Positive interactions among native and invasive vascular plants in Antarctica: assessing the “nurse effect” at different spatial scales
- 287 Downloads
Antarctica is a stressful ecosystem with few vascular plants, an ideal system to test positive interactions. Here, plants such as Deschampsia antarctica could generate more suitable micro-environmental conditions for the establishment of other plants (facilitation). We examined the co-occurrence of vascular plant species in the Antarctic Peninsula and assessed the potential nurse effect by D. antarctica on the native Colobanthus quitensis and the invasive Poa annua. We also measured the ecophysiological performance and survival of C. quitensis within and outside the canopy of D. antarctica in two study sites differing in stress levels. In addition, a survival experiment was conducted with the invasive Poa annua individuals within and outside D. antarctica individuals. In sites where present, target species co-occurred with D. antarctica in both Shetland Islands and Antarctic Peninsula. In agreement with the stress gradient hypothesis, we found evidence of facilitation between vascular Antarctic plant species. Specifically, we found that D. antarctica facilitates the native C. quitensis and the invasive P. annua and that the effect is stronger in more stressful sites. Additionally, C. quitensis distribution is compatible with an influence of either direct or indirect facilitation from D. antarctica. Facilitation between vascular plants may play a role structuring Antarctic plant communities. Thus, distribution of native species should be considered when assessing the introduction and spread of invasive species. Also, our results together with those from previous studies showed that the type and magnitude of biotic interactions may change with time and can depend on the plant traits considered.
KeywordsAntarctica Biotic interactions Colobanthus quitensis Deschampsia antarctica Nurse effect Poa annua Stress gradient hypothesis (SGH) Facilitation
We thank INACH, the Chilean Navy and the Arctowski Polish Antarctic Station for their logistical support and measurements of field data. To conduct all manipulative experiments in the field, we have taken into account the international permits and authorizations given by the INACH. This work was funded by CONICYT Project (PII20150126). Luis R. Pertierra was supported by “ALIENANT” Project Granted by the Spanish MINECO I+D programme (CTM2013-47381-P). P. Aragón was supported by the “UNITED” Project (CGL2016-78070-P, MINECO). This article contributes to the SCAR biological research programmes “Antarctic Thresholds - Ecosystem Resilience and Adaptation” (AnT-ERA) and “State of the Antarctic Ecosystem” (AntEco).
- Edgington E, Onghena P (2007) Randomization tests. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Fox GA (1993) Failure time analysis: emergence, flowering, survivorship, and other waiting times. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 253–289Google Scholar
- Green TGA, Schroeter B, Sancho LG (2007) Plant life in Antarctica. In: Pugnaire FI, Valladares F (eds) Functional plant ecology. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 389–399Google Scholar
- Horton TR, Bruns TD, Parker VT (1999) Ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with Arctostaphylos contribute to Pseudotsuga menziesii establishment. Can J Bot 77:93–102Google Scholar
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC (2016) The physical science basis. www.ipcc.ch
- Olech M (1996) Human impact on terrestrial ecosystem in west Antarctica. Proc NIPR Symp Polar Biol 9:299–306Google Scholar
- Olech M, Chwedorzewska KJ (2008) Population growth of alien species Poa annua L. at the vicinity of H. Arctowski station (South Shetland Is). SCAR/IASC first international polar year 2007–2009, Open science conference “polar research—Arctic and Antarctic perspectives in the international polar year” St. Petersburg, Russia 8–11 czerwca 2008, XXX SCAR meetingGoogle Scholar
- Pertierra LR, Hughes KA, Tejedo P, Enríquez P, Luciañez MJ, Benayas J (2017b) Eradication of the non-native Poa pratensis colony at Cierva Point, Antarctica: a case study of international cooperation and practical management in an area under multi-party governance. Environ Sci Policy 69:50–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith RIL, Poncet S (1987) Deschampsia antarctica and Colobanthus quitensis in the Terra Firma Islands. Brit Antarct Surv B 74:31–35Google Scholar
- Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar