Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 14, Issue 13, pp 3105–3125 | Cite as

Distribution and Conservation of Genetic Diversity Among UK Calcareous Grassland Regions: A Case Study Using Insects

Article

Abstract

Conservation strategies for whole communities at the landscape scale have rarely been able to take into account genetic diversity because of the number of species involved. However, if species can be grouped together by geographic distribution of genetic diversity and patterns of relatedness, then landscape and genetic conservation might be more effectively combined to cope with problems of fragmentation. We report on a study that measures how genetic diversity is distributed at national and regional scales in four unrelated species of calcareous grassland insects. Samples were obtained from sites within six UK calcareous grassland regions. Genetic diversity was measured using mtDNA sequencing (four species) and allozyme analysis (two of the four species). A striking difference in mtDNA diversity was found between the chrysomelid beetle Aphthona herbigrada (23 haplotypes; mean per region 5.5) and the cicadellid bug Batracomorphus irroratus (27 haplotypes; mean per region 6.2), with high haplotype richness, and the brown argus butterfly Aricia agestis (4 haplotypes; mean per region 1.7) and the cistus forester moth Adscita geryon (5 haplotypes; mean per region 2.4) with low. At the UK scale, patterns of diversity were species specific with no general conservation strategy emerging for the community. However, there was little differentiation among regions and any splitting into more than one management unit was not clearly justified, questioning whether distribution of genetic diversity should be a concern at this spatial scale.

Key words

Chalk grassland Conservation management Habitat fragmentation Invertebrate conservation Mitochondrial DNA Phylogeography 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aagaard, K., Hindar, K., Pullin, A.S., Christine, C.H., Hammarstedt, O., Balstad, T., Hanssen, O. 2002Phylogenetic relationships in brown argus butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Aricia) from north-western EuropeBiol. J. Linn. Soc.752737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arafeh, R.M.H., Sapir, Y., Shmida, A., Iraki, N., Fragman, O., Comes, H.P. 2002Patterns of genetic and phenotypic variation in Iris hayneiI. atrofusca (Iris sect. Oncocyclus = the royal irises) along and ecogeographical gradient in Israel and the West BankMol. Ecol.113953CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Avise, J.C. 1992Molecular population structure and the biogeographic history of a regional fauna: a case history with lessons for conservation biologyOikos636276Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Clarke, G.M., Oȁ9Dwyer, C. 2000Genetic variability and population structure of the endangered golden sun mothSynemon planaBiol. Conserv.92371381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 7.
    Crofts, A., Jefferson, R.G. 1999The Lowland Grassland Management Handbook2nd edEnglish Nature/The Wildlife TrustsUKGoogle Scholar
  6. 8.
    De Bruijin, M.H.L. 1983Drosophila melanogaster mitochondrial DNAa novel gene organisation and genetic codeNature304234241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 9.
    Excoffier L. 1993. http://anthropologie.unige.ch/LGB/softare/win/min-span-net/. Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    Frankham, R., Ballou, J.D., Briscoe, D.A. 2002Introduction to Conservation GeneticsCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. 11.
    Hansson, B., Westerberg, L. 2002On the correlation between heterozygosity and fitness in natural populationsMol. Ecol.1124672474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 12.
    Hewitt, G.M. 1999Post-glacial recolonisation of European BiotaBiol. J. Linn. Soc.6887112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 13.
    Hewitt, G.M. 2000The genetic legacy of quaternary ice agesNature405907913CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 14.
    Joyce, D.A., Pullin, A.S. 2001Phylogeography of the marsh fritillary Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in the UKBiol. J. Linn. Soc.72129141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 15.
    Joyce, D.A., Pullin, A.S. 2003Conservation implications of the distribution of genetic diversity at different scales: a case study using the marsh fritillary butterfly, Euphydryas auriniaBiol. Conserv.114453461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 16.
    Kimura, M. 1980A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequencesJ. Mol. Evol.16111120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 17.
    Kumar, S., Tamura, K., Nei, M. 2001MEGA: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 2.0. Institute of Molecular Evolutionary GeneticsThe Pennsylvania State UniversityPennsylvaniaUSAGoogle Scholar
  16. 18.
    Lande, R. 1988Genetics and demography in biological conservationScience24114551460PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 19.
    Le Quesne, W.J. 1965Handbooks for The Identification of British Insects Royal Entomological SocietyLondonGoogle Scholar
  18. 20.
    Mallet, J., Korman, A., Heckel, D.G., King, P. 1993Biochemical genetics of HeliothisHelicoverpa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and evidence for a founder event in Helicoverpa zeaAnn. Entomol. Soc. Am.86189197Google Scholar
  19. 21.
    Medeiros, R., Brito, C., Martins, A.M.F., Jordaens, K., Van Riel, P., De Wolf, H., Breugelmans, K., Backeljau, T. 2000Conservation genetics of the endemic Azorean slug Plutonia atlantica (MolluscaPulmonata)Biol. Conserv.937784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 22.
    Moritz, C. 1994Defining evolutionarily significant units for conservationTrends Ecol. Evol.9373375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 23.
    Moritz, C. 1995Uses of molecular phylogenies for conservationPhilos. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. B349113118Google Scholar
  22. 24.
    Nei, M. 1978Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individualsGenetics89583590Google Scholar
  23. 25.
    Nei, M. 1973Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populationsProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA7033213323PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 26.
    Pearson, D.L. 1994Selecting indicator taxa for the quantitative assessment of biodiversityPhilos. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. Ser. B3457579Google Scholar
  25. 27.
    Pullin, A.S. 2002Conservation BiologyCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. 28.
    Pywell, R.F., Bullock, J.M., Hopkins, A., Walker, K.J., Parks, T.M., Burke, M.W., Peel, S. 2002Restoration of species-rich grassland on arable land: assessing the limiting processes using a multi-site experimentJ. Appl. Ecol.39294309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 29.
    Reed, D.H., Frankham, R. 2003Correlation between fitness and genetic diversityConserv. Biol.17230237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 30.
    Richardson, B.J., Baverstock, P.R., Adams, M. 1986Allozyme Electrophoresis: A Handbook for Animal Systematics and Population StructureAcademic PressSydneyGoogle Scholar
  29. 31.
    Robinson, R.A., Sutherland, W.J. 2002Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great BritainJ. Appl. Ecol.39157176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 32.
    Schmitt, T., Seitz, A. 2002Influence of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of Ployommatus coridon (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): implications for conservationBiol. Conserv.107291297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 1001.
    Simon, C., Frati, F., Bechenback, A., Crespi, B., Liu, H., Flook, P. 1994Evaluation, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primerAnn. Entomol. Soc. Am.87651701Google Scholar
  32. 33.
    Simpson, G.G. 1949The Meaning of EvolutionColumbia University PressNew York, USAGoogle Scholar
  33. 34.
    Thomas, C.D., Bodsworth, E.J., Wilson, R.J., Simmons, A.D., Davies, Z.G., Musche, M., Conradt, L. 2001Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range marginsNature411 577581CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 35.
    Walsh, P.S., Metzger, D.A., Higuchi, R. 1991Chelex-100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic materialBiotechnique10506513PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 36.
    Yeh, F.C., Boyle, T.J. B. 1997Population genetic analysis of co-dominant and dominant markers and quantitative traitsBelgian J. Bot.129157Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BiosciencesThe University of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations