The invasive red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) increases infection of the amphibian chytrid fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis)

Abstract

Emerging infectious diseases are increasingly recognized as a severe threat to wildlife. Chytridiomycosis, caused by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), is considered one of the most important causes for the decline of amphibian populations worldwide. Identifying potential biological reservoirs and characterizing the role they can play in pathogen maintenance is not only important from a scientific point of view, but also relevant from an applied perspective (e.g. disease control strategies), especially when worldwide distributed invasive species are involved. We aimed (1) to analyse the prevalence and infection intensity of Bd in the invasive red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) across the western Andalusian region in Spain; and (2) to assess whether the presence of crayfish affects the prevalence and infection intensity of Bd in amphibians of Doñana Natural Space (DNS), a localized highly protected area within the Andalusian region. First, we found that infection prevalence in crayfish guts was 1.5% regionally (four out of 267 crayfish were qPCR positive to Bd, all of them belonging to the same Andalusian population); qPCR positives were histologically confirmed by finding zoosporangia of Bd in gastrointestinal walls of the red swamp crayfish. Second, we found a higher prevalence of Bd infection in DNS (19% for crayfish and 28% for amphibians on average), a place with great diversity and abundance of amphibians. Our analyses showed that prevalence of Bd in amphibians was related to the presence of the red swamp crayfish, indicating that this crayfish could be a suitable predictor of Bd infection in co-occurring amphibians. These results suggest that the red swamp crayfish might be a possible reservoir for Bd, representing an additional indirect impact on amphibians, a role that had not been previously recognised in its invasive range.

Introduction

Globalized infectious diseases, particularly fungal pathogens, are one of the greatest threats to wildlife (Fisher et al. 2012). Amphibians are the most threatened vertebrates globally, being highly susceptible to climatic change, habitat fragmentation and overexploitation (Stuart et al. 2004). Moreover, they are affected by the most devastating panzootic so far, amphibian chytridiomycosis, which is closely related to amphibian declines (Voyles et al. 2009; GISD 2018; Scheele et al. 2019). The amphibian-killing pathogen, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (hereafter “Bd”), infects keratinizing epithelial cells in amphibian skin (Berger et al. 1998; van Rooij et al. 2015), causing osmotic damage and often death (Daszak et al. 2003; Voyles et al. 2009). The Bd pathogen is considered as one of the 100 worst invasive species worldwide (GISD 2018), whose origin has been recently attributed to Asia, and the pathways of its spread at the global scale are mainly linked to amphibian pet trade (O’Hanlon et al. 2018). Global trade is also resulting in the evolution of further hypervirulent fungal lineages across a diverse range of host species and biomes (Farrer et al. 2011).

Because pathogenicity of Bd is temperature-dependent, prevalence of Bd is usually higher in early spring and lower in late summer or autumn (Kriger and Hero 2007), which affects the temporal patterns of exposure (Walker et al. 2010; Xie et al. 2016). The highest rate of Bd-infection often coincides with the breeding season of many amphibian species during winter, making them more vulnerable (Gervasi et al. 2017). However, viability of the Bd pathogen decreases through the seasons in areas where water temperature rises over 30 °C and waterbodies dry up during the dry season (Piotrowski et al. 2004; Doddington et al. 2013). Thus, amphibians with a highly variable response to different levels of infection can be reservoirs of Bd, maintaining this pathogen in the environment (Woolhouse et al. 2001; Gervasi et al. 2017; Brannelly et al. 2018). Others have hypothesized on the saprophytic feeding of Bd, which is able to live without an amphibian host (Speare et al. 2001). In addition, in spite of being an amphibian fungal disease, there is increasing interest in evaluating the potential role of non-amphibian species, which co-occur in aquatic ecosystems, as reservoirs or carriers of chytridiomycosis (van Rooij et al. 2015). Identification of potential reservoirs and characterization of the role they play in Bd maintenance and disease dynamics is not only important from an evolutionary perspective, but can also provide important insights on disease control strategies.

The red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii), native to north-eastern Mexico and south-central US, has been intentionally introduced worldwide, becoming one of the most widespread crayfish in the world (Oficialdegui et al. 2019). Over the last 45 years, southern European fresh waters have been widely invaded (Kouba et al. 2014), causing, among others, dramatic declines of many amphibian populations and negatively impacting their community structure (Ficetola et al. 2012), with an important decrease in amphibian richness (Cruz et al. 2006). The recent finding that the red swamp crayfish and other crayfish species can become infected by Bd in their native range (Louisiana, US), and potentially transmit infection to amphibians (McMahon et al. 2013; Brannelly et al. 2015a; but see Brannelly et al. 2015b), suggests the need for evaluating the role of invasive crayfish as carriers of the amphibian fungus in its invaded range. This is especially important in places where crayfish species are particularly prolific and colonize a wide range of aquatic environments where amphibians occur (GISD 2018).

The red swamp crayfish is especially abundant in the southern part of the Iberian Peninsula, including the Doñana Natural Space (DNS), a highly protected area located in western Andalusia where the conservation value of ponds for amphibians and other aquatic fauna and flora has been highlighted by many studies (Gómez-Rodríguez 2009; Díaz-Paniagua et al. 2010). Due to its commercial value, humans have intentionally translocated the red swamp crayfish among water bodies, promoting its rapid colonization across Europe (Oficialdegui et al. 2019). Thus, studies evaluating the role of the red swamp crayfish as potential reservoir in this area are of particular interest, as crayfish may rapidly disperse Bd over long distances and contribute to the global Bd pandemic in Europe. We conducted a study to explore these questions that comprised two sections. The first one was a regional survey across the western Andalusian region, with the goal of assessing the prevalence of infection and infection intensity of Bd in the red swamp crayfish in Andalusian streams and ponds (i.e. crayfish infection survey). The second one was a specific sampling in a localized area within the Andalusia region, DNS, which is particularly rich in amphibian populations where Bd had been circulating through the environment (Hidalgo-Vila et al. 2012); our aim was determining whether Bd infection prevalence and intensity in amphibians was positively related to the presence of the red swamp crayfish in ponds (i.e. crayfish/amphibian interaction).

Methods

Study area

In the crayfish infection survey, we sampled 11 streams of the provinces of Seville, Cadiz and Huelva, in western Andalusia (South-western Spain) and three ponds within DNS (Fig. 1A, see Table 1). The region is dominated by the Guadalquivir basin and characterized by a Mediterranean climate, with a long dry summer season, mean annual temperatures between < 10 and 18 °C, and mean altitude of 200 m asl. Most streams in this Mediterranean region are intermittent, where streams have little flow during the wet season and water remains in puddles along the stream during the dry season. Subsequently, for the study of crayfish/amphibian interaction, we sampled six different ponds in DNS in order to analyse the prevalence and infection intensity of Bd in relation to the presence of the red swamp crayfish (Fig. 1B). The DNS, situated in the mouth of the Guadalquivir River, comprises the Doñana Natural Park and the Doñana National Park, and is considered one of the largest and most important wetlands of Europe. It has been declared a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve, a Ramsar site, a Natural World Heritage Site, and part of the Natura 2000 network (see e.g. García-Novo and Marín-Cabrera 2005). As other very scarce Mediterranean temporary ponds, this system of more than 3000 water bodies that integrate DNS is considered a priority habitat under the European Union Habitats Directive (Code 3170: European Commission DG Environment 2007).

Fig. 1
figure1

A Map of the study area showing crayfish sampling points in streams of three provinces in western Andalusia (“HUE” Huelva, “SEV” Seville and “CAD” Cadiz). Black spots indicate locations with Bd- and the black triangle shows the only Bd+ location (see sites in Table 1). Area depicted by a square indicates the localized highly protected area of Doñana Natural Space (DNS) and greys represent the Doñana Natural Park (light grey) and Doñana National Park (dark grey). B Protected areas of Doñana Natural Space (Doñana Natural Park and Doñana National Park). Sampling sites with crayfish (black squares) and ponds without crayfish (black triangles) are numerated as follows: (1) ANS, (2) OLL, (3) PAJ, (4) TAR, (5) ZAH, and (6) PDR (see Table 2 for details). Dark grey patches depict temporary ponds and grey circles depict permanent water bodies

Table 1 Red swamp crayfish sampling in streams and ponds of western Andalusia, Spain, in 2015

Sample collection

To address the first objective, adults of the red swamp crayfish were collected during late spring and early summer of 2015 from 14 sites distributed across the western Andalusian region in Spain (Fig. 1A, Table 1). For most sampling sites, 20 crayfish were captured using fyke nets (Table 1), subsequently euthanized by decapitation, and their gastrointestinal (GI) tracts were removed. Samples were fixed in 70% ethanol and maintained in the refrigerator until laboratory analysis. For the second objective, sampling was performed in six ponds of DNS in early spring of 2018 (Fig. 1B, Tables 2 and 3). While crayfish were processed as for the first objective, amphibians were captured by hand nets and skin swabs were collected by gently rubbing a sterile cotton-tipped swab along their entire body. Subsequently, swabs were kept in Eppendorf vials with a drop of pure ethanol and maintained in the refrigerator until qPCR analysis.

Table 2 Red swamp crayfish and amphibian sampling in six ponds of Doñana Natural Space (south-western Spain) in 2018
Table 3 The seven amphibian species sampled in Doñana Natural Space in 2018. Life stage is represented by juveniles (J) and adults (A)

Real-time PCR TaqMan assay for Bd-quantification

In the laboratory, to ensure no contamination between samples, we used disposable blades to dissect the GI tract from each crayfish. In order to avoid contamination by amphibian tissue inside the GI tissue of crayfish (i.e. in case crayfish had fed on infected amphibians), the sample was washed twice with deionized pressure water. By using PrepMan Ultra Sample Preparation Reagent (Applied Biosystems), we extracted DNA from a small part of the GI tract of crayfish, and from swabs for amphibians. We quantified Bd DNA from GI tracts of crayfish and swabs using standard real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) procedures (Boyle et al. 2004). Amplifications were carried out in a 15 μl volume reaction, which included a Bd-specific TaqMan probe (Chytr MGB) for the quantification of zoospore equivalents (ZE). We included amplification standards of 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 zoospore equivalents (ZE, where one ZE is equivalent to a single zoospore) prepared from an isolate of known cell density (IA042, Spain) and a negative control in each plate. All samples, diluted (1/10), standards and the negative control were analysed in duplicate. We considered Bd positive samples if both replicates resulted positive and the amplification curves had the expected sigmoidal shape (otherwise, a 1/100 dilution was made to prevent inhibition problems). In case of contradictory results, the sample was repeated a third time. Infection intensity was reported in zoospore equivalents (ZE) and log-transformed values to show results in graphs. We considered ZE values of 0.1 (Cycle Threshold, CT < 37.0) or higher as positive for infection. Infection intensities are reported as the mean and standard error, unless otherwise noted.

Histological analyses

Only crayfish samples that were determined Bd positive by qPCR in the first objective (crayfish infection survey) were confirmed histologically. Samples were fixed in neutral buffered 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin and sectioned, before being stained with haematoxylin and eosin using routine methods (Drury nd Wallington 1980).

Statistical analyses

While the prevalence of Bd+ and infection intensity was only calculated in crayfish for the crayfish infection survey, we calculated the prevalence of Bd+ and infection intensity in both crayfish and amphibians for the crayfish/amphibian interaction. For both objectives, we calculated prevalence as the proportion of Bd+ with respect to the total number of sampled individuals (crayfish and amphibians), and infection intensity was calculated as Bd load [log10 (Bd load + 1)] in each sample. In our models, we aimed to analyse whether the presence of crayfish could have an effect on the prevalence and infection intensity of Bd in amphibians. To do that, we pooled all amphibian species (see Table 3 for species sampled) and both sexes to increase sample size. As we captured sub-adults (non-mature phase) and adults, we used life stage as independent variable to control for different time of permanence in the water. Thus, we analysed the effects of presence/absence of crayfish, pond and amphibian life stage (sub-adults and adults) on the prevalence of infection and infection intensity of amphibians. We used a Generalized Linear Model (GLM) with a binomial distribution to analyse the prevalence of infection and, in a second analysis only with Bd+-amphibians, we used a linear model to analyse the infection intensity in amphibians from ponds in the localized protected area (DNS). The factor “pond” was nested within the factor “presence of crayfish in each pond”; both factors were included in the model because one level of the factor “pond” could not combine presence and absence of crayfish at the same time but ponds could differ in infection intensity. Normality of the residuals of both models was visually inspected and they did not differ from normality. All analyses were performed with JMP 12 software (SAS Inc.).

Results

Crayfish infection survey

Only four crayfish out of 267 were positive to Bd, which means a total prevalence of 1.5% (95% CI 0.4–3.8). All Bd+-individuals were found in one population, Olivargas stream (site 9, Fig. 1A), where the prevalence reached 20% (95% CI 5.7–43.7) and average infection intensity was 4.1 ± 1.2 ZE (Table 1). After detecting qPCR Bd+, histological analyses confirmed the presence of zoosporangia in all four infected GI walls of the red swamp crayfish (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Section of GI tissue from one adult Bd+ red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, at different scales. Black arrows point out two different zoosporangia containing zoospores of Bd. A The two zoosporangia at 50 μm; B the two zoosporangia at 20 μm; C one of the two zoosporangia at 10 μm; and D the other zoosporangium at 10 μm

Crayfish/amphibian interaction

We sampled six different ponds (Fig. 1B) and captured a total of 37 crayfish and 165 amphibians of seven different species. A total of seven crayfish were qPCR-positive for Bd infection in their GI walls, which means a prevalence of 18.9% (95% CI 8.0–35.2), and average infection intensity was 6.0 ± 2.0 ranging from 0.6 to 13.5 ZE. On the other hand, a total of 46 amphibians of three species (Triturus pygmaeus, Pleurodeles waltl and Pelophylax perezi) were qPCR positive for Bd infection (Table 3), reaching an average prevalence of 27.6% (95% CI 21.2–35.4) and average infection intensity was 1.9 ± 0.6 ranging from 0.1 to 68.0 ZE (Table 2). Except for P. perezi, the other two species were widely represented in our samples. We rarely found positives in anurans (one individual of P. perezi) with prevalence of infection of 2.4% (95% CI 0.1–12.6) on average. However, the prevalence of infection in urodelans was of 36.6% (95% CI 28.1–45.7), being the prevalence within species of 35.1% (95% CI, 24.5 – 46.8) for T. pygmaeus and 39.1% (95% CI 28.1–45.7) for P. waltl (Table 3).

Our generalized linear model (binomial distribution) explained a 20.6% of total variance (generalized adjusted R2) for the prevalence of infection. The prevalence of Bd in amphibians was affected by the presence of crayfish (χ2 = 28.5, p < 0.0001), the pond (χ2 = 8.8, p = 0.0121) and life stage of amphibians (χ2 = 4.8, p = 0.0280) (Fig. 3A). However, Bd infection intensity in amphibians was significantly affected by pond (F = 2.90, df = 4.45, p = 0.0342), but not by the presence of crayfish in the pond (F = 1.83, df = 1.45, p = 0.1838) or life stage (F = 1.23, df = 1.45, p = 0.2737) (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3
figure3

A Prevalence and B infection intensity of Bd in amphibian species from six sampled ponds in Doñana Natural Space. The grey area includes ponds with presence of the red swamp crayfish. In Fig. 3A, while the number of Bd-negative are depicted in white bars, Bd-positive amphibians are depicted in black bars

Discussion

Identification of non-amphibian hosts is crucial to understand the virulence, distribution, spread and persistence of Bd in aquatic ecosystems worldwide. McMahon et al. (2013) observed encystment of Bd within GI tracts of the red swamp crayfish from Louisiana, the native area of this species. Importantly, our study confirmed the histological evidence of Bd embedded within GI tracts of the red swamp crayfish in its invaded range, indicating that the red swamp crayfish could be a potential carrier of this disease wherever it invades. The presence of the red swamp crayfish could thus imply, besides a predatory effect on amphibians, an indirect effect through the transmission of Bd, promoting the decline of amphibians in Europe or elsewhere. Our results indicated that the prevalence of Bd-infection in amphibians was high when the red swamp crayfish co-occurred in the same pond and, to a lesser extent, showed effects of pond (site) and amphibian life stage, being the sub-adult stage more susceptible to be Bd positive. For infection intensity we only found a slight effect of pond, but other non-tested variables (e.g. environmental variables or amphibian densities) could alter the infection intensity in amphibians. Therefore, our results suggest that non-amphibian species, and the presence of red swamp crayfish in particular, could play a crucial role in maintaining and spreading chytridiomycosis in amphibians.

Due to its great impact on amphibians, chytridiomycosis is considered the worst infectious disease in vertebrates (Gascon et al. 2007; GISD 2018). Sudden high mortality rates in several amphibian species have been related to this emerging panzootic infectious disease in the last decades (Berger et al. 1998; Bosch et al. 2001; Daszak et al. 2003; Bosch and Martínez-Solano 2006; Skerratt et al. 2007; Scheele et al. 2019). In Andalusian streams, we found a Bd prevalence of 1.5% in wild red swamp crayfish, which was similar to that found in a previous study in its native area (3.3% in the wild during spring) (Brannelly et al. 2015a). On the other hand, the red swamp crayfish in the localized highly protected area (DNS) showed a total prevalence of 18.9% (seven out of 37 sampled crayfish). Although our sampling size was too low to draw firm conclusions, it seems to exist a tendency to a higher prevalence of Bd in DNS compared to those from waterbodies across western Andalusia. It is well known that the infection of Bd is context-dependent on the amphibian host (Scheele et al. 2017), the fungal virulence (Fisher et al. 2009), and environmental determinants such as temperature, altitude, seasonality and/or rainfall (Berger et al. 2004; Kriger and Hero 2007; Walker et al. 2010; Doddington et al. 2013; Ruggeri et al. 2018). As presence of Bd is higher at low temperatures (Berger et al. 2004), spatial differences in Bd prevalence found between sampled areas (streams regionally and localized protected area) could be rather due to the sampling timing because crayfish across western Andalusia were sampled in late spring whereas those in DNS were sampled in early spring, the latter favouring Bd positives. In fact, all crayfish sampled within DNS in late spring (when water temperature can exceeded 25 °C) were Bd negatives. But also, the great diversity and abundance of amphibian species in DNS (Díaz-Paniagua et al. 2006) could facilitate that this disease remains in the environment over time, because amphibians vary greatly in their susceptibility to Bd (Scheele et al. 2017). We found relatively high prevalence of Bd in some ponds of DNS but no signs of chytridiomycosis in amphibian specimens and, as far as we know, no massive mortalities of amphibians have been detected in the area (Hidalgo-Vila et al. 2012). Lower infection intensity of Bd found in amphibians [reaching a maximum load of 68.0 ZE in one specimen of P. waltl, which is far from the threshold of ~ 10,000 ZE to observe mass mortalities (Vredenburg et al. 2010)], could explain why the chytrid fungus is present in the area since long without relevant mass mortalities (Hidalgo-Vila et al. 2012). Another possible factor is related to the virulence of Bd, which depends on each strain (Dang et al. 2017); however, nothing is known on which chytrid fungus strain is present in DNS.

Although some factors affecting Bd dynamics have been well studied (see paragraph above), how the fungus can be maintained in the environment remains less known. Some amphibian species, or some individuals within a species, may function as reservoirs of Bd since they are not highly susceptible to infection in spite of harbouring the pathogen and transmitting it to others (van Rooij et al. 2015; Scheele et al. 2017; Brannelly et al. 2018). But other studies in addition to ours have demonstrated infections of Bd in non-amphibian taxa such as reptiles (Kilburn et al. 2011), waterfowl (Garmyn et al. 2012; Johnson and Speare 2005), fish (Liew et al. 2017) and crayfish (McMahon et al. 2013; Brannelly et al. 2015a). The generalist strategy of the Bd fungus, which is able to infect a wide range of hosts, may have profound evolutionary consequences for the pathogen, including the evolution of highly pathogenic strains.

We show that the presence of the highly invasive red swamp crayfish could be a relevant factor in the prevalence of Bd in amphibians. However, our models for the infection intensity of Bd in amphibians showed that crayfish presence had no effect. Thus, other variables such as amphibian densities or environmental determinants (probably the hydroperiod) affecting in turn the viability of Bd zoospores, could be playing a more important role in Bd infection intensity. Our study demonstrates the presence of Bd in several amphibian species across DNS and a high prevalence of Bd in nearby sampling sites that had been studied 10 years ago (Hidalgo-Vila et al. 2012). Therefore, the presence of the red swamp crayfish could explain the high prevalence of Bd, whereas pond desiccation in summer could prevent sudden declines in amphibian populations in DNS. Thus, human-made permanent ponds that supply water for livestocks within this protected area could act as infection hubs, not only because infected amphibians can remain there in summer (Hidalgo-Vila et al. 2012), but also because crayfish can co-occur there (Román 2014). If the red swamp crayfish acts as vector competent of Bd, it would be a good step in understanding the dynamic system of this disease in places where both taxa co-occur, and its participation in transmitting the infection to amphibians (see references in van Rooij et al. 2015).

The positive relationship between the presence of the red swamp crayfish and prevalence of Bd in amphibians suggests an unrecognised indirect impact of crayfish on amphibian populations of DNS, besides the already known direct effects (Arribas et al. 2014). Although the red swamp crayfish has been mainly translocated by human-mediated dispersal (Oficialdegui et al. 2019), its spread in this highly protected area seems to be due to the presence of seasonal streams connecting the ponds and human-made permanent ponds, thus facilitating the crayfish expansion (Román 2014). However, their overland movement in rice fields often depends on water availability, relative humidity, air temperature and time of the day (Ramalho and Anastácio 2015), so we can expect such behaviour in our study area, where temporary ponds are close to each other. Therefore, the particular system of DNS, which encompasses > 3000 temporary waterbodies, could play a crucial role in the spread of the red swamp crayfish and, consequently, in the dynamics of Bd. More effort should be made to control emerging diseases such as Bd and the factors influencing their dynamics in protected areas that are considered biodiversity hotspots.

To conclude, our study suggests a role of the red swamp crayfish as potential reservoir of the Bd pathogen and suitable predictor of its prevalence in amphibians. The suitability of the red swamp crayfish as a potential Bd reservoir (McMahon et al. 2013), together with its ubiquitous presence in temperate habitats worldwide (see Oficialdegui et al. 2019) and its positive relationship with high prevalence of Bd in amphibians, may represent new pathways of introduction for this disease globally. This study highlights the need to include non-amphibian hosts, especially invasive species such as the red swamp crayfish, as part of the dynamics of Bd infection in order to predict possible outbreaks of chytridiomycosis, as well as its contemplation in future conservation strategies on amphibians. Further research should consider experiments on the role of the red swamp crayfish in the transmission of Bd to amphibians, longitudinal studies to assess the effect of hydroperiod together with the presence of the red swamp crayfish simultaneously, as well as the inclusion of non-amphibian hosts in epidemiological models to estimate clinical outcomes of this panzootic disease.

References

  1. Arribas R, Díaz-Paniagua C, Gómez-Mestre I (2014) Ecological consequences of amphibian larvae and their native and alien predators on the community structure of temporary ponds. Freshw Biol 59(9):1996–2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berger L, Speare R, Daszak P et al (1998) Chytridiomycosis causes amphibian mortality associated with population declines in the rain forests of Australia and Central America. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95(15):9031–9036

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berger L, Speare R, Hines HB et al (2004) Effect of season and temperature on mortality in amphibians due to chytridiomycosis. Aust Vet J 82(7):434–439

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosch J, Martínez-Solano I (2006) Chytrid fungus infection related to unusual mortalities of Salamandra salamandra and Bufo bufo in the Peñalara Natural Park (Central Spain). Oryx 40:84–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bosch J, Martínez-Solano I, García-París M (2001) Evidence of a chytrid fungus infection involved in the decline of the common midwife toad (Alytes obstetricans) in protected areas of Central Spain. Biol Cons 97:331–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyle DG, Boyle DB, Olsen V et al (2004) Rapid quantitative detection of chytridiomycosis (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) in amphibian samples using real-time Taqman PCR assay. Dis Aquat Org 60(2):141–148

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brannelly LA, McMahon TA, Hinton M et al (2015a) Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in natural and farmed Louisiana crayfish populations: prevalence and implications. Dis Aquat Org 112(3):229–235

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brannelly LA, Hunter DA, Lenger D, Scheele BC, Skerratt LF, Berger L (2015b) Dynamics of chytridiomycosis during the breeding season in an Australian alpine amphibian. PLoS ONE 10(12):e0143629

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brannelly LA, Webb RJ, Hunter DA et al (2018) Non declining amphibians can be important reservoir hosts for amphibian chytrid fungus. Anim Conserv 21:91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cruz MJ, Rebelo R, Crespo EG (2006) Effects of an introduced crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, on the distribution of south-western Iberian amphibians in their breeding habitats. Ecography 29(3):329–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dang TD, Searle CL, Blaustein AR (2017) Virulence variation among strains of the emerging infectious fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) in multiple amphibian host species. Dis Aquat Org 124(3):233–239

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Daszak P, Cunningham AA, Hyatt AD (2003) Infectious disease and amphibian population declines. Divers Distrib 9(2):141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Díaz-Paniagua C, Gómez-Rodríguez C, Portheault A, De Vries W (2006) Distribución de los anfibios del Parque Nacional de Doñana en función de la densidad y abundancia de los hábitats de reproducción. Revista Española de Herpetología 20:17–30

    Google Scholar 

  14. Díaz-Paniagua C, Fernández-Zamudio R, Florencio M et al (2010) Temporary ponds from Doñana National Park: a system of natural habitats for the preservation of aquatic flora and fauna. Limnetica 29(1):41–58

    Google Scholar 

  15. Doddington BJ, Bosch J, Oliver JA et al (2013) Context-dependent amphibian host population response to an invading pathogen. Ecology 98:1795–1804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Drury RB, Wallington EA (1980) Preparation and fixation of tissues. Carleton’s Histol Tech 5:41–54

    Google Scholar 

  17. European Commission DG Environment (2007) Interpretation manual of European Union habitats. EUR 27:1–142

    Google Scholar 

  18. Farrer RA, Weinert LA, Bielby J et al (2011) Multiple emergences of genetically diverse amphibian-infecting chytrids include a globalized hypervirulent recombinant lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(46):18732–18736

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ficetola GF, Siesa ME, Padoa-Schioppa E, De Bernardi F (2012) Wetland features, amphibian communities and distribution of the alien crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. Alytes 29(1–4):75–87

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fisher MC, Bosch J, Yin Z et al (2009) Proteomic and phenotypic profiling of the amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis shows that genotype is linked to virulence. Mol Ecol 18(3):415–429

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fisher MC, Henk DA, Briggs CJ et al (2012) Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health. Nature 484:186–194

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. García-Novo F, Marín-Cabrera C (2005) Doñana: Agua y Biosfera. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Sevilla (in Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Garmyn A, van Rooij P, Pasmans F et al (2012) Waterfowl: potential environmental reservoirs of the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. PLoS ONE 7(4):e35038

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gascon C, Collins J, Moore R et al (2007) Amphibian conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Amphibian Specialist Group, Gland. ISBN 978-2-8317-1008-2

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gervasi SS, Stephens PR, Hua J et al (2017) Linking ecology and epidemiology to understand predictors of multi-host responses to an emerging pathogen, the amphibian chytrid fungus. PLoS ONE 12(1):e0167882

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Global Invasive Species Database (2018) Species profile: Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=123. Accessed on 19 Dec 2018

  27. Gómez-Rodríguez C (2009) Condicionantes ecológicos de la distribución de anfibios en el Parque Nacional de Doñana. Dissertation, Universidad de Salamanca

  28. Hidalgo-Vila J, Díaz-Paniagua C, Marchand MA, Cunningham AA (2012) Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infection of amphibians in the Doñana National Park, Spain. Dis Aquat Org 98(2):113–119

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson ML, Speare R (2005) Possible modes of dissemination of the amphibian chytrid Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in the environment. Dis Aquat Org 65:181–186

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kilburn VL, Ibáñez R, Green DM (2011) Reptiles as potential vectors and hosts of the amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in Panama. Dis Aquat Org 97:127–134

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kouba A, Petrusek A, Kozák P (2014) Continental-wide distribution of crayfish species in Europe: update and maps. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 413:05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kriger KM, Hero JM (2007) Large-scale seasonal variation in the prevalence and severity of chytridiomycosis. J Zool 271:352–359

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liew N, Moya MJM, Wierzbicki CJ et al (2017) Chytrid fungus infection in zebrafish demonstrates that the pathogen can parasitize non-amphibian vertebrate hosts. Nat Commun 8:15048

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. McMahon TA, Brannelly LA, Chatfield MWH et al (2013) Chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis has non-amphibian hosts and releases chemicals that cause pathology in the absence of infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(1):210–215

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. O’Hanlon SJ, Rieux A, Farrer RA et al (2018) Recent Asian origin of chytrid fungi causing global amphibian declines. Science 360:621–627

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Oficialdegui FJ, Clavero M, Sánchez MI et al (2019) Unravelling the global invasion routes of a worldwide invader, the red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii). Freshw Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13312 (in press)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Piotrowski JS, Annis SL, Longcore JE (2004) Physiology of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, a chytrid pathogen of amphibians. Mycologia 96(1):9–15

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ramalho RO, Anastácio PM (2015) Factors inducing overland movement of invasive crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) in a ricefield habitat. Hydrobiologia 746(1):135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Román J (2014) Artificial water points for wildlife management facilitate the spread of red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii). Manag Biol Invasions 5(4):341–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ruggeri J, de Carvalho-e-Silva SP, James TY, Toledo LF (2018) Amphibian chytrid infection is influenced by rainfall seasonality and water availability. Dis Aquat Org 127(2):107–115

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Scheele BC, Hunter DA, Brannelly LA et al (2017) Reservoir-host amplification of disease impact in an endangered amphibian. Conserv Biol 31(3):592–600

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Scheele BC, Pasmans F, Skerratt LF et al (2019) Amphibian fungal panzootic causes catastrophic and ongoing loss of biodiversity. Science 363(6434):1459–1463

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Skerratt LF, Berger L, Speare R et al (2007) Spread of chytridiomycosis has caused the rapid global decline and extinction of frogs. EcoHealth 4(2):125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Speare R, Alford R, Aplin K et al (2001) Nomination for listing of amphibian chytridiomycosis as a key threatening process under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. In: Speare R (ed) Developing management strategies to control amphibian diseases: decreasing the risks due to communicable diseases. School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, pp 185–196

    Google Scholar 

  45. Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA et al (2004) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306(5702):1783–1786

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. van Rooij P, Martel A, Haesebrouck F, Pasmans F (2015) Amphibian chytridiomycosis: a review with focus on fungus–host interactions. Vet Res 46(1):137

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Voyles J, Young S, Berger L et al (2009) Pathogenesis of chytridiomycosis, a cause of catastrophic amphibian declines. Science 326(5952):582–585

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Vredenburg VT, Knapp RA, Tunstall TS, Briggs CJ (2010) Dynamics of an emerging disease drive large-scale amphibian population extinctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(21):9689–9694

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Walker SF, Bosch J, Gomez V et al (2010) Factors driving pathogenicity vs. prevalence of amphibian panzootic chytridiomycosis in Iberia. Ecol Lett 13:372–382

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Woolhouse ME, Taylor LH, Haydon DT (2001) Population biology of multihost pathogens. Science 292(5519):1109–1112

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Xie GY, Olson DH, Blaustein AR (2016) Projecting the global distribution of the emerging amphibian fungal pathogen, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, based on IPCC climate futures. PLoS ONE 11(8):e0160746

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are strongly grateful to C. Serrano, M. A. Bravo, V. Castaño and R. Arribas for their help in the fieldwork, M. Wass for his help in the laboratory, and C. Díaz-Paniagua and The Monitoring Team on Natural Resources and Processes of the Doñana Biological Station for their valuable and helpful comments. We also thank the Laboratorio de Histología at Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC) and the Laboratorio de SIG y Teledetección (LAST-EBD) at Estación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC) for providing logistical support. We thank two anonymous reviewers for useful suggestions that helped us to improve the final version of this manuscript. This study was funded by the Andalusian Government (RNM-936) and by Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (CGL2015-70070-R). F.J.O. was supported by an Andalusian Government Grant. L.B. was supported by the Basque Government (IT951-16) and the Spanish Ministry for Science, Innovation and Universities (RTI2018-095023-B-I00).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco J. Oficialdegui.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oficialdegui, F.J., Sánchez, M.I., Monsalve-Carcaño, C. et al. The invasive red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) increases infection of the amphibian chytrid fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis). Biol Invasions 21, 3221–3231 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-019-02041-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Amphibians
  • Chytridiomycosis
  • Doñana
  • Emerging infectious diseases
  • Histological analysis
  • Non-amphibian host
  • Transmission