Biological Invasions

, Volume 20, Issue 7, pp 1899–1911 | Cite as

Fish behavior in elevated CO2: implications for a movement barrier in flowing water

  • Eric V. C. Schneider
  • Caleb T. Hasler
  • Cory D. SuskiEmail author
Original Paper


Preventing the spread of invasive fishes is an important aspect of management programs, but is challenging due to the behavior of fish and the nature of aquatic environments. The use of dissolved carbon dioxide (CO2) has recently gained traction as a non-physical barrier for invasive fishes due to its ability to elicit avoidance behaviors in fish. Research to date has focused on the development of CO2 barriers using static water environments. Because CO2 barriers have been proposed for flowing water (i.e., in rivers or shipping canals), understanding the dynamics between fish and elevated CO2 in flowing water is essential. Our study aims to define threshold levels required to alter behavior of bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) and largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) in flowing water, and to quantify behavioral metrics of fish exposed to < 200 [ambient], 25,000, 50,000, and 100,000 µatm pCO2. We also sought to quantify the impacts of repeated CO2 exposure on fish behavior. Bluegill showed increased activity at 25,000 µatm, while largemouth bass showed increased activity at 100,000 µatm. When repeatedly exposed to cycles of 50,000 µatm pCO2, bluegill exhibited increased activity followed by a diminished response after the second exposure. Results from this study define threshold levels required to elicit behavioral responses, and show that the effects that multiple exposures of elevated pCO2 can decline, possibly due to habituation. Results will help shape the development and deployment of a CO2 barrier to control the movements of invasive fishes.


Carbon dioxide Acidification Behavior Climate change Barrier Invasive species 



Funding for this project was provided by the United States Geological Survey, through funds provided by the USEPA’s Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (G14AC00119). Cody Sullivan provided valuable assistance during the course of the experiment. This work conformed to protocols set through the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Illinois (Protocol #15137).

Supplementary material

10530_2018_1669_MOESM1_ESM.docx (251 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 251 kb)


  1. Atchison GJ, Henry MG, Sandheinrich MB (1987) Effects of metals on fish behavior: a review. Environ Biol Fish 18(1):11–25. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Best JD, Berghmans S, Hunt JJFG, Clarke SC, Fleming A, Goldsmith P, Roach AG (2008) Non-associative learning in larval zebrafish. Neuropsychopharmacol 33:1206–1215. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chivers DP, Smith RJF (1994) The role of experience and chemical alarm signalling in predator recognition by fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas. J Fish Biol 44(2):273–285. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cocherell DE, Fangue NA, Klimley PA, Cech JJ Jr (2014) Temperature preferences of hardhead Mylopharodon conocephalus and rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss in an annular chamber. Environ Biol Fish 97:865–873. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cole JJ, Caraco NF, Kling GW, Kratz TK (1994) Carbon dioxide supersaturation in the surface waters of lakes. Science 265:1568–1570CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cummins E, Selfridge A, Sporn P et al (2014) Carbon dioxide-sensing in organisms and its implications for human disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 71(5):831–845. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cupp AR, Erickson RA, Fredricks KT, Swyers NM, Hatton TW, Amberg JJ (2016) Responses of invasive silver and bighead carp to a carbon dioxide barrier in outdoor ponds. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 74(3):297–305. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dennis CE, Adhikari S, Wright AW, Suski CD (2016a) Molecular, behavioral, and performance responses of juvenile largemouth bass acclimated to an elevated carbon dioxide environment. J Comp Physiol B 186:297–311. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dennis CE, Wright AW, Suski CD (2016b) Potential for carbon dioxide to act as a non-physical barrier for invasive sea lamprey movement. J Great Lakes Res 42:150–155. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dettmers JM, Boisvert BA, Barkley T, Sparks RE (2005) Potential impact of steel-hulled barges on movement of fish across an electric barrier to prevent the entry of invasive carp into Lake Michigan. Final report, Illinois Natural History Survey, Urbana, ILGoogle Scholar
  11. Development Core Team R (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  12. Donaldson MR, Amberg J, Adhikari S, Cupp A, Jensen N, Romine J, Wright A, Gaikowski M, Suski CD (2016) Carbon dioxide as a tool to deter the movement of invasive bigheaded carps. Trans Am Fish Soc 145:657–670. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fausch KD, Rieman BE, Dunham JB, Young MK, Peterson DP (2009) Invasion versus isolation: trafe-offs in managing native Salmonids with barriers to upstream movement. Cons Biol 23(4):859–870. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferrari MCO, Dixson DL, Munday PL, McCormick MI, Meekan MG, Sih A, Chivers DP (2011) Intrageneric variations in antipredator responses of coral reef fishes affected by ocean acidification: implications for climate change projections on marine communities. Glob Change Biol 17:2980–2986. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilderhus PA, Marking LL (1987) Comparative efficacy of 16 anesthetic chemicals on rainbow trout. North Am J Fish Manag 7(2):288–292. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hannan KD, Jeffrey JD, Hasler CT, Suski CD (2016) Physiological responses of three species of unionid mussels to intermittent exposure to elevated carbon dioxide. Conserv Physiol 4:1–13. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hara TJ (1994) The diversity of chemical stimulation in fish olfaction and gustation. Rev Fish Biol Fisher 4:1–35. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heuer RM, Grosell M (2014) Physiological impacts of elevated carbon dioxide and ocean acidification on fish. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 307:R1061–R1084. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson MS, Billett MF, Dinsmore KJ, Wallin M, Dyson KE, Jassal RS (2010) Direct and continuous measurement of dissolved carbon dioxide in freshwater aquatic systems-method and applications. Ecohydrology 3:68–78. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jutfelt F, Hedgärde M (2013) Atlantic cod actively avoid CO2 and predator odour, even after long-term CO2 exposure. Front Zool 10:1–8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jutfelt F, Sundin J, Raby GD, Krang A-S, Clark TD (2016) Two-current choice flumes for testing avoidance and preference in aquatic animals. Methods Ecol Evol. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kates D, Dennis C, Noatch MR, Suski CD (2012) Responses of native and invasive fishes to carbon dioxide: potential for a nonphysical barrier to fish dispersal. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 69:1748–1759. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kraus RT, Knight CT, Farmer TM, Gorman AM, Collingsworth PD, Warren GJ, Kocovsky PM, Conroy JD (2015) Dynamic hypoxic zones in Lake Erie compress fish habitat, altering vulnerability to fishing gears. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 72:797–806. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laird NM, Ware JH (1982) Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38:963–974. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindstrom MJ, Bates DM (1990) Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures. Biometrics 46:673–687. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Massel SR (1999) Fluid mechanics for marine ecologists. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Montgomery JC, Coombs SL (2011) Hearing and lateral line: lateral line neuroethology. In: Encyclopedia of Fish Physiology, pp 329–335.
  28. Noatch MR, Suski CD (2012) Non-physical barriers to deter fish movements. Environ Rev 20:1–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reinert KH, Giddings JM, Judd L (2002) Effects analysis of time-varying or repeated exposures in aquatic ecological risk assessment of agrochemicals. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:1977–1992. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Roche DG, Binning SA, Bosiger Y, Johansen JL, Rummer JL (2013) Finding the best estimates of metabolic rates in a coral reef fish. J Exp Biol 216:2103–2110. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Scott GR, Sloman KA (2004) The effects of environmental pollutants on complex fish behaviour: integrating behavioural and physiological indicators of toxicity. Aquat Toxicol 68:369–392. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tierney KB (2016) Chemical avoidance responses of fishes. Aquat Toxicol 174:228–241. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Tix JA, Hasler CT, Sullivan C, Jeffrey JD, Suski CD (2016a) Elevated carbon dioxide has limited acute effects on Lepomis macrochirus behaviour. J Fish Biol. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tix JA, Hasler CT, Sullivan C, Jeffrey JD, Suski CD (2016b) Elevated carbon dioxide has the potential to impact alarm cue responses in some freshwater fishes. Aquat Ecol. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. United States Army Corps of Engineers (2014) The GLMRIS report: Great Lakes and Mississippi River interbasin study. USACE, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  36. Wei T, Simko V (2016) Corrplot: visualization of a correlation matrix. R package, version 0.77.
  37. Zuur AF, Leno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyThe University of WinnipegWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations