Biological Invasions

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 1673–1676

Functional responses can’t unify invasion ecology

  • James Vonesh
  • Mike McCoy
  • Res Altwegg
  • Pietro Landi
  • John Measey

DOI: 10.1007/s10530-016-1356-2

Cite this article as:
Vonesh, J., McCoy, M., Altwegg, R. et al. Biol Invasions (2017) 19: 1673. doi:10.1007/s10530-016-1356-2


Dick et al. (Biol Invasions, 2017) propose that the comparative functional response framework provides a unifying approach for the study of invasive species. We agree that functional responses are an important and powerful quantitative description of consumer effects on resources, and co-opting classical ecological theory to better predict invasive species impacts is a laudable move for invasion biology. However, we fear that the early successes of select examples of the comparative functional response (CFR) approach has led Dick et al. to exaggerate the generality of its utility, and about its ability to unify the field. Further, they fail to provide a convincing argument why CFR is better than existing tools such as invasion history or impact indices, even when considering emerging or potential invaders. In this response we provide details of three conceptual issues stemming from classical ecological theoretical frameworks and two practical problems that Dick et al. and other CFR proponents need to address.


Functional responses Impact prediction Impact indices Resource–consumer Prey–predator Invasion hypotheses 

Funding information

Funder NameGrant NumberFunding Note
DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
  • NA
  • NA

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and ZoologyStellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of BiologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyEast Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA
  4. 4.Statistics in Ecology, Environment and Conservation, Department of Statistical SciencesUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa
  5. 5.African Climate and Development InitiativeUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa
  6. 6.Department of MathematicsStellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations