Advertisement

Changes in the distribution of Michigan crayfishes and the influence of invasive rusty crayfish (Faxonius rusticus) on native crayfish substrate associations

  • Kelley R. Smith
  • Brian M. RothEmail author
  • Michael L. Jones
  • Daniel B. Hayes
  • Seth J. Herbst
  • Nicholas Popoff
Original Paper

Abstract

Invasive crayfishes have a strong negative effect on multiple trophic levels, including other crayfishes. However, documentation of the spread of non-native crayfish species and their impact on native crayfishes could be improved, particularly over large spatial scales in stream ecosystems. We collected crayfish and quantified habitat at 461 stream sites throughout Michigan in 2014–2016 and compared our collections to a historical account of crayfish collections published in 1975. Our objectives were to: (1) quantify the change in non-native rusty crayfish (Faxonius rusticus) and native species distributions from 1975 to 2014–2016; (2) quantify how rusty crayfish affect the habitat associations of native species in Michigan streams; and (3) determine the effectiveness of dipnets, our primary sampling method. We found all species in more watersheds compared to 1975, likely due in part to increased sampling. However, we found rusty crayfish in 22 more HUC-8 watersheds than in 1975, a larger increase than all other species. Habitat associations of native species also shift in the presence of rusty crayfish. In instances where native species co-occurred with rusty crayfish, most obligate aquatic native species were found in less-preferred habitat such as sand or macrophytes compared to cobble substrate when the species is in isolation. Our results indicate a broad range expansion by rusty crayfish over the last 40 years, suggesting that surveys of crayfish diversity and habitat occupancy should be more routine to inform management of native crayfish species.

Keywords

Rusty crayfish Orconectes Range expansion Crayfish Substrate associations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Roger Thoma, Jim Norrocky for valuable information regarding crayfish ecology, behavior, methods, and classification Brandon Bergen, Casey Koleski, Jon Hummel, Aya Pickett, Emily Giuliano, and Brandon Schroeder for field assistance. Kwamina Otseidu was invaluable in transcribing Lippson’s collections into GPS coordinates. This is publication 2018–17 of the Quantitative Fisheries Center at Michigan State University. This project was funded by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, under Contract No. 751B4300065.

Supplementary material

10530_2018_1852_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (226 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (JPEG 225 kb)

References

  1. Bergman D, Moore P (2003a) Field observations of intraspecific agonistic behavior of two crayfish species, Orconectes rusticus and Orconectes virilis, in different habitats. Biol Bull 205:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergman D, Moore P (2003b) Field observations of intraspecific agonistic behavior of two crayfish species, Orconectes rusticus and Orconectes virilis, in different habitats. Biol Bull 205:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berrill M (1978) Distribution and ecology of crayfish in the Kawartha Lakes region of southern Ontario. Can J Zool 56:166–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berrill M, Hollett L, Margosian A et al (1985) Variation in tolerance to low environmental pH by the crayfish Orconectes rusticus, O. propinquus, and Cambarus robustus. Can J Zool 63:2586–2589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burskey JL, Simon TP (2010) Reach- and watershed-scale associations of crayfish within an area of varying agricultural impact in west-central Indiana. Southeast Nat 9:199–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Capelli G, Munjal B (1980) Hybridization between crayfish of the genus Orconectes: morphological evidence. Crustaceana 39:121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Capelli GM, Munjal BL (1982) Aggressive interactions and resource competition in relation to species displacement among crayfish of the genus Orconectes. J Crustac Biol 2:486–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carreira B, Dias M, Rebelo R (2014) How consumption and fragmentation of macrophytes by the invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii shape the macrophyte communities of temporary ponds. Hydrobiologia 721:89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charlebois P, Lamberti G (1996) Invading crayfish in a Michigan stream: direct and indirect effects on periphyton and macroinvertebrates. J N Am Benthol Soc 15:551–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins NC, Harvey HH, Tierney AJ et al (1983) Influence of predatory fish density on trapability of crayfish in Ontario lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 40:1820–1828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Creaser EP (1931) The Michigan decapod crustaceans. Pap Mich Acad Sci Arts Lett 13:257–276Google Scholar
  12. Creel S, Winnie J Jr, Maxwell B et al (2005) Elk alter habitat selection as an antipredator response to wolves. Ecology 86:3387–3397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crocker DW, Barr DW (1968) Handbook of the crayfishes of Ontario. University of Toronto Press, TorontoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daniels R (1998) Changes in the distribution of stream dwelling crayfishes in the Schoharie Creek system, eastern New York State. Northeast Nat 5:231–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Didham R, Tylianakis J, Hutchison M et al (2005) Are invasive species the drivers of ecological change? Trends Ecol Evol 20:470–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Didham R, Tylianakis J, Gemmell N et al (2007) Interactive effects of habitat modification and species invasion on native species decline. Trends Ecol Evol 22:489–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DiDonato G, Lodge D (1993) Species replacements among Orconectes crayfishes in Wisconsin lakes: the role of predation by fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:1484–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dorn NJ, Mittelbach GG (1999) More than predator and prey: a review of interactions between fish and crayfish. Vie Et Milieu 49:229–237Google Scholar
  19. Dorn N, Urguelles R, Trexler J (2005) Evaluating active and passive sampling methods to quantify crayfish density in a freshwater wetland. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:346–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ESRI (2011) ArcGIS desktop: release 10. Environmental Systems Research Institute, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
  21. Faller M, Harvey GL, Henshaw AJ et al (2016) River bank burrowing by invasive crayfish: spatial distribution, biophysical controls and biogeomorphic significance. Sci Total Environ 569:1190–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Faxon W (1884) Descriptions of new species of Cambarus. Proc Am Acad Arts Sci 20:107–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. France RL (1985) Relationship of crayfish (Orconectes virilis) growth to population abundance and system productivity in small oligotrophic lakes in the experimental Lakes Area, Northwestern Ontario. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42:1096–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garvey JE, Stein RA (1993) Evaluating how chela size influences the invasion potential of an introduced crayfish (Orconectes rusticus). Am Midl Nat 129:172–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garvey JE, Stein RA, Thomas HM (1994) Assessing how fish predation and interspecific prey competition influence a crayfish assemblage. Ecology 75:532–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garvey JE, Rettig JE, Stein RA et al (2003) Scale-dependent associations among fish predation, littoral habitat, and distributions of crayfish species. Ecology 84:3339–3348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gherardi F (2006) Crayfish invading Europe: the case study of Procambarus clarkii. Mar Freshw Behav Phys 39:175–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gherardi F, Daniels W (2004) Agonism and shelter competition between invasive and indigenous crayfish species. Can J Zool 82:1923–1932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hill A, Lodge D (1994) Diel changes in resource demand: competition and predation in species replacement among crayfishes. Ecology 75:2118–2126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hill A, Sinars D, Lodge D (1993) Invasion of an occupied niche by the crayfish Orconectes rusticus: potential importance of growth and mortality. Oecologia 94:303–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hobbs H (1942) The crayfishes of Florida. University of Florida Publications. Biol Sci Ser 3:1–79Google Scholar
  32. Hobbs HH (1981) The crayfishes of Georgia. Smithson Contrib Zool 318:1–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hobbs HI, Jass J (1988) The crayfishes and shrimps of Wisconsin. Wisconsin Public Museum, MilwaukeeGoogle Scholar
  34. Hobbs HHI, Jass JP, Huner JV (1989) A review of global crayfish introductions with particular emphasis on two North American species (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Crustaceana 56:299–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hrabik T, Roth B, Ahrenstorff TD (2014) Predation risk and prey fish vertical migration in Lake Superior: insights from an individual based model of siscowet (Salvelinus namaycush). J Great Lakes Res 40:730–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huner J, Lundquist O (1995) Phyisological adaptations of freshwater crayfishes that permit successful aquacultural enterprises. Am Soc Zool 35:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ilheu M, Bernardo J, Fernandes S (2007) Predation of invasive crayfish on aquatic vertebrates: the effect of Procambarus clarkii on fish assemblages in Mediterranean temporary streams. Biol Invaders Inland Waters 29:543–558Google Scholar
  38. Jansen W, Geard N, Mosindy T et al (2009) Relative abundance and habitat association of three crayfish (Orconectes virilis, O. rusticus, and O. immunis) near an invasion front of O. rusticus, and long-term changes in their distribution in Lake of the Woods, Canada. Aquat Invasions 4:627–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kershner MW, Lodge DM (1995) Effects of littoral habitat and fish predation on the distribution of an exotic crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. J N Am Benthol Soc 14:141–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kiesecker J, Blaustein A (1998) Effects of introduced bullfrogs and smallmouth basson microhabitat use, growth, and survival of native red-legged frogs (Rana aurora). Conserv Biol 12:776–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Seelbach P, Whiley M, Kotanchik J, et al. (1997) A landscape-based ecological classification system for river valley segments in lower Michigan (MI-VSEC Version 1.0). Michigan Department of natural resources fisheries report no. 2036Google Scholar
  42. Kreps T, Larson E, Lodge D (2016) Do invasive rusty crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) decouple littoral and pelagic energy flows in lake food webs? Freshw Sci 35:104–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lippson R (1975) The distribution of the crayfishes of Michigan with aspects of their life cycle and physiology. Michigan State University, East LansingGoogle Scholar
  44. Lodge DM, Lorman JG (1987) Reductions in submersed macrophyte biomass and species richness by the crayfish Orconectes rusticus. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 44:591–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lodge DM, Kershner MW, Aloi JE et al (1994) Effects of an omnivorous crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) on a freshwater littoral food web. Ecology 75:1265–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lodge DM, Stein RA, Brown KM et al (1998) Predicting impact of freshwater exotic species on native biodiversity: challenges in spatial scaling. Aust J Ecol 23:53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lodge DM, Taylor CA, Holdich DM et al (2000) Nonidigenous crayfishes threaten North American freshwater biodiversity. Fisheries 25:7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Losos J, Marks J, Schoener T (1993) Habitat use and ecological interactions of an introduced and a native species of Anolis lizard on Grand Cayman, with a review of the outcomes of anole introductions. Oecologia 95:525–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lozon J, MacIsaac HJ (1997) Biological invasions: are they dependent on disturbance? Environ Rev 5:131–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mackenzie D, Nichols J, Royle A et al (2006) Occupancy estimation and modelling. Academic Press, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  51. Mather ME, Stein RA (1993a) Direct and indirect effects of fish predation on the replacement of a native crayfish by an invading congener. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:1279–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mather ME, Stein RA (1993b) Using growth/mortality trade-offs to explore a crayfish species replacement in stream riffles and pools. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:88–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Michigan Department of Natural Resources (2001) Fisheries management units. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Research Reports, East LansingGoogle Scholar
  54. Momot WT (1995) Redefining the role of crayfish in aquatic ecosystems. Rev Fish Sci 3:33–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Momot WT, Gowing H (1983) Some factors regulating cohort production of the crayfish Orconectes virilis. Freshw Biol 13:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Momot WT, Gowing H, Jones PD (1978) The dynamics of crayfish and their role in ecosystems. Am Midl Nat 99:10–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Morse J, Baldridge A, Sargent L (2013) Invasive crayfish Orconectes rusticus is a more effective predator of substrate nesting fish eggs than native crayfish (O. virilis). Crustaceana 86:387–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moyle PB, Light T (1996) Biological invasions of fresh water: empirical rules and assembly theory. Biol Conserv 78:149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nystrom P, Stenroth P, Holmqvist N et al (2006) Crayfish in lakes and streams: individual and population responses to predation, productivity and substratum availability. Freshw Biol 51:2096–2112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Olden J, McCarthy J, Maxted J et al (2006) The rapid spread of rusty crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) with observations on native crayfish declines in Wisconsin (U.S.A.) over the past 130 years. Biol Invasions 8:1621–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Peck SK (1985) Effects of aggressive interaction on temperature selection by the crayfish, Orconectes virilis. Am Midl Nat 114:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Perry WL, Feder JL, Dwyer G et al (2001a) Hybrid zone dynamics and species replacement between Orconectes crayfishes in a northern Wisconsin lake. Evolution 55:1153–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Perry WL, Feder JL, Lodge DM (2001b) Implications of hybridization between introduced and resident Orconectes crayfishes. Conserv Biol 15:1656–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Perry W, Feder J, Lodge D (2002) Importance of Hybridization between indigenous and nonindigenous freshwater species: an overlooked threat to North American biodiversity. Syst Biol 51:255–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pintor L, Sih A (2009) Differences in growth and foraging behavior of native and introduced populations of an invasive crayfish. Biol Invasions 11:1895–1902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Price J, Welch S (2009) Semi-quantitative methods for crayfish sampling: sex, size, and habitat bias. J Crustac Biol 29:208–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. R Development Core Team (2018) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org
  68. Rabeni CF (1992) Trophic linkage between stream centrarchids and their crayfish prey. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:1714–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Reid S, Nocera J (2015) Composition of native crayfish assemblages in southern Ontario rivers affected by rusty crayfish (Orconectes rusticus Girard, 1852) invasions—implications for endangered queensnake recovery. Aquat Invasions 10:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Roth BM, Kitchell JF (2005) The role of size-selective predation in the displacement of Orconectes crayfishes following rusty crayfish invasion. Crustaceana 78:299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Roth BM, Hein CL, Zanden MJV (2006) Using bioenergetics and stable isotopes to assess the trophic role of rusty crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) in lake littoral zones. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:335–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Roth BM, Tetzlaff JC, Alexander ML et al (2007) Reciprocal relationships between exotic rusty crayfish, macrophytes, and Lepomis species in northern Wisconsin lakes. Ecosystems 10:74–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Saiki M, Tash J (1979) Use of cover and dispersal by crayfish to reduce predation by largemouth bass. In: Johnson D, Stein R (eds) Response of fish to habitat structure in standing water. American Fisheries Society, New York, pp 44–48Google Scholar
  74. Smily PC, Dibble ED (2000) Microhabitat use of an introduced crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) in Long Lake, Wisconsin. J Freshw Ecol 15:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tack P (1939) The life history and ecology of the crayfish Cambarus immunis (Hagen). Michigan State University Press, East LansingGoogle Scholar
  76. Taylor CA, Redmer M (1996) Dispersal of the crayfish Orconectes rusticus in Illinois, with notes on species displacement and habitat preference. J Crustac Biol 16:547–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Taylor CA, Warren ML, Fitzpatrick JF et al (1996) Conservation status of crayfishes of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 21:25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Taylor C, Schuster G, Cooper J et al (2007) A reassessment of the conservation status of crayfishes of the United States and Canada after 10 + years of increased awareness. Fisheries 32:372–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Taylor CA, Schuster G, Wylie D (2015) Field guide to crayfishes of the Midwest. Illinois Natural History Survey Press, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  80. Thoma RF, Jezerinac F, Simon TP (2005) Cambarus (Tubericambarus) polychromatus (Decapoda: Cambaridae), a new species of crayfish from the United States. Proc Biol Soc Wash 118:326–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Trammell M, Butler J (1995) Effects of exotic plants on native ungulate use of habitat. J Wildl Manag 59:808–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. U.S. Department of Agriculture Service Center Agencies—National Geospatial Management Center (2013) 8 Digit Watershed Boundary Dataset. USDA/NRCS—National Geospatial Management Center, RestonGoogle Scholar
  83. Valeix M, Loveridge A, Chamaille-Jammes S et al (2009) Behavioral adjustments of African herbivores to predation risk by lions: spatiotemporal variations influence habitat use. Ecology 90:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Welch S, Eversole A (2006) The occurrence of primary burrowing crayfish in terrestrial habitat. Biol Conserv 130:458–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Werner EE, Gilliam JF, Hall DJ et al (1983) An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64:1540–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J et al (1998) Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wills T, Zorn T, Nuhfer A (2006) Stream status and trends program sampling protocols. In: Schneider J (ed) Manual of fisheries survey methods II: with periodic updates. Michigan Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Special Report 25, Ch. 26, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
  88. Wilson KA, Magnuson JJ, Lodge DM et al (2004) A long-term rusty crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) invasion: dispersal patterns and community change in a north temperate lake. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:2255–2266CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Fisheries and WildlifeMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Michigan Department of Natural ResourcesLansingUSA

Personalised recommendations