Invasive bigheaded carp are currently advancing upstream in the Mississippi River and threaten to invade its headwaters. The possibility that sound projected into navigation locks might block this invasion is being considered and four types of complex sound have been shown to have promise: an outboard-motor sound, a proprietary cyclic sound, air curtains, and the (coupling) pairing of this proprietary sound with an air curtain. In a laboratory study, we systematically tested the effects of these stimuli on invasive bighead carp and common carp, as well as the native largemouth bass (which lack hearing specializations), in a darkened laboratory flume. We were specifically interested in whether the outboard-motor sound or the proprietary sound might be more effective at blocking and deterring fishes (i.e., does the type of complex sound matter), and whether coupling either of these sounds with an air curtain might enhance their effectiveness. We found that the proprietary sound was more effective than the outboard-motor sound at both deterring and blocking common carp as well as deterring bighead carp. The largemouth bass were less affected by both sounds. We also found that when an air curtain was coupled to either sound, the combined stimulus became more effective at blocking all three species. This was especially true for the proprietary sound which when coupled with an air curtain blocked 97% of bighead carp. The proprietary sound coupled with the air curtain has promise to block bigheaded carp and should be considered for field tests.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Anscombe FJ, Tukey JW (1963) The examination and analysis of residuals. Technometrics 5:141–160
Chapman DC, Hoff MH (2011) Invasive carps in North America. In: American Fisheries Society symposium 74, Bethesda
Domenico SN (1982) Acoustic wave propagation in air-bubble curtains in water—part 1: history and theory. Geophysics 47:345–353
Engås A, Misund O, Soldal A, Horvei B, Solstad A (1995) Reactions of penned herring and cod to playback of original, frequency-filtered and time-smoothed vessel sound. Fish Res 22:243–254
Flammang MK, Weber MJ, Thul MD (2014) Laboratory evaluation of a bioacoustics bubble strobe light barrier for reducing walleye escapement. N Am J Fish Manag 35:1047–1054
Hansen A, Ghosal R, Caprio J, Claus AW, Sorensen PW (2014) Anatomical and physiological studies of bigheaded carps demonstrate that the epibranchial organ functions as a pharyngeal taste organ. J Exp Biol 217:3945–3954
Hawkins A, Roberts L, Cheesman S (2014) Responses of free-living coastal pelagic fish to impulsive sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 135:3101–3116
Kolar C, Chapman D, Courtenay W, Housel C, Williams J, Jennings D (2007) Bigheaded carps: a biological synopsis and environmental risk assessment. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda
Ladich F, Fay RR (2013) Auditory evoked potential audiometry in fish. Rev Fish Biol Fisher 23:317–364
Leighton TG, Richards SD, White PR (2004) Trapped within a ‘wall of sound’. Acoust Bull 29:24–29
Lovell JM, Findlay MM, Moate RM, Nedwell JR, Pegg MA (2005) The inner ear morphology and hearing abilities of the Paddlefish (Polyodon spathula) and the Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens). Comp Biochem Physiol A 142:286–296
Lubejko MV, Whitledge GW, Coulter AA, Brey MK, Oliver DC, Garvey JE (2017) Evaluating upstream passage and timing of approach by adult bigheaded carps at a gated dam on the Illinois River. River Res Appl 33:1268–1278
Mann D, Cott P, Hanna B, Popper A (2007) Hearing in eight species of northern Canadian freshwater fishes. J Fish Biol 70:109–120
Murchy KA, Vetter BJ, Brey MK, Amberg JJ, Gaikowski MP, Mensinger AF (2016) Not all carp are created equal: Impacts of broadband sound on common carp swimming behavior. Proc Meet Acoust 27:1–9
Murchy KA, Cupp AR, Amberg JJ, Vetter BJ, Fredricks KT, Gaikowski MP, Mensinger AF (2017) Potential implications of acoustic stimuli as a non-physical barrier to silver carp and bighead carp. Fish Manag Ecol 24:208–216
Noatch M, Suski C (2012) Non-physical barriers to deter fish movements. Environ Rev 20:71–82
Patel AG, Glassner-Shwayder K, Eder T (2010) Halting the invasion: maintaining the health of the Great Lakes and Mississippi River basins by preventing further exchange of aquatic invasive species. Environ Pract 12:342–356
Patrick PH, Christie AE, Sager D, Hocutt C, Staugger J (1985) Responses of fish to a strobe light/air-bubble barrier. Fish Res 3:157–172
Perry RW, Romine JG, Adams NS, Blake AR, Burau JR, Johnston SV, Liedtke TL (2014) Using a non-physical behavioural barrier to alter migration routing of juvenile chinook salmon in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. River Res Appl 30:192–203
Popper A, Carlson T (1998) Application of sound and other stimuli to control fish behavior. Trans Am Fish Soc 127:673–707
Radford CA, Montgomery JC, Caiger P, Higgs DM (2012) Pressure and particle motion detection thresholds in fish: a re-examination of salient auditory cues in teleosts. J Exp Biol 215:3429–3435
Rankin CH, Abrams T, Barry RJ, Bhatnagar S, Clayton D, Colombo J, Coppola G, Geyer MA, Glanzman DL, Marsland S, McSweeney F, Wilson DA, Wu CF, Thompson RF (2009) Habituation revisited: an updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation. Neurobiol Learn Mem 92:135–138
Ruebush B, Sass G, Chick J, Stafford J (2012) In-situ tests of sound-bubble-strobe light barrier technologies to prevent range expansions of Asian carp. Aquat Invasions 7:37–48
Schakner ZA, Blumstein DT (2013) Behavioral biology of marine mammal deterrents: a review and prospectus. Biol Conserv 167:380–389
Schwarz A, Greer G (1984) Responses of Pacific herring, Clupea harengus pallasi, to some underwater sounds. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 41:1183–1192
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. WH Freeman and Company, New York
Sorensen PW, Bajer PB (2011) The common carp. In: Simberloff D, Rejmanek M (eds) Encyclopedia of invasive introduced species. University of California Press, Berkeley
Taylor R, Pegg M, Chick J (2005) Response of bighead carp to a bioacoustic behavioural fish guidance system. Fish Manag Ecol 12:283–286
Vetter BJ, Cupp AR, Fredricks KT, Gaikowski MP, Mensinger AF (2015) Acoustical deterrence of silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). Biol Invasions 17(12):3383–3392
Vetter BJ, Brey MK, Mensinger AF (2018) Reexamining the frequency range of hearing in silver (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) and bighead (H. nobilis) carp. Plos ONE 13:e0192561
Wang J, Chapman D, Xu X, Wang B, Gu B (2018) Isotope niche dimension and tropic overlap between bighead carps and native filter feeding fish in the lower Missouri River. Plos One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197584
Welton J, Beaumont W, Clarke R (2002) The efficacy of air, sound and acoustic bubble screens in deflecting Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., smolts in the River Frome, UK. Fish Manag Ecol 9:11–18
Zeddies DG, Fay RR, Gray MD, Alderks PW, Acob A, Sisneros JA (2012) Local acoustic particle motion guides sound-source localization behavior in the plainfin midshipman fish, Porichthys notatus. J Exp Biol 215:152–160
Zielinski DP, Sorensen PW (2015) Field test of a bubble curtain deterrent system for common carp. Fish Manag Ecol 22:181–184
Zielinski DP, Sorensen PW (2016) Bubble curtain deflection screen diverts the movement of both Asian and common carp. N Am J Fish Manag 36(2):267–276
Zielinski DP, Sorensen PW (2017) Silver, bighead, and common carp orient to acoustic particle motion when avoiding a complex sound. PLoS One 12:e0180110. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180110
Zielinski D, Voller V, Svendsen J, Hondzo M, Mensinger AF, Sorensen P (2014) Laboratory experiments demonstrate that bubble curtains can effectively inhibit movement of common carp. Ecol Eng 67:95–103
Funding for this project was provided by the Minnesota Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund as recommended by the Legislative-Citizen Commission for Minnesota Resources (LCCMR). We also thank the Minnesota Aquatic Invasive Species Research Center for helping administer the project and providing laboratory space. David Lambert and Andy Turnpenny provided technical support for the laboratory equipment which was leased from Fish Guidance Systems Ltd. without conditions or any expectation of what we would find and publish. We thank them for agreeing to release the power spectrum of their sound which they have spent many years developing. Help with statistical design and analyses were provided by the University of Minnesota’s Institute for Research on Statistics and its Applications (IRSA) Statistical Consulting Center. Dan Krause, Rosie Daniels, Austin Abbott, Nicholas Jacob, Kara Van Lerberghe and Jane Feely provided valuable help with fish husbandry, running experiments and data analysis. Three anonymous reviewers and an editor provided very helpful feedback.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dennis, C.E., Zielinski, D. & Sorensen, P.W. A complex sound coupled with an air curtain blocks invasive carp passage without habituation in a laboratory flume. Biol Invasions 21, 2837–2855 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-019-02017-6
- Invasive carps
- Air curtain
- Bio-acoustic fish fence
- Outboard-motor sound