Citizen engagement in the management of non-native invasive pines: Does it make a difference?

Abstract

Civil society can play a relevant role in supporting local environmental management, as volunteer efforts can be carried out at low cost and therefore be sustained over time. We present in this paper the assessment of the effectiveness of a volunteer program for the control of invasive pines in a protected area (PA) in a coastal zone of southern Brazil. Volunteer work has been ongoing for 8 years and the current state of invasion was compared with three simulation scenarios of species distribution that considered suitable habitats for pine invasion. Our results suggest that management actions have been effective. In the absence of any control efforts, pine trees would cover a high percentage of suitable habitats within the PA. Eliminating adult pine trees that function as seed sources and not allowing the next generation to reach maturity has been an efficient control strategy that has led to changes in the population structure of pines in the PA. Reaching neighboring private property owners is key for the future effective control of pines in the area, as all sources of pine seeds need to be eliminated. The approach used in our study may be applied to broader spatial scales to provide a baseline for management efforts needed to effectively control non-native invasive species.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Araújo MB, New M (2007) Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:42–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baret S, Baider C, Kueffer C, Foxcroft LC, Lagabrielle E (2013) Threats to paradise? Plant invasions in protected areas of the Western Indian Ocean Islands. In: Foxcroft LC, Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Genovesi P (eds) Plant invasion in protected areas—patterns, problems and challenges, vol 7. Springer, New York, pp 423–447

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bechara FC, Reis A, Bourscheid K, Vieira NK, Trentin BE (2013) Reproductive biology and early establishment of Pinus elliottii var. elliottii in Brazilian sandy coastal plain vegetation: implications for biological invasion. Sci Agric 70(2):88–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Biehl L, Landgrebe DA (2002) MultiSpec—a tool for multispectral-hyperspectral image data analysis. Comput Geosci 28(10):1153–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bois ST, Silander JA, Mehrhoff LJ (2011) Invasive plant atlas of New England: the role of citizens in the science of invasive alien species detection. Bioscience 61:763–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers WE, Siemann E, Prati D (2005) Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144:1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brandon A, Spyreas G, Molano-Flores B, Carroll C, Ellis J (2003) Can volunteers provide reliable data for forest vegetation surveys? Nat Areas J 23:254–261

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bryce R, Oliver MK, Davies L, Gray H, Urquhart J, Lambin X (2011) Turning back the tide of american mink invasion at an unprecedented scale through community participation and adaptive management. Biol Conserv 144(1):575–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Caruso MML (1990) O desmatamento da Ilha de Santa Catarina de 1500 aos dias atuais, 2nd edn. UFSC, Florianopolis

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cooper RW (1957) Silvicultural characteristics of Slash Pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var elliottii). Station paper. Southeast For Exp Stn 81:13

    Google Scholar 

  11. Crall AW, Newman GJ, Jarnevich C, Stohlgren TJ, Waller DM, Graham J (2010) Improving and integrating data on invasive species collected by citizen scientists. Biol Invasions 12:3419–3428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Crall AW, Jarnevich CS, Young NE, Panke BJ, Renz M, Stohlgren TJ (2015) Citizen science contributes to our knowledge of invasive plant species distributions. Biol Invasions 17(8):2415–2427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Delaney DG, Sperling CD, Adams CS, Leung B (2008) Marine invasive species: validation of citizen science and implications for national monitoring networks. Biol Invasions 10:117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Engler R, Hordijk W, Guisan A (2012) The MIGCLIM R package—seamless integration of dispersal constraints into projections of species distribution models. Ecography 35(10):872–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ford-Thompson AES, Snell C, Saunders G, White PCL (2012) Stakeholder participation in management of invasive vertebrates. Conserv Biol 26(2):345–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Foxcroft LC, McGeoch M (2011) Implementing invasive species management in an adaptive management framework. Koedoe 53(2):11. https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoev53i2.1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Foxcroft LC, Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Genovesi P, MacFadyen S (2017) Plant invasion science in protected areas: progress and priorities. Biol Invasions 19:1353–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Franzese J, Urrutia J, García RA, Taylor K, Pauchard A (2017) Pine invasion impacts on plant diversity in Patagonia: invader size and invaded habitat matter. Biol Invasions 19:1015–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gallo T, Waitt D (2011) Creating a successful citizen science model to detect and report invasive species. Bioscience 61:459–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guimarães TB (2006) Florística e fenologia reprodutiva de plantas vasculares na restinga do Parque Municipal das Dunas da Lagoa da Conceição, Florianópolis, SC. Master thesis, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil

  21. Guizoni-Jr IR, Farias FB, Vieira BP, Willrich G, Silva ES, Mendonça EN, Albuquerque JLB, Gass DA, Ternes MH, Nascimento CE, Roos AL, Couto CCM, Serrão M, Serafini PP, Dias D, Fantacini FM, Santi S, Souza MCR, Silva MS, Barcellos A, Albuquerque C, Espínola CRR (2013) Checklist da avifauna da ilha de Santa Catarina, sul do Brasil. Atualidades Ornitológicas On-line Nº 171. http://www.ao.com.br/download/AO171_50.pdf

  22. Ingwell LL, Preisser EL (2011) Using citizen science programs to identify host resistance in pest-invaded forests. Conserv Biol 25:182–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. INMET (2017) Climatological database. http://www.inmet.gov.br/portal/index.php?r=clima/graficosClimaticos. Acessed 24 Oct 2017

  24. Jankovski (1985) Avaliação da produção e disseminação de sementes em um povoamento de Pinus taeda L. Master thesis, Federal University of Paraná, Brazil

  25. Klein RM (1990) Espécies raras ou ameaçadas de extinção–estado de Santa Catarina–v1. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  26. Klein RM (1997) Espécies raras ou ameaçadas de extinção–estado de Santa Catarina–v3. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kueffer C, McDougall K, Alexander J, Daehler C, Edwards P, Haider S, Milbau A, Parks C, Pauchard A, Reshi ZA, Rew LJ, Schroder M, Seipel T (2013) Invasions into mountain protected areas: assessment, prevention and control at multiple spatial scales. In: Foxcroft LC, Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Genovesi P (eds) Plant invasion in protected areas—patterns, problems and challenges. Springer, New York, pp 89–113

    Google Scholar 

  28. Le Maitre DC, Versfeld DB, Chapman RA (2000) The impact of invading alien plants on surface water resources in South Africa: a preliminary assessment. Water 26:397–408

    Google Scholar 

  29. McConnachie M, vanWilgen BW, Ferraro PJ, Forsyth AT, Richardson DM, Gaertner M, Cowling RM (2016) Using counterfactuals to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of controlling biological invasions. Ecol Appl 26:475–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Miralles L, Dopico E, Devlo-Delva F, Garcia-Vazquez E (2016) Controlling populations of invasive pygmy mussel (Xenostrobus securis) through citizen science and environmental DNA. Mar Pollut Bull 110:127–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Naimi B, Araújo MB (2016) sdm: a reproducible and extensible R platform for species distribution modelling. Ecography 39:368–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nuñez MA, Chiuffo MC, Torres A, Paul T, Dimarco RD, Raal P, Policelli N, Moyano J, García RA, van Wilgen BW, Pauchard A, Richardson D (2017) Ecology and management of invasive Pinaceae around the world: progress and challenges. Biol Invasions 19:3099–3120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pagès M, Fischer A, van der Wal R (2017) The dynamics of volunteer motivations for engaging in the management of invasive plants:insights from a mixed-methods study on Scottish seabird islands. J Environ Plann Man. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1329139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pichancourt JB, Chadès I, Firn J, van Klinken RD, Martin TD (2012) Simple rules to contain an invasive species with a complex life cycle and high dispersal capacity. J Appl Ecol 49:52–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pocock MJO, Roy HE, Fox R, Ellis WN, Botham M (2016) Citizen science and invasive alien species: predicting the detection of the oak processionary moth Thaumetopoea processionea by moth recorders. Biol Conserv 208:146–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Queensland Government (2011) Slash pine, Pinus elliottii. Weeds of Australia, Biosecurity Queensland Edition. Brisbane, QLD, Australia: Queensland Government. http://keyserver.lucidcentral.org/weeds/data/080c0106-040c-4508-8300-0b0a06060e01/media/Html/Pinus_elliottii.htm. Accessed 26 June 2018

  37. R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

  38. Rejmánek M, Pitcairn MJ (2002) When eradication is a realistic goal? In: Veitch CR, Clout MN (eds) Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species. IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group. IUCN Gland, Cambridge, pp 249–253

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ricciardi A, Blackburn TM, Carlton JT, Dick JTA, Hulme PE, Iacarella JC, Jeschke JM, Liebhold AM, Lockwood JL, MacIsaac HJ, Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Ruiz GM, Simberloff D, Sutherland WF, Wardle DA, Aldridge DC (2017) Invasion science: a horizon scan of emerging challenges and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 32(6):464–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Richardson DM (1998) Forestry trees as invasive aliens. Conserv Biol 12:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Richardson DM (2006) Pinus: A model group for unlocking the secrets of alien plant invasions? Preslia 78:375–388

    Google Scholar 

  42. Richardson DM, Higgins SI (1998) Pines as invaders in the southern hemisphere. In: Richardson DM (ed) Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 450–473

    Google Scholar 

  43. Richardson DM, Williams PA, Hobbs RJ (1994) Pine invasions in the southern hemisphere: determinants of spread and invasibility. J Biogeogr 21:511–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rundel PW, Dickie IA, Richardson DM (2014) Tree invasions into treeless areas: mechanisms and ecosystem processes. Biol Invasions 16(3):663–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. SIGSC (2017) Geographical information system of Santa Catarina state. http://sigsc.sds.sc.gov.br/download/index.jsp. Accessed 03 Mar 2017

  46. Simberloff D (2003) Eradication—preventing invasions at the outset. Weed Sci 51(2):247–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Simberloff D, Nuñez MA, Ledgard NJ, Pauchard A, Richardson DM, Sarasola M, Van Wilgen BW, Zalba SM, Zenni RD, Bustamante R, Peña E, Ziller SR (2010) Spread and impact of introduced conifers in South America: lessons from other southern hemisphere regions. Aust Ecol 35:489–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tomazello Filho M, Latorraca JVF, Fischer FM, Muñiz GIB, Melandri JL, Stasiak PM, Torres MA, Piccioni WJ, Hoffmann HA, Silva LD (2016) Avaliação da Dispersão de Sementes de Pinus taeda L. pela Análise dos Anéis de Crescimento de Árvores de Regeneração Natural. Floresta e Ambiente. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.040913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. USDA Plants Database (2017). https://plants.usda.gov/java. Accessed 16 Jan 2018

  50. Valduga MO, Zenni RD, Vitule JRS (2016) Ecological impacts of non-native tree species plantations are broad and heterogeneous: a review of Brazilian research. An Acad Bras de Ciênc 88(3):1675–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. van Wilgen BW, Fill JM, Baard J, Cheney C, Forsyth AT, Kraaij T (2016) Historical costs and projected future scenarios for the management of invasive alien plants in protected areas in the Cape Floristic Region. Biol Conserv 200:168–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zalba SM, Ziller SR (2007) Adaptive management of alien invasive species: putting the theory into practice. Perspect Ecol Conserv 5(2):86–92

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zenni RD, Ziller SR, Pauchard A, Rodriguez-Cabal M, Nuñez MA (2017) Invasion science in the developing world: a response to Ricciardi. Trends Ecol Evol 32(11):807–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ziller SR, Galvão F (2000) A degradação da Estepe Gramíneo-Lenhosa no Paraná por contaminação biológica de P. elliottii e P. taeda. Revista Floresta 32(1):41–47

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Professor David Richardson and three anonymous reviewers provided thoughtful comments and suggestions which helped to improve the manuscript. We acknowledge and thank all the volunteers who have been working on the project since 2010. We thank all the people who have made donations through our crowd funding campaigns. The Federal University of Santa Catarina provided transportation for volunteers on occasion and a scholarship for an undergraduate student in 2010. MSD, RBS, ELHG and TCLS are supported by CAPES-Brazil.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele de Sá Dechoum.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 5694 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dechoum, M., Giehl, E.L.H., Sühs, R.B. et al. Citizen engagement in the management of non-native invasive pines: Does it make a difference?. Biol Invasions 21, 175–188 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1814-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Coastal scrub
  • Control program
  • Habitat suitability models
  • Invasive pines
  • Simulations
  • Volunteering