Skip to main content

A review of impact assessment protocols of non-native plants

Abstract

Impact assessment protocols (i.e. scoring systems) for non-native species have been developed and implemented relatively recently, driven by an increasing demand for desk study approaches to screen and classify non-native species, considering their environmental and socio-economic impacts. While a number of impact assessment protocols have been developed, there are no clear guidelines to help researchers, environmental practitioners and policy-makers understand their differences, uses and limitations, and to ultimately assist in the choice of protocol and practical implementation. In this review, we compare the main structure of 26 impact assessment protocols used for non-native plants. We describe these protocols in terms of the impact types that they include, the way in which impacts are categorized and ranked, how uncertainty is considered, and how the overall score is calculated. In general, environmental impacts are included more often than socio-economic impacts. Impacts are rated by estimates of the intensity, extent, persistence and reversibility of the impact. Uncertainty is mainly estimated by the availability and quality of the scientific information, but also by the agreement and relevance of the available evidence on impacts beyond the region in which the impact is assessed (including the assessment of climatic similarity with other invaded areas). The final impact score is usually calculated as the sum of scores, the maximum score achieved across all impact types, or a rule-based aggregation of impacts in order to provide a final rank of the non-native species. We finally indicate issues related with transparency, redundancy, clarity, friendliness, scope, scaling, reproducibility and flexibility as key challenges for impact assessment improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Kumschick and two anonymous reviewers for comments to a previous version of the manuscript. This publication is based upon work from COST Action TD1209 “Alien Challenge” (http://www.brc.ac.uk/alien-challenge/home/) supported by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST). The content of this manuscript is the authors’ responsibility and neither COST nor any person acting on its behalf is responsible for the use, which might be made of the information contained in it. The study was partially supported by the project IMPLANTIN (CGL2015-65346-R) of the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO). MK and PG-M were supported by CABI with core financial support from its member countries (see http://www.cabi.org/about-cabi/who-we-work-with/key-donors/ for details).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Montserrat Vilà.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vilà, M., Gallardo, B., Preda, C. et al. A review of impact assessment protocols of non-native plants. Biol Invasions 21, 709–723 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1872-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1872-3

Keywords

  • Decision-making
  • Environmental impacts
  • Risk analysis
  • Scoring system
  • Socio-economic impacts
  • Uncertainty