Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diverse native island flora shows rapid initial passive recovery after exotic herbivore removal on Santa Rosa Island, California

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Removing exotic vertebrates from islands is an increasingly common and potentially effective strategy for protecting biodiversity. Yet, surprisingly few studies evaluate large-scale effects of island removals on native plants. We surveyed 431 hectares of habitat in 7 canyons on Santa Rosa Island just after exotic herbivore control began (1994–1996), and again after two herbivore species had been eradicated and ~ 90% of herbivores removed (2010–2012). We searched for 68 endemic and/or rare native plant taxa, mapping and recording abundances for the 39 found. Initially most of these 39 species were absent from most canyons (79.9% species-canyon combinations). Nearly 35% of absences changed to presences by 2010–2012, while only 5.5% of presences changed to absences. Thirty-six of these 39 species increased in total area, and 38 increased in total abundance. Graminoids increased more and shrubs less than other life histories, for both apparent colonizations and abundances. Beta diversity and species turnover between canyons was high at both surveys. Although a diversity of the 39 located taxa showed substantial gains, nearly half remained uncommon in 2010–2012. These results reinforce the devastating effects of exotic vertebrate herbivores on island native plants, particularly long-lived, slow-growing species. They also demonstrate significant potential benefits of exotic herbivore removal even without other active restoration, not only for vegetative cover but for a number of rare taxa. Our surveys were more spatially extensive than most post-removal studies; high spatial turnover in these data suggests that larger-scale monitoring may be critical to capture full effects of exotic animal removal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data

All data are available as a geodatabase through the U. S. Geological Survey ScienceBase repository.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank participants in a 1993 National Park Service workshop with local expert botanists that selected target plants; S. Chaney, L. Johnson, and D. Rodriguez for help with project development and field support; and C. Schwemm, L. Dye, S. Bednar, and R. Rudolph for assistance with spatial databases and analyses. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Funding

Funding was provided by the U.S. National Park Service, the National Biological Survey, National Science Foundation grant DEB-0950106, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the W.M. Keck Science Department.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D. Thomson: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Project Administration, Writing- Original Draft Preparation. A. McEachern: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Project Administration, Writing- Reviewing and Editing. E. Schultz: Data Curation, Investigation, Supervision. K. Niessen: Data Curation, Investigation, Supervision. K. Chess: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology. D. Wilken: Investigation, Methodology. L. Chan: Data Curation, Investigation. J. Phillips: Data Curation, Investigation. R. Oliver: Data Curation, Investigation. A. Tucker. Data Curation, Investigation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diane M. Thomson.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest:

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report for this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 570 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomson, D.M., McEachern, A.K., Schultz, E.L. et al. Diverse native island flora shows rapid initial passive recovery after exotic herbivore removal on Santa Rosa Island, California. Biol Invasions 24, 1635–1649 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02735-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02735-4

Keywords

Navigation