Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial patterns and drivers of invasive rodent dynamics in New Zealand forests

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Populations of invasive ship rat (Rattus rattus) and house mouse (Mus musculus) vary greatly over both time and space in New Zealand’s indigenous forests. Both species threaten endemic fauna, and their spatiotemporal variation over short time scales and steep environmental gradients present substantial challenges for conservation management. We fitted models to 18 years of 3-monthly records from a large-scale tracking-tunnel network to (1) predict, classify and describe forest-wide spatial patterns of temporal dynamics of unmanaged rat and mouse populations, and (2) understand the population-limiting roles of environment and biotic interactions. We distinguish six classes of forest rodent dynamics by classifying deciles of predicted rat-tracking rates. Classes form sequences across broad latitudinal and elevation gradients, and grade from ‘irruptive’, with low median but synchronous high maximum rat and mouse tracking rates in colder forests, to ‘continuously ratty’, with high median rat and low unsynchronised mouse tracking rates in warmer forests. Mice irrupt alone more frequently in colder forests, and their tracking rates are spatially reciprocal with rat tracking rate minima but not maxima. We conclude that predictable spatial patterns of rodent population dynamics arise from stronger low-temperature limitations on rats than mice, biotic limitation of mice by rats, and spatiotemporal food resource patterns affecting both species. Practical implications are that native species conservation in New Zealand forests requires spatially-differentiated predator management regimes; ship rats are likely to become increasingly prevalent at higher elevations as climate warms; and suppression of ship rats alone will release house mouse populations, especially in warmer forests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell GL, Potter MA, McLennan JA, Minot EO (2003) The role of predators in ship rat and house mouse population eruptions: drivers or passengers? Oikos 100:601–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman L, Innes J, Gillies C, Fitzgerald N, Rohan M, King C (2018) Interactions between ship rats and house mice at Pureora Forest Park. New Zeal J Zool 45:238–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown KP, Moller H, Innes J, Alterio N (1996) Calibration of tunnel tracking rates to estimate relative abundance of ship rats (Rattus rattus) and mice (Mus musculus) in a New Zealand forest. New Zeal J Ecol 20:271–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown K, Elliott GE, Innes J, Kemp J (2015) Ship rat, stoat and possum control on mainland New Zealand: an overview of techniques, successes and challenges. Department of Conservation, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Caughley G, Peek JM, Flader SL (1981) Comments on “Natural regulation of ungulates (what constitutes a real wilderness?)”. Wildl Soc B 9:232–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman TB, Veblen TT, Schoennagel T (2012) Spatiotemporal patterns of mountain pine beetle activity in the southern rocky mountains. Ecology 93:2175–2185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie JE, Wilson PR, Taylor RH, Elliott GE (2017) How elevation affects ship rat (Rattus rattus) capture patterns, Mt Misery, New Zealand. New Zeal J Ecol 41:113–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowding JE, Murphy EC (1994) Ecology of ship rats (Rattus rattus) in a kauri (Agathis australis) forest in Northland, New Zealand. New Zeal J Ecol 18:19–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Dymond JR, Shepherd JD (2004) The spatial distribution of indigenous forest and its composition in the Wellington region, New Zealand, from ETM + satellite imagery. Remote Sens Environ 90:116–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efford MG, Fitzgerald BM, Karl BJ, Berben PH (2006) Population dynamics of the ship rat Rattus rattus L. in the Orongorongo Valley, New Zealand. New Zeal J Zool 33:273–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Leathwick JR, Hastie T (2008) A working guide to boosted regression trees. J Anim Ecol 77:802–813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott GP, Kemp J (2016) Large-scale pest control in New Zealand beech forests. Ecol Manag Restor 17:200–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott GP, Wilson PR, Taylor RH, Beggs JR (2010) Declines in common, widespread native birds in a mature temperate forest. Biol Cons 143:2119–2126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24:38–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies C, Williams D (2013) DOC tracking tunnel guide v2.5.2: using tracking tunnels to monitor rodents and mustelids. Department of Conservation, Science & Capability Group, Hamilton

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldwater N, Perry GLW, Clout MN (2012) Responses of house mice to the removal of mammalian predators and competitors. Austral Ecol 37:971–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill RS, Jordan GJ, Macphail MK (2015) Why we should retain Nothofagus sensu lato. Aust Syst Bot 28:190–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes JG (2005) Ship rat. In: King CM (ed) The handbook of New Zealand mammals. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, pp 187–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes JG, Warburton B, Williams D, Speed H, Bradfield P (1995) Large-scale poisoning of ship rats (Rattus rattus) in indigenous forests of the North Island, New Zealand. New Zeal J Ecol 19:5–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes JG, King CM, Flux M, Kimberley MO (2001) Population biology of the ship rat and Norway rat in Pureora Forest Park, 1983–87. New Zeal J Zool 28:57–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes JG, Kelly D, Overton JM, Gillies C (2010) Predation and other factors currently limiting New Zealand forest birds. New Zeal J Ecol 34:86–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassambara A (2017) Practical guide to cluster analysis in R: unsupervised machine learning, vol 1. STHDA. https://www.sthda.com

  • King CM (1983) The relationships between beech (Nothofagus spp.) seedfall and populations of mice (Mus musculus), and the demographic and dietary responses of stoats (Mustela erminea), in three New Zealand forests. J Anim Ecol 52:141–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King CM, Innes JG, Flux M, Kimberley MO, Leathwick JR, Williams DS (1996) Distribution and abundance of small mammals in relation to habitat in Pureora Forest Park. N Zeal J Ecol 20:215–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (2013) Population fluctuations in rodents. University of Chicago Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leathwick JR (2001) New Zealand’s potential forest pattern as predicted from current species–environment relationships. New Zeal J Bot 39:447–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norbury GL, Pech RP, Byrom AE, Innes J (2015) Density-impact functions for terrestrial vertebrate pests and indigenous biota: guidelines for conservation managers. Biol Cons 191:409–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell CF, Weston KA, Monks JM (2017) Impacts of introduced mammalian predators on New Zealand’s alpine fauna. New Zeal J Ecol 41:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2017) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3:1–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway G (2017) gbm: Generalized Boosted Regression Models. R package version 2.1.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gbm

  • Riney T, Watson JS, Bassett C, Turbott EG, Howard WE (1959) Lake Monk expedition: an ecological study in Southern Fiordland. DSIR Bull 135:1–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruscoe WA, Murphy EC (2005) House mouse. In: King CM (ed) The handbook of New Zealand mammals. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, pp 204–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruscoe WA, Ramsey DS, Pech RP, Sweetapple PJ, Yockney I, Barron MC, Perry M, Nugent G, Carran R, Warne R, Brusch C, Duncan RP (2011) Unexpected consequences of control: competitive vs. predator release in four-species assemblage of invasive mammals. Ecol Lett 14:1035–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Core funding from the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment to Manaaki Whenua—Landcare Research supported the analysis. New Zealand’s Department of Conservation designed, collected, and curated the rodent tracking dataset over two decades: we thank many individuals who contributed to this in the field and office. We thank R. Price, A. Monks, W.G. Lee, and R.T.T. Stephens for advice and review.

Data accessibility

The data used in this study will be made available in the permanent Landcare Research Repository https://datastore.landcareresearch.co.nz/.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Walker.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 2132 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walker, S., Kemp, J.R., Elliott, G.P. et al. Spatial patterns and drivers of invasive rodent dynamics in New Zealand forests. Biol Invasions 21, 1627–1642 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-019-01922-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-019-01922-0

Keywords

Navigation