Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Viability of the Endangered Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax Population of Western France

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stochastic computer simulations are used to evaluate the sensitivity of Little bustard population parameters, estimating the survival probabilities of the seven endangered Little bustard populations of central-western France for which conservation actions are currentlybeing or have been implemented. Different scenarios of parameter compensation for those nuclei to establish parameter levels assuring population viability are discussed. Adult survival, productivity per female, initial population size and carrying capacity were the most sensitive parameters in a hypothetical, isolated population. Juvenile survival also affected population survival, although its sensitivity was lower. Sex ratio did not have a linear effect on population survival, but probability of extinction increased for extreme values. Productivity per female and initial population size, varied strongly among the populations studied, determining their average time of extinction and growth rate. When a metapopulation scenario was simulated, the survival probabilities of each population and the metapopulations stayed close to 1.0 if no mortality was associated to migration. When mortality during migration was included in the simulations, the metapopulation's probability of survival significantly decreased under 90%. This approach may help managers to correctly address conservation measures and design effective strategies, which should be directed mainly to improve productivity, enhance female survival, and minimise mortality during migration (e.g. promoting insect-rich nesting substrates, avoiding female killing and nest destruction at harvesting, reducing the risk of collision with powerlines, or controlling poaching).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.M. Boutin M. Métais (1995) L'outarde canepetière Eveil Editeur Saint-Yrieix

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.W. Bradbury S.L. Vehrencamp R.M. Gibson (1986) Leks and the unanimity of female choice P.J. Greenwood P.H. Harvey M. Slatkin (Eds) Evolution: Essays in Honor of John Maynard-Smith Cambridge University Press Cambridge 301–314

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheylan G. 1985. Le statut de la canepetié re en Provence. Alauda 53: 90–99.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clatton-Brock T.H. (ed.). 1988. Reproductive success. Studies of Individual Variation in Contrasting Breeding Systems. Chicago UP, Chicago.

  5. S. Cramp K.E.L. Simmons (Eds) (1980) The Birds of the Western Paleartic, Vol. II Oxford University Press London

    Google Scholar 

  6. O. Combreau J. Qiao M. Lawrence X. Gao J. Yao W. Yang F. Launay (2002) Breeding success in a Houbara bustard Chlamydotis [undulata] macqueenii population on the eastern fringe of the Jungar Basin, People's Republic of ChinaIbis 144 (on-line) E45–E56

    Google Scholar 

  7. Del Hoyo J., Elliott A. and Sargatal J. (eds) 1996. Handbook of the birds of the World. Vol. 3. Hoatzin to Auks. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.

  8. P. Goriup (1994) Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax G.M. Tucker M.F. Heath (Eds) Birds in Europe: Their Conservation Status Bird Life International Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Goriup L. Batten (1990) ArticleTitleThe conservation of steppic birds: a European prespective Oryx 24 215–223

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heath M. and Barggreve C. and Peet N. 2000. European Bird Populations: Estimates and Trends. Birdlife Conservation Series. Birdlife, Cambridge.

  11. J. Hellmich (1992) ArticleTitleImpact of pesticide use: a case study on Great Bustard Ardeola 39 7–22

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Höglund R.V. Alatalo (1995) Leks Princeton University Press Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Jiguet (2001) Defense des Ressources, Choix du Partenaire et Mecanismes de Formation des Leks chez l'Outarde Canepetière Université de Paris 6 Paris

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Jiguet (2002) ArticleTitleArthropods in diet of Little bustard Tetrax tetrax during the breeding season in western France Bird Study 49 105–109

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. Jiguet B. Arroyo V. Bretagnolle (2000) ArticleTitleLek mating systems: a case study in the Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax Behav. Process. 51 63–82 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00119-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Jiguet D. Ollivier (2002) ArticleTitleMale phenotypic repeatability in the threatened Little bustard Tetrax tetrax: a tool to estimate turnover and dispersal Ardea 90 43–50

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Jolivet (1996) ArticleTitleL'Outarde canepetiére Tetrax tetrax en déclin en France Situation en 1995. Ornithos. 3 73–77

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Jolivet (1997) ArticleTitleL'Outarde canepetiére Tetrax tetrax en France: le déclin s'accentue Ornitos 4 73–77

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Jolivet V. Bretagnolle (2002) ArticleTitleL'outarde canepetière en France: evolution récente des populations, bilan des measures de sauvegarde et perspectives d'avenir Alauda 70 93–96

    Google Scholar 

  20. P.A. Johnsgard (1983) The Grouse of the World University of Nebraska Press Lincoln, NE

    Google Scholar 

  21. R.C. Lacy A.H. Kimberly P.S. Miller (1995) Vortex: a stochastic simulation of the extinction process Version 7, User's Manual IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group Apple Valley, MNUSA

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Lecomte S. Voisin (1991) Dry grassland birds in France: status, distribution and conservation measures P.D. Goriup L.A. Batten J.A. Norton (Eds) The Conservation of Lowland Dry Grassland Birds in Europe Joint Nature Conservation Commitee Peterborough 59–68

    Google Scholar 

  23. Morales M.B. and Garcí a de la Morena E.L. 2001. Recherche des zones d’hivernage des outardes canepetié res franç aises hivernant en Espagne (hiver 2000–2001). Rapport, LPO/Life Nature/ Ministé re de l’Environment.

  24. M.B. Morales J.C. Alonso J.A. Alonso (2002) ArticleTitleProductivity and female individual breeding success in a Great bustard Otis tarda population Ibis 144 293–300 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1474-919X.2002.00042.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M.B. Morales C.A. Martín (2003) ArticleTitleOtis tarda Great Bustard BWP Update 4 217–232

    Google Scholar 

  26. I. Newton (1998) Population Limitation in Birds Academic Press London

    Google Scholar 

  27. Partridge L. and Endler J.A. 1987. Life history constraints on sexual selection. In: Bradbury J.W. and Andersson M.B. (eds), Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp. 265–277.

  28. M. Salamolard C. Moreau (1999) ArticleTitleHabitat selection by Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax in a cultivated area of France Bird Study 46 25–33

    Google Scholar 

  29. H. Schulz (1985) Grundlagenforschung zur Biologie der Zwergtrappe Tetrax tetrax Staatlichen Naturhistorischen Museum Braunschweig

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schulz H. 1987. Biologie et protection de l’Outarde Canepetié re Tetrax tetrax. Rapport de synthese d’un projecte de recherche des Communauté es Europeennes avec une bibliogaphie sur l’outarde canepetié re.

  31. G.M. Tucker (1991) The status of lowland dry grassland birds in Europe P.D. Goriup L.A. Batten J.A. Norton (Eds) The Conservation of Lowland Dry Grassland Birds in Europe Joint Nature Conservation Commitee Peterborough 37–48

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tucker G.M. and Heath M.F. 1994. Birds in Europe: their conservation status. Bird Life Conservation Series, 3, Cambridge.

  33. O. Von Frisch (1976) ArticleTitleZur Biologie der zwergtrappe (Tetrax Tetrax). Bonn Zool Beitr. 27 21–38

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wolf A. 2001. Chamgements agricoles et conservation de la grande avifaune de plaine: Etude des relations espè ce-habitats 'diferentes' chelles chez l’Outarde canepetiè re. PhD. Thesis, Université Montpellier II, Montpellier.

  35. A. Wolff J.P. Paul J.L. Martin V. Bretagnolle (2001) ArticleTitleThe benefits of extensive agriculture to birds: the case of the little bustard J. Appl. Ecol. 38 963–975 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00651.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel B. Morales.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morales, M., Bretagnolle, V. & Arroyo, B. Viability of the Endangered Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax Population of Western France. Biodivers Conserv 14, 3135–3150 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0382-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0382-z

Key words:

Navigation