Abstract
As a non-native species invades a new region, individuals at the range front are often characterised by differences in their traits and behaviours versus individuals in the established ‘core’ area. Here, differences in life history traits of invading pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus were assessed across a fine spatial scale in the Sarıçay Stream, Turkey, with seven locations sampled between their core area and the invasion front. Following genetic analyses that suggested the pumpkinseed all originated from the same founding population, life history trait analyses revealed pronounced differences between the sites at the core and front that were independent of environmental factors. Pumpkinseed in sites towards the invasion front were of relatively low abundance and displayed relatively high reproductive investment, with heavier gonads, higher fecundity and smaller eggs. They also had faster growth rates than pumpkinseed in sites towards the core of the invasion. The traits displayed by pumpkinseed at sites in the mid-range were intermediate between the extremes displayed by fish at core and frontal sites. These results suggested high plasticity in life history traits of these pumpkinseed across this fine-scale invasion gradient and was considered to be most likely due to responses to low intra-specific competition at the invasion front that had shifted selective pressures towards higher investment in somatic growth and reproduction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
References
Amundsen P-A, Salonen E, Niva T, Gjelland KØ, Præbel K, Sandlund OT, Knudsen R, Bøhn T (2012) Invader population speeds up life history during colonization. Biol Invasion 14:1501–1513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0175-3
Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR (2008) ‘PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods’. (PRIMER-E Ltd, Plymouth, UK)
Bagenal TB (1978) Aspects of fish fecundity. In: Bagenal TB (ed) Methods for assessment of fish production in fresh waters. IBH Handbook, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 75–101
Bagenal TB, Tesch FW (1978) Age and growth. In: Bagenal TB (ed) Methods for assessment of fish production in fresh waters. IBH Handbook, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 101–136
Baker HG (1965) Characters and modes of origins of weeds. In: Baker HG, Stebbins GL (eds) The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York, pp 147–172
Beamish R, McFarlane GA (1983) The forgotten requirement for age validation in fisheries biology. Trans Am Fish Soc 112:735–743. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659
Bertschy KA, Fox MG (1999) The influence of age-specific survivorship on pumpkinseed sunfish life histories. Ecology 80:2299–2313. https://doi.org/10.2307/176911
Bøhn T, Sandlund OT, Amundsen P, Primicerio R (2004) Rapidly changing life history during invasion. Oikos 106:138–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13022.x
Bossdorf O, Arcuri D, Richards CL, Pigliucci M (2010) Experimental alteration of DNA methylation affects the phenotypic plasticity of ecologically relevant traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evol Ecol 24:541–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-010-9372-7
Brandner J, Cerwenka AF, Schliewen UK, Geist J (2013) Bigger is better: characteristics of round gobies forming an invasion front in the Danube River. PLoS ONE 8(9):e73036. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073036
Britton JR, Harper DM, Oyugi DO (2010) Is the fast growth of an equatorial Micropterus salmoides population explained by high water temperature? Ecol Fresh Fish 19:228–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0633.2010.00407.x
Brownscombe JW, Fox MG (2012) Range expansion dynamics of the invasive round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) in a river system. Aquat Ecol 46(2):175–189. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2012.7.4.010
Chevin L, Lande R, Mace GM (2010) Adaptation, plasticity, and extinction in a changing environment: towards a predictive theory. Plos Biol 8(4):e1000357. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000357
Chuang A, Peterson CR (2016) Expanding population edges: theories, traits, and trade-offs. Glob Change Biol 22(2):494–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13107
Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2006) PRIMER v6: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UK
Copp GH, Fox MG (2007) Growth and life-history traits of introduced pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) in Europe, and the relevance to potential invasiveness. In: Gherardi F (ed) Biological invaders in inland wàters. Springer, Berlin, pp 289–306
Copp GH, Wesley KJ, Vilizzi L (2005) Pathways of ornamental and aquarium fish introductions into urban ponds of Epping Forest (London, England): the human vector. J Appl Ichthyol 21:263–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2005.00673.x
Crivelli AJ, Mestre D (1988) Life history traits of pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus introduced into the Camargue, a Mediterranean wetland. Arch Hydrobiol 111:449–466. Corpus ID: 89320711
Cucherousset J, Copp G, Fox MG, Sterud E, Kleef HH, Verreycken H, Zahorska E (2009) Life history traits and potential invasiveness of introduced pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus populations in northwestern Europe. Biol Invasions 11:2171–2180
DeMaster DP (1978) Calculation of the average age of sexual maturity in marine mammals. J Fish Res Board Can 35:912–915
Dominguez Almela V, Gillingham PK, Palmer SCF, Travis JM, Britton JR (2020) Integrating an individual-based model with approximate Bayesian computation to predict the invasion of a freshwater fish provides insights into dispersal and range expansion dynamics. Biol Invasions 22:1461–1480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-020-02197-6
Ercan D, Andreou D, Sana S, Öntaş C, Baba E, Top N, Karakuş U, Tarkan AS, Gozlan RE (2015) Evidence of threat to European economy and biodiversity following introduction of an alien pathogen on the fungal-animal boundary. Emerg Microbes Infect 4:e52. https://doi.org/10.1038/emi.2015.52
Farwell M, Fox MG, Moyes CD, Burness G (2007) Can hypoxia tolerance explain differences in distribution of two co-occurring north temperature sunfishes? Environ Biol Fish 78:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-006-9079-3
Fox MG, Copp GH (2014) Old world versus new world: life-history alterations in a successful invader introduced across Europe. Oecologia 174(2):435–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2776-7
Fox MG, Vila-Gispert A, Copp GH (2007) Life-history traits of introduced Iberian pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus relative to native populations. Can differences explain colonization success? J Fish Biol 71:56–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01683.x
Francis RICC (1990) Back-calculation of fish length: a critical review. J Fish Biol 36:883–902. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1990.tb05636.x
García-Berthou E, Moreno-Amich R (2000) Food of introduced pumpkinseed sunfish: ontogenetic diet shift and seasonal variation. J Fish Biol 57:29–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb00773.x
García-Berthou E, Alcaraz C, Pou-Rovira Q, Zamora L, Coenders G, Feo C (2005) Introduction pathways and establishment rates of invasive aquatic species in Europe. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:453–463. https://doi.org/10.1139/f05-017
Grabowska J, Tarkan AS, Błońska D, Top Karakuş N, Janic B, Przybylski M (2021) Prolific pioneers and reserved settlers. Changes in the life-history of the Western tubenose goby (Proterorhinus semilunaris) at different invasion stages. Sci Total Environ 750: 142316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142316
Gutowsky LF, Fox MG (2012) Intra-population variability of life-history traits and growth during range expansion of the invasive round goby Neogobius Melanostomus. Fish Manag Ecol 19(1):78–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2400.2011.00831.x
Hickley P, Dexter FK (1979) A comparative index of quantifying growth in length of fish. Aquac Res 10:147–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.1979.tb00270.x
Hudina S, Hock K, Žganec K, Lucić A (2012) Changes in population characteristics and structure of the signal crayfish at the edge of its invasive range in a European river. Ann Limnol-Int J Lim 48:3–11. https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2011051
Knaepkens G, Knapen D, Hanfling B, Verheyen E, Eens M (2002) Genetic diversity and condition factor: a significant relationship in Flemish but not in German populations of the European bullhead (Cottus gobio L.). Heredity 89:280–287. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800133
Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2002) Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233–1236. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1075753
Konečná M, Janáč M, Roche K, Jurajda P (2015) Variation in life-history traits between a newly established and long-established population of non-native pumpkinseed, Lepomis gibbosus (Actinopterygii: Perciformes: Centrarchidae). Acta Ichthyol Piscat 45(4):385–392. https://doi.org/10.3750/AIP2015.45.4.06
Le Cren ED (1951) The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). J Anim Ecol 20:201–219. https://doi.org/10.2307/1540
Liebl AL, Schrey AW, Richards CL, Martin LB (2013) Patterns of DNA methylation throughout a range expansion of an introduced songbird. Integr Comp Biol 53:351–358. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/ict007
Ling SD, Johnson CR, Frusher S, King CK (2008) Reproductive potential of a marine ecosystem engineer at the edge of a newly expanded range. Glob Chang Biol 14:907–915. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01543.x
Maes L (1898) Notes sur la peˆche fluviale et maritime en Belgique. Administration des Easux et Forets. Imprimerie Scientifique. Bruxelles, Belgium
Masson L, Brownscombe JW, Fox MG (2016) Fine scale spatio-temporal life history shifts in an invasive species at its expansion front. Biol Invasions 18(3):775–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-1047-4
Messager ML, Olden JD (2019) Phenotypic variability of rusty crayfish (Faxonius rusticus) at the leading edge of its riverine invasion. Freshw Biol 64:1196–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13295
Moyle PB, Light T (1996) Biological invasions of fresh water: Empirical rules and assembly theory. Biol Conserv 78:149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(96)00024-9
Murphy BR, Willis DW (1996) Fisheries techniques. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD, p 732
Nolan ET, Britton JR (2019) Spatial variability in the somatic growth of pikeperch Sander lucioperca, an invasive piscivorous fish. Ecol Freshw Fish 28:330–340
Paton RA, Gobin J, Rooke AC, Fox MG (2019) Population density contributes to the higher functional response of an invasive fish. Biol Invasions 21:1737–1749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-019-01931-z
Perkins AT, Phillips BL, Baskett ML, Hastings A (2013) Evolution of dispersal and life history interact to drive accelerating spread of an invasive species. Ecol Lett 16:1079–1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12136
Phillips BL (2009) The evolution of growth rates on an expanding range edge. Biol Lett 5(6):802–804. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0367
Ribeiro F, Elvira B, Collares-Pereira MJ, Moyle PB (2008) Life-history traits of non-native fishes in Iberian watersheds across several invasion stages: a first approach. Biol Invasions 10(1):89–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9112-2
Roff DA (1992) The evolution of life histories. London, Chapman & Hall
Top N (2012) Bio-ecological features of exotic Lepomis gibbosus (Linneaeus, 1758) (pumpkinseed) in Sarıçay stream. Dissertation, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University
Top N, Tarkan AS, Vilizzi L, Karakuş U (2016) Microhabitat interactions of non-native pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus in a Mediterranean-type stream suggest no evidence for impact on endemic fishes. Knowl Manag Aquat Ec 417:36. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2016023
Trippel EA, Harvey HH (1987) Reproductive responses of five white sucker (Catostomus commersoni) populations in relation to lake acidity. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 44:1018–1023. https://doi.org/10.1139/f87-119
Vilizzi L, Copp GH, Britton JR (2013) Age and growth of European barbel Barbus barbus (Cyprinidae) in the small, mesotrophic River Lee and relative to other populations in England. Knowl Manag Aquat Ec 9:409. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2013054
Walford LA (1946) A new graphic method of describing the growth of animals. Biol Bull 90:141–147. https://doi.org/10.2307/1538217
Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PDN (2005) DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philos Trans Royal Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 360:1847–1857. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1716
Weiss-Lehman C, Hufbauer RA, Melbourne BA (2017) Rapid trait evolution drives increased speed and variance in experimental range expansions. Nat Commun 8:14303. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14303
Williamson M (1999) Invasions. Ecography 22:5–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00449.x
Winemiller KO, Rose KA (1992) Patterns of life-history diversification in North American fishes: implications for population regulation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:2196–2218. https://doi.org/10.1139/f92-242
Wolfram-Wais A, Wolfram G, Auer B, Mikschi E, Hain A (1999) Feeding habits of two introduced fish species (Lepomis gibbosus, Pseudorasbora parva) in Neusiedler See (Austria), with special reference to chironomid larvae (Diptera: Chironomidae). Hydrobiologia 408(409):123–129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017014130103
Wootton RJ (1990) Ecology of Teleost Fishes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London
Zięba G, Vilizzi L, Copp GH (2020) How likely is Lepomis gibbosus to become invasive in Poland under conditions of climate warming? Acta Ichthyol Piscat 50:37–51. https://doi.org/10.3750/AIEP/02390
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by The Scientific & Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) (Project No: 115Y660).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tarkan, A.S., Karakuş, U., Top-Karakuş, N. et al. Invasion of pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus is facilitated by phenotypic plasticity across its invasion gradient. Biol Invasions 23, 3201–3214 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-021-02574-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-021-02574-9