Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 1947–1972 | Cite as

Entomological time travel: reconstructing the invasion history of the buckeye butterflies (genus Junonia) from Florida, USA

  • Melanie M. L. Lalonde
  • Jeffrey M. MarcusEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Invasion biology examines the process by which non-native species integrate into new habitats. Three species of buckeye butterflies (genus Junonia) currently occur in Florida, USA, including Junonia coenia (polyphagous and widely distributed), J. neildi (monophagous and restricted to coastal areas), and J. zonalis (polyphagous tropical species restricted to frost-free South Florida). Two species have long been resident in Florida, whereas J. zonalis was first detected in Florida in 1981. Diagnostic morphological and molecular markers exist for determining Junonia with Caribbean ancestry, allowing observation of the invasion and creation of a secondary contact zone over space and time. We developed techniques to quickly, inexpensively, and unambiguously determine mitochondrial genotypes from museum specimens collected in Florida and the Caribbean over the last 150 years. We reconstructed the invasion of J. zonalis as it colonized Florida using 816 Junonia museum specimens from 1866 to 2016, including some of the oldest insect museum specimens ever genotyped. Significant correlations were found between the presence of Caribbean genotypes and latitude, longitude, and time. Junonia zonalis likely colonized Florida from Cuba by the 1930s, followed by hybridization with resident species, with ongoing genetic exchange between Cuba and the Florida Keys. Episodic gene flow between Florida Keys and mainland populations of J. zonalis may also be occurring. Mainland mitochondrial genotypes appear to be more resilient to extreme high and low temperatures than Caribbean genotypes. This time series in Junonia can be used as a model for understanding the process of adaptation required for successful invasion of new habitats.

Keywords

Invasion biology Junonia zonalis Gene flow Hybridization Genetic population structure Museum specimen DNA 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the generations of collectors for their efforts in collecting the Junonia specimens used in this study and for their generosity and foresight in donating them to public collections. We also thank the generations of museum curators who preserved these specimens for posterity. John Calhoun, Charles Covell, Carlos Cruz, Nick Gillham, Marc Minno, Fred Nijhout, and Jeff Slotten very kindly allowed us to sample tissue from specimens in their personal collections. We also owe a great debt of gratitude to the following entomology curators, collections managers, and research associates: Paul Opler and Boris Kondratieff of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity at Colorado State University, Brian Fisher and Robert Zuparko of the California Academy of Sciences, Philip Perkins and Rachel Hawkins of the Harvard University Museum of Comparative Zoology, Chris Grinter of the Illinois Natural History Survey Prairie Research Institute at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Mark O’Brien of the LSA Museum of Zoology at the University of Michigan, Andy Warren of the McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity at the Florida Museum of Natural History, Jim Hayden of the Division of Plant Industry of the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gary Parsons of the Albert J. Cook Arthropod Research Collection at Michigan State University, Susan Borkin and Julia Colby of the Milwaukee Public Museum, Richard Brown and John MacDonald of the Mississippi Entomological Museum at Mississippi State University, Chris Marshall of the Oregon State Arthropod Collection, Corvallis at Oregon State University, Bob Robbins, Brian Harris, and Don Harvey of the Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History, Barb Sharonowski and Amber Bass of the Wallis Roughley Museum at the University of Manitoba, and Larry Gall of the Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History. Without the support and encouragement of these individuals, this work would not have been possible. We thank two anonymous peer reviewers for their constructive criticism of our initial manuscript submission. Melanie Lalonde received support from a Graduate Enhancement of Tricouncil Award from the Faculty of Graduate Studies at the University of Manitoba. This project was part of a research program supported by NSERC Discovery Grants RGPIN386337-2011 and RGPIN-06012-2016 and was also supported by grants from the Canada Foundation for Innovation (212382), and the Canada Research Chair program (950-212382) (to Jeffrey Marcus).

Supplementary material

10530_2019_1948_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (84 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 84 kb)

References

  1. Alexander JM, Diez JM, Levine JM (2015) Novel competitors shape species’ responses to climate change. Nature 525:515–518.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14952 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aliabadian M, Roselaar CS, Nijman V, Sluys R, Vences M (2005) Identifying contact zone hotspots of passerine birds in the Palaearctic region. Biol Lett 1:21–23.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson E, Hubricht L (1938) The evidence for introgressive hybridization. Am J Bot 25:396–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnold ML (2004) Transfer and origin of adaptations through natural hybridization: were Anderson and Stebbins right? Plant Cell 16:562–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avise JC (2000) Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Avise JC, Saunders NC (1984) Hybridization and introgression among species of sunfish (Lepomis)—analysis by mitochondrial-DNA and allozyme markers. Genetics 108:237–255Google Scholar
  7. Baggett HD (1982a) 1981 season summary. News Lepid Soc 2:26–27Google Scholar
  8. Baggett HD (1982b) Report on the 1981 Homestead meeting. So Lepid News 3:19–23Google Scholar
  9. Bernatchez L, Glémet H, Wilson CC, Danzmann RG (1995) Introgression and fixation of Acrtic char (Salvelinus alpinus) mitochondrial genome in an allopatric population of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52:179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boecklen WJ (1986) Optimal design of nature reserves: consequences of genetic drift. Biol Cons 38:323–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borchers TE, Marcus JM (2014) Genetic population structure of buckeye butterflies (Junonia) from Argentina. Syst Ent 39:242–255.  https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowers MD (1984) Iridoid glycosides and host-plant specificity in larvae of the buckeye butterfly, Junonia coenia (Nymphalidae). J Chem Ecol 10:1567–1577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown CR, Bomberger Brown M (2000) Weather-mediated natural selection on arrival time in cliff swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Calhoun JV (2010) The Identities of Papilio evarete Cramer and Papilio genoveva Cramer (Nymphalidae), with notes on the occurrence of Junonia evarete in Florida. News Lepid Soc 52:47–51Google Scholar
  15. Camara MD (1997) A recent host range expansion in Junonia coenia Huebner (Nymphalidae): oviposition preference, survival, growth, and chemical defense. Evolution 51:873–884Google Scholar
  16. Carroll SP, Boyd C (1992) Host race radiation in the soapberry bug: natural history with the history. Evolution 46:1052–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cech R, Tudor G (2005) Butterflies of the East Coast. Princeton Univ. Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  18. Didham RK, Tylianakis JM, Hutchinson MA, Ewers RM, Gemmell NJ (2005) Are invasive species the drivers of ecological change? Trends Ecol Evol 20:470–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dillon N, Austin AD, Bartowsky E (1996) Comparison of preservation techniques for DNA extraction from hymenopterous insects. Insect Mol Biol 5:21–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dobzhansky T (1970) Genetics of the evolutionary process. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Dupuis JR, Sperling FAH (2015) Repeated reticulate evolution in North American Papilio machaon group swallowtail butterflies. PLoS ONE 10:e0141882.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141882 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Durand E, Jay F, Gaggiotti OE, François O (2009) Spatial inference of admixture proportions and secondary contact zones. Mol Biol Evol 26:1963–1973.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Espeland M, Irestedt M, Johanson KA, Bergh J-E, Kallersjo M (2010) Dichlorvos exposure impedes extraction and amplification of DNA from insects in museum collections. Front Zool 7:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-1187-1182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Flohr RCE, Blom CJ, Rainey PB, Beaumont HJE (2013) Founder niche constrains evolutionary adaptive radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:20663–20668.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1310310110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Florida Climate Center (2017a) Florida Climate Center, Office of the State Climatologist, The Florida State University, Data for Key West, FL (WWW document). https://climatecenter.fsu.edu/products-services/data/precipitation/key-west. Accessed 7 Apr 2017
  26. Florida Climate Center (2017b) Florida Climate Center, Office of the state climatologist, The Florida State University, Data for Miami Florida (WWW document). https://climatecenter.fsu.edu/products-services/data/precipitation/miami. Accessed 7 Apr 2017
  27. Folmer O, Black MB, Hoch W, Lutz RA, Vrijehock RC (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3:294–299Google Scholar
  28. Ford EB (1975) Ecological Genetics, vol 4. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Gemmell AP, Marcus JM (2015) A tale of two haplotype groups: the origin and distribution of divergent New World Junonia COI haplotypes. Syst Ent 40:532–546.  https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gemmell AP, Borchers TE, Marcus JM (2014) Genetic population structure of buckeye butterflies (Junonia) from French Guiana, Martinique, and Guadeloupe. Psyche 2014:1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/897596 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Glassberg J, Minno MC, Calhoun JV (2000) Butterflies through binoculars: a field, finding, and gardening guide to butterflies in Florida. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldstein PZ, Desalle R (2003) Calibrating phylogenetic species formation in a threatened insect using DNA from historical specimens. Mol Ecol 12:1993–1998.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01860.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Good JM, Hird S, Reid N, Demboski JR, Steppan SJ, Martin-Nimss TR, Sullivan J (2008) Ancient hybridization and mitochondrial capture between two species of chipmunks. Mol Ecol 17:1313–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grigaltchick VS, Ward AJW, Seebacher F (2012) Thermal acclimation of interactions: differential responses to temperature change alter predator-prey relationship. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:4058–4064.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.1277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Habel JC, Zachos FE, Finger A, Meyer M, Louy D, Assmann T, Schmitt T (2009) Unprecedented long-term genetic monomorphism in an endangered relict butterfly species. Conserv Genet 10:1659–1665.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-008-9744-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hajibabaei M, Janzen DH, Burns JM, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN (2006) DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:968–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hall RJ (2016) Hybridization helps colonizers become conquerors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:9963–9964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harper GL, Maclean N, Goulson D (2006) Analysis of museum specimens suggests extreme genetic drift in the adonis blue butterfly (Polyommatus bellargus). Biol J Linn Soc 88:447–452.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00632.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harris AC (1988) A large migration of the Australian meadow argus butterfly Junonia villida calybe (Lepidopera: Nymphalidae) to southern New Zealand. N Z Entomol 11:67–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:313–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Heintzman PD, Elias SA, Moore K, Paszkiewicz K, Barnes I (2014) Characterizing DNA preservation in degraded specimens of Amara alpina (Carabidae: Coleoptera). Mol Ecol Res 14:606–615.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Heppner JB (1993) Lepidoptera of Florida part 1: introduction and catalog. Arthropods Fla Neighb Land Areas 17:1–618Google Scholar
  43. Janzen DH, Hajibabaei M, Burns JM, Hallwachs W, Remigio E, Hebert PDN (2005) Wedding biodiversity inventory of a large and complex Lepidoptera fauna with DNA barcoding. Philos Trans R Soc B 360:1835–1845.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1715 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Karl I, Schmitt T, Fischer K (2009a) Genetic differenctiation between alpine and lowland populations of a butterfly is related to PGI enzyme genotype. Ecography 32:448–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Karl I, Sorensen JG, Loeschke V, Fischer K (2009b) HSP70 expression in the copper butterfly Lycaena tityrus across altitudes and temperatures. J Evol Biol 22:172–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kettlewell B (1973) The evolution of melanism: the study of a recurring necessity. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  47. Keyghobadi N, Koscinski D, Weintraub JD, Fonseca DM (2013) Historical specimens reveal past relationships and current conservation status of populations in a declining species: the regal fritillary butterfly. Insect Conserv Divers 6:234–242.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00208.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kimball CP (1965) The Lepidoptera of Florida: an annotated checklist. Division of Plant Industry, State of Florida Department of Agriculture, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
  49. Knerl A, Bowers MD (2013) Incorporation of an introduced weed into the diet of a native butterfly: consequences for preference, performance and chemical defense. J Chem Ecol 39:1313–1321.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-013-0355-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kodandaramaiah U, Wahlberg N (2007) Out-of-Africa origin and dispersal-mediated diversification of the butterfly genus Junonia (Nymphalidae: Nymphalinae). J Evol Biol 20:2181–2191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kornbrot D (2014) Point Biserial Correlation. Wiley StatsRef: statistics reference online (WWW document). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118445112.stat06227. Accessed 30 Apr 2018
  52. Kral TW (1996) Getting the facts straight. News Lepid Soc 38:41–44Google Scholar
  53. Lalonde MML, Marcus JM (2018) Getting Western: biogeographical analysis of morphological variation, mitochondrial haplotypes, and nuclear markers reveals cryptic species and hybrid zones in the Junonia butterflies of the American Southwest and Mexico. Syst Entomol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12335 Google Scholar
  54. Lalonde MML, McCullagh BS, Marcus JM (2018) The taxonomy and population structure of the buckeye butterflies (Genus Junonia, Nymphalidae: Nymphalini) of Florida, USA. J Lepid Soc 72:97–115Google Scholar
  55. Lamichhaney S, Han F, Webster MT, Andersson L, Grant BR, Grant PR (2018) Rapid hybrid speciation in Darwin’s finches. Science 359:224–228.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao4593 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Laufer P (2010) The dangerous world of butterflies: the startling subculture of criminals, collectors, and conservationists. Lyons Press, GuilfordGoogle Scholar
  57. Linnaeus (1758) systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum clases, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, symonymis, locis. Tomis I, 10 ed. Syst Nat (Edn 10)1:473Google Scholar
  58. Lister AM (2011) Natural history collections as sources of long-term datasets. Trends Ecol Evol 26:153–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mandrioli M, Borsatti F, Mola L (2006) Factors affecting DNA preservation from museum-collected lepidopteran specimens. Entomol Exp Appl 120:239–244.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2006.00451.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Marcus JM (2018) Our love-hate relationship with DNA barcodes, the Y2K problem, and the search for next generation barcodes. AIMS Genet 5:1–23.  https://doi.org/10.3934/genet.2018.3931.3931 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mayr E (1963) Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Miller-Struttmann NE et al (2015) Functional mismatch in a bumble bee pollination mutualism under climate change. Science 329:1541–1544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Minno MC (2016) Rare or endangered butterflies of Southeast Florida Miami blue chapter, North American Butterfly Association. http://miamiblue.org/rare-or-endangered-butterflies. Accessed 16 Sept 2016
  64. Minno MC, Emmel TC (1993) Butterflies of the Florida Keys. Mariposa Press, Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  65. Mitter KT (2013) Junonia genoveva isolate AV-91-0109 cytochrome oxidase subunit I. Genbank Accession KF491814. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/558477287
  66. Mooney HA, Cleland EE (2001) The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5446–5451.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.091093398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Paulsen SM (1994) Quantitative genetics of butterfly wing color patterns. Dev Genet 15:79–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Paulsen SM (1996) Quantitative genetics of the wing color pattern in the buckeye butterfly (Precis coenia and Precis evarete): evidence against the constancy of G. Evolution 50:2360–2372Google Scholar
  69. Peters MJ, Marcus JM (2017) Taxonomy as a hypothesis: testing the status of the Bermuda buckeye butterfly Junonia coenia bergi (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Syst Entomol 42:288–300.  https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Peters JL, Zhuravlev Y, Fefelov I, Logie A, Omland KE (1992) Nuclear loci and coalescent methods support ancient hybridization as cause of mitochondrial paraphyly between gadwall and falcated duck (Anas spp.). Evolution 61:1992–2006.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00149.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pfeiler E, Johnson S, Markow TA (2012) DNA barcodes and insights into the relationships and systematics of buckeye butterflies (Nymphalidae: Nymphalinae: Junonia) from the Americas. J Lepid Soc 66:185–198Google Scholar
  72. Pilsbry HA (1946) Land Mollusca of North America (North of Mexico) volume 2 part 1. Acad Natl Sci Phila Monogr 3:1–520Google Scholar
  73. Rank NE, Dahlhoff EP (2002) Allele frequency shifts in response to climate change and physiological consequences of allozyme variation in a montane insect. Evolution 56:2278–2289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN (2007) BOLD: the barcode of life data system. Mol Ecol Notes 7:355–364. http://www.barcodinglife.org
  75. Remington CL (1968) Suture-zones of hybrid interaction between recently joined biotas. In: Dobzhansky T, Hecht A, Steere WC (eds) Evolutionary Biology, vol 2. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 322–428Google Scholar
  76. Remington CL (1985) Genetical differences in solutions of the crises of hybridization and competition in early sympatry. Boll Zool 52:21–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Roberts KT, Heidl SJ, Zavala NA, Mardulyn PM, Smiley JT, Dahlhoff EP, Rank NE (2014) Variation in nuclear and mitochondrial genes important for energy metabolism along a climatic gradient in montane populations of a leaf beetle. Integr Comp Biol 54:E339Google Scholar
  78. Rutkowski F (1971) Notes on some South Florida Lepidoptera. J Lepid Soc 25:137–138Google Scholar
  79. Saarinen EV, Daniels JC (2012) Using museum specimens to assess historical distribution and genetic diversity in an endangered butterfly. Anim Biol 62:337–350.  https://doi.org/10.1163/157075612X624176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schmidt GA (2016) GISS surface temperature analysis station data: key west international airport, FL (24.6 N, 81.8 W) (WWW document). http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=425000845700&dt=1&ds=14. Accessed 1 June 2016
  81. Schwartz A (1987) The butterflies of the lower Florida Keys. Milwaukee Pub Mus Contrib Biol Geol 73:1–34Google Scholar
  82. Scott JA (1986) The butterflies of North America: a natural history and field guide. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  83. Shapiro AM (1991) Extirpation and recolonization of the buckeye, Junonia coenia (Nymphalidae) following the northern California freeze of December, 1990. J Res Lep 30:209–220Google Scholar
  84. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1989) Statistical methods, 8th edn. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
  85. Sproul JS, Maddison DR (2017) Sequencing historical specimens: successful preparation of small specimens with low amounts of degraded DNA. Mol Ecol Resour 17:1183–1201.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12660 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Stigall AL (2010) Invasive species and biodiversity crises: testing the link in the late Devonian. PLoS ONE 5:e15584.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015584 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Strange JP, Knoblett J, Griswold T (2009) DNA amplification from pin-mounted bumble bees (Bombus) in a museum collection: effects of fragment size and specimen age on successful PCR. Apidologie 40:134–139.  https://doi.org/10.1051/apido/2008070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Stuart A (1963) Standard errors for percentages. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 12:87–101Google Scholar
  89. Tebeau CW (1955) The story of the Chokoloskee Bay country, with reminiscences of pioneer C. S. “Ted” Smallwood. Univ. Miami Press, Coral Gables, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  90. Templeton AR (1989) The meaning of species and speciation: a genetic perspective. In: Otte D, Endler JA (eds) Speciation and its consequences. Sinaur Associates, Sunderland, pp 3–27Google Scholar
  91. Turner TW, Parnell JR (1985) The identification of two species of Junonia Hübner (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): J. evarete and J. genoveva in Jamaica. J Res Lep 24:142–153Google Scholar
  92. Wahlberg N, Wheat C (2008) Genomic outposts serve the phylogenomic pioneers: designing novel nuclear markers. Syst Biol 57:231–242.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150802033006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wahlberg N, Brower AVZ, Nylin S (2005) Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Biol J Linn Soc 86:227–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wandeler P, Hoeck PEA, Keller LK (2007) Back to the future: museum specimens in population genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 22:634–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Watts PC, Thompson DJ, Allen KA, Kemp SJ (2007) How useful is DNA extracted from the legs of archived insects for microsatellite-based population genetic analyses? J Insect Conserv 11:195–198.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9024-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Weather Source (2009a) Weather warehouse past monthly weather data for homestead airforce base, FL: 1960–2016. (WWW document). http://weather-warehouse.com/WeatherHistory/PastWeatherData_HomesteadAfb_Homestead_FL_January.html. Accessed 1 June 2016
  97. Weather Source (2009b) Weather warehouse past monthly weather data for homestead experimental station, FL: 1910–1988 (WWW document). http://weather-warehouse.com/WeatherHistory/PastWeatherData_HomesteadExpStn_Homestead_FL_January.html. Accessed 1 June 2016
  98. Weather Source (2009c) Weather warehouse past monthly weather data for homestead general aviation, FL: 1990–2016 (WWW document). http://weather-warehouse.com/WeatherHistory/PastWeatherData_HomesteadGenAviation_Homestead_FL_January.html. Accessed 1 June 2016
  99. Weather Source (2009d) Weather warehouse past monthly weather data for tavernier, FL: 1936–2009 (WWW document). http://weather-warehouse.com/WeatherHistory/PastWeatherData_Tavernier_Tavernier_FL_December.html. Accessed 1 June 2016
  100. Wells CN, Marko PB, Tonkyn DW (2015) The phylogeographic history of the threatened Diana fritillary, Speyeria diana (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): with implications for conservation. Conserv Genet 16:703–716.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-014-0694-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wheat C (2010) Phosphoglucose isomerase (Pgi) performance and fitness effects among arthropods and its potential role as an adaptive marker in conservation genetics. Conserv Genet 11:387–397.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-009-0042-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Zink RM, Barrowclough GF (2008) Mitochondrial DNA under siege in avian phylogeography. Mol Ecol 17:2107–2121.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03737.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations