Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Source–sink dynamics explain the distribution and persistence of an invasive population of common carp across a model Midwestern watershed

Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Source–sink theory is an ecological framework that describes how site and habitat-specific demographic rates and patch connectivity can explain population structure and persistence across heterogeneous landscapes. Although commonly used in conservation planning, source–sink theory has rarely been applied to the management of invasive species. This study tested whether the common carp, one of the world’s most invasive species, exhibits source–sink dynamics in a representative watershed in the Upper Mississippi River Basin comprised of a dozen interconnected ponds and lakes. To test for source–sink population structure, we used standard fish sampling techniques, tagging, and genetic assignment methods to describe habitat-specific recruitment rates and dispersal. Five years of sampling revealed that while adult carp were found across the entire watershed, reproductive success (the presence of young carp) was restricted to shallow ponds. Additionally, nearly a third of the carp tagged in a representative pond dispersed into the connected deeper lakes, suggesting that ponds in this system serve as sources and lakes as sinks. This possibility was confirmed by microsatellite analysis of carp tissue samples (n = 1041) which revealed the presence of two distinct strains of carp cohabitating in the lakes, whose natal origins could be traced back to one of two pond systems, with many adult carp attempting to migrate back into these natal ponds to spawn. We conclude that the distribution and persistence of invasive carp in complex interconnected systems may often be driven by source–sink dynamics and that their populations could be controlled by suppressing reproduction in source habitats or by disrupting dispersal pathways, instead of culling individuals from sink habitats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson EC, Thompson EA (2002) A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics 160:1217–1229

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bajer PG, Sorensen PW (2010) Recruitment and abundance of an invasive fish, the common carp, is driven by its propensity to invade and reproduce in basins that experience winter-time hypoxia in interconnected lakes. Biol Invasions 12:1101–1112

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajer PG, Chizinski CJ, Sorensen PW (2011) Using the Judas technique to locate and remove wintertime aggregations of invasive common carp. Fish Manag Ecol 18:497–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajer PG, Chizinski CJ, Silbernagel JJ, Sorensen PW (2012) Variation in native micro-predator abundance explains recruitment of a mobile invasive fish, the common carp, in a naturally unstable environment. Biol Invasions 14:1919–1929

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajer PG, Cross TK, Lechelt JD, Chizinski CJ, Weber MJ, Sorensen PW (2015a) Across-ecoregion analysis suggests a hierarchy of ecological filters that regulate recruitment of a globally invasive fish. Divers Distrib 21:500–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajer PG, Parker JE, Cross TK, Venturelli PA, Sorensen PW (2015b) Partial migration to seasonally-unstable habitat facilitates biological invasions in a predator-dominated system. Oikos 124:1520–1526

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajer PG, Beck MW, Cross TK, Koch JD, Bartodziej WM, Sorensen PW (2016) Biological invasion by a benthivorous fish reduced the cover and species richness of aquatic plants in most lakes of a large North American ecoregion. Glob Change Biol 22:3937–3947

    Google Scholar 

  • Balon EK (1995) Origin and domestication of the wild carp, Cyprinus carpio: from Roman gourmets to the swimming flowers. Aquaculture 129:3–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonneau JL, Scarnecchia DL (2002) Spawning-season homing of common carp and river carpsucker. Prairie Nat 32:13–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Boughton DA (1999) Empirical evidence for complex source–sink dynamics with alternative states in a butterfly metapopulation. Ecology 80:2727–2739

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown P, Gilligan D (2014) Optimising an integrated pest-management strategy for a spatially structured population of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) using meta-population modelling. Mar Freshw Res 65:538–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown P, Sivakumaran K, Stoessel D, Giles A (2005) Population biology of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) in the Mid-Murray River and Barmah forest wetlands, Australia. Mar Freshw Res 56:1151–1164

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll C, Noss RF, Paquet PC, Schumaker NH (2003) Use of population viability analysis and reserve selection algorithms in regional conservation plans. Ecol Appl 13:1773–1789

    Google Scholar 

  • Chizinski CJ, Bajer PG, Headrick ME, Sorensen PW (2016) Different migratory strategies of invasive common carp and native northern pike in the American Midwest suggest an opportunity for selective manaement strategies. N Am J Fish Manag 36:769–779

    Google Scholar 

  • Conallin AJ, Smith BB, Thwaites LA, Walker KF, Gillanders BM (2016) Exploiting the innate behaviour of common carp, Cyprinus carpio, to limit invasion and spawning in wetlands of the River Murray, Australia. Fish Manag Ecol 23:431–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooijmans R, Van der Poel J, Groenen M, Bierbooms V, Komen J (1997) Microsatellite markers in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Anim Genet 28:129–134

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crook DA, Macdonald JI, McNeil D, Gilligan D, Asmus M, Maas R, Woodhead J (2013) Recruitment sources and dispersal of an invasive fish in a large river system as revealed by otolith chemistry analysis. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 70:953–963

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder LB, Lyman SJ, Figueira WF, Priddy J (2000) Source–sink population dynamics and the problem of siting marine reserves. Bull Mar Sci 66:799–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Dias PC (1996) Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends Ecol Evol 11:326–330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diffendorfer JE (1998) Testing models of source–sink dynamics and balanced dispersal. Oikos 81:417–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver PD, Harris JH, Closs GP, Koen TB (2005) Effects of flow regulation on carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) recruitment in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. River Res Appl 21:327–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JB, Danielson BJ, Pulliam HR (1992) Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65:169–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl DA, VonHoldt BM (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:359–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Epifanio J, Philipp D (2000) Simulating the extinction of parental lineages from introgressive hybridization: the effects of fitness, initial proportions of parental taxa, and mate choice. Rev Fish Biol Fish 10:339–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Figueira WF, Crowder LB (2006) Defining patch contribution in source–sink metapopulations: the importance of including dispersal and its relevance to marine systems. Popul Ecol 48:215–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Frouz J, Kindlmann P (2001) The role of sink to source re-colonisation in the population dynamics of insects living in unstable habitats: an example of terrestrial chironomids. Oikos 93:50–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton AH, Anzalone S, Moran P, Van Doornik DM, Copeland T, Zabel RW (2016) Setting spatial conservation priorities despite incomplete data for characterizing metapopulations. Ecol Appl 26:2558–2578

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Furrer RD, Pasinelli G (2015) Empirical evidence for source–sink populations: a review on occurrence, assessments and implications. Biol Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • García-Berthou E, Alcaraz C, Pou-Rovira Q, Zamora L, Coenders G, Feo C (2005) Introduction pathways and establishment rates of invasive aquatic species in Europe. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:453–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert WA (1996) Passive capture techniques. In: Murphy BR, Willis DW (eds) Fisheries techniques, 2nd edn. American Fisheries Society, Maryland, pp 157–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DM (2004) Source–sink dynamics in a temporally heterogeneous environment. Ecology 85:2037–2045

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson B, Jonsson N (1993) Partial migration: niche shift versus sexual maturation in fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fish 3:348–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlmann K, Kersten P (2013) Deeper insight into the origin and spread of European common carp (Cyprinus carpio carpio) based on mitochondrial D-loop sequence polymorphisms. Aquaculture 376:97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2002) Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233–1236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Daufresne T, Gonzalez A, Gravel D, Guichard F, Leroux SJ, Loeuille N, Massol F, Mouquet N (2013) Unifying sources and sinks in ecology and Earth sciences. Biol Rev 88:365–379

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, De Poorter M (2000) 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species: a selection from the global invasive species database. Invasive Species Specialist Group, Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald JI, Crook DA (2014) Nursery sources and cohort strength of young-of-the-year common carp (Cyprinus carpio) under differing flow regimes in a regulated floodplain river. Ecol Freshw Fish 23:269–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Pressey LR (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller LM, Mero SW, Younk JA (2009) The genetic legacy of stocking muskellunge in a Northern Minnesota lake. Trans Am Fish Soc 138:602–615

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novaro AJ, Funes MC, Walker RS (2005) An empirical test of source–sink dynamics induced by hunting. J Appl Ecol 42:910–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne JB (2012) Distribution, abundance and overwinter survival of young-of-year common carp in a Midwestern watershed. MS thesis, University of Minnesota. https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/123056)

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am Nat 132:652–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn TP (1993) A review of homing and straying of wild and hatchery-produced salmon. Fish Res 18:29–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts CM (1998) Sources, sinks, and the design of marine reserve networks. Fisheries 23:16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Runge JP, Runge MC, Nichols JD (2006) The role of local populations within a landscape context: defining and classifying sources and sinks. Am Nat 167:925–938

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S, Pressey RL, Faith DP, Margules CR, Fuller T, Stoms DM, Moffett A, Wilson KA, Williams KJ, Williams PH, Andelman S (2006) Biodiversity conservation planning tools: present status and challenges for the future. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:123–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea K (1998) Management of populations in conservation, harvesting and control. Trends Ecol Evol 13:371–375

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silbernagel JJ, Sorensen PW (2013) Direct field and laboratory evidence that a combination of egg and larval predation controls recruitment of common carp in many lakes of the upper Mississippi Basin. Trans Am Fish Soc 142:1134–1140

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen PW, Bajer PG (2011) The common carp. In: Simberloff D, Rejmanek M (eds) Encyclopedia of invasive introduced species. University of California Press, Berkely, pp 100–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart IG, Jones MJ (2006) Large, regulated forest floodplain is an ideal recruitment zone for non-native common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Mar Freshw Res 57:333–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart IG, Williams A, McKenzie J, Holt T (2006) Managing a migratory pest species: a selective trap for common carp. N Am J Fish Manag 26:888–893

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AH, Tracey SR, Hartmann K, Patil JG (2012) Exploiting seasonal habitat use of the common carp, Cyprinus carpio, in a lacustrine system for management and eradication. Mar Freshw Res 63:587–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD, Singer MC, Boughton DA (1996) Catastrophic extinction of population sources in a butterfly metapopulation. Am Nat 148:957–975

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis JM, Park KJ (2004) Spatial structure and the control of invasive alien species. Anim Conserv 7:321–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitule JRS, Freire CA, Simberloff D (2009) Introduction of non-native freshwater fish can certainly be bad. Fish Fish 10:98–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber MJ, Brown ML (2009) Effects of common carp on aquatic ecosystems 80 years after “carp as a dominant”: ecological insights for fisheries management. Rev Fish Sci 17:524–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber MJ, Brown ML (2013) Density-dependence and environmental conditions regulate recruitment and first-year growth of common carp in shallow lake. Trans Am Fish Soc 142:471–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber MJ, Hennen MJ, Brown ML, Lucchesi DO, St. Sauver TR (2016) Compensatory response of invasive common carp Cyprinus carpio to harvest. Fish Res 179:168–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilberg MJ, Irwin BJ, Jones ML, Bence JR (2008) Effects of source–sink dynamics on harvest policy performance for yellow perch in southern Lake Michigan. Fish Res 94:282–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodford DJ, McIntosh AR (2010) Evidence of source–sink metapopulations in a vulnerable native galaxiid fish driven by introduced trout. Ecol Appl 20:967–977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto T, Kohmatsu Y, Yuma M (2006) Effects of summer drawdown on cyprinid fish larvae in Lake Biwa, Japan. Limnology 7:75–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Yue GH, Ho MY, Orban L, Komen J (2004) Microsatellites within genes and ESTs of common carp and their applicability in silver crucian carp. Aquaculture 234:85–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zambrano L, MartÌnez-Meyer E, Menezes N, Peterson AT (2006) Invasive potential of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in American freshwater systems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63:1903–1910

    Google Scholar 

  • Zielinski DP, Sorensen PW (2015) Field test of a bubble curtain deterrent system for common carp. Fish Manag Ecol 22:181–184

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD). We thank Nathan Berg, Justin Howard, Jacob Osborne, Mary Headrick, Brett Miller, Seth Miller, and Danielle Grunzke for assistance with fieldwork and laboratory analyses. We would also like to thank RWMWD staff, specifically Bill Bartodziej and Simba Blood, for project coordination and support. We thank Jessica Eichmiller and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter W. Sorensen.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dauphinais, J.D., Miller, L.M., Swanson, R.G. et al. Source–sink dynamics explain the distribution and persistence of an invasive population of common carp across a model Midwestern watershed. Biol Invasions 20, 1961–1976 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1670-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1670-y

Keywords

Navigation