Biological Invasions

, Volume 21, Issue 8, pp 2781–2788 | Cite as

Using a natural population collapse of an invasive species to assess the benefits of invader control for native species

  • Gregory P. BrownEmail author
  • Richard Shine
Original Paper


Efforts to control invasive species often assume that suppressing invader abundance will benefit impacted native species, but that assumption may sometimes be in error. In some systems, reducing invader abundance may have little effect. At our study site in tropical Australia, numbers of invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina) declined 98% over a 27-month period post-invasion, but none of the 19 native species we monitored increased in counts during that period. Because cane toads impact native fauna primarily via rapid extirpation of top-predators, subsequent reduction in invader abundance may confer little immediate benefit. Short-term culling of cane toads in already-colonised areas is likely to be less beneficial to native species than preventing the spread of cane toads to new areas, or buffering the initial impact of toad arrival through Conditioned Taste Aversion training of vulnerable taxa. More generally, exploiting natural declines in invader populations as a proxy for eradication measures provides a low-cost opportunity to assess the potential for native fauna to passively recover over the short-term. Monitoring native fauna during periods of invader decline can tell us whether or not invader control is likely to confer short-term benefits for native fauna.


Alien species Bufo marinus Biocontrol Ecosystem recovery Invader collapse Invader impact 



We thank the Australian Research Council for funding and the Northern Territory Land Corporation for facilities. Funding was provided by the Australian Research Council (Grant No. FT120100095). Two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on the manuscript.

Author contributions

GPB collected and analyzed data. GPB and RS wrote the manuscript.


  1. Aagaard K, Lockwood JL (2016) Severe and rapid population declines in exotic birds. Biol Invasions 18:1667–1678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonnaud E, Zarzoso-Lacoste D, Bourgeois K et al (2010) Top-predator control on islands boosts endemic prey but not mesopredator. Anim Conserv 13:556–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown GP, Shine R (2002) Reproductive ecology of a tropical natricine snake, Tropidonophis mairii (Colubridae). J Zool 258:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown GP, Shine R (2016) Frogs in the spotlight: a 16-year survey of native frogs and invasive toads on a floodplain in tropical Australia. Ecol Evol 6:4445–4457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown GP, Greenlees MJ, Phillips BL et al (2013a) Road transect surveys do not reveal any consistent effects of a toxic invasive species on tropical reptiles. Biol Invasions 15:1005–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown GP, Ujvari B, Madsen T et al (2013b) Invader impact clarifies the roles of top-down and bottom-up effects on tropical snake populations. Funct Ecol 27:351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown GP, Kelehear C, Shilton CM et al (2015) Stress and immunity at the invasion front: a comparison across cane toad (Rhinella marina) populations. Biol J Linn Soc 116:748–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown GP, Holden D, Shine R et al (2018) Invasion history alters the behavioural consequences of immune system activation in cane toads. J Anim Ecol 87:716–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buxton R, Taylor G, Jones C et al (2016) Spatio-temporal changes in density and distribution of burrow-nesting seabird colonies after rat eradication. N Z J Ecol 40:88–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooling M, Hoffmann B (2015) Here today, gone tomorrow: declines and local extinctions of invasive ant populations in the absence of intervention. Biol Invasions 17:3351–3357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Croll DA, Newton KM, McKown M et al (2016) Passive recovery of an island bird community after rodent eradication. Biol Invasions 18:703–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doherty TS, Ritchie EG (2017) Stop jumping the gun: a call for evidence-based invasive predator management. Conserv Lett 10:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doody JS, Green B, Sims R et al (2006) Indirect impacts of invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) on nest predation in pig-nosed turtles (Carettochelys insculpta). Wildl Res 33:349–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Florance D, Webb JK, Dempster T et al (2011) Excluding access to invasion hubs can contain the spread of an invasive vertebrate. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 278:2900–2908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeland WJ (1986) Populations of cane toad Bufo marinus in relation to time since colonization. Aust Wildl Res 13:321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Green SJ, Dulvy NK, Brooks AM et al (2014) Linking removal targets to the ecological effects of invaders: a predictive model and field test. Ecol Appl 24:1311–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Griffiths AD, McKay JL (2007) Cane toads reduce the abundance and site occupancy of Merten’s water monitor (Varanus mertensi). Wildl Res 34:609–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hilker F, Lewis M, Seno H et al (2005) Pathogens can slow down or reverse invasion fronts of their hosts. Biol Invasions 7:817–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Letnic M, Webb J, Shine R (2008) Invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) cause mass mortality of freshwater crocodiles (Crocodylus johnstoni) in tropical Australia. Biol Conserv 141:1773–1782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mayer M, Brown GP, Zimmermann B et al (2015) Habitat use of the introduced cane toad (Rhinella marina) and native frog species in tropical Australia. J Trop Ecol 31:531–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moore JW, Herbst DB, Heady WN et al (2012) Stream community and ecosystem responses to the boom and bust of an invading snail. Biol Invasions 14:2435–2446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Narayan EJ, Cockrem JF, Hero J-M (2013) Sight of a predator induces a corticosterone stress response and generates fear in an amphibian. PLoS ONE 8:e73564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Narayan EJ, Jessop TS, Hero J-M (2015) Invasive cane toad triggers chronic physiological stress and decreased reproductive success in an island endemic. Funct Ecol 29:1435–1444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nogales M, Martín A, Tershy BR et al (2004) A review of feral cat eradication on islands. Conserv Biol 18:310–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pardon LG, Brook BW, Griffiths AD et al (2003) Determinants of survival for the northern brown bandicoot under a landscape-scale fire experiment. J Anim Ecol 72:106–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Phillips BL, Shine R (2006) An invasive species induces rapid adaptive change in a native predator: cane toads and black snakes in Australia. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sci 273:1545–1550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Phillips BL, Kelehear C, Pizzatto L et al (2010) Parasites and pathogens lag behind their host during periods of host range advance. Ecology 91:872–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Price-Rees SJ, Brown GP, Shine R (2010) Predation on toxic cane toads (Bufo marinus) may imperil bluetongue lizards (Tiliqua scincoides intermedia, Scincidae) in tropical Australia. Wildl Res 37:166–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roy HE, Adriaens T, Isaac NJB et al (2012) Invasive alien predator causes rapid declines of native European ladybirds. Divers Distrib 18:717–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shilton CM, Šlapeta J, Shine R et al (2018) Invasive colonic entamoebiasis in wild cane toads, Australia. Emerg Infect Dis 24:1541–1543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shine R (2010) The ecological impact of invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) in Australia. Q Rev Biol 85(3):253–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shine R (2014) A review of ecological interactions between native frogs and invasive cane toads in Australia. Austral Ecol 39:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simberloff D, Gibbons L (2004) Now you see them, now you don’t! Population crashes of established introduced species. Biol Invasions 6:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Simberloff D, Nunez MA, Ledgard NJ et al (2010) Spread and impact of introduced conifers in South America: lessons from other southern hemisphere regions. Austral Ecol 35:489–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Somaweera R, Shine R (2012) The (non) impact of invasive cane toads on freshwater crocodiles at Lake Argyle in tropical Australia. Anim Conserv 15:152–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Strayer DL, Eviner VT, Jeschke JM et al (2006) Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 21:645–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Strayer DL, Cid N, Malcom HM (2011) Long-term changes in a population of an invasive bivalve and its effects. Oecologia 165:1063–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Strayer DL, Hattala KA, Kahnle AW et al (2014) Has the Hudson River fish community recovered from the zebra mussel invasion along with its forage base? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 71:1146–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tingley R, Ward-Fear G, Greenlees M et al (2017) New weapons in the toad toolkit: a review of methods to control and mitigate the biodiversity impacts of invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina). Q Rev Biol 92:123–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Towns DR, Atkinson IA, Daugherty CH (2006) Have the harmful effects of introduced rats on islands been exaggerated? Biol. Invasions 8:863–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ujvari B, Madsen T (2009) Increased mortality of naive varanid lizards after the invasion of non-native can toads (Bufo marinus). Herpetol Conserv Biol 4:248–251Google Scholar
  42. Wall M, Shine R (2013) Ecology and behaviour of Burton’s legless lizard (Lialis burtonis, Pygopodidae) in tropical Australia. Asian Herpetol Res 4:9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ward-Fear G, Pearson DJ, Brown GP et al (2016) Ecological immunization: in situ training of free-ranging predatory lizards reduces their vulnerability to invasive toxic prey. Biol Lett 12:20150863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wingate DB (2011) The successful elimination of cane toads, Bufo marinus, from an island with breeding habitat off Bermuda. Biol Invasions 13:1487–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Woinarski JCZ, Oakwood M, Winter J et al (2008) Surviving the toads: patterns of persistence of the northern quoll Dasyurus hallucatus in Queensland. Report to The Australian Government’s Natural Heritage Trust, March 2008Google Scholar
  46. Woinarski JCZ, Armstrong M, Brennan K et al (2010) Monitoring indicates rapid and severe decline of native small mammals in Kakadu National Park, northern Australia. Wildl Res 37:116–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Woinarski JCZ, Legge S, Fitzsimons JA et al (2011) The disappearing mammal fauna of northern Australia: context, cause, and response. Conserv Lett 4:192–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yokomizo H, Possingham HP, Thomas MB et al (2009) Managing the impact of invasive species: the value of knowing the density-impact curve. Ecol Appl 19:376–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zavaleta ES, Hobbs RJ, Mooney HA (2001) Viewing invasive species removal in a whole ecosystem context. Trends Ecol Evol 16:454–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations