Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 20, Issue 11, pp 3167–3178 | Cite as

Invertebrates associated with aquatic plants bought from aquarium stores in Canada and New Zealand

  • Ian C. DugganEmail author
  • Paul D. Champion
  • Hugh J. MacIsaac
Original Paper

Abstract

Invertebrate species carried incidentally (i.e., ‘hitchhikers’) in the aquarium trade have gained increasing attention in recent years, but factors affecting the movement of species from stores to homes are poorly understood. We aimed to determine how macrophytes bought from stores act as vectors for transport of non-indigenous invertebrate species. We tested whether incidental invertebrate faunas carried on macrophytes vary internationally by comparing the New Zealand and Canadian trades, and if macrophyte species with different morphologies carry different risks. We recorded a large variety of invertebrate species associated with Vallisneria spp., Sword plants (Echinodorus spp.) and Elodea canadensis bought from stores, including species non-indigenous to both countries. Community composition of incidental fauna differed significantly between New Zealand (primarily domestically cultivated) and Canadian (primarily imported) bought macrophytes. Differences in composition between different macrophyte species were only statistically significant between wild-collected E. canadensis and the cultured species in New Zealand. Behaviours observed in stores, such as the amount of time macrophytes were removed from water before being placed in plastic bags for transport, did not affect the abundances or richness of incidental invertebrates transported, and thus did not appear to be effective in reducing invasion risk. We therefore recommend chemical treatment for removal of invertebrates from macrophytes at or pre-border, and from tanks containing plants at culture facilities and in stores. Such management will reduce the probability of introduction of hitchhikers to home aquaria, from which risk of release to natural waters is greatest.

Keywords

Incidental fauna Hitchhikers Biological invasions Ornamental plants Aquarium trade Copepoda 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Jiri Patoka and an anonymous reviewer for providing comments that improved our manuscript. HJM was supported by an NSERC Discovery Grant and Canada Research Chair.

Supplementary material

10530_2018_1766_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (124 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (JPEG 123 kb)

References

  1. Abe H, Tanaka M, Ueno Y (2017) First report of the non-native freshwater nereidid polychaete Namalycastis hawaiiensis (Johnson, 1903) from a private goldfish aquarium in eastern Japan. BioInvasions Rec 6:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brunel S (2009) Pathway analysis: aquatic plants imported in 10 EPPO countries. EPPO Bull 39:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buczyński P, Bielak-Bielecki P (2012) Crocothemis servilia (Drury, 1773) (Odonata: Libellulidae) introduced with aquarium plants to Lublin (Poland). Ann Univ Mar Curie Skłodowska Sect C 67:21–26Google Scholar
  4. Carlton JT (1996) Pattern, process, and prediction in marine invasion ecology. Biol Conserv 78:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Champion PD (2012) The identity of Vallisneria in New Zealand. Unpublished report to Ministry for Primary Industries, 4 pGoogle Scholar
  6. Champion PD, Clayton JS (2001) Border control for potential aquatic weeds: stage 2. Weed risk assessment. Sci Conserv 185:1–30Google Scholar
  7. Chang CY, Yoon HJ (2008) Nitokra copepods (Harpacticoida: Ameieridae) from Korea. Korean J Syst Zool 24:115–127Google Scholar
  8. Cheong L (1996) Overview of the current international trade in ornamental fish, with special reference to Singapore. Rev Sci Tech 15:445–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke KR, Warwick RM (1994) Change in Marine Communities: an Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd edn. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, National Research Council, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen J, Mirotchnick N, Leung B (2007) Thousands introduced annually: the aquarium pathway for non-indigenous plants to the St Lawrence Seaway. Front Ecol Environ 5:528–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Connolly JK, Watkins JM, Hinchey EK, Rudstam LG, Reid JW (2017) New cyclopoid copepod (Thermocyclops crassus) reported in the Laurentian Great Lakes. J Great Lakes Res 43:198–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Smet WH (1997) The Dicranophoridae. In: De Smet WH, Pourriot R, Nogrady T (eds) Volume 5: The Dicranophoridae and the Ituridae (Monogononta). Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the World, vol 12. SPB Academic Publishing Bv, Hague, pp 1–325Google Scholar
  13. Duggan IC (2002) First record of a wild population of the tropical snail Melanoides tuberculata in New Zealand. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 36:825–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duggan IC (2010) The freshwater aquarium trade as a vector for incidental invertebrate fauna. Biol Invasions 12:3757–3770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duggan IC (2011) Aquaria. In: Simberloff D, Rejmanek M (eds) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, California, pp 32–35Google Scholar
  16. Duggan IC, Collier KJ (2018) Management of non-indigenous lacustrine animals. In: Howard-Williams C, Quinn J, Collier K, Hamilton D (eds) Lake restoration handbook: a New Zealand perspective. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  17. Duggan IC, van Overdijk CDA, Bailey SA, Jenkins PT, Limén H, MacIsaac HJ (2005) Invertebrates associated with residual ballast water and sediments of cargo-carrying ships entering the Great Lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:2463–2474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duggan IC, Rixon CAM, MacIsaac HJ (2006) Popularity and propagule pressure: determinants of invasion success in aquarium fish. Biol Invasions 8:393–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ejsmont-Karabin J (2011) Does invasions of Vallisneria spiralis L. promote appearance of rare and new rotifer (Rotifera) species in littoral of the lakes heated by power station (Konin Lakes, W. Poland)? Pol J Ecol 59:201–207Google Scholar
  20. Ferreiro N, Feijoó C, Giorgi A, Rosso J (2014) Macroinvertebrates select complex macrophytes independently of their body size and fish predation risk in a Pampean stream. Hydrobiologia 740:191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fish GR (1971) Craspedacusta sowerbyi Lankester (Coelenterata: Limnomedusae) in New Zealand lakes. N Z J Mar Fresh Res 5:66–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grigorovich IA, Korniushin AV, Gray DK, Duggan IC, Colautti RI, MacIsaac HJ (2003) Lake superior: An invasion coldspot? Hydrobiologia 499:191–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Horvath TG, Whitman RL, Last LL (2001) Establishment of two invasive crustaceans (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) in the nearshore sands of Lake Michigan. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:1261–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karanovic T, Kim K, Grygier MJ (2015) A new species of Schizopera (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) from Japan, its phylogeny based on the mtCOI gene and comments on the genus Schizoperopsis. J Nat Hist 49:41–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kobayashi T, Shiel RJ, Segers H (2007) First record of the rotifer Lecane shieli Segers & Sanoamuang, 1994 from Australia. Aust Zool 34:181–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lang K (1948) Monographie der Harpacticiden. Hakan Ohlsson, Lund, p 1682Google Scholar
  28. Lucena-Moya P, Duggan IC (2011) Macrophyte architecture affects the abundance and diversity of littoral microfauna. Aquat Ecol 45:279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MacIsaac HJ (1999) Biological invasion in Lake Erie: past, present and future. In: Munawar M, Edsall T, Munawar IF (eds) State of Lake Eri: past, present and future. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 305–322Google Scholar
  30. Maki K, Galatowitsch S (2004) Movement of invasive aquatic plants into Minnesota (USA) through horticultural trade. Biol Conserv 118:389–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. National Research Council (NRC) (2011) Assessing the relationship between propagule pressure and invasion risk in ballast water. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  32. Ng TH, Tan SK, Wong WH, Meier R, Chan S-Y, Tan HH, Yeo DCJ (2016) Molluscs for sale: assessment of freshwater gastropods and bivalves in the ornamental pet trade. PLoS ONE 11:e0161130.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161130 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Nogrady T, Pourriot R (1995) Rotifera 3: The Notommatidae. In: Nogrady T, Dumont HJ (eds) Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world. SPB Academic Publishing, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  34. Patoka J, Bláha M, Kalous L, Vrabec V, Buřič M, Kouba A (2016a) Potential pest transfer mediated by international ornamental plant trade. Sci Rep 6:25896.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25896 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Patoka J, Bláha M, Devetter M, Rylková K, Čadková Z, Kalous L (2016b) Aquarium hitchhikers: attached commensals imported with freshwater shrimps via the pet trade. Biol Invasions 18:457–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Patoka J, Kopecký O, Vrabec V, Kalous L (2017) Aquarium molluscs as a case study in risk assessment of incidental freshwater fauna. Biol Invasions 19:2039–2046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Petroeschevsky A, Champion PD (2008) Preventing further introduction and spread of aquatic weeds through the ornamental plant trade. In: van Klinken RD, Osten VA, Panetta FD, Scanlan JC (eds) Hot topics in the tropics, proceedings of the 16th Australian weed conference, 18–22 May 2008. Cairns Convention Centre, Cairns, Queensland, Australia, pp 399–402Google Scholar
  38. Rahat M, Campbell RD (1974) Three forms of the tentacles and non-tentacled fresh-water coelenterate polyp genera Craspedacusta and Calpasoma. Trans Am Microsc Soc 93:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rixon CAM, Duggan IC, Bergeron NMN, Ricciardi A, MacIsaac HJ (2005) Invasion risks posed by the aquarium trade and live fish markets to the Laurentian Great Lakes. Biodivers Conserv 14:1365–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Segers H (1995) Rotifera 2: the Lecanidae (Monogononta). In: Nogrady T, Dumont HJ (eds) Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world 6. SPB Academic Publishing Bv, Hague, p 226Google Scholar
  41. Strecker AL, Campbell PM, Olden JD (2011) The aquarium trade as an invasion pathway in the Pacific Northwest. Fisheries 36:74–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yanai Z, Dayan T, Mienis HK, Gasith A (2017) The pet and horticultural trades as introduction and dispersal agents of non-indigenous freshwater molluscs. Manag Biol Invasion 8:523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Research Institute, School of ScienceThe University of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand
  2. 2.National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd. (NIWA)HamiltonNew Zealand
  3. 3.Great Lakes Institute for Environmental ResearchThe University of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations