Advertisement

Interaction between invasive plant leaf litter and NaCl on two model amphibians

  • Devin G. DiGiacopoEmail author
  • George A. Meindl
  • Sean Ryan
  • Jared Jaeger
  • Matthew Wersebe
  • Amelia Martin
  • Seth A. Robinson
  • Gabrielle Graham
  • Adam R. Palmer
  • Amanda Setteducate
  • Ian Murray
  • Kirsten Prior
  • Jessica Hua
Original Paper

Abstract

Human activities are rapidly changing natural environments, often with harmful consequences for native communities. The introduction of invasive species is particularly damaging to native communities, especially when invasive species alter the chemical environment and create novel, stressful conditions. These abiotic conditions are predicted to favor other stress-tolerant organisms, potentially shifting community abundance and diversity over time. However, few environments are free of other anthropogenic stressors (i.e., chemical contaminants), which can also influence patterns of abundance and diversity. Therefore, to understand the impacts of invasive species, we need to consider their potential interactions with other anthropogenic stressors. Towards this goal, we tested how leachates from invasive plants and road salt impacted a model amphibian that is native to the U.S. (northern leopard frog, Lithobates pipiens) and a model amphibian that is non-native to the U.S. and considered invasive in some localities (African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis). We examined the effects of native and invasive leaf litter leachate and sublethal NaCl concentrations on amphibian development, size, and tolerance to a lethal concentration of NaCl. Exposure to invasive leaf litter and sublethal NaCl both accelerated hatching time in leopard frogs, but neither affected hatching time in Xenopus. Exposure to invasive leaf litter also led to reduced mass and tolerance to lethal NaCl concentrations in the leopard frog, but had no effect on mass and led to increased tolerance to lethal NaCl concentrations in Xenopus. These findings suggest that invasive leaf litter leachate impacts these amphibian species differently, being more stressful to the leopard frog than Xenopus. Further, we demonstrate that the presence of a pollutant may augment the effect of invasive leaf litter on amphibians, highlighting the need to consider concurrent stressors in invasive species management.

Keywords

Xenopus laevis African clawed frog Lithobates pipiens Northern leopard frog Contaminant Salt 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dylan Horvath for his help locating plants in the Binghamton Nature Preserve and Dr. J. Graney for help with the ICPMS analyses. We would also like to thank the Garden Club of America (to MW), and Society of Wetland Scientists (to DGD) for funding this research. Finally, we would like to thank Dr. Nancy Stamp for her guidance in course-based undergraduate research.

Supplementary material

10530_2018_1836_MOESM1_ESM.docx (647 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 647 kb)
10530_2018_1836_MOESM2_ESM.png (1.7 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (PNG 1733 kb)

References

  1. Adams C, Saenz D (2012) Leaf litter of invasive Chinese tallow (Triadica sebifera) negatively affects hatching success of an aquatic breeding anuran, the Southern Leopard Frog (Lithobates sphenocephalus). Can J Zool 90:991–998.  https://doi.org/10.1139/Z2012-067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albecker MA, McCoy MW (2017) Adaptive responses to salinity stress across multiple life stages in anuran amphibians. Front Zool 14:40.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-017-0222-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bais HP, Vepachedu R, Gilroy S et al (2003) Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion: from molecules and genes to species interactions. Science 301:1377–1380.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1083245 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellavance M-E, Brisson J (2010) Spatial dynamics and morphological plasticity of common reed (Phragmites australis) and cattails (Typha sp.) in freshwater marshes and roadside ditches. Aquat Bot 93:129–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2010.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bielen A, Bošnjak I, Sepčić K et al (2016) Differences in tolerance to anthropogenic stress between invasive and native bivalves. Sci Total Environ 543:449–459.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.049 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Borth EB, Custer KW, McEwan RW (2018) Lethal effects of leaf leachate from the non-native invasive shrub Amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii) on a model aquatic organism (Hyalella azteca). Écoscience 25:189–197.  https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2018.1426261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brady SP, Richardson JL (2017) Road ecology: shifting gears toward evolutionary perspectives. Front Ecol Environ 15:91–98.  https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1458 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown MG, Dobbs EK, Snodgrass JW, Ownby DR (2012) Ameliorative effects of sodium chloride on acute copper toxicity among Cope’s gray tree frog (Hyla chrysoscelis) and green frog (Rana clamitans) embryos. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:836–842.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.1751 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chown SL, Slabber S, McGeoch MA et al (2007) Phenotypic plasticity mediates climate change responses among invasive and indigenous arthropods. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 274:2531–2537.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0772 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clavero M, García-Berthou E (2005) Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.01.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen JS, Maerz JC, Blossey B (2012) Traits, not origin, explain impacts of plants on larval amphibians. Ecol Appl 22:218–228.  https://doi.org/10.1890/11-0078.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins SJ, Russell RW (2009) Toxicity of road salt to Nova Scotia amphibians. Environ Pollut 157:320–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.06.032 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Côté IM, Darling ES, Brown CJ (2016) Interactions among ecosystem stressors and their importance in conservation. Proc R Soc B 283:20152592.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2592 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Crooks JA, Chang AL, Ruiz GM (2011) Aquatic pollution increases the relative success of invasive species. Biol Invasions 13:165–176.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9799-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. da Silva Veronez AC, Salla RV, Baroni VD et al (2016) Genetic and biochemical effects induced by iron ore, Fe and Mn exposure in tadpoles of the bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus. Aquat Toxicol 174:101–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2016.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Didham RK, Tylianakis JM, Hutchison MA et al (2005) Are invasive species the drivers of ecological change? Trends Ecol Evol 20:470–474.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dukes JS, Mooney HA (1999) Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends Ecol Evol 14:135–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01554-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Freda J, Dunson WA (1985) The influence of external cation concentration on the hatching of amphibian embryos in water of low pH. Can J Zool 63:2649–2656.  https://doi.org/10.1139/z85-396 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garber EAE, Erb JL, Magner J, Larsen G (2004) Low levels of sodium and potassium in the water from wetlands in minnesota that contained malformed frogs affect the rate of Xenopus development. Environ Monit Assess 90:45–64.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000003565.25474.8f CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Godfrey EW, Sanders GE (2004) Effect of water hardness on oocyte quality and embryo development in the african clawed frog (Xenopus laevis). Comp Med 54:170–175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gomez-Mestre I, Wiens JJ, Warkentin KM (2008) Evolution of adaptive plasticity: risk-sensitive hatching in neotropical leaf-breeding treefrogs. Ecol Monogr 78:205–224.  https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0529.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190Google Scholar
  23. Gutierrez JL, Jones CG, Sousa R (2014) Toward an integrated ecosystem perspective of invasive species impacts. Acta Oecol 54:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haarstad K, Bavor HJ, Mæhlum T (2011) Organic and metallic pollutants in water treatment and natural wetlands: a review. Water Sci Technol 65:76–99.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2011.831 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Howe P, Malcolm H, Dobson S (2004) Manganese and its compounds: environmental aspects. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  26. Hua J, Relyea R (2014) Chemical cocktails in aquatic systems: pesticide effects on the response and recovery of >20 animal taxa. Environ Pollut 189:18–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hua J, Jones DK, Mattes BM, Cothran RD, Relyea R, Hoverman JT (2015) The contribution of phenotypic plasticity to the evolution of insecticide tolerance in amphibian populations. Evol Appl 8:586–596.  https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12267 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones B, Snodgrass JW, Ownby DR (2015) Relative toxicity of NaCl and road deicing salt to developing amphibians. Copeia 103:72–77.  https://doi.org/10.1643/CP-13-082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaushal SS, Groffman PM, Likens GE et al (2005) Increased salinization of fresh water in the northeastern United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:13517–13520.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506414102 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuebbing SE, Nuñez MA, Simberloff D (2013) Current mismatch between research and conservation efforts: the need to study co-occurring invasive plant species. Biol Conserv 160:121–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lafferty KD, Page CJ (1997) Predation on the endangered tidewater goby, Eucyclogobius newberryi, by the introduced African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis, with notes on the frog’s parasites. Copeia 1997:589–592.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1447564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lambert MR, Edwards TM (2016) Hormonally active phytochemicals and vertebrate evolution. Evol Appl 10:419–432.  https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12469 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lambert MR, Stoler AB, Smylie MS et al (2016) Interactive effects of road salt and leaf litter on wood frog sex ratios and sexual size dimorphism. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 74:141–146.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2016-0324 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lannoo MJ (2005) Amphibian declines: the conservation status of United States species. University of California Press, Berkeley, p 1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lewis SL, Maslin MA (2015) Defining the anthropocene. Nature 519:171.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14258 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Luque GM, Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C et al (2014) The 100th of the world’s worst invasive alien species. Biol Invasions 16:981–985.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0561-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Macel M, de Vos RCH, Jansen JJ et al (2014) Novel chemistry of invasive plants: exotic species have more unique metabolomic profiles than native congeners. Ecol Evol 4:2777–2786.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1132 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Maerz JC, Brown CJ, Chapin CT, Blossey B (2005) Can secondary compounds of an invasive plant affect larval amphibians? Funct Ecol 19:970–975.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.01054.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Main AR, Headley JV, Peru KM et al (2014) Widespread use and frequent detection of neonicotinoid insecticides in wetlands of Canada’s prairie pothole region. PLoS ONE 9:e92821.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092821 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. McKenzie LA, Brooks RC, Johnston EL (2012) A widespread contaminant enhances invasion success of a marine invader. J Appl Ecol 49:767–773.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02158.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Measey GJ, Rödder D, Green SL et al (2012) Ongoing invasions of the African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis: a global review. Biol Invasions 14:2255–2270.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0227-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mooney H, Hobbs R (2000) Global change and invasive species: where do we go from here. In: Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (eds) Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Newman MC (2014) Fundamentals of ecotoxicology: the science of pollution, 4th edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J (1994) Normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin): a systematical and chronological survey of the development from the fertilized egg till the end of metamorphosis. North-Holland Publishing Co., AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  45. O’Loughlin LS, Green PT (2017) Secondary invasion: when invasion success is contingent on other invaders altering the properties of recipient ecosystems. Ecol Evol 7:7628–7637.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3315 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Quesnelle PE, Fahrig L, Lindsay KE (2013) Effects of habitat loss, habitat configuration and matrix composition on declining wetland species. Biol Conserv 160:200–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.01.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rowland FE, Tuttle SK, González MJ, Vanni MJ (2016) Canopy cover and anurans: nutrients are the most important predictor of growth and development. Can J Zool 94:225–232.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2015-0022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rubbo MJ, Belden LK, Kiesecker JM (2008) Differential responses of aquatic consumers to variations in leaf-litter inputs. Hydrobiologia 605:37–44.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9298-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sacerdote AB, King RB (2009) Dissolved oxygen requirements for hatching success of two ambystomatid salamanders in restored ephemeral ponds. Wetlands 29:1202–1213.  https://doi.org/10.1672/08-235.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sacerdote AB, King RB (2014) Direct effects of an invasive European buckthorn metabolite on embryo survival and development in Xenopus laevis and Pseudacris triseriata. J Herpetol 48:51–58.  https://doi.org/10.1670/12-066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Semlitsch RD, Scott DE, Pechmann JHK (1988) Time and size at metamorphosis related to adult fitness in Ambystoma talpoideum. Ecology 69:184–192.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1943173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invasions 1:21–32.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010086329619 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith SM, Roman CT, James-Pirri M-J et al (2009) Responses of plant communities to incremental hydrologic restoration of a tide-restricted Salt Marsh in Southern New England (Massachusetts, U.S.A.). Restor Ecol 17:606–618.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00426.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Somma LA (2017) Xenopus laevis (Daudin, 1802): nonindigenous aquatic species database. U.S. Geological Survey, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
  55. Stebbins RC (2003) A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston, p 570Google Scholar
  56. Stephens JP, Berven KA, Tiegs SD (2013) Anthropogenic changes to leaf litter input affect the fitness of a larval amphibian. Freshwater Biol 58:1631–1646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stoler AB, Relyea RA (2013) Bottom-up meets top-down: leaf litter inputs influence predator–prey interactions in wetlands. Oecologia 173:249–257.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2595-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Stoler AB, Hintz WD, Jones DK et al (2017) Leaf litter mediates the negative effect of road salt on forested wetland communities. Freshw Sci 36:415–426.  https://doi.org/10.1086/692139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thompson RL, Jones RL (2001) Woody plants of rock creek research natural area and watershed uplands, Laurel County, Kentucky. Castanea 66:275–287Google Scholar
  60. Thomsen MS, McGlathery KJ (2007) Stress tolerance of the invasive macroalgae Codium fragile and Gracilaria vermiculophylla in a soft-bottom turbid lagoon. Biol Invasions 9:499–513.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-006-9043-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tylianakis JM, Didham RK, Bascompte J, Wardle DA (2008) Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 11:1351–1363.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01250.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M (2010) A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol Lett 13:235–245.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01418.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Vonesh JR (2005) Sequential predator effects across three life stages of the African tree frog, Hyperolius spinigularis. Oecologia 143:280–290.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1806-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Vonesh JR, Bolker BM (2005) Compensatory larval responses shift trade-offs associated with predator-induced hatching plasticity. Ecology 86:1580–1591.  https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0535 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Warkentin KM (2011) Plasticity of hatching in amphibians: evolution, trade-offs, cues and mechanisms. Integr Comp Biol 51:111–127.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icr046 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Watling JI, Hickman CR, Lee E, Wang K, Orrock JL (2011) Extracts of the invasive shrub Lonicera maackii increase mortality and alter behavior of amphibian larvae. Oecologia 165:153–159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Weidenhamer JD, Callaway RM (2010) Direct and indirect effects of invasive plants on soil chemistry and ecosystem function. J Chem Ecol 36:59–69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-009-9735-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Wright KM, Whitaker BR (2001) Water quality. In: Wright KM, Whitaker BR (eds) Amphibian medicine and captive husbandry. Kreiger Publishing Co., Malabar, pp 147–157Google Scholar
  69. Zedler JB, Kercher S (2004) Causes and consequences of invasive plants in wetlands: opportunities, opportunists, and outcomes. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:431–452.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680490514673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Devin G. DiGiacopo
    • 1
    Email author return OK on get
  • George A. Meindl
    • 1
  • Sean Ryan
    • 1
  • Jared Jaeger
    • 1
  • Matthew Wersebe
    • 1
  • Amelia Martin
    • 1
  • Seth A. Robinson
    • 1
  • Gabrielle Graham
    • 1
  • Adam R. Palmer
    • 1
  • Amanda Setteducate
    • 1
  • Ian Murray
    • 1
  • Kirsten Prior
    • 1
  • Jessica Hua
    • 1
  1. 1.Biological Sciences DepartmentBinghamton University (SUNY)BinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations