Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 849–860 | Cite as

Native or nonnative host plants: What is better for a specialist moth?

  • José Roberto Trigo
  • Carlos H. Z. Martins
  • Beatriz P. Cunha
  • Vera N. Solferini
Original Paper

Abstract

The enemy release hypothesis (ERH) predicts that the lack of natural enemies, such as herbivores, contributes to the success of nonnative plants as colonizers. Larvae of the Neotropical specialist moth Utetheisa ornatrix (Erebidae: Arctiinae) can feed on unripe seeds and leaves of both native and nonnative Crotalaria species (Fabaceae). Despite some species being able to eat nonnative plants, such behavior can impair the herbivore, as they are not adapted to the alien plant, and still contribute to the success of the nonnative species via enemy release. We tested the performance of the moth from hatching to adulthood fed on two native (C. micans and C. paulina) and two nonnative (C. pallida, C. juncea) host plants. Utetheisa ornatrix performed better (lower development time, heavier pupae and more eggs) on the native host plants than in the nonnative. However, larva performance in nonnative C. pallida was similar to that in the native host plants. Using the larval weight 7 days after hatching from the eggs as a proxy for performance in twelve Crotalaria species (five Neotropical natives, four nonnatives from Afrotropical region, and three nonnatives from India), we found similar results. Crotalaria nutritional compounds, the defensive pyrrolizidine alkaloids and Crotalaria phylogeny did not explain moth performance. Our results give some support to the ERH. The good moth performance in nonnative C. pallida may be related to its high availability as host plant for U. ornatrix, and its longer time since their introduction in Neotropics which would provide opportunity for the moth to adapt.

Keywords

Crotalaria Crotalaria pallida Enemy release hypothesis Pyrrolizidine alkaloids Specialist Utetheisa ornatrix 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Andréia Silva Flores for the identification of Crotalaria species, José Carlos da Silva and Daniela Rodrigues for helping in plant and moth rearing. The phylogenetic signal analysis was carried out using the R-script kindly made available by José Hidasi Neto (http://rfunctions.blogspot.com.br/2014/02/measuring-phylogenetic-signal-in-r.html). Ligia Pizzatto helped with English correction and statistical analyses. We also acknowledge to Klaas Vrieling, Rodrigo Cogni, Karina Silva-Brandão, Ligia Pizzatto and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments in the early draft of the manuscript. Financial support was provided by FAPESP (2011/17708-0) and CNPq (306103/2013-3) to JRT.

Supplementary material

10530_2017_1577_MOESM1_ESM.docx (24 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 23 kb)

References

  1. Ali JG, Agrawal AA (2012) Specialist versus generalist insect herbivores and plant defense. Trends Plant Sci 17:293–302CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bezemer TM, Harvey JA, Cronin JT (2014) Response of native insect communities to invasive plants. Ann Rev Entomol 59:119–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ (1959) A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37:911–917CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Blomberg SP, Garland T, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evol 57:717–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Catford JA, Jansson R, Nilsson C (2009) Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Divers Distrib 15:22–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cogni R (2010) Resistance to plant invasion? A native specialist herbivore shows preference for and higher fitness on an introduced host. Biotropica 42:188–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cogni R, Futuyma DJ (2009) Local adaptation in a plant herbivore interaction depends on the spatial scale. Biol J Linn Soc 97:494–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cogni R, Trigo JR (2016) Pyrrolizidine alkaloids negatively affect a generalist herbivore feeding on the chemically protected legume Crotalaria pallida. Neotrop Entomol 45:252–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cogni R, Trigo JR, Futuyma DJ (2012) A free lunch? No cost for acquiring defensive plant pyrrolizidine alkaloids in a specialist arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix). Mol Ecol 21:6152–6162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunha BP (2017) Caracterização da variabilidade e estruturação genética de Crotalaria pallida (Fabaceae). Dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, BrasilGoogle Scholar
  11. Da Costa MA (2010) Phylogeny of Utetheisa s. str. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Arctinae) with comments on the evolution of colour, hind wing scales and origin of New World species. Invertebr Syst 24:113–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dai H, Lu X, Zang J, Ding J (2014) Responses of a native beetle to novel exotic plant species with varying invasion history. Ecol Entomol 39:118–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dingley J, Blossey B (2009) Differences in preference and performance of the water lily leaf beetle, Galerucella nymphaeae populations on native and introduced aquatic plants. Environ Entomol 38:1653–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eisner T, Meinwald J (1995) The chemistry of sexual selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:50–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferro VG, Guimaraes PR, Trigo JR (2006) Why do larvae of Utetheisa ornatrix penetrate and feed in pods of Crotalaria species? Larval performance vs. chemical and physical constraints. Entomol Exp Appl 121:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flores AS (2004) Taxonomia, números cromossômicos e química de espécies de Crotalaria L. (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) no Brasil. Dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, BrasilGoogle Scholar
  18. Flores AS, Correa AM, Forni-Martins ER, Tozzi AMGA (2006) Chromosome numbers in Brazilian species of Crotalaria (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) and their taxonomic significance. Bot J Linn Soc 151:271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flores AS, Tozzi AMGA, Trigo JR (2009) Pyrrolizidine alkaloid profiles in Crotalaria species from Brazil: chemotaxonomic significance. Biochem Syst Ecol 37:459–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fonseca RL, Guimarães PR, Morbiolo SR, Scachetti-Pereira R, Peterson T (2006) Predicting invasive potential of smooth crotalaria (Crotalaria pallida) in Brazilian national parks based on African records. Weed Sci 54:458–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hartmann T, Witte L (1995) Chemistry, biology and chemoecology of the pyrrolizidine alkaloids. In: Pelletier SW (ed) Alkaloids: chemical and biological perspectives, vol 9. Pergamon Press, Elmsford, pp 156–233Google Scholar
  22. Jeffery GH, Bassett J, Mendham J, Denney RC (1992) VOGEL: Análise Química Quantitativa. LTC Editora, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  23. Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  25. le Roux MM (2011) A taxonomic study of the genus Crotalaria L. (Fabaceae, tribe Crotalarieae) and a modified infrageneric classification system. Dissertation, University of Johannesburg, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  26. le Roux MM, Boatwright JS, van Wyk B-E (2013) A global infrageneric classification system for the genus Crotalaria (Leguminosae) based on molecular and morphological evidence. Taxon 62:957–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lorenzi H (2000) Plantas daninhas no Brasil: Terrestres, aquáticas, parasitas e tóxicas. Instituto Plantarum, Nova OdessaGoogle Scholar
  28. Macel M (2011) Attract and deter: a dual role for pyrrolizidine alkaloids in plant-insect interactions. Phytochem Rev 10:75–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Magalhães AE, Martins CHZ, Verçosa D, Massuda KF, Trigo JR (2017) Ants visiting extrafloral nectaries and pyrrolizidine alkaloids may shape how a specialist herbivore feeds on its host plants. Arthropod Plant Interact. doi: 10.1007/s11829-017-9510-z Google Scholar
  30. Martins CHZ, Cunha BP, Solferini VN, Trigo JR (2015) Feeding on host plants with different concentrations and structures of pyrrolizidine alkaloids impacts the chemical-defense effectiveness of a specialist herbivore. PLoS ONE 10:e0141480CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. McKee R, Enlow CR (1931) Crotalaria, a new legume for the south. USDA Circular 137Google Scholar
  32. Pandey A, Singh R, Sharma SK, Bhandari DC (2010) Diversity assessment of useful Crotalaria species in India for plant genetic resources management. Gen Res Crop Evol 57:461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Polhill RM (1982) Crotalaria in Africa and Madagascar. A. A. Balkema, BalkemaGoogle Scholar
  34. R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  35. Revell LJ, Harmon LJ, Collar DC (2008) Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate. Syst Biol 57:591–601CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Schilthuizen M, Pimenta LPS, Lammers Y, Steenbergen PJ, Flohil M, Beveridge NGP, van Duijn PT, Meulblok MM, Sosef N, van de Ven R, Werring R, Beentjes KK, Meijer K, Vos RA, Vrieling K, Gravendeel B, Choi Y, Verpoorte R, Smit C, Beukeboom LW (2016) Incorporation of an invasive plant into a native insect herbivore food web. PeerJ 4:e1954CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Siemann E, Rogers WE, Dewalt SJ (2006) Rapid adaptation of insect herbivores to an invasive plant. Proc R Soc B 273:2763–2769CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Sourakov A (2015) You are what you eat: native versus exotic Crotalaria species (Fabaceae) as host plants of the Ornate Bella Moth, Utetheisa ornatrix (Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Arctiinae). J Nat Hist 49:2397–2415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Trigo JR (2011) Effects of pyrrolizidine alkaloids through different trophic levels. Phytochem Rev 10:83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van der Meijden E (1996) Plant defence, an evolutionary dilemma: contrasting effects of (specialist and generalist) herbivores and natural enemies. Entomol Exp Appl 80:307–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Verçosa D (2016) Variação geográfica e temporal de defesas em Crotalaria pallida (Fabaceae: Papilionoideae: Crotalarieae). Dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, BrasilGoogle Scholar
  42. Zahiri R, Holloway JD, Kitching IJ, Lafontaine JD, Mutanen M, Wahlberg N (2012) Molecular phylogenetics of Erebidae (Lepidoptera, Noctuoidea). Syst Entomol 37:102–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zuur A, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2008) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratório de Ecologia Química, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de BiologiaUNICAMPCampinasBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Genética, Evolução e Bioagentes Instituto de BiologiaUNICAMPCampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations