Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contrasting invasion histories and effects of three non-native fishes observed with long-term monitoring data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Boom-bust population dynamics are long-recognized phenomena during species invasions, but few studies documented impacts of these dynamic changes. The Florida Everglades is the largest wetland in the United States, is undergoing a multi-decade hydro-restoration effort, and has been invaded by several tropical freshwater fishes. We used a 26-year dataset of small native marsh fishes and decapods to assess potential effects of African Jewelfish (Hemichromis letourneuxi) invasion and compared their effects to those of a more recently invading species, Asian Swamp Eels (Monopterus albus/javanensis), and a long-established non-native species, Mayan Cichlids (Mayaheros urophthalmus). Unlike boom-bust dynamics of jewelfish, swamp eel abundance increased and stabilized over the course of this study. After accounting for effects of hydrologic variation, the densities of several native species were more reduced by either jewelfish or swamp eels than by native fish predators, while effects of Mayan Cichlids were similar to those of native fish predators. Impacts of the jewelfish boom in Shark River Slough were smaller (density reductions ≤ 50%) and more temporally limited than those of swamp eels, which produced near-complete loss of four species in Taylor Slough. Following the jewelfish bust, the density of affected species approximated pre-invasion predictions based on hydrology, but their recovery is now threatened by the subsequent invasion of swamp eels in Shark River Slough. Long-term monitoring data provide opportunities to probe for population-level effects at field scales, and indicate that impacts of non-native species can be context-dependent and vary across ecosystems and temporal scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are archived on the FIU Florida Coastal Everglades LTER website through the Environmental Data Initiative (https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/b5038017157f91ef92ff495dde6122b0).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the many technicians that have worked to collect and process the samples over the years. We also thank William F. Loftus, NPS and USGS (retired), and David Sikkema, NPS (retired), for supporting establishment and continuation of this long-term monitoring program. Collections were made most recently made under permits EVER-2022-SCI-0045 from Everglades National Park and S-22-01 from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Florida International University’s IACUC committee most recently approved this work under #IACUC-22-047. This is contribution number 1599 from the Institute of Environment at Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.

Funding

Data collection was supported by the Modified Water Deliveries project through a series of task agreements between Everglades National Park and Florida International University culminating in P21AC10856 under the South Florida and Caribbean Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit cooperative agreement P18AC00974, the Critical Ecosystem Studies Initiative and Everglades National Park base funding. This paper was developed in collaboration with the Florida Coastal Everglades Long-Term Ecological Research program under National Science Foundation grants nos. DEB-1237517 and DEB-2025954.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NJD, JLK, and JCT managed the project and data collection. MRP analyzed the data with input from NJD, JCT, and JLK. MRP led the writing of the manuscript and all authors contributed to revisions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew R. Pintar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1614 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pintar, M.R., Dorn, N.J., Kline, J.L. et al. Contrasting invasion histories and effects of three non-native fishes observed with long-term monitoring data. Biol Invasions 25, 3887–3903 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-023-03146-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-023-03146-9

Keywords

Navigation