Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 14, Issue 7, pp 1541–1582 | Cite as

Sacred groves of Manipur, northeast India:biodiversity value, status and strategies for their conservation

  • Ashalata Devi Khumbongmayum
  • M. L. Khan
  • R. S. Tripathi


The people of Manipur, a state in northeast India, follow ancestral worship and animism in the form of deity worship, with the central focus on worship in forest patches. The beliefs and taboos associated with the Sylvan deities (Umanglais) in the forest patches are restricted to any sort of disturbance of flora and fauna. These social boundaries help to conserve the entire organism as a whole, which stand the concept of sacred groves. The pleasing of deities is performed every year by the Meiteis, a dominant community of Manipur, in honour of the deities and to gain their favour. Indigenous cultural and rituals practices of the local people in sacred groves serve as a tool for conserving biodiversity. Sacred groves are distributed over a wide ecosystem and help in conservation of rare and endemic species. Well-preserved sacred groves are store houses of valuable medicinal and other plants having high economic value, and serve as a refuge to threatened species. One hundred and sixty-six sacred groves were inventoried in Manipur valley that comprises Imphal east, Imphal west, Thoubal and Bishnupur districts of the state. Detailed studies were carried out in four selected sacred groves, to know the importance of biodiversity status and vegetation characteristics. A total of 173 plant species representing 145 genera under 70 families were recorded through baseline floristic survey. The species diversity indices were compared among the four studied groves. The vegetation composition and community characteristics were recorded. Ethnobotanical uses of species were examined, which reveal that 96% of the species were used as medicine for the treatment of various ailments. Utilization of herbal medicine by the Meiteis is closely related to the cultural and ritual practices. A few of the medicinal plants which have disappeared from the locality are now confined only to the groves. Socio-cultural aspects were investigated taking into account the attitudes of local people, which indicate social beliefs and taboo are eroding, simultaneously degrading the degree of protection of sacred groves. Therefore, conservation measures of sacred groves need to be formulated considering the factor of degradation and the basic necessities of the local people. Until and unless a viable option is provided to the local people (especially those who habitat nearby the adjoining areas) for sustaining their economic condition, no step for conservation of biodiversity will be successful.


Biodiversity value Conservation status Manipur Sacred grove Socio-cultural aspects Tree diversity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Balasubramanyan, K., Induchoodan, N.C. 1996Plant diversity in sacred groves of KeralaEvergreen3634Google Scholar
  2. Basu, R. 2000Studies on Sacred Groves and Taboos in Purulia District of West BengalIndian Forester13091317Google Scholar
  3. Boojh, R., Ramakrishan, P.S. 1983

    Sacred Groves and their Role in Environmental Conservation

    Strategies for Environmental ManagementDepartment of Science and Environmental of Uttar PradeshLucknow68Souvenir Vol.
    Google Scholar
  4. Boraiah, K.T., Vasudeva, R., Shonil, A.B., Kushalapa, C.G. 2003Do informally managed sacred groves have higher richness and regeneration of medicinal plants than state-managed reserve forests?Current Science84804808Google Scholar
  5. Brandis, D. 1897Indian Forestry, WorkingOriental InstituteWorkingGoogle Scholar
  6. Burman, R.J.J. 1992The institution of sacred groveJournal of the Indian Anthropological Society27219238Google Scholar
  7. Denslow, J.S. 1980Patterns of plant species diversity during succession under different disturbance regimesOecologia461821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Devi, S. 2000Sacred groves of ManipurAbstractNational workshop on community strategies on the Management of Natural ResourcesBhopal, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  9. Gadgil, M., Vartak, V.D. 1975Sacred groves of India – a plea of the continuous conservationJournal of the Bombay Natural History Society72313320Google Scholar
  10. Gadgil, M., Vartak, V.D. 1976Sacred groves of Western Ghats of IndiaEconomic Botany30152160Google Scholar
  11. Hajra, P.K. 1975Law Lyngdoh (sacred groves), MawphlangGovernment of MeghalayaShillong, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  12. Haridasan, K., Rao, R.R. 1985Forest flora of MeghalayaBishen Singh and Mahendrapal SinghDehra DunGoogle Scholar
  13. Hughes D.J. and Chandran Subash M.D. 1997. Sacred Groves around the earth: an overview. Paper presented in the workshop on The role of sacred groves in conservation and management of Biological Resources, KFRI, Pechi.Google Scholar
  14. Jain, S.K., Rao, R.R. 1977A Handbook of Field and Herbarium MethodsToday and tomorrow’s printers and publishersNew DelhiGoogle Scholar
  15. Jamir, S.A., Pandey, H.N. 2002Status of biodiversity in the sacred groves of Jaintia Hills, MeghalayaIndian Forester128738744Google Scholar
  16. Khan, M.L., Menon, S., Bawa, K.S. 1997Effectiveness of the protected area network in biodiversity conservation: a case study of Meghalaya stateBiodiversity and Conservation6853868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khiewtam R.S. 1986. Ecosystem function of protected forests of Cherrapunji and adjoining area. PhD thesis, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India.Google Scholar
  18. Khiewtam, R.S., Ramakrishnan, P.S. 1989Socio-cultural studies of the sacred groves at Cherrapunji and adjoining areas in North-Eastern IndiaMan in India696471Google Scholar
  19. King-Oliver, I.E.D., Chitra, V., Narasimha, D. 1997Sacred groves: traditional ecological heritageInternational Journal of Ecological Environmental Science23463470Google Scholar
  20. Kosambi, D.D. 1962Myth and RealityPopular PressBombay, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumar M. and Swamy P.S. 2003. Tree diversity and regeneration status of six selected sacred groves in Tamil NaduSouth India. Paper presented in national seminar on Eco restoration, biodiversity conservation and sustainable development. 3–5 June 2003, Hostel Green Park, VisakhapatnamIndiap. 3.Google Scholar
  22. Kumar O. 1990. Floristic study of Tamenglong districtManipur with ethnobotanical notes. PhD thesis, Manipur University, Imphal, Manipur.Google Scholar
  23. Kushalapa, C.G., Bhagwat, S.A., Kushalapa, K.A. 2001

    Conservation and management of sacred groves of HodaguKarnatakaSouth India - a unique approach

    Ganeshaiah, K.N.Shaanker Uma, R.Bawa, K.S. eds. Tropical Ecosystems: StructureDiversity and Human WelfareOxford IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. LtdNew Delhi565569
    Google Scholar
  24. MAB 1995. Sacred places and vernacular conservation. MAB 23. UNESCO, Man and Biosphere ProgrammeParis, pp. 20–21.Google Scholar
  25. Menhinick, E.F. 1964A comparison of some species diversity indices applied to samples of field insectsEcology45859861Google Scholar
  26. Misra, R. 1968Ecology Work BookOxford and IBH publishing CompanyNew DelhiGoogle Scholar
  27. Pielou, E.C. 1969An Introduction to Mathematical EcologyWileyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Ramakrishan, P.S. 1996Conserving the sacred: from species to LandscapesNature Resources UNESCO321119Google Scholar
  29. Rodgers, W.A. 1994The sacred groves of MeghalayaMan in India74339348Google Scholar
  30. Shannon, C.I., Weiner, W. 1963The Mathematical Theory of CommunicationUniversity of Illinois PressUrbana111. USAGoogle Scholar
  31. Simpson, E.M. 1949Measurement of diversityNature163688Google Scholar
  32. Singh Nilakanta, E. 1961Lai Harouba in Marg143034Google Scholar
  33. Singh, B.H. 1996Plants used in medico-sexual purposes by the Meitei community in Manipur StateIndiaJournal Economic Taxonomy of Botany Additional Series12364366Google Scholar
  34. Singh R.N. 2001. Biodiversity mapping of sacred groves of Manipur with special references to conservation of few endangered tree species. PhD thesis, International Institute of Ecology and EnvironmentNew Delhi.Google Scholar
  35. Singh, H.B., Singh, R.S., Sandhu, J.S. 2003Herbal Medicine of Manipur A Colour EncyclopediaDaya publishing houseNew DelhiIndiaGoogle Scholar
  36. Singh, K.I., Singh, P.K., Singh, S.S. 2002An ethnobiological approach to the indigenous soaps and detergents of Meitei community of ManipurJournal Economic Taxonomy of Botany25547552Google Scholar
  37. Singh P.K. and Singh K.I. 2000. Traditional medicinal knowledge of Dog-Bite: need for documentation, conservation and research. Seminar on Ethnobotany Northeastern India: Pastpresent and future. Dept. of Forestry, North-Eastern Hill University, Mizoram Campus, pp. 6–17.Google Scholar
  38. Sinha, B., Maikhuri, R.K. 1998

    Conservation through ȁ8socio-cultural-religious practiceȁ9 in Garhwal Himalaya: a case study of Hariyali sacred groveȁ9

    Ramakrishan, P.S.Saxena, K.G.Chandrasekhar, U. eds. Conserving the Sacred: For Biodiversity ManagementUNESCO and Oxford IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. LtdNew Delhi289299
    Google Scholar
  39. Sinha, S.C. 1986Ethnobotanical study of ManipurManipur UniversityImphal, ManipurPhD thesisGoogle Scholar
  40. Sorensen, T. 1948A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species contentDet. Kong. Danske Vidensk, Selsk Biology Skr (Copenhagen)5134Google Scholar
  41. Sunitha, S., Rao, R.P.B. 1999

    Sacred groves in Kurnool DistrictAndhra Pradesh

    Sivadasan, M.Philip, Mathew eds. Biodiversity, Taxonomy and Conservation of Flowering PlantsMentor booksCalicut367373
    Google Scholar
  42. Tiwari, B.K., Barik, S.K., Tripathi, R.S. 1998Biodiversity valuestatus and strategies for conservation of sacred groves of MeghalayaIndia. Ecosystem Health42032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tiwari, B.K., Barik, S.K., Tripathi, R.S. 1999Sacred Forests of Meghalaya – Biological and Cultural Diversity. Regional CentreNational Afforestation and Ecodevelopment BoardNorth-Eastern Hill UniversityShillong120Google Scholar
  44. Totey, N.G., Verma, R.K. 1996Biodiversity conservationIndian Forester4710Google Scholar
  45. Tripathi, R.S. 2001

    Sacred groves: community biodiversity conservation model in north-east India

    Ganeshaiah, K.N.Shaanker Uma, R.Bawa, K.S. eds. Tropical ecosystems structurediversity and human welfare (Supplement)Proceedings of the International Conference on Tropical EcosystemsATREEBangalore104107
    Google Scholar
  46. Vartak, V.D., Gadgil, M. 1973Dev Rahati: an ethnobotanical study of the forests preserved on grounds of religious beliefsAbstractProceedings Indian Scientific Congress60341Google Scholar
  47. Vedaja, S. 1998Manipur Geography and Regional DevelopmentRajesh publicationsNew Delhi167Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashalata Devi Khumbongmayum
    • 1
  • M. L. Khan
    • 1
  • R. S. Tripathi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ForestryNorth Eastern Regional Institute of Science and TechnologyNirjuli (Itanagar)India
  2. 2.Department of BotanyNorth-Eastern Hill UniversityShillongIndia

Personalised recommendations