Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 1229–1241 | Cite as

Introductions of non-native fishes into a heavily modified river: rates, patterns and management issues in the Paranapanema River (Upper Paraná ecoregion, Brazil)

  • Diego Azevedo Zoccal Garcia
  • John Robert Britton
  • Ana Paula Vidotto-Magnoni
  • Mário Luís Orsi
Original Paper

Abstract

Understanding the pathways and impacts of non-native species is important for helping prevent new introductions and invasions. This is frequently challenging in regions where human activities continue to promote new introductions, such as in Brazil, where aquaculture and sport fishing are mainly dependent on non-native fishes. Here, the non-native fish diversity of the Paranapanema River basin of the Upper Paraná River ecoregion, Brazil, was quantified fully for the first time. This river has been subject to considerable alteration through hydroelectric dam construction and concomitant development of aquaculture and sport fishing. Through compilation of a non-native fish inventory by literature review, with complementary records from recent field studies, analyses were completed on the timings of introduction, and the taxonomy, origin and introduction vectors of the non-native fishes. A total of 47 non-native fishes are now present across the basin. Of these, 24 invaded from the Lower Paraná River following construction of Itaipu Dam that connected previously unconnected fish assemblages. Activities including fish stocking, aquaculture and sport angling continue to result in new introductions. Discounting Itaipu invasions, the introduction rate between 1950 and 2014 was approximately one new introduction every 3 years. Introduced fish were mainly of the Cichlidae and Characidae families; most species were from other South American ecoregions, but fishes of African, Asian, North American and Central American origin were also present. These introductions have substantially modified the river’s fish fauna; when coupled with altered lentic conditions caused by impoundment, this suggests that the river’s native fishes are increasingly threatened.

Keywords

Biodiversity Invasion Aquaculture Hydroelectric dams Hydropower 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Fernando Jerep and José Birindelli (MZUEL), Carla S. Pavanelli (Nupelia-UEM), and Heraldo A. Britski (MZUSP) by the clarification about the origin of some non-native species; Sandro G. Britto by provided reports; and Lepib co-workers by provided help in field samples.

Supplementary material

10530_2017_1623_MOESM1_ESM.doc (332 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 332 kb)

References

  1. Abell R, Thieme ML, Revenga C, Bryer M, Kottelat M, Bogutskaya N, Coad B, Mandrak N, Balderas SC, Bussing W, Stiassny MLJ, Skelton P, Allen GR, Unmack P, Naseka A, Ng R, Sindorf N, Robertson J, Armijo E, Higgins JV, Heibel TJ, Wikramanayake E, Olson D, López HL, Reis RE, Lundberg JG, Sabaj Pérez MH, Petry P (2008) Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. Bioscience 58:403–414.  https://doi.org/10.1641/B580507 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agostinho AA, Júlio HF Jr, Gomes LC, Bini LM, Agostinho CS (1997) Composição, abundância e distribuição espaço-temporal da ictiofauna. In: Vazzoler AEAM (ed) A planície de inundação do alto rio Paraná: aspectos físicos, biológicos e socioeconômicos. Eduem, Maringá, pp 179–208Google Scholar
  3. Agostinho AA, Gomes LC, Pelicice FM (2007) Ecologia e manejo de recursos pesqueiros em reservatórios do Brasil. Eduem, MaringáGoogle Scholar
  4. Agostinho AA, Gomes LC, Santos NCL, Ortega JCG, Pelicice FM (2016) Fish assemblages in Neotropical reservoirs: colonization patterns, impacts and management. Fish Res 173:26–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2015.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azevedo-Santos VM, Rigolin-Sá O, Pelicice FM (2011) Growing, losing or introducing? Cage aquaculture as a vector for the introduction of nonnative fish in Furnas Reservoir, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Neotrop Ichthyol 9:915–919.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252011000400024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azevedo-Santos VM, Vitule JRS, García-Berthou E, Pelicice FM, Simberloff D (2016) Misguided strategy for mosquito control. Science 351:675.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.351.6274.675 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonetto AA (1986) The Paraná river system. In: Davies BR, Walker KF (eds) The ecology of river systems. Dr. Junk, Dordrecht, pp 541–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Britski HA, Silimon KZS, Lopes BS (2007) Peixes do Pantanal: manual de identificação. Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  9. Britton JR, Gozlan RE (2013) Geo-politics and freshwater fish introductions: how the cold war shaped Europe’s fish allodiversity. Glob Environ Change 23:1566–1574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Britton JR, Orsi ML (2012) Non-native fish in aquaculture and sport fishing in Brazil: economic benefits versus risks to fish diversity in the upper River Paraná basin. Rev Fish Biol Fish 22:555–565.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-012-9254-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Britton JR, Gozlan RE, Copp GH (2011) Managing non-native fish in the environment. Fish Fish 12:256–274.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00390.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carvalho ED, Britto SGC, Orsi ML (2005) O panorama das introduções de peixes na bacia hidrográfica do rio Paranapanema, Alto Paraná, Brasil. In: Rocha O, Espíndola ELG, Fenerich-Verani N, Verani JR, Rietzler AC (eds) Espécies invasoras em águas doces: estudos de caso e propostas de manejo. Editora da Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, pp 253–273Google Scholar
  13. Casimiro ACR, Garcia DAZ, Costa ADA, Britton JR, Orsi ML (2017) Impoundments facilite a biological invasion: dispersal and establishment of non-native armoured catfish Loricariichthys platymetopon (Isbrücker & Nijssen, 1979) in a neotropical river. Limnologica 62:34–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2016.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castro RMC, Casatti L, Santos HF, Ferreira KM, Ribeiro AC, Benine RC, Derdis GZP, Melo ALA, Stopiglia R, Abreu TX, Bockmann FA, Carvalho M, Gibran FZ, Lima FCT (2003) Estrutura e composição da ictiofauna de riachos do rio Paranapanema, Sudeste e Sul do Brasil. Biota Neotrop 3:1–31.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032003000100007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. CESP (1997) Produção de alevinos, povoamento/repovoamento nos reservatórios da CESP, CPFL e outros. Companhia Energética de São Paulo, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  16. Daga VD, Skóra F, Padial AA, Abilhoa V, Gubiani EA, Vitule JRS (2015) Homogenization dynamics of the fish assemblages in Neotropical reservoirs: comparing the roles of introduced species and their vectors. Hydrobiologia 746:327–347.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-2032-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Energy Duke (2008) Peixes do rio Paranapanema. Horizonte Geográfico, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  18. Eschmeyer WN, Fricke R, Van der Laan R (2016) Catalog of fishes: genera, species, references. http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp. Accessed 13 Apr 2016
  19. Forneck SC, Dutra FM, Zacarkim CE, Cunico AM (2016) Invasion risks by non-native freshwater fishes due to aquaculture activity in a Neotropical stream. Hydrobiologia 773:193–205.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2699-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frehse FA, Braga RR, Nocera GA, Vitule JRS (2016) Non-native species and invasion biology in a megadiverse country: scientometric analysis and ecological interactions in Brazil. Biol Invasions 18:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1260-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garcia DAZ, Hernandes MC, Silva-Souza ÂT, Orsi ML (2015) Establishment of non-native predator (Pisces, Erythrinidae) in a tributary of the Upper Paraná River basin, south Brazil. Neotrop Biol Conserv 10:177–181.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12468 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gherardi F, Britton JR, Mavuti KM, Pacini N, Grey J, Tricarico E, Harper DM (2011) A review of allodiversity in Lake Naivasha, Kenya: developing conservation actions to protect East African lakes from the negative impacts of alien species. Biol Conserv 144:2585–2596.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.07.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gozlan RE (2008) Introduction of non-native freshwater fish: is it all bad? Fish Fish 9:106–115.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2007.00267.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gozlan RE, Britton JR, Cowx IG, Copp GH (2010) Current knowledge on non-native freshwater fish introductions. J Fish Biol 76:751–786.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02566.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graça WJ, Pavanelli CS (2007) Peixes da planície de inundação do alto rio Paraná e áreas adjacentes. Eduem, MaringáGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackson MC, Grey J (2013) Accelerating rates of freshwater invasions in the catchment of the River Thames. Biol Invasions 15:945–951.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0343-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson PT, Olden JD, Vander Zanden MJ (2008) Dam invaders: impoundments facilitate biological invasions into freshwaters. Front Ecol Environ 6:357–363.  https://doi.org/10.1890/070156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Júlio Júnior HF, Dei Tós C, Agostinho AA, Pavanelli CS (2009) A massive invasion of fish species after eliminating a natural barrier in the upper rio Paraná basin. Neotrop Ichthyol 7:709–718.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252009000400021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2002) Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233–1236.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1075753 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Langeani F, Castro RMC, Oyakawa OT, Shibatta OA, Pavanelli CS, Casatti L (2007) Diversidade da ictiofauna do Alto Rio Paraná: composição atual e perspectivas futuras. Biota Neotrop 7:181–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Latini AO, Resende DC, Pombo VB, Coradin L (2016) Espécies exóticas invasoras de águas continentais no Brasil. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  32. Lima Júnior DP, Hoeinghaus DJ, Bini LM, Agostinho AA (2015a) Are non-native species larger in their invaded range? A test with tropical floodplain fish assemblages following inundation of a biogeographic barrier. Biol Invasions 17:3263–3274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lima Júnior DP, Magalhães ALB, Vitule JRS (2015b) Dams, politics and drought threat: the march of folly in Brazilian freshwaters ecosystems. Nat Conservação 13:196–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncon.2015.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trend Ecol Evol 20:223–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn TM (2009) The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Divers Distrib 15:904–910.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00594.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Magalhães ALB, Jacobi CM (2013) Asian aquarium fishes in a Neotropical biodiversity hotspot: impeding establishment, spread and impacts. Biol Invasions 15:2157–2163.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0443-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Magalhães ALB, Vitule JRS (2013) Aquarium industry threatens biodiversity. Science 341:457.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.341.6145.457-a CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Magurran AE, Dornelas M, Moyes F, Gotelli NJ, McGill B (2015) Rapid biotic homogenization of marine fish assemblages. Nat Commun 6:8405.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9405 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Menezes RF, Attayde JL, Lacerot G, Kosten S, Coimbra e Souza L, Costa LS, Van Nes EH, Jeppesen E (2012) Lower biodiversity of native fish but only marginally altered plankton biomass in tropical lakes hosting introduced piscivorous Cichla cf. ocellaris. Biol Invasions 14:1353–1363.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0159-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Muñoz H, Van Damme PA, Duponchelle F (2006) Breeding behaviour and distribution of the tucunaré Cichla aff. monoculus in a clear water river of the Bolivian Amazon. J Fish Biol 69:1018–1030.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01177.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Olden JD, Poff NL, Douglas MR, Douglas ME, Fausch KD (2004) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization. Trend Ecol Evol 19:18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Orsi ML, Agostinho AA (1999) Introdução de espécies de peixes por escapes acidentais de tanques de cultivo em rios da bacia do rio Paraná, Brasil. Rev Bras Zool 16:557–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Orsi ML, Britton JR (2014) Long-term changes in the fish assemblage of a Neotropical hydroelectric reservoir. J Fish Biol 84:1964–1970.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12392 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Orsi ML, Almeida FS, Swarça AC, Claro-García A, Vianna NC, Garcia DAZ, Bialetzki A (2016) Ovos, larvas e juvenis da bacia do rio Paranapanema, uma avaliação para conservação. Triunfal Gráfica e Editora, AssisGoogle Scholar
  46. Ortega JCG, Júlio HF Jr, Gomes LC, Agostinho AA (2015) Fish farming as the main driver of fish introductions in Neotropical reservoirs. Hydrobiologia 746:147–158.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-2025-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Padial AA, Agostinho AA, Azevedo-Santos VM, Frehse FA, Lima Junior DP, Magalhães ALB, Mormul RP, Pelicice FM, Bezerra LAV, Orsi ML, Pretere Junior M, Vitule JRS (2016) The “Tilapia Law” encouraging non-native fishes threatens Amazonian River basins. Biodivers Conserv 25:1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1229-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pelicice FM, Agostinho AA (2009) Fish fauna destruction after the introduction of a non-native predator (Cichla kelberi) in a Neotropical reservoir. Biol Invasions 11:1789–1801.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9358-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pelicice FM, Vitule JRS, Lima Júnior D, Orsi ML, Agostinho AA (2014) A serious new threat to Brazilian freshwater ecosystems: the naturalization of nonnative fish by decree. Conserv Lett 7:55–60.  https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pelicice FM, Latini JD, Agostinho AA (2015) Fish fauna disassembly after the introduction of a voracious predator: main drivers and the role of the invader’s demography. Hydrobiologia 746:271–283.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-1911-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Poff NL, Olden JD, Merritt DM, Pepin DM (2007) Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:5732–5737CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Rahel FJ (2000) Homogenization of fish faunas across the United States. Science 288:854–856CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Ramos IP, Brandão H, Zanatta AS, Zica ÉOP, Silva RJ, Rezende-Ayroza MM, Carvalho ED (2013) Interference of cage fish farm on diet, condition factor and numeric abundance on wild fish in a Neotropical reservoir. Aquaculture 414:56–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.07.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reis RE, Kullander SO, Ferraris CJ Jr (2003) Check list of freshwater fishes of South and Central America. Edipucrs, Porto AlegreGoogle Scholar
  55. Reis RE, Albert JS, Di Dario F, Mincarone MM, Petry P, Rocha LA (2016) Fish biodiversity and conservation in South America. J Fish Biol 89:12–47.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Sampaio T (1944) Relato sobre os estudos efetuados nos rios Itapetininga e Paranapanema. Revista do Instituto de Geografia e Geologia 2:30–81Google Scholar
  57. Tófoli RM, Alves GHZ, Dias RM, Gomes LC (2016) Brazil’s Amazonian fish at risk by decree. Science 353:229.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2922 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Vieira AB, Melo R, Santos GB, Bazzoli N (2009) Reproductive biology of the peacock bass Cichla piquiti (Perciformes: Cichlidae), an exotic species in a Neotropical reservoir. Neotrop Ichthyol 7:745–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Villéger S, Blanchet S, Beauchard O, Oberdorff T, Brosse S (2011) Homogenization patterns of the world’s freshwater fish faunas. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:18003–18008.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1107614108 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Vitule JRS, Skóra F, Abilhoa V (2012) Homogenization of freshwater fish faunas after the elimination of a natural barrier by a dam in Neotropics. Divers Distrib 18:494–499.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00821.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Xiong W, Sui X, Liang SH, Chen Y (2015) Non-native freshwater fish species in China. Rev Fish Biol Fish 25:651–687.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-015-9396-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zieritz A, Gallardo B, Baker SJ, Britton JR, van Valkenburg JL, Verreycken H, Aldridge DC (2017) Changes in pathways and vectors of biological invasions in Northwest Europe. Biol Invasions 19:269–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diego Azevedo Zoccal Garcia
    • 1
  • John Robert Britton
    • 2
  • Ana Paula Vidotto-Magnoni
    • 3
  • Mário Luís Orsi
    • 3
  1. 1.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Ecologia de Peixes e Invasões BiológicasUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaLondrinaBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and TechnologyBournemouth UniversityPooleUK
  3. 3.Laboratório de Ecologia de Peixes e Invasões BiológicasUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaLondrinaBrazil

Personalised recommendations