Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 1337–1348 | Cite as

Weeds, worms, and deer: positive relationships among common forest understory stressors

  • Nicholas A. FisichelliEmail author
  • Kathryn M. Miller
Original Paper

Abstract

Biotic global change agents, such as non-native plants (‘weeds’), non-native earthworms (‘worms’), and overabundant herbivores (white-tailed ‘deer’), can be major stressors in the forest understory. The status and relationships among these global change stressors across large spatial extents and under naturally varying conditions are poorly understood. Here, through an observational study using a network of U.S. National Park Service forest health monitoring plots (n = 350) from eight parks in seven northeastern states, we modeled causal pathways among global change stressors through model selection in a structural equation (SEM) framework. Weeds, worms, and, deer were common across all parks in the study—46% of plots had non-native plants, 42% of plots had evidence of earthworms, and all parks had plots with high deer browse damage. All biotic global change stressors were significantly and positively correlated with one another (all Spearman rank correlations ≥ 0.44). Consequently, 28% of plots had a combination of earthworms absent, low deer browse, and no non-native plants, and 29% of plots included earthworms, non-native plants, and moderate or greater browse damage. Through SEM, we found strong support for pathways among global change stressors, e.g., deer browse positively influenced earthworm presence and both deer and earthworms promoted non-native plants. Warmer air temperatures and higher soil pH also facilitated non-natives. This research highlights the tremendous multipronged management challenge for areas already experiencing the combined effects of weeds, worms, and deer and the future vulnerability of other areas as temperatures warm and conditions become more amenable to biotic global change stressors.

Keywords

Climate Earthworms Forest soils Herbivory Global change Non-native plants 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Maine Timberlands Charitable Trust. We thank the National Park Service Northeast Temperate Network staff for their tremendous work which makes such studies possible.

Supplementary material

10530_2017_1630_MOESM1_ESM.docx (42 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 42 kb)

References

  1. Abella S (2014) Effectiveness of exotic plant treatments on National Park Service lands in the United States. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 7:147–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alpert P, Bone E, Holzapfel C (2000) Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 3:52–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartuszevige AM, Hrenko RL, Gorchov DL (2007) Effects of leaf litter on establishment, growth and survival of invasive plant seedlings in a deciduous forest. Am Midl Nat 158:472–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Cleland DT, Freeouf JA, Keys JE, Nowacki GJ, Carpenter CA, McNab WH (2007) Ecological subregions: sections and subsections for the conterminous United States. Gen Tech Report WO-76D. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Côté SD, Rooney TP, Tremblay JP, Dussault C, Waller DM (2004) Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:113–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Craven D, Thakur MP, Cameron EK, Frelich LE, Beauséjour R, Blair RB, Blossey B, Burtis J, Choi A, Dávalos A, Fahey TJ, Fisichelli NA, Gibson K, Handa IT, Hopfensperger K, Loss SR, Nuzzo VA, Maerz JC, Sackett T, Scharenbroch BC, Smith SM, Vellend M, Umek L, Eisenhauer N (2016) The unseen invaders: introduced earthworms as drivers of change in plant communities in North American forests (a meta-analysis). Glob Change Biol 23:1065–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curry JP (2004) 6 factors affecting the abundance of earthworms in soils. In: Edwards CA (ed) Earthworm ecology, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 91–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dávalos A, Nuzzo V, Blossey B (2015a) Single and interactive effects of deer and earthworms on non-native plants. For Ecol Manag 351:28–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dávalos A, Nuzzo V, Blossey B (2015b) Interactive effects of deer, earthworms and non-native plants on rare forest plant recruitment. Biol Conserv 187:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dávalos A, Simpson E, Nuzzo V, Blossey B (2015c) Non-consumptive effects of native deer on introduced earthworm abundance. Ecosystems 18:1029–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dobson A, Blossey B (2015) Earthworm invasion, white-tailed deer and seedling establishment in deciduous forests of north-eastern North America. J Ecol 103:153–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fierer N, Jackson RB (2006) The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:626–631CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisichelli NA, Frelich LE, Reich PB (2012) Sapling growth responses to warmer temperatures ‘cooled’ by browse pressure. Glob Change Biol 18:3455–3463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisichelli NA, Frelich LE, Reich PB, Eisenhauer N (2013) Linking direct and indirect pathways mediating earthworms, deer, and understory composition in Great Lakes forests. Biol Invasions 15:1057–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisichelli NA, Abella SR, Peters MP, Krist FJ Jr (2014) Climate, trees, pests, and weeds: change, uncertainty, and biotic stressors in eastern U.S. National Park forests. For Ecol Manag 327:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frelich LE, Hale CM, Scheu S, Holdsworth AR, Heneghan L, Bohlen PJ, Reich PB (2006) Earthworm invasion into previously earthworm-free temperate and boreal forests. Biol Invasions 8:1235–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grace JB (2006) Structural equation modeling and natural systems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grace JB, Schoolmaster DR, Guntenspergen GR, Little AM, Mitchell BR, Miller KM, Schweiger EW (2012) Guidelines for a graph-theoretic implementation of structural equation modeling. Ecosphere 3:1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harrison XA (2014) Using observation-level random effects to model overdispersion in count data in ecology and evolution. PeerJ 2:e616CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Hendrix PF, Bohlen PJ (2002) Exotic earthworm invasions in North America: ecological and policy implications. Bioscience 52:801–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Hall CM, Bridgewater P, Chapin FS, Ellis EC, Ewel JJ, Hallett LM, Harris J, Hulvey KB (2014) Managing the whole landscape: historical, hybrid, and novel ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 12:557–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kalisz S, Spigler RB, Horvitz CC (2014) In a long-term experimental demography study, excluding ungulates reversed invader’s explosive population growth rate and restored natives. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:4501–4506CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Karberg NJ, Lilleskov EA (2009) White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) fecal pellet decomposition is accelerated by the invasive earthworm Lumbricus terrestris. Biol Invasions 11:761–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kourtev P, Huang W, Ehrenfeld J (1999) Differences in earthworm densities and nitrogen dynamics in soils under exotic and native plant species. Biol Invasions 1:237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lefcheck JS (2015) piecewiseSEM: piecewise structural equation modelling in R for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol Evol 7(5):573–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Loss SR, Hueffmeier RM, Hale CM, Host GE, Sjerven G, Frelich LE (2013) Earthworm invasions in northern hardwood forests: a rapid assessment method. Nat Areas J 33:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Mark Lonsdale W, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Madritch MD, Lindroth RL (2009) Removal of invasive shrubs reduces exotic earthworm populations. Biol Invasions 11:663–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McShea WJ (2012) Ecology and management of white-tailed deer in a changing world. Ann NY Acad Sci 1249:45–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller KM, Dieffenbach FW, Campbell JP, Cass WB, Comiskey JA, Matthews ER, McGill BJ, Mitchell BR, Perles SJ, Sanders S (2016) National parks in the eastern United States harbor important older forest structure compared with matrix forests. Ecosphere.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1404 Google Scholar
  33. Monahan WB, Fisichelli NA (2014) Climate exposure of US national parks in a new era of change. PLoS ONE 9(7):e101302.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101302 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Morellet N, Gaillard J, Hewison A, Ballon P, Boscardin Y, Duncan P, Klein F, Maillard D (2007) Indicators of ecological change: new tools for managing populations of large herbivores. J Appl Ecol 44:634–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. National Fish, Wildlife and Plants Climate Adaptation Partnership (NFWPCAP) (2012) National fish, wildlife and plants climate adaptation strategy. Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Council on Environmental Quality, Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  37. National Park System Advisory Board (NPSAB) (2012) Revisiting leopold: resource stewardship in the national parks. National Park System Advisory Board, Washington. http://www.nps.gov/calltoaction/PDF/LeopoldReport_2012.pdf
  38. Nuzzo VA, Maerz JC, Blossey B (2009) Earthworm invasion as the driving force behind plant invasion and community change in northeastern North American forests. Conserv Biol 23:966–974CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Oswalt CM, Fei S, Guo Q, Iannone BV III, Oswalt SN, Pijanowski BC, Potter KM (2015) A subcontinental view of forest plant invasions. NeoBiota 24:49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pearl J (2012) The causal foundations of structural equation modeling. In: Hoyle RH (ed) Handbook of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press, New York, pp 68–91Google Scholar
  41. PRISM Climate Group (2012) Oregon State University. http://prism.oregonstate.edu
  42. R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://CRAN.R-project.org/
  43. Rearick D, Kintz L, Burke KL, Ransom TS (2011) Effects of white-tailed deer on the native earthworm, Eisenoides carolinensis, in the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. Pedobiologia 54:S173–S180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rooney TP, Waller DM (2003) Direct and indirect effects of white-tailed deer in forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag 181:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roth AM, Whitfeld TJ, Lodge AG, Eisenhauer N, Frelich LE, Reich PB (2015) Invasive earthworms interact with abiotic conditions to influence the invasion of common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica). Oecologia 178:219–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Schoenholtz SH, Van Miegroet H, Burger J (2000) A review of chemical and physical properties as indicators of forest soil quality: challenges and opportunities. For Ecol Manag 138:335–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invasions 1:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. WH Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Suárez ER, Fahey TJ, Yavitt JB, Groffman PM, Bohlen PJ (2006) Patterns of litter disappearance in a northern hardwood forest invaded by exotic earthworms. Ecol Appl 16:154–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Theobald DM (2013) A general model to quantify ecological integrity for landscape assessments and US application. Landsc Ecol 28:1859–1874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tierney GL, Mitchell BR, Miller KM, Comiskey JA, Kozlowski AJ, Faber-Langendoen D (2016) Northeast Temperate Network long-term forest monitoring protocol: 2016 revision Natural Resource Report NPS/NETN/NRR—2016/1184Google Scholar
  52. Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M, Hulme PE, Jarošík V, Maron JL, Pergl J, Schaffner U, Sun Y, Pyšek P (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14:702–708CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Waller DM, Maas LI (2013) Do white-tailed deer and the exotic plant garlic mustard interact to affect the growth and persistence of native forest plants? For Ecol Manag 304:296–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walther G, Roques A, Hulme PE, Sykes MT, Pyšek P, Kühn I, Zobel M, Bacher S, Botta-Dukát Z, Bugmann H (2009) Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 24:686–693CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Warren RJ, Bahn V, Bradford MA (2012) The interaction between propagule pressure, habitat suitability and density-dependent reproduction in species invasion. Oikos 121:874–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forest Ecology ProgramSchoodic Institute at Acadia National ParkWinter HarborUSA
  2. 2.Northeast Temperate NetworkNational Park ServiceBar HarborUSA

Personalised recommendations