This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Catford JA, Jansson R, Nilsson C (2009) Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Divers Distrib 15:22–40
Enders M, Hütt MT, Jeschke JM (2018) Drawing a map of invasion biology based on a network of hypotheses. Ecosphere 9(3):e02146
Havens K, Jolls CL, Knight TM, Vitt P (2019) Risks and rewards: assessing the effectiveness and safety of classical invasive plant biocontrol by arthropods. Bioscience 69(4):247–258
Heger T, Jeschke JM (2018) The hierarchy-of-hypotheses approach. In: Jeschke JM, Heger T (eds) Invasion biology: hypotheses and evidence. CABI, Wallingford, pp 14–18
Howarth FG (1983) Classical biological control: panacea or Pandora’s box? Proc Hawaiian Entomol Soc 24:239–244
Funding
The author declares no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest or competing interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simberloff, D. Concise, comprehensive reviews of how invasive plants interact with plants, animals, and microbes. Biol Invasions 24, 2635–2637 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02767-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02767-w