Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 20, Issue 11, pp 3069–3077 | Cite as

Working with gardeners to identify potential invasive ornamental garden plants: testing a citizen science approach

  • Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz
  • Judith Conroy
Original Paper

Abstract

The introduction and use of ornamental plants in gardens is the main pathway for plant invasions globally. High numbers of ornamental plants in gardens may not have started an invasion process yet and are a risk for possible future invasions. Gardeners could be among the first to notice plant traits that have also been recognised to contribute to the potential risk of ornamental plants to escape from cultivation. We asked gardeners in Britain to report ornamental plants that were spreading within their gardens and difficult to control using an online survey. Gardeners submitted 201 records of 121 species of which 104 are non-native in Britain. Most non-native species reported were already recorded and wide-spread in Britain outside cultivation, but about a third are not widely distributed, and eight species are not known outside cultivation. Gardeners’ control efforts were mainly directed to confine plants from further spread, but they also tried to eradicate many of the reported plants. Our results provide evidence that gardeners’ knowledge could help to identify potentially problematic invasive plants early in the invasion process. Even with low levels of participation all evidence collected would be very valuable in official risk management procedures as well as supporting legal obligations on early detection, surveillance and monitoring. At the same time, however, raising awareness of the problem by actively collaborating with gardeners could be of equal importance for the prevention of ornamental plant invasions in the future.

Keywords

Ornamental plants Plant invasion Citizen science Garden Horticulture Non-native plants Great Britain 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to all participants in the survey, people and organisations, who helped to distribute the survey, in particular the Botanical Society of Britain and Ireland, and to Pauline Pears for helpful advice on the survey design. We also thank Mark van Kleunen and the GloNAF consortium for checking our species list against the GloNAF database. Coventry University funded the project with a pump-priming award.

Supplementary material

10530_2018_1759_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (374 kb)
Supplementary material 1–3 (PDF 374 kb)

References

  1. Adriaens T, Sutton-Croft M, Owen K, Brosens D, van Valkenburg J, Kilbey D, Groom Q, Ehmig C, Thürkow F, van Hende P, Schneider K (2015) Trying to engage the crowd in recording invasive alien species in Europe: experiences from two smartphone applications in northwest Europe. Manag Biol Invasions 6:215–225.  https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2015.6.2.12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armitage J, Edwards D, Konyves K, Lancaster N, Marshall R, Cubey J, Merrick J (2016) RHS plant finder 2016. Royal Horticultural Society, WisleyGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradley BA, Blumenthal DM, Early R, Grosholz ED, Lawler JJ, Miller LP, Sorte CJB, D’Antonio CM, Diez JM, Dukes JS, Ibanez I, Olden JD (2011) Global change, global trade, and the next wave of plant invasions. Front Ecol Environ 10:20–28.  https://doi.org/10.1890/110145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Branquart E, Brundu G, Buholzer S, Chapman D, Ehret P, Fried G, Starfinger U, van Valkenburg J, Tanner R (2016) A prioritization process for invasive alien plant species incorporating the requirements of EU Regulation no. 1143/2014. EPPO Bull 46:603–617.  https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cardoso AC, Tsiamis K, Gervasini E, Schade S, Taucer F, Adriaens T, Copas K, Flevaris S, Galiay P, Jennings E, Josefsson M, López BC, Magan J, Marchante E, Montani E, Roy H, von Schomberg R, See L, Quintas M (2017) Citizen science and open data: a model for invasive alien species in Europe. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3:e14811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies ZG, Fuller RA, Loram A, Irvine KN, Sims V, Gaston KJ (2009) A national scale inventory of resource provision for biodiversity within domestic gardens. Biol Conserv 142:761–771.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dehnen-Schmutz K (2011) Determining non-invasiveness in ornamental plants to build green lists. J Appl Ecol 48:1374–1380.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02061.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dehnen-Schmutz K, Touza J, Perrings C, Williamson M (2007a) A century of the ornamental plant trade and its impact on invasion success. Divers Distrib 13:527–534.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00359.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dehnen-Schmutz K, Touza J, Perrings C, Williamson M (2007b) The horticultural trade and ornamental plant invasions in Britain. Conserv Biol 21:224–231.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00538.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Dullinger I, Wessely J, Bossdorf O, Dawson W, Essl F, Gattringer A, Klonner G, Kreft H, Kuttner M, Moser D, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Thuiller W, van Kleunen M, Weigelt P, Winter M, Dullinger S (2017) Climate change will increase the naturalization risk from garden plants in Europe. Global Ecol Biogeogr 26:43–53.  https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12512 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Early R, Bradley BA, Dukes JS, Lawler JJ, Olden JD, Blumenthal DM, Gonzalez P, Grosholz ED, Ibañez I, Miller LP, Sorte CJB, Tatem AJ (2016) Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nat Commun 7:12485.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12485 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Essl F, Dullinger S, Rabitsch W, Hulme PE, Hülber K, Jarošík V, Kleinbauer I, Krausmann F, Kühn I, Nentwig W, Vilà M, Genovesi P, Gherardi F, Desprez-Loustau M-L, Roques A, Pyšek P (2011) Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:203–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Faulkner KT, Robertson MP, Rouget M, Wilson JRU (2016) Understanding and managing the introduction pathways of alien taxa: South Africa as a case study. Biol Invasions 18:73–87.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-0990-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foster G, Bennett J, Sparks T (2017) An assessment of bumblebee (Bombus spp) land use and floral preference in UK gardens and allotments cultivated for food. Urban Ecosyst 20:425–434.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0604-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gallo T, Waitt D (2011) Creating a successful Citizen science model to detect and report invasive species. Bioscience 61:459–465.  https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.6.8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hulme PE, Bacher S, Kenis M, Klotz S, Kühn I, Minchin D, Nentwig W, Olenin S, Panov V, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Roques A, Sol D, Solarz W, Vila M (2008) Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. J Appl Ecol 45:403–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hulme PE, Brundu G, Carboni M, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Dullinger S, Early R, Essl F, González-Moreno P, Groom QJ, Kueffer C, Kühn I, Maurel N, Novoa A, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Seebens H, Tanner R, Touza JM, van Kleunen M, Verbrugge LNH (2018) Integrating invasive species policies across ornamental horticulture supply chains to prevent plant invasions. J Appl Ecol 55:92–98.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12953 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Humair F, Siegrist M, Kueffer C (2014) Working with the horticultural industry to limit invasion risks: the Swiss experience. EPPO Bull 44:232–238.  https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kowarik I (2005) Urban ornamentals escaped from cultivation. In: Gressel J (ed) Crop ferality and volunteerism. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 97–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mack RN (2000) Cultivation fosters plant naturalization by reducing environmental stochasticity. Biol Invasions 2:111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Novoa A, Kaplan H, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM (2016) Resolving a prickly situation: involving stakeholders in invasive cactus management in South Africa. Environ Manag 57:998–1008.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0645-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pergl J, Sádlo J, Petřík P, Danihelka J, Chrtek J Jr, Hejda M, Moravcová L, Perglová I, Štajerová K, Pyšek P (2016) Dark side of the fence: ornamental plants as a source of wild-growing flora in the Czech Republic. Preslia 88:163–184Google Scholar
  24. Preston CD, Pearman DA, Dines TD (2002) New atlas of the British and Irish Flora. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Pyšek P, Richardson DM (2007) Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? In: Nentwig W (ed) Biol Inv. Springer, Berlin, pp 97–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pyšek P, Pergl J, Essl F, Lenzner B, Dawson W, Kreft H, Weigelt P, Winter M, Kartesz J, Nishino M, Antonova LA, Barcelona JF, Cabezas FJ, Cardenas D, Cardenas-Toro J, Castano N, Chacon E, Chatelain C, Dullinger S, Ebel AL, Figueiredo E, Fuentes N, Genovesi P, Groom QJ, Henderson L, Inderijt KA, Masciadri S, Maurel N, Meerman J, Morozova O, Moser D, Nickrent D, Nowak PM, Pagad S, Patzelt A, Pelser PB, Seebens H, Shu W-S, Thomas J, Velayos M, Weber E, Wieringa JJ, Baptiste MP, van Kleunen M (2017) Naturalized alien flora of the world: species diversity, taxonomic and phylogenetic patterns, geographic distribution and global hotspots of plant invasion. Preslia. 89:203–274.  https://doi.org/10.23855/preslia.2017.203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  28. Roy HE, Rorke SL, Beckmann B, Booy O, Botham MS, Brown PMJ, Harrower C, Noble D, Sewell J, Walker K (2015) The contribution of volunteer recorders to our understanding of biological invasions. Biol J Linn Soc 115:678–689.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saul W-C, Roy HE, Booy O, Carnevali L, Chen H-J, Genovesi P, Harrower CA, Hulme PE, Pagad S, Pergl J, Jeschke JM (2017) Assessing patterns in introduction pathways of alien species by linking major invasion data bases. J Appl Ecol 54:657–669.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12819 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seebens H, Blackburn TM, Dyer EE, Genovesi P, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Pagad S, Pyšek P, Winter M, Arianoutsou M, Bacher S, Blasius B, Brundu G, Capinha C, Celesti-Grapow L, Dawson W, Dullinger S, Fuentes N, Jäger H, Kartesz J, Kenis M, Kreft H, Kühn I, Lenzner B, Liebhold A, Mosena A, Moser D, Nishino M, Pearman D, Pergl J, Rabitsch W, Rojas-Sandoval J, Roques A, Rorke S, Rossinelli S, Roy HE, Scalera R, Schindler S, Štajerová K, Tokarska-Guzik B, van Kleunen M, Walker K, Weigelt P, Yamanaka T, Essl F (2017) No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nat Commun 8:14435.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14435 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith RM, Thompson K, Hodgson JG, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2006) Urban domestic gardens (IX): composition and richness of the vascular plant flora, and implications for native biodiversity. Biol Conserv 129:312–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stace CA, Crawley MJ (2015) Alien plants. Harper Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Touza J, Pérez-Alonso A, Chas-Amil ML, Dehnen-Schmutz K (2014) Explaining the rank order of invasive plants by stakeholder groups. Ecol Econom 105:330–341.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.06.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Essl F, Pergl J, Winter M, Weber E, Kreft H, Weigelt P, Kartesz J, Nishino M, Antonova LA, Barcelona JF, Cabezas FJ, Cardenas D, Cardenas-Toro J, Castano N, Chacon E, Chatelain C, Ebel AL, Figueiredo E, Fuentes N, Groom QJ, Henderson L, Inderjit Kupriyanov A, Masciadri S, Meerman J, Morozova O, Moser D, Nickrent DL, Patzelt A, Pelser PB, Baptiste MP, Poopath M, Schulze M, Seebens H, W-s Shu, Thomas J, Velayos M, Wieringa JJ, Pyšek P (2015) Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature 525:100–103.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14910 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. van Kleunen M, Essl F, Pergl J, Brundu G, Carboni M, Dullinger S, Early R, González-Moreno P, Groom QJ, Hulme PE, Kueffer C, Kühn I, Máguas C, Maurel N, Novoa A, Parepa M, Pyšek P, Seebens H, Tanner R, Touza J, Verbrugge L, Weber E, Dawson W, Kreft H, Weigelt P, Winter M, Klonner G, Talluto MV, Dehnen-Schmutz K (2018) The changing role of ornamental horticulture in alien plant invasions. Biol Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12402 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Verbrugge LNH, Leuven RSEW, van Valkenburg JLCH, van den Born RJG (2014) Evaluating stakeholder awareness and involvement in risk prevention of aquatic invasive plant species by a national code of conduct. Aquat Invasions 9:369–381.  https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2014.9.3.11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Williamson M, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Kühn I, Hill M, Klotz S, Milbau A, Stout J, Pyšek P (2009) The distribution of range sizes of native and alien plants in four European countries and the effects of residence time. Divers Distrib 15:158–166.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00528.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Agroecology, Water and ResilienceCoventry UniversityCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations