Biological Invasions

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 1113–1127 | Cite as

Downstream dispersal of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) under different flow conditions in a coupled lake-stream ecosystem

  • Christopher J. ChurchillEmail author
  • Daniel P. Quigley
Original Paper


Dispersal, establishment, and spread of aquatic invasive species such as the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) can be influenced by riverine velocities and volumetric flows in invaded lake-stream ecosystems. Zebra mussels, which have a planktonic larval form (veliger), disperse rapidly downstream from a source population. Concentrations, dispersal, and body conditions of zebra mussel veligers were studied under different volumetric flow, or discharge, conditions in a coupled lake-stream ecosystem in northern Texas, USA. Veliger densities in lotic environments were strongly related to population dynamics in upstream lentic source populations. A strong exponential decrease in veliger density was observed through a 28-km downstream study reach. Increased water releases from the source reservoir increased veliger flux and dispersal potential, concomitantly increasing veliger flux and decreasing transit time. However, passage through release gates in the dam and increased turbulence in the river during high-discharge events could negatively affect body condition of veligers, and veliger body condition generally decreased from the source population to the farthest downstream site and was lower for veligers during periods of high discharge. Thus increased discharge appears to reduce the proportion of viable veligers because of increased turbulence-induced mortality. Colonization of distant downstream reservoirs can occur if discharge and propagule pressure are sufficient or if interim habitats are suitable for establishment of in-stream populations.


Veliger River Flux Velocities Discharge Population dynamics 



This paper describes results from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Zebra Mussel Monitoring Program for Texas that is cooperatively funded by Dallas Water Utilities and the USGS. The authors would like to thank Denis Qualls, Varghese Abraham, and Chang Lee (Dallas Water Utilities) and Glenn Clingenpeel (Trinity River Authority) for thoughtful discussions during study development. The authors would also like to thank anonymous reviewers who provided useful suggestions that improved this manuscript. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.


  1. Aldridge DC, Elliott P, Moggridge GD (2006) Microencapsulated biobullets for the control of biofouling zebra mussels. Environ Sci Technol 40:975–979CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen YC, Ramcharan CW (2001) Dreissena distribution in commercial waterways of the U.S.: using failed invasions to identify limiting factors. Can J Aquat Sci 58:898–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bobeldyk AM, Bossenbroek JM, Evans-White MA, Lodge DM, Lamberti GA (2005) Secondary spread of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) in coupled lake-stream systems. Ecoscience 12:339–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bossenbroek JM, Kraft CE, Nekola JC (2001) Prediction of long-distance dispersal using gravity models: zebra mussel invasion of inland lakes. Ecol Appl 11:1778–1788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Britton DK, Dingman S (2011) Use of quaternary ammonium to control the spread of aquatic invasive species by wildland fire equipment. Aquat Invasions 6:169–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burlakova LE, Karatayev AY, Karatayev VA, May ME, Bennett DL, Cook MJ (2011) Biogeography and conservation of freshwater mussels (Bilvalvia: Unionidae) in Texas: patterns of diversity and threats. Divers Distrib 17:393–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burlakova LE, Tulumello BL, Karatayev AY, Krebs RA, Schloesser DW, Paterson WL, Griffith TA, Scott MW, Crail T, Zanatta DT (2014) Competitive replacement of invasive congeners may relax impact on native species: interactions among zebra, quagga, and unionid mussels. PLoS ONE 9:e114926CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Carling PA (1992) In-stream hydraulics and sediment transport. In: Calow P, Petts GE (eds) The rivers handbook, vol 1. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, pp 101–125Google Scholar
  9. Carlton JT (1993) Dispersal mechanisms of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha). In: Nalepa TF, Schloesser DW (eds) Zebra mussels: biology, impacts, and control. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 677–697Google Scholar
  10. Churchill CJ (2013) Spatio-temporal spawning and larval dynamics of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) in a north Texas reservoir: implications for invasions in the southern United States. Aquat Invasions 8:389–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Churchill CJ, Baldys S (2012) USGS zebra mussel monitoring program for North Texas. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2012–3077, 6 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Churchill CJ, Quigley DP (2017) Biological and physical data for zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) veligers collected from a coupled lake-stream ecosystem in north Texas, 2012–2014. U.S. Geological Survey data release,
  13. Gray MS (2005) Natural and human-mediated dispersal of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) in the upper Susquehanna River basin of New York. Thesis, State University of New York College at Oneonta, 116 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Higgins SN, Vander Zanden MJ (2010) What a difference a species makes: a meta-analysis of dreissenid mussel impacts on freshwater ecosystems. Ecol Monogr 80:179–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Horvath TG, Crane L (2010) Hydrodynamic forces affect larval zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) mortality in a laboratory setting. Aquat Invasions 5(4):379–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horvath TG, Lamberti GA (1999) Mortality of zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha, veligers during downstream transport. Freshw Biol 42:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Horvath TG, Lamberti GA, Lodge DM, Perry WL (1996) Zebra mussel dispersal in lake-stream systems: source-sink dynamics? J N Am Benthol Soc 15:564–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hosler DM (2011) Early detection of dreissenid species—zebra/quagga mussels in water systems. Aquat Invasions 6:217–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson LE (1995) Enhanced early detection and enumeration of zebra mussel (Dreissena spp.) veligers using cross-polarized light microscopy. Hydrobiologia 312:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson LE, Carlton JT (1996) Post-establishment spread in large-scale invasions: dispersal mechanisms of the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha. Ecology 77:1686–1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson PTJ, Olden JD, Vander Zanden MJ (2008) Dam invaders: impoundments facilitate biological invasions into freshwaters. Front Ecol Environ 6:357–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kern R, Borcherding J, Neumann D (1994) Recruitment of a freshwater mussel with a planktonic life-stage in running waters-studies on Dreissena polymorpha in the Rhine River. Archiv für Hydrobiol 131:385–400Google Scholar
  23. Kirsch KM, Dzialowski AR (2012) Effects of invasive zebra mussels on phytoplankton, turbidity, and dissolved nutrients in reservoirs. Hydrobiologia 686:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kraft CE, Sullivan PJ, Karatayev AY, Burlakova LE, Nekola JC, Johnson LE, Padilla DK (2002) Landscape patterns of an aquatic invader: assessing dispersal extent from spatial distributions. Ecol Appl 12:749–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lucy FE, Minchin D, Boelens R (2008) From lakes to rivers: downstream larval distribution of Dreissena polymorpha in Irish river basins. Aquat Invasions 3:297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MacIsaac HJ, Sprules WG, Leach JH (1991) Ingestion of small-bodied zooplankton by zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha): can cannibalism on larvae influence population dynamics? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:2051–2060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mackie GL, Claudi R (2009) Monitoring and control of macrofouling mollusks in fresh water systems, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  28. Madon SP, Schneider DW, Stoeckel JA, Sparks RE (1998) Effects of inorganic sediment and food concentrations on energetic processes of the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha: implications for growth in turbid rivers. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:401–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martel A, Hynes TM, Buckland-Nicks J (1995) Prodissoconch morphology, planktonic shell growth, and size at metamorphosis in Dreissena polymorpha. Can J Zool 73:1835–1844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McMahon RF, Ussery TA (1995) Thermal tolerance of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) relative to rate of temperature increase and acclimation temperature. Technical Report EL-95-10. United States Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MSGoogle Scholar
  31. Muirhead JR, MacIsaac HJ (2005) Development of inland lakes as hubs in an invasion network. J Appl Ecol 42:80–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Natural Earth Data (2008) Lakes and reservoirs. Accessed 19 May 2016
  33. Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52:273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Randklev CR (2011) The ecology and paleobiogeography of freshwater mussels (Family: Unionidae) from selected river basins in Texas. Dissertation, University of North Texas, 120 ppGoogle Scholar
  35. Rehmann CR, Stoeckel JA, Schneider DW (2003) Effect of turbulence on the mortality of zebra mussel veligers. Can J Zool 81:1063–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ricciardi A (2003) Predicting the impacts of an introduced species from its invasion history: an empirical approach applied to zebra mussel invasions. Freshw Biol 48:972–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ricciardi A, Neves RJ, Rasmussen JB (1998) Impending extinctions of North American freshwater mussels (Unionoida) following the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) invasion. J Anim Ecol 67:613–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanz-Ronda JF, Lopez-Saenz S, San-Martin R, Palau-Ibars A (2014) Physical habitat of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in the lower Ebro River (Northeastern Spain): influence of hydraulic parameters in their distribution. Hydrobiologia 735:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schaefer R, Claudi R, Grapperhaus M (2010) Control of zebra mussels using sparker pressure pulses. J Am Water Work Assoc 102:113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schneider DW, Stoeckel JA, Rehmann CR, Blodgett KD, Sparks RE, Padilla DK (2003) A developmental bottleneck in dispersing larvae: implications for spatial population dynamics. Ecol Lett 6:352–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smirnova NF, Vinogradov GA (1990) Biology and ecology of Dreissena polymorpha from the European USSR. Presented at the workshop on introduced species in the Great Lakes: ecology and management, Saginaw, MI 26–28 SeptGoogle Scholar
  42. Speirs DC, Gurney WS (2001) Population persistence in rivers and estuaries. Ecology 82:1219–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sprecher SL, Getsinger KD (2000) Zebra mussel chemical control guide. ERDC/EL TR-00-1, United States Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, 114 ppGoogle Scholar
  44. Sprung M (1993) The other life: an account of present knowledge of the larval phase of Dreissena polymorpha. In: Nalepa TF, Schloesser DW (eds) Zebra mussels: biology, impacts, and control. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 39–53Google Scholar
  45. Stoeckel JA, Schneider DW, Soeken LA, Blodgett KD, Sparks RE (1997) Larval dynamics of a riverine metapopulation: implications for zebra mussel recruitment, dispersal, and control in a large-river system. J N Am Benthol Soc 16:586–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stoeckel JA, Rehmann CR, Schneider DW, Padilla DK (2004) Retention and supply of zebra mussel larvae in a large river system: importance of an upstream lake. Freshw Biol 49:919–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Strayer DL (2009) Twenty years of zebra mussels: lessons from the mollusk that made headlines. Front Ecol Environ 7:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Strayer DL, Malcom HM (2007) Effects of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) on native bivalves: the beginning of the end or the end of the beginning? J N Am Benthol Soc 26:111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Strayer DL, Powell J, Ambrose P, Smith LC, Pace ML, Fischer DT (1996) Arrival, spread, and early dynamics of a zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) population in the Hudson River estuary. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:1143–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Strayer DL, Cid N, Malcom HM (2011) Long-term changes in a population of an invasive bivalve and its effects. Oecologia 165:1063–1072CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (2009) Download TCEQ GIS data. Accessed 11 Jan 2016
  52. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (2009) Lone zebra mussel found in Lake Texoma. Accessed 27 Feb 2015
  53. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (2012) Zebra mussels found in Lake Ray Roberts. Accessed 3 Mar 2015
  54. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (2013) Zebra mussels documented in Lewisville Lake. Accessed 3 Mar 2015
  55. Texas Water Development Board (2006) GIS data. Accessed 10 Aug 2015
  56. Texas Water Development Board (2017) Texas lakes and reservoirs. Accessed 9 Mar 2017
  57. United States Census Bureau (2014) TIGER/Line Shapefiles. Accessed 19 May 2016
  58. U.S. Geological Survey (2015) USGS water data for the Nation: U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System database. Accessed 27 Feb 2015
  59. U.S. Geological Survey (2016) The National Map viewer. Accessed 14 Jan 2016
  60. Vanderploeg HA, Liebig JR, Gluck AA (1996) Evaluation of different phytoplankton for supporting development of zebra mussel larvae (Dreissena polymorpha): the importance of size and popolyunsaturated fatty acid content. J Great Lakes Res 22:36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wimbush J, Frischer ME, Zarzynski JW, Nierzwicki-Bauer SA (2009) Eradication of colonizing populations of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) by early detection and SCUBA removal: Lake George, NY. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 19:703–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature (outside the USA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USGS Texas Water Science CenterNorth Texas Program OfficeFort WorthUSA

Personalised recommendations