How do invasive species travel to and through urban environments?

Abstract

Globalisation has resulted in the movement of organisms outside their natural range, often with negative ecological and economic consequences. As cities are hubs of anthropogenic activities, with both highly transformed and disturbed environments, these areas are often the first point of entry for alien species. We compiled a global database of cities with more than one million inhabitants that data had on alien species occurrence. We then identified the most prominent pathways of introduction and vectors of spread of alien species in these cities. Most species were intentionally introduced to cities and were released or escaped from confinement. The majority of alien species then spread within cities through natural means (primarily unaided dispersal). Pathway prominence varied across the taxonomic groups of alien species: the most prominent pathway for plants and vertebrates was the escape pathway; for invertebrates the stowaway and contaminant pathways were most likely to facilitate introductions. For some organisms, pathway prominence varied with the geographical and climatic characteristics of the city. The characteristics of the cities also influenced the prominence of vectors of spread for alien species. Preventing the natural spread of alien species within cities, and into adjacent natural environments will be, at best, difficult. To prevent invasions, both the intentional and unintentional introduction of potentially harmful alien species to cities must be prevented. The pathways of introduction and vectors of spread identified here should be prioritised for management.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Bacon SJ, Bacher S, Aebi A (2012) Gaps in border controls are related to quarantine alien insect invasions in Europe. PLoS ONE 7:e47689

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošik V, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26:333–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blackie RR, Sunderland TC (2015) Mapping landscape guidelines and principles to the Aichi targets. CIFOR 123:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown R (2006) Exotic pets invade United States ecosystems: legislative failure and a proposed solution. Indiana Law J 81:713–731

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burt JW, Muir AA, Piovia-Scott J, Veblen KE, Chang AL, Grossman JD, Weiskel HW (2007) Preventing horticultural introductions of invasive plants: potential efficacy of voluntary initiatives. Biol Invasions 9:909–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cope RC, Ross VJ, Wittmann TA, Prowse TAA, Cassey P (2016) Intergrative analysis of the physical transport network into Australia. PLoS ONE 11:e0148831

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Crawley M (2007) The R book. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Cronin K, Kaplan H, Gaertner M, Irlich I, Hoffman TM (2017) Aliens in the nursery: assessing the attitudes of nursery managers to invasive species regulations. Biol Invasions 19:925–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dehnen-Schmutz K, Touza J, Perrings C, Williamson M (2007) The horticultural trade and ornamental plant invasions in Britain. Conserv Biol 21:224–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Demographia (2014) Demographia world urban areas (built-up urban areas or world agglomerations) 10th annual edition. http://www.demographia.com/. Accessed 23 Aug 2015

  11. Drew J, Anderson N, Andow D (2010) Conundrums of a complex vector for invasive species control: a detailed examination of the horticultural industry. Biol Invasions 12:2837–2851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ESRI (2006) ArcGIS 9.3. Environmental Research Systems Institute, Inc, Redlands, CA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Essl F, Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Booy O et al (2015) Crossing frontiers in tackling pathways of biological invasions. Bioscience 65:769–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Faulkner KT, Robertson MP, Rouget M, Wilson JRU (2016a) Understanding and managing the introduction pathways of alien taxa: South Africa as a case study. Biol Invasions 18:73–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Faulkner KT, Robertson MP, Rouget M, Wilson JRU (2016b) Border control for stowaway alien species should be prioritised based on variations in establishment debt. J Environ Manage 180:301–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ficetola GF, Thuiller W, Padoa-Schioppa E (2009) From introduction to the establishment of alien species: bioclimatic differences between presence and reproduction localities in the slider turtle. Divers Distrib 15:108–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gallardo B, Aldridge DC (2013) The ‘dirty dozen’: socio-economic factors amplify the invasion potential of 12 high-risk aquatic invasive species in Great Britain and Ireland. J Appl Ecol 50:757–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. GBIF (2016) Global Biodiversity Information Facility. http://www.gbif.org/. Accessed 01 Dec 2016

  19. GISD (2016) Global Invasive Species Database. Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) of the IUCN Species Survival Commission. http://www.issg.org/database. Accessed 9 June 2016

  20. Gotzek D, Axen HJ, Suarez AV, Helms Cahan S, Shoemaker D (2015) Global invasion history of the tropical fire ant: a stowaway on the first global trade routes. Mol Ecol 24:374–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. GRIIS (2016) Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species. http://www.griis.org/. Accessed 15 Nov 2016

  22. Hansen MJ, Clevenger AP (2005) The influence of disturbance and habitat on the presence of non-native plant species along transport corridors. Biol Conserv 125:249–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hulme PE (2006) Beyond control: wider implications for the management of biological invasions. J Appl Ecol 43:835–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hulme PE (2015) Invasion pathways at a crossroads: policy and research challenges for managing alien species introductions. J Appl Ecol 52:1418–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hulme PE, Bacher S, Kenis M et al (2008) Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. J Appl Ecol 45:403–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Katsanevakis S, Zenetos A, Belchior C, Cardoso A-C (2013) Invading European seas: assessing pathways of introduction of marine aliens. Ocean Coast Manage 76:64–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kenis M, Auger-Rozenberg M-A, Roques A et al (2009) Ecological effects of invasive alien insects. Biol Invasions 11:21–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kölzsch A, Blasius B (2011) Indications of marine bioinvasion from network theory. Eur Phys J B 84:601–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F (2006) World Map of the Köppen–Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Z 15:259–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kraus F (2007) Using pathway analysis to inform prevention strategies for alien reptiles and amphibians. Manag Vertebr Invasive Species 21:94–103

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kumschick S, Richardson DM (2013) Species-based risk assessments for biological invasions: advances and challenges. Divers Distrib 19:1095–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Leung B, Springborn MR, Turner JA, Brockerhoff EG (2014) Pathway-level risk analysis: the net present value of an invasive species policy in the US. Front Ecol Environ 12:273–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McGeoch MA, Genovesi P, Bellingham PJ, Costello MJ, McGrannachan C, Sheppard A (2016) Prioritizing species, pathways, and sites to achieve conservation targets for biological invasions. Biol Invasions 18:299–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. McLean P, Gallien L, Wilson JRU, Gaertner M, Richardson DM (2017) Small urban centres as launching sites for plant invasions in natural areas: insights from South Africa. Biol Invasions. doi:10.1007/s10530-017-1600-4

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mohri M, Rostamizadeh A, Talwalkar A (2012) The foundations of machine learning. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  36. Novoa A, Le Roux JJ, Robertson MP et al (2015) Introduced and invasive cactus species: a global review. AoB Plants 7:plu078. doi:10.1093/aobpla/plu078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pergl J, Pyšek P, Bacher S et al (2017) Troublling travellers: are economically harmful alien species associated with particular introduction pathways? NeoBiota 32:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pimentel D, McNair S, Janecka J et al (2001) Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal and microbe invasions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 84:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Puth LM, Post DM (2005) Studying invasions: have we missed the boat? Ecol Lett 8:715–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pyšek P, Richardson DM (2010) Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annu Rev Environ Resour 35:25–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. r foundation for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/

  42. Reaser JK, Meyerson LA, Von Holle B (2008) Saving camels from straws: how propagule pressure-based prevention policies can reduce the risk of biological invasion. Biol Invasions 10:1085–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M et al (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6:93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Carlton JT (2010) A compendium of essential concepts and terminology in invasion ecology. In: Richardson DM (ed) Fifty years of invasion ecology: the legacy of Charles Elton. Wiley, Oxford. doi:10.1002/9781444329988.ch30

    Google Scholar 

  45. Saul W-C, Roy HE, Booy O, Carnevali L, Chen H-J, Genovesi P, Harrower CA, Hulme PE, Pagad S, Pergl J, Jeschke JM (2016) Assessing patterns in introduction pathways of alien species by linking major invasion databases. J Appl Ecol 54:657–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Scalera R, Genovesi P, Booy O et al. (2016) Technical report: progress towards pathways prioritization in compliance to Aichi Target 9. Information documented presented at SBSTTA 20 UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/20/INF/5, the twentieth meeting of the CBD’s Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, Montreal, Canada, 25–30 April 2016

  47. Schrader G, Unger J-G (2003) Plant quarantine as a measure against invasive alien species: the framework of the International Plant Protection Convention and the plant health regulations in the European Union. Biol Invasions 5:357–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Therneau T, Atkinson B, Ripley B (2015) Rpart: recursive partitioning and regression trees. R package version 4.1.10. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rpart

  49. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2014) World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, CD-ROM edition. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/cd-rom/. Accessed 23 Aug 2015

  50. Van Wilgen NJ, Richardson DM, Baard EHW (2008) Alien reptiles and amphibians in South Africa: towards a pragmatic management strategy. S Afr J Sci 104:13–20

    Google Scholar 

  51. Van Wilgen NJ, Wilson JRU, Elith J et al (2010) Alien invaders and reptile traders: what drivers the live animal trade in South Africa? Anim Conserv 13(Suppl 1):24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Vila M, Basnou C, Pyšek P, Josefsson M et al (2010) How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment. Front Ecol Environ 8:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Visser V, Wilson JRU, Fish L, Brown C, Cook GD, Richardson DM (2016) Much more give than take: South Africa as a major donor but infrequent recipient of invasive non-native grasses. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 25:679–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. von der Lippe M, Kowarik I (2008) Do cities export biodiversity? Traffic as dispersal vector across urban-rural gradients. Divers Distrib 14:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wilson JRU, Dormontt EE, Prentis PJ et al (2009) Something in the way you move: dispersal pathways affect invasion success. Trends Ecol Evol 24:136–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Woodford DJ, Richardson DM, MacIsaac HJ et al (2016) Confronting the wicked problem of managing biological invasions. NeoBiota 31:63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the South African National Department of Environmental Affairs through its funding of the South African National Biodiversity Institute’s Invasive Species Programme. An early version of this paper was presented at a workshop on “Non-native species in urban environments: Patterns, processes, impacts and challenges” that was hosted and co-funded by the DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology in Stellenbosch in November 2016. Many participants at the workshop provided useful comments and suggestions which improved the paper. We thank The Global Invasive Species Database for the provision of data, Desika Moodley and Osadolor Ebhuoma for their technical assistance, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashlyn L. Padayachee.

Additional information

Guest Editors: Mirijam Gaertner, John R.U. Wilson, Marc W. Cadotte, J. Scott MacIvor, Rafael D. Zenni and David M. Richardson/Urban Invasions.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 86 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 582 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Padayachee, A.L., Irlich, U.M., Faulkner, K.T. et al. How do invasive species travel to and through urban environments?. Biol Invasions 19, 3557–3570 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1596-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Biological invasions
  • Pathways of introduction
  • Prioritisation
  • Urban invasions
  • Vectors of spread