington M., Rosier J., Wilkinson R. and Freeman C. 1998. Urban restoration: social opportunities and constraints. NZ Symposium on restoring the health and Wealth of ecosystems, 28–30 September 1998, June 03, http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/social/urban_pap.asp.

  40. M. Kilvington R. Taylor W. Allen (2000) Restoration and the city: looking for a framework for social and ecological restoration G. Stewart M. Ignatieva (Eds) Urban Biodiversity and Ecology as a Basis for Holistic Planning and Design Lincoln University International Centre for Nature Conservation Publication Number 1. Wickcliffe Press ChristchurchNew Zealand 72–79

    Google Scholar 

  41. A.P. Kinzig J.M. Grove (2001) ArticleTitleUrban-suburban ecology Encyclopedia of Biodiversity Vol. 5 733–745

    Google Scholar 

  42. K.M. Korpela T. Hartig F. Kaiser U. Fuhrer (2001) ArticleTitleRestorative experience and self-regulation in favorite places Environment and Behavior 33 572–589

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kortelainen J. (ed) 2000. Vihertyväkaupunkiseutu: Suunnittelun ja hallinnan ekomoderni käänne. SoPhi, Jyväskylä, Finland (in Finnish).

  44. S. Laakkonen (2001) Vesiensuojelun synty – Helsingin ja sen merialueen ympäristöhistoriaa 1987–1928 Gaudeamus HelsinkiFinland

    Google Scholar 

  45. Laakso S. 1997. Urban Housing Prices and the Demand for Housing Characteristics. Elin- 761 keinoelämäntutkimuslaitos ETLA, A 27, Helsinki, Finland.

  46. Laakso S., Loikkanen H.A. and Mattila M. 2001. Maankäytön ohjauksesta kaupunkialueilla: Kaupunkitalouden näkökulma. Suomen ympäristö517, Ympäristöministeriö, Alueiden käyttö. Edita, Helsinki, Finland (in Finnish, with abstract in English).

  47. Land use and Building Act 1999 (in Finnish), July 04. http://www.finlex.fi/linkit/smur/19990132.

  48. Lankinen M. and Sairinen R. 2000. Helsinkiläisten ympäristöasenteet vuonna 2000. City of Helsinki Urban Facts, Research Series, 2000: 6: (in Finnish).

  49. B. Latour (1987) How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society Harvard University Press CambridgeMA

    Google Scholar 

  50. B. Latour (1999) On recalling ANT J. Law J. Hassard (Eds) Actor Network Theory and After Blackwell London

    Google Scholar 

  51. B. Latour S. Woolgar (1986) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lindholm G. 1999. Communication concerning green structure – a discussion on the interpretation of concepts. Communication in Urban Planning – Göteborg Conference Papers, June 03, http://www.arbeer.demon.co.uk/MAPweb/Goteb/got-guni.htm.

  53. K. Löfvenhaft C. Björn M. Ihse (2002) ArticleTitleBiotope patterns in urban areas: a conceptual model integrating biodiversity issues in spatial planning Landscape Urban Planning 58 223–240

    Google Scholar 

  54. Maijala O. 2001. Tavallinen kaupunkiluonto haastaa kaavoituksen – biodiversiteetti ja kaupunkisuunnittelu. Rakentaminen ja Asuminen (RakAs), 2/2001 (in Finnish).

  55. Maijala O. 2002. Managing urban biodiversity – a challenge for urban planning tools and processes. NSBB-seminar paper 18 November 2002 in HanasaariEspooFinland.

  56. I. Massa (1991) Suunnistus ympäristösosiologiaan I. Massa R. Sairinen (Eds) Ympäristökysymys: ympäristöuhkien haaste yhteiskunnalle Gaudeamus HelsinkiFinland 66–92

    Google Scholar 

  57. Maury J. 1997. An aerial view of the social differences in the Helsinki region. In: Ilmonen M., Lankinen M., Lehtonen H., Maury J. and Päivinen J. (eds), How Do you Address Yourself? Spatial Differentiation in the Helsinki Region, English Summaries. Pääkaupunkiseudun julkaisusarja B 1997:2. YTV, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 166–167.

  58. M.J. McDonnell S.T.A. Pickett (1990) ArticleTitleEcosystem structure and function along urban–rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology Ecology 71 1232–1237

    Google Scholar 

  59. N.E. McIntyre K. Knowles-Yánez D. Hope (2000) ArticleTitleUrban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: differences in the use of ȁ8urbanȁ9 between the social and natural sciences Urban Ecosystems 4 5–24

    Google Scholar 

  60. B. Mitchell (2003) Integration of ecosystem management and impact assessment with spatial planning M. Dijst P. Schot K. de Jong (Eds) Framing Land Use Dynamics: Reviewed Abstracts of International Conference 16–18 April, 2003 Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht University UtrechtThe Netherlands 29

    Google Scholar 

  61. M.R. Moss (2000) ArticleTitleInterdisciplinarity, landscape ecology and the transformation of agricultural landscapes Landscape Ecology 15 303–311

    Google Scholar 

  62. J. Niemelä (1999a) ArticleTitleEcology and urban planning Biodiversity and Conservation 8 119–131 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008817325994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. J. Niemelä (1999b) ArticleTitleIs there a need for a theory of urban ecology? Urban Ecosyst. 3 57–65

    Google Scholar 

  64. J. Niemelä (2000) ArticleTitleBiodiversity monitoring for decision-making Annales Zoologici Fennici 37 307–317

    Google Scholar 

  65. J. Niemelä D.J. Kotze S. Venn L. Penev I. Stoyanov J. Spence et al. (2002) ArticleTitleCarabid beetle assemblages (ColeopteraCarabidae) across urban–rural gradients: an international comparison Landscape Ecology 17 387–401

    Google Scholar 

  66. B.G. Norton (1998) ArticleTitleImproving ecological communication: the role of ecologists in environmental policy information Ecological Applications 8 350–364

    Google Scholar 

  67. P. Olsson C. Folke (2001) ArticleTitleLocal ecological knowledge and institutional dynamics for ecosystem management: a study of Lake Racken watershedSweden Ecosystems 4 85–104

    Google Scholar 

  68. Päivänen J. 1997. The South Coast of Espoo as a real estate product. In: Ilmonen M., Lankinen M., Lehtonen H., Maury J. and Päivinen J. (eds), How Do you Address Yourself? Spatial Differentiation in the Helsinki Region, English Summaries. Pääkaupunkiseudun julkaisusarja B 1997:2. YTV, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 170–171.

  69. M.J. Paul J.L. Meyer (2001) ArticleTitleStreams in an urban landscape Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32 333–365 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. S. Pauleit F. Duhme (2000) ArticleTitleAssessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning Landscape Urban Planning 52 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  71. S.T.A. Pickett W.R. Burch SuffixJr S. Dalton T. Foresman J. Grove R. Rowntree (1997) ArticleTitleA conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas Urban Ecosystems 1 185–199

    Google Scholar 

  72. S.T.A. Pickett M.L. Cadenasso J.M. Grove C.H. Nilon R.V. Pouyat W.C. Zipperer R. Costanza (2001) ArticleTitleUrban ecological systems: Linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32 127–157

    Google Scholar 

  73. C. Price (2003) ArticleTitleQuantifying the aesthetic benefits of urban forestry Urban Forest. Urban Greening 1 123–133

    Google Scholar 

  74. M. Redclift (1993) ArticleTitleSustainable development: Needs, values, rights Environmental Values 21 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  75. C.L. Redman (2003) Crossing the socio-ecological divide and urban land use patterns M. Dijst P. Schot K. de Jong (Eds) Framing Land Use Dynamics: Reviewed Abstracts of International Conference 16–18 April, 2003 Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht University UtrechtThe Netherlands 119–120

    Google Scholar 

  76. I. Scoones (1999) ArticleTitleNew ecology and the social sciences: what prospects for a fruitful engagement? Annual Review of Anthropology 28 479–507

    Google Scholar 

  77. Sievänen T. (ed) 2001. Luonnon virkistyskäyttö 2000. Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja 802 (in Finnish).

  78. H. Sukopp (1998) Urban ecology–scientific and practical aspects J. Breuste H. Feldman O. Uhlmann (Eds) Urban Ecology Springer-Verlag Berlin, Germany 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  79. H. Sukopp M. Numata A. Huber (Eds) (1995) Urban Ecology as the Basis for Urban Planning SPB Academic Publishing The HagueThe Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  80. B. Tress G. Tress H. Décamps A.-M. dȁ9Hauteserre (2001) ArticleTitleBridging human and natural sciences in landscape research Landscape Urban Planning 57 137–141

    Google Scholar 

  81. L. Tyrväinen (1997) ArticleTitleThe amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic pricing method Landscape Urban Planning 37 211–222

    Google Scholar 

  82. L. Tyrväinen H. Silvennoinen O. Kolehmainen (2003) ArticleTitleEcological and aesthetic values in urban forest management Urban Forest. Urban Greening 1 135–149

    Google Scholar 

  83. Vanclay F. 2002. Bringing SIA and HIA together for Human Impact Assessment. Conference on Human Impact AssessmentNational Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health (STAKES), 24 January 2002, HelsinkiFinlandJune 03, http://www.stakes.fi/sva/huia/seminar/vanclay.html.

  84. L.W. Vandruff D.L. Leedy F.W. Stearns (1995) Urban wildlife and human well-being H. Sukopp M. Numata A. Huber (Eds) Urban Ecology as the Basis for Urban Planning SPB Academic Publishing The HagueThe Netherlands 203–211

    Google Scholar 

  85. M. Wackernagel J.D. Yount (1998) ArticleTitleThe ecological footprint: an indicator of progress toward regional sustainability Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 51 511–529

    Google Scholar 

  86. InstitutionalAuthorNameWCED, The World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our Common Future Oxford University Press OxfordUK

    Google Scholar 

  87. J.R. Weber C.S. Word (2001) ArticleTitleThe communication process as evaluative context: What do nonscientists hear when scientists speak? BioScience 51 487–495

    Google Scholar 

  88. R. Westmacott (1991) ArticleTitleScale economics: ecological theory and planning practice in urban landscapes Landscape Urban Planning 21 21–29

    Google Scholar 

  89. R.R. White (2001) Sustainable development in urban areas: an overview D. Devuyst L. Hens W. De Lannoy (Eds) How Green is the City? – Sustainability Assessment and the Management of Urban Environments Columbia University Press New York 47–62

    Google Scholar 

  90. Ympäristöhallinto 2002. Suomi keskittyy taaja-asutusalueille (in Finnish). Alueidenkäyttö, June 03, http://www.vyh.fi/aluekayt/yhdysk/ykrak/taajaas.htm.

  91. W.C. Zipperer J. Wu R.V. Pouyat S.T.A. Pickett (2000) ArticleTitleThe application of ecological principles to urban and urbanizing landscapes Ecological Applications 10 685–688

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, FIN-00014, Finland

    Vesa Yli-Pelkonen & Jari Niemelä

Authors
  1. Vesa Yli-Pelkonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jari Niemelä
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vesa Yli-Pelkonen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yli-Pelkonen, V., Niemelä, J. Linking ecological and social systems in cities: urban planning in Finland as a case. Biodivers Conserv 14, 1947–1967 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-2124-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-2124-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation