Abstract
The study of ecological perturbation gradients provides a unique opportunity to investigate the utility of various biocomplexity indices. The ability of four measures of biocomplexity (quadratic entropy, taxonomic entropy, total complexity and total diversity) and their components to quantify the nature and degree of perturbation in plant communities was assessed by how closely each measure reflected the trends in biocomplexity that are expected to occur along a gradient of decreasing perturbation. The measures were applied to two landscapes, located near Sudbury, Canada and Harjavalta, Finland, perturbed by nickel–copper smelter emissions. Taxonomic entropy was determined to be the most useful of the four measures as it has a clear information-theoretical meaning, the relative contributions of classical diversity and taxonomic information can be easily isolated, and its computation is straightforward relative to the other measures. Additionally, it is relatively insensitive to community evenness, thereby rendering it less sample-size dependant and a more appropriate measure to use for comparisons between studies as well as for conservation and restoration purposes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
B.D. Amiro G.M. Courtin (1981) ArticleTitlePatterns of vegetation in the vicinity of an industrially disturbed ecosystemSudbury, Ontario Can. J. Bot. 59 1623–1639
M. Anand L. Orlóci (1996) ArticleTitleComplexity in plant communities: the notion and quantification J. Theor. Biol. 179 179–186 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jtbi.1996.0058
M. Anand L. Orlóci (2000) ArticleTitleOn hierarchical partitioning of an ecological complexity function Ecol. Modell. 132 51–62 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00304-5
M. Anand B.C. Tucker R. Desrochers (2002) Ecological monitoring of terrestrial ecosystem recovery from man-made perturbation: assessing community complexity C.A. Brebbia J.F. Martin-Duque (Eds) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Modelling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution WIT Press Southampton, UK 341–350
M. Anand K.M. Ma A. Okonski S. Levin D. McCreath (2003) ArticleTitleCharacterizing biocomplexity and soil microbial dynamics along a smelter-damaged landscape gradient Sci. Total Environ. 311 247–259 Occurrence Handle12826396 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00058-5 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXkvVWju7g%3D
M. Anand B.C. Tucker (2003) ArticleTitleDefining biocomplexity – an ecological perspective Comments Theor. Biol. 8 497–510 Occurrence Handle10.1080/08948550302432
S. Champely D. Chessel (2002) ArticleTitleMeasuring biological diversity using Euclidean metrics Environ. Ecol. Stat. 9 167–177 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1015170104476
K.R. Clarke R.M. Warwick (1998) ArticleTitleA taxonomic distinctness index and its statistical properties J. Appl. Ecol. 35 523–531 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.3540523.x
K.R. Clarke R.M. Warwick (1999) ArticleTitleThe taxonomic distinctness measure of biodiversity: weighting of step lengths between hierarchical levels Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 184 21–29
R.E. Desrochers M. Anand (2003) The use of taxonomic diversity indices in the assessment of perturbed community recovery C.A. Brebbia (Eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ecosystems and Sustainable Development WIT Press Southampton, UK 111–122
Desrochers R.E. and Anand M. From traditional diversity indices to taxonomic diversity indices. Int. J. Ecol. Environ. Sci.. in-press.
C.L. Dybas (2001) ArticleTitleFrom biodiversity to biocomplexity: a multidisciplinary step toward understanding our environment BioScience 51 426–430
B.J. Enquist J.P. Haskell B.H. Tiffney (2002) ArticleTitleGeneral patterns of taxonomic and biomass partitioning in extant and fossil plant communities Nature 419 610–613 Occurrence Handle12374977 Occurrence Handle10.1038/nature01069 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xns1Ontrg%3D
K.J. Gaston (1996) What is biodiversity? K.J. Gaston (Eds) Biodiversity: A Biology of Numbers and Differences Blackwell Science Ltd London, UK 1–9
J. Gunn W. Keller J. Negusanti R. Potvin P. Beckett K. Winterhalder (1995) ArticleTitleEcosystem recovery after emission reductions: Sudbury, Canada Water Air Soil Pollut. 85 1783–1788 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00477238 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK28Xit1eisL4%3D
J.M. Gunn (Eds) (1995) Restoration and Recovery of an Industrial Region: Progress in Restoring the Smelter-Damaged Landscape near Sudbury, Canada Springer-Verlag NY, USA
S.H. Hurlbert (1971) ArticleTitleThe nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters Ecology 52 577–586
J. Izsák L. Papp (1995) ArticleTitleApplication of the quadratic entropy indices for diversity studies of drosophilid assemblages Environ. Ecol. Stat. 2 213–224
J. Izsák L. Papp (2000) ArticleTitleA link between ecological diversity indices and measures of biodiversity Ecol. Modell. 130 151–156
J. Izsák L. Szeidl (2002) ArticleTitleQuadratic diversity: Its maximization can reduce the richness of species Environ. Ecol. Stat. 9 423–430
P. Koleff K.J. Gaston J.L. Lennon (2003) ArticleTitleMeasuring beta diversity for presence-absence data J. Animal Ecol. 72 367–382
R. Lande (1996) ArticleTitleStatistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities Oikos 76 5–13
R.R. Laxton (1978) ArticleTitleThe measure of diversity J. Theor. Biol. 70 51–67 Occurrence Handle625122 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-5193(78)90302-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaE1c7ht1KnsQ%3D%3D
J.M. Leverenz B.R. Cover (Eds) (1998) The New International Atlas: 25th Anniversary Edition Rand McNally & Company USA
A.E. Magurran (1988) Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ, USA
L. Orlóci (1991) Entropy and information. Ecological Computation Series NumberInSeriesVol. 3 SPB Academic Publishing The Hague, The Netherlands
L. Orlóci M. Anand V.D. Pillar (2002) ArticleTitleBiodiversity analysis: issues, concepts, techniques Commun. Ecol. 3 IssueID2 217–236
R.K. Peet (1974) ArticleTitleThe measurement of species diversity Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5 285–307 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001441
E. Pielou (1975) Ecological Diversity John Wiley & Sons Inc. Toronto, ON, Canada
C.R. Rao (1982) ArticleTitleDiversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approach Theor. Popul. Biol. 21 24–43 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0040-5809(82)90004-1
Rényi A. 1960. On measures of entropy and information. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 547–561.
C. Ricotta G.C. Avena (2003) ArticleTitleAn information-theoretical measure of taxonomic diversity Acta Biotheor. 51 IssueID1 35–41 Occurrence Handle12765251 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1023000322071 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3kt1ajtg%3D%3D
C. Ricotta (2003) ArticleTitleAdditive partition of parametric information and its associated β-diversity measure Acta Biothor. 51 IssueID2 91–100
M. Salemaa I. Vanha-Majamaa J. Derome (2001) ArticleTitleUnderstorey vegetation along a heavy-metal pollution gradient in SW Finland Environ. Pollut. 112 339–350 Occurrence Handle11291440 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0269-7491(00)00150-0 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXit12lurk%3D
K. Shimatani (2001) ArticleTitleOn the measurement of species diversity incorporating species differences Oikos 93 135–147 Occurrence Handle10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.930115.x
A. Solow S. Polasky J. Broadus (1993) ArticleTitleOn the measurement of biological diversity J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 24 IssueID1 60–68 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jeem.1993.1004
B.C. Tucker M. Anand (2003) ArticleTitleDetecting natural and pollution-induced forest gradients using matrix models Commun. Ecol. 4 89–100 Occurrence Handle10.1556/ComEc.4.2003.1.13
J.A. Veech K.S. Summerville T.O. Crist J.C. Gering (2002) ArticleTitleThe additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea Oikos 99 3–9 Occurrence Handle10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990101.x
R.M. Warwick K.R. Clarke (1995) ArticleTitleNew ‘biodiversity’ measures reveal a decrease in taxonomic distinctness with increasing stress Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 129 301–305
R.M. Warwick K.R. Clarke (1998) ArticleTitleTaxonomic distinctness and environmental assessment J. Appl. Ecol. 35 532–543 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.3540532.x
C.O. Webb D.D. Ackerly M.A. McPeek M.J. Donoghue (2002) ArticleTitlePhylogenies and community ecology Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33 475–505 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448
R.H. Whittaker (1960) ArticleTitleVegetation of the Siskiyou mountains, Oregon and California Ecol. Monogr. 30 279–338
R.H. Whittaker (1972) ArticleTitleEvolution and measurement of species diversity Taxon 21 213–251
M.V. Wilson A. Shmida (1984) ArticleTitleMeasuring beta diversity with presence-absence data J. Ecol. 72 1055–1064
K. Winterhalder (1996) ArticleTitleEnvironmental degradation and rehabilitation of the landscape around Sudbury, a major mining and smelting area NRC Environ. Rev. 4 IssueID3 185–224 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXjtFWgtA%3D%3D
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Desrochers, R.E., Anand, M. Quantifying the Components of Biocomplexity Along Ecological Perturbation Gradients. Biodivers Conserv 14, 3437–3455 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0549-7
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0549-7