Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 147–159 | Cite as

Co-invasion of similar invaders results in analogous ecological impact niches and no synergies

  • Daniel R. TekielaEmail author
  • Jacob N. Barney
Original Paper

Abstract

Exotic species can cause changes to their invaded ecosystems, which can be large and long lasting. Despite most landscapes being invaded by multiple exotic plant species, >90 % of impact studies only characterize the impacts of single species. Therefore, our knowledge of invasive plant impacts does not reflect the co-invaded nature of most landscapes, potentially ignoring complex interactions among exotic species. Our objective was to characterize potential invader synergies (positive interactions) on biotic and abiotic ecological parameters among the important forest invaders Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum) and wavyleaf basketgrass (Oplismenus undulatifolius), which co-invade eastern US deciduous forests. To characterize synergies, we used a factorial selective removal study, as well as an observational study to further explore invader cover-impact relationships. Although both invaders can reduce native plant richness by 70 % individually or in combination, there were no impact synergies. Total cover of any combination of the two invaders had a negative quadratic effect on total, exotic, and native plant richness; i.e., all community metrics were greatest at intermediate levels of total invader cover and lowest at maximum invader cover. Native richness was more greatly affected than exotic richness by the co-invasion. Soil metrics had no clear trend in either study. Japanese stiltgrass and wavyleaf basketgrass appear to have overlapping impact niches—the number, magnitude, and direction of biotic and abiotic changes to the invaded ecosystem—that only vary in impact magnitude, not breadth. As a result of their overlapping impact niches and non-synergies in this co-invaded system, the addition of the recent invader wavyleaf basketgrass has not resulted in additional changes to the invaded forests. Future impact studies should focus on multiple species and identifying synergies, especially as they relate to invader cover, which informs ecological interactions and management prioritization.

Keywords

Biological invasions Co-invasion Deciduous forest Impact Interaction Invasive species Japanese stiltgrass Wavyleaf basketgrass 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank two anonymous reviewers for very helpful comments that greatly improved the manuscript. Funding for this work was provided in part, by the Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station and the Hatch Program of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture to JNB.

References

  1. Alvarez ME, Cushman JH (2002) Community-level consequences of a plant invasion: effects on three habitats in coastal California. Ecol Appl 12:1434–1444. doi: 10.2307/3099982 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baiser B, Lockwood JL, Puma D, Aronson MFJ (2008) A perfect storm: two ecosystem engineers interact to degrade deciduous forests of New Jersey. Biol Invasions 10:785–795. doi: 10.1007/s10530-008-9247-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barney JN, Tekiela DR, Dollete ES, Tomasek BJ (2013) What is the “real” impact of invasive plant species? Front Ecol Environ 11:322–329. doi: 10.1890/120120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barney JN, Tekiela DR, Barrios-Garcia MN et al (2015) Global Invader Impact Network (GIIN): toward standardized evaluation of the ecological impacts of invasive plants. Ecol Evol 5:2878–2889. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1551 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Beauchamp V, Koontz S, Suss C et al (2013) An introduction to Oplismenus undulatifolius (Ard.) Roem. & Schult. (wavyleaf basketgrass), a recent invader in Mid-Atlantic forest understories 1, 2. J Torrey Bot Soc 140:391–413. doi: 10.3159/TORREY-D-13-00033.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackburn TM, Essl F, Evans T et al (2014) A unified classification of alien species based on the magnitude of their environmental impacts. PLoS Biol. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001850 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Brewer JS (2011) Per capita community-level effects of an invasive grass, Microstegium vimineum, on vegetation in mesic forests in northern Mississippi (USA). Biol Invasions 13:701–715. doi: 10.1007/s10530-010-9861-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins SL, Glenn SM, Gibson DJ (1995) Experimental analysis of intermediate disturbance and initial floristic composition: decoupling cause and effect. Ecology 76:486–492. doi: 10.2307/1941207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cushman JH, Gaffney KA (2010) Community-level consequences of invasion: impacts of exotic clonal plants on riparian vegetation. Biol Invasions 12:2765–2776. doi: 10.1007/s10530-009-9682-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeMeester JE, Richter DdeB (2010) Differences in wetland nitrogen cycling between the invasive grass Microstegium vimineum and a diverse plant community. Ecol Appl 20:609–619. doi: 10.1890/09-0283.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Didham RK, Tylianakis JM, Hutchison MA et al (2005) Are invasive species the drivers of ecological change? Trends Ecol Evol 20:471–474. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ehrenfeld JG (2010) Ecosystem consequences of biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:59–80. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144650 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fairbrothers D, Gray J (1972) Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus (Gramineae) in the United States. Bull Torrey Bot Club 99:97–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flory SL, Clay K (2009) Non-native grass invasion alters native plant composition in experimental communities. Biol Invasions 12:1285–1294. doi: 10.1007/s10530-009-9546-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gooden B, French K, Turner PJ, Downey PO (2009) Impact threshold for an alien plant invader, Lantana camara L., on native plant communities. Biol Conserv 142:2631–2641. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.06.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greene BT, Blossey B (2011) Lost in the weeds: Ligustrum sinense reduces native plant growth and survival. Biol Invasions 14:139–150. doi: 10.1007/s10530-011-9990-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hellmann JJ, Byers JE, Bierwagen BG, Dukes JS (2008) Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conserv Biol 22:534–543. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00951.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Isermann M (2007) Effects of the expansion by Hippophaë rhamnoides on plant species richness in coastal dunes. Appl Veg Sci 10:33–42. doi:10.1658/1402-2001(2007)10[33:EOTEBH]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jeschke JM, Bacher S, Blackburn TM et al (2014) Defining the impact of non-native species. Conserv Biol 00:1–7. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12299 Google Scholar
  20. Kourtev P, Huang W, Ehrenfeld J (1999) Differences in earthworm densities and nitrogen dynamics in soils under exotic and native plant species. Biol Invasions 1:237–245. doi: 10.1023/A:1010048909563 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kourtev P, Ehrenfeld J, Häggblom M (2003) Experimental analysis of the effect of exotic and native plant species on the structure and function of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 35:895–905. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00120-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuebbing SE, Nuñez MA, Simberloff D (2013) Current mismatch between research and conservation efforts: the need to study co-occurring invasive plant species. Biol Conserv 160:121–129. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumschick S, Gaertner M, Vila M et al (2015) Ecological impacts of alien species: quantification, scope, caveats, and recommendations. Bioscience 65:55–63. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biu193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuppinger D (2000) Management of plant invasions in the southern Appalachians. Chiquapin 8:21Google Scholar
  25. Litt AR, Cord EE, Fulbright TE, Schuster GL (2014) Effects of invasive plants on arthropods. Conserv Biol 00:1–18. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12350 Google Scholar
  26. Lowry E, Rollinson EJ, Laybourn AJ et al (2013) Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature. Ecol Evol 3:182–196. doi: 10.1002/ece3.431 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Marshall JM, Buckley DS (2009) Influence of Microstegium vimineum presence on insect abundance in hardwood forests. Southeast Nat 8:515–526. doi: 10.1656/058.008.0312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McGrath DA, Binkley MA (2009) Microstegium vimineum invasion changes soil chemistry and microarthropod communities in cumberland plateau forests. Southeast Nat 8:141–156. doi: 10.1656/058.008.0113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Olsson AD, Betancourt J, McClaran MP, Marsh SE (2012) Sonoran Desert ecosystem transformation by a C4 grass without the grass/fire cycle. Divers Distrib 18:10–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00825.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pearson DE, Ortega YK, Eren O, Hierro JL (2015) Quantifying “apparent” impact and distinguishing impact from invasiveness in multispecies plant invasions. Ecol Appl. doi: 10.1890/14-2345.1 Google Scholar
  31. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE et al (2012) A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Glob Chang Biol 18:1725–1737. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02636.x CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Ricciardi A, Jones LA, Kestrup ÅM, Ward JM (2011) Expanding the propagule pressure concept to understand the impact of biological invasions. In: Fifty years of invasion ecology: the legacy of Charles Elton, pp 225–235Google Scholar
  33. Ruwanza S, Gaertner M, Esler KJ, Richardson DM (2013) Both complete clearing and thinning of invasive trees lead to short-term recovery of native riparian vegetation in the Western Cape, South Africa. Appl Veg Sci 16:193–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2012.01222.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Simao MCM, Flory SL, Rudgers JA (2010) Experimental plant invasion reduces arthropod abundance and richness across multiple trophic levels. Oikos 119:1553–1562. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18382.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stricker KB, Hagan D, Flory SL (2015) Improving methods to evaluate the impacts of plant invasions: lessons from 40 years of research. AoB PLANTS. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plv022 Google Scholar
  36. Strickland MS, Devore JL, Maerz JC, Bradford MA (2010) Grass invasion of a hardwood forest is associated with declines in belowground carbon pools. Glob Chang Biol 16:1338–1350. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02042.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tekiela DR, Barney JN (2015) System-level changes following invasion caused by disruption of functional relationships among plant and soil properties. Ecosphere 6:1–12. doi: 10.1890/ES15-00412.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thiele J, Isermann M, Kollmann J, Otte A (2011) Impact scores of invasive plants are biased by disregard of environmental co-variation and non-linearity. NeoBiota 10:65. doi: 10.3897/neobiota.10.1191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M et al (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14:702–708. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant SciencesUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed ScienceVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations