Biological Invasions

, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 1577–1595 | Cite as

A genetic reconstruction of the invasion of the calanoid copepod Pseudodiaptomus inopinus across the North American Pacific Coast

  • Eric Dexter
  • Stephen M. Bollens
  • Jeffery Cordell
  • Ho Young Soh
  • Gretchen Rollwagen-Bollens
  • Susanne P. Pfeifer
  • Jérôme Goudet
  • Séverine Vuilleumier
Original Paper
  • 125 Downloads

Abstract

The rate of aquatic invasions by planktonic organisms has increased considerably in recent decades. In order to effectively direct funding and resources to control the spread of such invasions, a methodological framework for identifying high-risk transport vectors, as well as ruling out vectors of lesser concern will be necessary. A number of estuarine ecosystems on the North American Pacific Northwest coast have experienced a series of high impact planktonic invasions that have slowly unfolded across the region in recent decades, most notably, that of the planktonic copepod crustacean Pseudodiaptomus inopinus. Although introduction of P. inopinus to the United States almost certainly occurred through the discharge of ballast water from commercial vessels originating in Asia (the species’ native range), the mechanisms and patterns of subsequent spread remain unknown. In order to elucidate the migration events shaping this invasion, we sampled the genomes of copepods from seven invasive and two native populations using restriction-site associated DNA sequencing. This genetic data was evaluated against spatially-explicit genetic simulation models to evaluate competing scenarios of invasion spread. Our results indicate that invasive populations of P. inopinus exhibit a geographically unstructured genetic composition, likely arising from infrequent and large migration events. This pattern of genetic patchiness was unexpected given the linear geographic structure of the sampled populations, and strongly contrasts with the clear invasion corridors observed in many aquatic systems.

Keywords

RADseq Zooplankton Aquatic invasions Migration/colonization pattern ABC Genetic simulation Copepod 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Kristen Irwin for helpful comments and suggestions, as well as Alan Brelsford, Catherine Bernay, and Roberto Semier for their assistance with RADseq library preparation. Funding for this research was provided in part by the U.S. Department of State Fulbright program and the Swiss Government Excellence Scholarships for Foreign Scholars and Artists, as well as a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency STAR graduate fellowship (grant #FP91780901-0) awarded to E. Dexter and S. Bollens. Additional funding was provided by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant #PMPDP3_158381) and a University of Lausanne FBM Interdisciplinary Grant to S. Vuilleumier, and by Washington Sea Grant for zooplankton sample collection (to S. Bollens and J. Cordell) and manuscript preparation (to G. Rollwagen-Bollens and S. Bollens). All computations were performed at the Vital-IT Center for high-performance computing of the SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (http://www.vital-it.ch) and on the University of Lausanne’s GenpopBD high-performance computing cluster.

Author contributions

ED conceived the research question, collected North American samples, performed DNA extraction and RADseq library preparation, conducted bioinformatics and statistical analysis, programmed genetic simulations and led composition of the manuscript. JG guided selection of molecular protocols, helped design genetic simulations, and provided access to laboratory space, high performance computing facilities and sequencing resources. JG also contributed to data analysis and composition of the manuscript. SMB helped conceive of the initial problem and research question; supervised the North American field collections; and edited and co-wrote all versions of the manuscript, from initial outline to final submission. JC supervised the North American field collections and contributed to composition of the manuscript. HYS collected samples from the Republic of Korea, provided taxonomic and morphological expertise, and contributed to the composition of the manuscript. GRB supervised the North American field collections and contributed to composition of the manuscript. SPP contributed to bioinformatics analysis and contributed to the composition of the manuscript. SV helped conceive, design, and coordinate the project, select laboratory protocols, design genetic simulations, and arrange for laboratory space and specialized training provided to ED at the University of Lausanne. SV also contributed to bioinformatics and statistical analysis as well as composition of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

10530_2017_1649_MOESM1_ESM.docx (21 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20 kb)

References

  1. Allan JD (1976) Life history patterns in zooplankton. Am Nat 110:165–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arlot S, Celisse A (2010) A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Stat Surv 4:40–79.  https://doi.org/10.1214/09-SS054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avise JC (2000) Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS et al (2008) Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS ONE 3:e3376.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003376 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bayha KM, Chang MH, Mariani CL et al (2014) Worldwide phylogeography of the invasive ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi (Ctenophora) based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA data. Biol Invasions.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0770-6 Google Scholar
  6. Beaumont MA, Zhang W, Balding DJ (2002) Approximate Bayesian computation in population. Genetics 162:2025–2035PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Benestan L, Gosselin T, Perrier C, Sainte-Marie B, Rochette R, Bernatchez L (2015) RAD genotyping reveals fine-scale genetic structuring and provides powerful population assignment in a widely distributed marine species, the American lobster (Homarus americanus). Mol Ecol 24(13):3299–3315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanco-Bercial L, Bucklin A (2016) New view of population genetics of zooplankton: RAD-seq analysis reveals population structure of the North Atlantic planktonic copepod Centropages typicus. Mol Ecol 25:1566–1580.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13581 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ 310:170.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6973.170 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Bollens SM, Cordell JR, Avent S, Hooff R (2002) Zooplankton invasions: a brief review, plus two case studies from the northeast Pacific Ocean. Hydrobiologia 480:87–110.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021233018533 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bollens SM, Breckenridge JK, Cordell JR et al (2012) Invasive copepods in the Lower Columbia River Estuary: seasonal abundance, co-occurrence and potential competition with native copepods. Aquat Invasions 7:101–109.  https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2012.7.1.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boxshall GA, Defaye D (2008) Global diversity of copepods (Crustacea: Copepoda) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595:195–207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-9014-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Breckenridge JK, Bollens SM, Rollwagen-Bollens G, Roegner GC (2015) Plankton assemblage variability in a river-dominated temperate estuary during late spring (high-flow) and late summer (low-flow) periods. Estuaries Coasts 38:93–103.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-014-9820-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brelsford A, Dufresnes C, Perrin N (2016) High-density sex-specific linkage maps of a European tree frog (Hyla arborea) identify the sex chromosome without information on offspring sex. Heredity 116:177–181.  https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2015.83 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bron JE, Frisch D, Goetze E et al (2011) Observing copepods through a genomic lens. Front Zool 8:22.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-8-22 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Bucklin A, Wiebe PH (1998) Low mitochondrial diversity and small effective population sizes of the copepods Calanus finmarchicus and Nannocalanus minor: possible impact of climatic variation during recent glaciation. J Hered 89:383–392.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/89.5.383 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cáceres C, Soluk D (2002) Blowing in the wind: a field test of overland dispersal and colonization by aquatic invertebrates. Oecologia 131:402–408.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0897-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Carlton JT, Geller JB (1993) Ecological roulette: the global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms. Science 261:78–82.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.261.5117.78 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Catchen J, Hohenlohe PA, Bassham S et al (2013) Stacks: an analysis tool set for population genomics. Mol Ecol 22:3124–3140.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12354 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Christy J, Stancyk S (1982) Timing of larval prodcution and flux of invertebrate larvae in a well-mixed estuary. In: Estuarine comparisons: proceedings of the Sixth Biennial International Estuarine Research Conference, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, November 1–6, 1981. Academic Press, p 489–503Google Scholar
  21. Colautti RI, Manca M, Viljanen M, Ketelaars HA, Buergi H, Macisaac HJ, Heath DD (2005) Invasion genetics of the Eurasian spiny waterflea: evidence for bottlenecks and gene flow using microsatellites. Mol Ecol 14(7):1869–1879CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Connelly NA, O’Neill CR, Knuth BA, Brown TL (2007) Economic impacts of zebra mussels on drinking water treatment and electric power generation facilities. Environ Manage 40:105–112.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0296-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Cordell JR, Morgan CA, Simenstad CA (1992) Occurrence of the Asian Calanoid Copepod Pseudodiaptomus inopinus in the Zooplankton of the Columbia River Estuary. J Crustac Biol 12:260–269.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1549079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cordell JR, Bollens SM, Draheim R, Sytsma M (2008) Asian copepods on the move: recent invasions in the Columbia-Snake River system, USA. ICES J Mar Sci J Cons 65:753–758.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsm195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cordell JR, Lawrence DJ, Ferm NC et al (2009) Factors influencing densities of non-indigenous species in the ballast water of ships arriving at ports in Puget Sound, Washington, United States. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 19:322–343.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.986 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cordell JR, Tear LM, Bollens SM (2010) Modelling physico-chemical factors affecting occurrences of a non-indigenous planktonic copepod in northeast Pacific estuaries. Biol Invasions 12:1427–1445.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9558-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Csilléry K, Blum MGB, Gaggiotti OE, François O (2010) Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) in practice. Trends Ecol Evol 25:410–418.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.04.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Csilléry K, François O, Blum MGB (2012) abc: an R package for approximate Bayesian computation (ABC). Methods Ecol Evol 3:475–479.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00179.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cuhel RL, Aguilar C (2013) Ecosystem Transformations of the Laurentian Great Lake Michigan by nonindigenous biological invaders. Annu Rev Mar Sci 5:289–320.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100952 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Davey JW, Blaxter ML (2010) RADSeq: next-generation population genetics. Brief Funct Genomics 9:416–423.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elq031 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Dexter E, Bollens SM, Rollwagen-Bollens G et al (2015) Persistent vs. ephemeral invasions: 8.5 years of zooplankton community dynamics in the Columbia River. Limnol Oceanogr 60:527–539.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Drake DAR, Chan FT, Briski E et al (2014) Assemblage structure: an overlooked component of human-mediated species movements among freshwater ecosystems. J Limnol.  https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2014.802 Google Scholar
  33. Emerson KJ, Merz CR, Catchen JM et al (2010) Resolving postglacial phylogeography using high-throughput sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:16196–16200.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1006538107 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Emerson JE, Bollens SM, Counihan TD (2015) Seasonal dynamics of zooplankton in Columbia-Snake River reservoirs, with special emphasis on the invasive copepod Pseudodiaptomus forbesi. Aquat Invasions 10:25–40.  https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2015.10.1.03 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Estoup A, Guillemaud T (2010) Reconstructing routes of invasion using genetic data: why, how and so what? Mol Ecol 19:4113–4130.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04773.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Excoffier L (2004) Patterns of DNA sequence diversity and genetic structure after a range expansion: lessons from the infinite-island model. Mol Ecol 13:853–864.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.02004.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Floerl O, Inglis GJ, Dey K, Smith A (2009) The importance of transport hubs in stepping-stone invasions. J Appl Ecol 46:37–45.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01540.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Frisch D, Green AJ, Figuerola J (2007) High dispersal capacity of a broad spectrum of aquatic invertebrates via waterbirds. Aquat Sci 69:568–574.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-007-0915-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Frisch D, Havel JE, Weider LJ (2013) The invasion history of the exotic freshwater zooplankter Daphnia lumholtzi (Cladocera, Crustacea) in North America: a genetic analysis. Biol Invasions 15:817–828.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0329-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ganz HH, Burton RS (1995) Genetic differentiation and reproductive incompatibility among Baja California populations of the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Mar Biol 123:821–827.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ghabooli S, Shiganova TA, Briski E et al (2013) Invasion pathway of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi in the Mediterranean Sea. PLoS ONE 8:e81067.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081067 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Goetze E (2005) Global populatiion genetic structure and biogeography of the oceanic copepods Eucalanus Hyalinus and E. Spinifer. Evolution 59:2378–2398.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00948.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Goetze E, Andrews KR, Peijnenburg KTCA et al (2015) Temporal stability of genetic structure in a mesopelagic copepod. PLoS ONE 10:e0136087.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136087 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Goudet J (2005) hierfstat, a package for r to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Mol Ecol Notes 5:184–186.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00828.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Griffiths RW, Schloesser DW, Leach JH, Kovalak WP (1991) Distribution and dispersal of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in the Great Lakes region. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:1381–1388.  https://doi.org/10.1139/f91-165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Havel JE, Stelzleni-Schwent J (2001) Zooplankton community structure: the role of dispersal. Int Ver Theor Angew Limnol Verhandlungen 27(5):3264–3268Google Scholar
  47. Havel JE, Shurin JB (2004) Mechanisms, effects, and scales of dispersal in freshwater zooplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 49:1229–1238.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2004.49.4_part_2.1229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hellberg ME, Burton RS, Neigel JE, Palumbi SR (2002) Genetic assessment of connectivity among marine populations. Bull Mar Sci 70:273–290Google Scholar
  49. Hudson J, Viard F, Roby C, Rius M (2016) Anthropogenic transport of species across native ranges: unpredictable genetic and evolutionary consequences. Biol Lett 12(10):20160620CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Humes A (1994) How many copepods. Hydrobiologia 293:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229916 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Huntley ME, Lopez MDG (1992) Temperature-dependent production of marine copepods: a global synthesis. Am Nat 140:201–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Irwin KK, Laurent S, Matuszewski S, Vuilleumier S, Ormond L, Shim H, Bank C, Jensen JD (2016) On the importance of skewed offspring distributions and background selection in viral population genetics. bioRxiv 048975.  https://doi.org/10.1101/048975
  53. Jeffery NW, DiBacco C, Van Wyngaarden M, Hamilton LC, Stanley RR, Bernier R, FitzGerald J, Matheson K, McKenzie CH, Nadukkalam Ravindran P, Beiko R (2017) RAD sequencing reveals genomewide divergence between independent invasions of the European green crab (Carcinus maenas) in the Northwest Atlantic. Ecol Evol 7(8):2513–2524CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Johnson LE, Padilla DK (1996) Geographic spread of exotic species: ecological lessons and opportunities from the invasion of the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha. Biol Conserv 78:23–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(96)00015-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jombart T, Ahmed I (2011) Adegenet 1.3-1: new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics 27:3070–3071.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr521 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F (2010) Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet 11:94.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-94 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Knowler D (2005) Reassessing the costs of biological invasion: Mnemiopsis leidyi in the Black sea. Ecol Econ 52:187–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kofler R, Pandey RV, Schlötterer C (2011) PoPoolation2: identifying differentiation between populations using sequencing of pooled DNA samples (Pool-Seq). Bioinformatics 27:3435–3436.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr589 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Lawrence DJ, Cordell JR (2010) Relative contributions of domestic and foreign sourced ballast water to propagule pressure in Puget Sound, Washington, USA. Biol Conserv 143:700–709.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lee CE (2000) Global phylogeography of a cryptic copepod species complex and reproductive isolation between genetically proximate “populations”. Evolution 54:2014–2027.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb01245.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Lemaire L, Jay F, Lee I, Csilléry K, Blum MG (2016) Goodness-of-fit statistics for approximate Bayesian computation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.04096
  62. Li H (2013) Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv preprint arXiv:1303.3997
  63. Lin D, Li X, Fang H et al (2011) Calanoid copepods assemblages in Pearl River Estuary of China in summer: relationships between species distribution and environmental variables. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 93:259–267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2011.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lopes JS, Beaumont MA (2010) ABC: a useful Bayesian tool for the analysis of population data. Infect Genet Evol 10:825–832.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2009.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Makino W, Knox MA, Duggan IC (2010) Invasion, genetic variation and species identity of the calanoid copepod Sinodiaptomus valkanovi. Freshw Biol 55:375–386.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02287.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McCormack JE, Hird SM, Zellmer AJ et al (2013) Applications of next-generation sequencing to phylogeography and phylogenetics. Mol Phylogenet Evol 66:526–538.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.12.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Neuenschwander S, Hospital F, Guillaume F, Goudet J (2008) quantiNemo: an individual-based program to simulate quantitative traits with explicit genetic architecture in a dynamic metapopulation. Bioinformatics 24:1552–1553.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn219 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Palumbi SR (1994) Genetic divergence, reproductive isolation, and marine speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:547–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Parchman TL, Gompert Z, Mudge J, Schilkey FD, Benkman CW, Buerkle C (2012) Genome-wide association genetics of an adaptive trait in lodgepole pine. Mol ecol 21(12):2991–3005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Park E-O, Cordell JR, Soh HY (2013) Occurrence characteristics of two sibling species, Pseudodiaptomus inopinus and Pseudodiaptomus poplesia (Copepoda, Calanoida, Pseudodiaptomidae), in the Mankyung River estuary, South Korea. Zool Stud 52:7.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1810-522X-52-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Peterson BK, Weber JN, Kay EH et al (2012) Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS ONE 7:e37135.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037135 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52:273–288.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Port Locations & Stats | PMA Pacific Maritime Association (n.d.). Retrieved 11 Dec 2017, from http://www.pmanet.org/port-locations-stats
  74. Provan J, Beatty GE, Keating SL et al (2009) High dispersal potential has maintained long-term population stability in the North Atlantic copepod Calanus finmarchicus. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 276:301–307.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  76. Ruiz GM, Fofonoff PW, Carlton JT et al (2000) Invasion of coastal marine communities in North America: apparent patterns, processes, and biases. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:481–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sakaguchi SO, Ueda H (2010) A new species of Pseudodiaptomus (Copepoda: Calanoida) from Japan, with notes on the closely related P. inopinus Burckhardt, 1913 from Kyushu Island. Zootaxa 2623:52–68Google Scholar
  78. Sakaguchi SO, Ueda H (2011) Morphological divergence of Pseudodiaptomus inopinus Burckhardt, 1913 (Copepoda: Calanoida) between the Japan Sea and Pacific coasts of western Japan. Plankton Benthos Res 6:124–128.  https://doi.org/10.3800/pbr.6.124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schloesser DW, Nalepa TF, Mackie GL (1996) Zebra mussel infestation of unionid bivalves (Unionidae) in North America. Am Zool 36:300–310.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/36.3.300 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schlötterer C, Tobler R, Kofler R, Nolte V (2014) Sequencing pools of individuals–mining genome-wide polymorphism data without big funding. Nat Rev Genet 15(11):749CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Schneider DW, Ellis CD, Cummings KS (1998) A transportation model assessment of the risk to native mussel communities from zebra mussel spread. Conserv Biol 12:788–800.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.97042.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shiganova TA (1998) Invasion of the Black Sea by the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and recent changes in pelagic community structure. Fish Oceanogr 7:305–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Simberloff D (1997) Strangers in paradise: impact and management of nonindigenous species in Florida. Island Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  84. Soh HY, Kwon SW, Lee W, Yoon YH (2012) A new Pseudodiaptomus (Copepoda, Calanoida) from Korea supported by molecular data. Zootaxa 3368:229–244Google Scholar
  85. Tatebe H, Yasuda I, Saito H, Shimizu Y (2010) Horizontal transport of the calanoid copepod Neocalanus in the North Pacific: the influences of the current system and the life history. Deep Sea Res Part Oceanogr Res Pap 57:409–419.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2009.11.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tepolt CK, Palumbi SR (2015) Transcriptome sequencing reveals both neutral and adaptive genome dynamics in a marine invader. Mol Ecol 24(16):4145–4158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Toews DPL, Brelsford A (2012) The biogeography of mitochondrial and nuclear discordance in animals. Mol Ecol 21:3907–3930.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05664.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Ueda H, Kuwatani M, Suzuki KW (2010) Tidal vertical migration of two estuarine copepods: naupliar migration and position-dependent migration. J Plankton Res 32:1557–1572.  https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbq078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Van Wormhoudt A (2015) Seasonal and cyclical changes in genetic composition of the marine intertidal rock pool copepod tigriopus brevicornis. Biochem Genet 53:79–92.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-015-9674-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Vandepitte K, Honnay O, Mergeay J et al (2013) SNP discovery using Paired-End RAD-tag sequencing on pooled genomic DNA of Sisymbrium austriacum (Brassicaceae). Mol Ecol Resour 13:269–275.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12039 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Vanderploeg HA, Liebig JR, Carmichael WW et al (2001) Zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) selective filtration promoted toxic Microcystis blooms in Saginaw Bay (Lake Huron) and Lake Erie. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:1208–1221.  https://doi.org/10.1139/f01-066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Vanderploeg HA, Nalepa TF, Jude DJ et al (2002) Dispersal and emerging ecological impacts of Ponto-Caspian species in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1209–1228.  https://doi.org/10.1139/f02-087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Vuilleumier S, Goudet J, Perrin N (2010) Evolution in heterogeneous populations: from migration models to fixation probabilities. Theor Popul Biol 78:250–258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2010.08.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Winder M, Jassby AD (2011) Shifts in zooplankton community structure: implications for food web processes in the upper San Francisco estuary. Estuaries Coasts 34:675–690.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-010-9342-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Winkler G, Dodson JJ, Lee CE (2008) Heterogeneity within the native range: population genetic analyses of sympatric invasive and noninvasive clades of the freshwater invading copepod Eurytemora affinis. Mol Ecol 17:415–430.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03480.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Wood DE, Salzberg SL (2014) Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol 15:R46.  https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. Yeo GT, Roe M, Dinwoodie J (2008) Evaluating the competitiveness of container ports in Korea and China. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 42(6):910–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zeller M, Reusch TBH, Lampert W (2008) Small effective population sizes in two planktonic freshwater copepod species (Eudiaptomus) with apparently large census sizes. J Evol Biol 21:1755–1762.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01589.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Dexter
    • 1
  • Stephen M. Bollens
    • 1
  • Jeffery Cordell
    • 2
  • Ho Young Soh
    • 3
  • Gretchen Rollwagen-Bollens
    • 1
  • Susanne P. Pfeifer
    • 4
    • 5
  • Jérôme Goudet
    • 6
  • Séverine Vuilleumier
    • 7
    • 8
  1. 1.Washington State UniversityVancouverUSA
  2. 2.School of Aquatic and Fishery SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Chonnam National UniversityYeosuRepublic of Korea
  4. 4.École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, EPFL SV IBI-SV UPJENSENLausanneSwitzerland
  5. 5.School of Life SciencesArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  6. 6.University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  7. 7.École Polytechnique fédérale de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  8. 8.La SourceUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts, Western Switzerland (HES-SO) Health ScienceLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations