Southern New England is currently experiencing the first major gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) defoliation event in nearly 30 years. Using a novel approach based on time series of Landsat satellite observations, we generated consistent maps of gypsy moth defoliation for 2015 (first year of the outbreak), 2016 (second year of outbreak), and 2017 (third year of outbreak). Our mapped results demonstrate that the defoliation event continued through the 2017 growing season. Moreover, the affected area more than doubled in extent each year and expanded radially to encompass 4386 km2 of forested area in Rhode Island, eastern Connecticut, and central Massachusetts. The current gypsy moth outbreak is believed to be the result of a series of unusually dry springs in 2014, 2015, and 2016, which suppressed Entomophaga maimaiga, a fungal mortality agent that has historically reduced gypsy moth impacts in this region. The continuation and marked expansion of the outbreak in 2017 despite average spring rainfall suggests that caterpillars were active early in the growing season, and mortality from the fungus likely peaked after significant defoliation had already occurred. Our Landsat time series approach represents an important new source of data on spatial and temporal patterns in gypsy moth defoliation, and continued satellite-based monitoring will be essential for tracking the progress of this and other gypsy moth outbreaks.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Asaro C, Chamberlin LA (2015) Outbreak history (1953–2014) of spring defoliators impacting oak-dominated forests in Virginia, with emphasis on gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) and fall cankerworm (Alsophila pometaria Harris). Am Entomol 61:174–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/ae/tmv043
Barron ES, Patterson WA III (2008) Monitoring the effects of gypsy moth defoliation on forest stand dynamics on Cape Cod, Massachusetts: sampling intervals and appropriate interpretations. For Ecol Manag 256:2092–2100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.08.001
Davidson CB, Gottschalk KW, Johnson JE (1999) Tree mortality following defoliation by the European gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) in the United States: a review. For Sci 4:74–84
De Beurs K, Townsend P (2008) Estimating the effect of gypsy moth defoliation using MODIS. Remote Sens Environ 112(10):3983–3990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.07.008
Elkinton JS, Liebhold AM (1990) Population dynamics of gypsy moth in North America. Annu Rev Entomol 35:571–596
Elkinton J, Boettner J, Pasquarella V (2018) Gypsy moths in 2018: a pathogen epidemic. MassWildlife 68:30–35
Fajvan MA, Wood JM (1996) Stand structure and development after gypsy moth defoliation in the Appalachian Plateau. For Ecol Manag 89:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03865-0
Foster JR, Townsend PA, Mladenoff DJ (2013) Spatial dynamics of a gypsy moth defoliation outbreak and dependence on habitat characteristics. Landsc Ecol 28:1307–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9879-8
Gandhi KJ, Herms DA (2010) Direct and indirect effects of alien insect herbivores on ecological processes and interactions in forests of eastern North America. Biol Invasions 12:389–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9627-9
Hajek AE, Roberts DW (1991) Pathogen reservoirs as a biological control resource: introduction of Entomophaga maimaiga to North American gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar, populations. Biol Control 1:9–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/1049-9644(91)90098-K
Hajek AE, Humber RA, Elkinton JS (1995) Mysterious origin of Entomophaga maimaiga in North America. Am Entomol 41:31–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/ae/41.1.31
Liebhold A, Elkinton J, Williams D, Muzika RM (2000) What causes outbreaks of the gypsy moth in North America? Popul Ecol 42:257–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012004
McShea WJ, Healy WM, Devers P, Fearer T, Koch FH, Stauffer D, Waldon J (2007) Forestry matters: decline of oaks will impact wildlife in hardwood forests. J Wildl Manag 71:1717–1728. https://doi.org/10.2193/2006-169
Morin RS, Liebhold AM (2004) Area-wide analysis of hardwood defoliator effects on tree conditions in the Allegheny Plateau. North J Appl For 21:31–39
Morin RS, Liebhold AM (2016) Invasive forest defoliator contributes to the impending downward trend of oak dominance in eastern North America. Forestry 89:284–289. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpv053
Nelson RF (1983) Detecting forest canopy change due to insect activity using Landsat MSS. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 49(9):1303–1314
Ostfeld RS, Jones CG (2010) The ecology of place in oak forests. In: Billick I, Price MV (eds) The ecology of place: contributions of place-based research to ecological understanding. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Pasquarella VJ, Bradley BA, Woodcock CE (2017) Near-real-time monitoring of insect defoliation using Landsat time series. Forests 8:275. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8080275
Rock BN, Vogelmann JE, Williams DL, Vogelmann AF, Hoshizaki T (1986) Remote detection of forest damage. Bioscience 36(7):439–445
Rullan-Silva CD, Olthoff AE, Delgado de la Mata JA, Pajares-Alonso JA (2013) Remote monitoring of forest insect defoliation—a review. For Syst 22(3):377. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2013223-04417
Senf C, Pflugmacher D, Wulder MA, Hostert P (2015) Characterizing spectral–temporal patterns of defoliator and bark beetle disturbances using Landsat time series. Remote Sens Environ 170(C):166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.09.019
Spruce JP, Sader S, Ryan RE, Smoot J, Kuper P, Ross K, Prados D, Russell J, Gasser G, McKellip R, Hargrove W (2011) Assessment of MODIS NDVI time series data products for detecting forest defoliation by gypsy moth outbreaks. Remote Sens Environ 115(2):427–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.09.013
Townsend PA, Singh A, Foster JR, Rehberg NJ, Kingdon CC, Eshleman KN, Seagle SW (2012) A general Landsat model to predict canopy defoliation in broadleaf deciduous forests. Remote Sens Environ 119:255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.12.023
Woodcock CE, Allen R, Anderson M et al (2008) Free access to Landsat imagery. Science 320:1011. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.320.5879.1011a
The project described in this publication was supported by Grant or Cooperative Agreement No. G12AC00001 from the United States Geological Survey. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center or the USGS. This manuscript is submitted for publication with the understanding that the United States Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Governmental purposes. The authors would like to thank Jeff Boettner, Emily Fusco, Brittany Laginhas, Eve Beaury, Caroline Curtis, and our three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
About this article
Cite this article
Pasquarella, V.J., Elkinton, J.S. & Bradley, B.A. Extensive gypsy moth defoliation in Southern New England characterized using Landsat satellite observations. Biol Invasions 20, 3047–3053 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1778-0
- Gypsy moth
- Lymantria dispar
- Entomophaga maimaiga
- New England
- Remote sensing