Biological Invasions

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 1701–1711 | Cite as

Timing of invasive pollen deposition influences pollen tube growth and seed set in a native plant

Original Paper


Invasive plants may threaten the reproductive success of native sympatric plants by modifying the pollination process. One potential mechanism takes place through the deposition of invasive pollen onto native stigmas when pollinators are shared among species. We explore how pollen from the invasive plant Brassica nigra influences pre- and post-fertilization stages in the native plant Phacelia parryi, through a series of hand pollination experiments. These two species share pollinators to a high degree. P. parryi flowers were hand-pollinated with either pure conspecific pollen (the control) or with B. nigra pollen applied prior to, simultaneously with, or following conspecific pollen. Application of B. nigra pollen lowered seed set, with the simultaneous application resulting in the highest reduction. Pollen tube growth was also influenced by the presence of invasive pollen, with fewer conspecific pollen tubes reaching the base of P. parryi styles in treatments where B. nigra pollen was applied prior to or simultaneously with conspecific pollen. The deleterious effects of invasive pollen on native seed set in this study are likely not due to loss of stigmatic receptivity since seed set was less affected when heterospecific pollen was applied prior to conspecific pollen, but may instead involve interactions between interspecific pollen grains on the stigma or within the style. Our study highlights the importance of timing of foreign pollen deposition on native stigmas and suggests that interspecific pollen transfer between native and exotic plants may be an important mechanism of competition for pollination in invaded plant communities.


Pollination Heterospecific pollen deposition Competition Brassica nigra 


  1. Ashman TL, Arceo-Gómez G (2013) Toward a predictive understanding of the fitness costs of heterospecific pollen receipt and its importance in co-flowering communities. Am J Bot 100:1061–1070CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bais HP, Vepachedu R, Gilroy S, Callaway RM, Vivanco JM (2003) Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion: from molecules and genes to species interactions. Science 301:1377–1380. doi:10.1126/science.1083245 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell DT, Muller CH (1973) Dominance of California annual grasslands by Brassica nigra. Am Midl Nat 90:277–299. doi:10.2307/2424453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bjerknes AL, Totland O, Hegland SJ, Nielsen A (2007) Do alien plant invasions really affect pollination success in native plant species? Biol Conserv 138:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.04.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown B, Mitchell R (2001) Competition for pollination: effects of pollen of an invasive plant on seed set of a native congener. Oecologia 129:43–49. doi:10.1007/S004420100700 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown BJ, Mitchell RJ, Graham SA (2002) Competition for pollination between an invasive species (purple loosestrife) and a native congener. Ecology 83:2328–2336. doi:10.2307/3072063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruckman D (2015) Mechanisms for pollinator-mediated interactions between native and invasive plants. PhD Dissertation, University of California, IrvineGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruckman D, Campbell DR (2014) Floral neighborhood influences pollinator assemblages and effective pollination in a native plant. Oecologia 176:465–476. doi:10.1007/s00442-014-3023-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Callaway RM, Ridenour WM (2004) Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Front Ecol Environ 2:436–443. doi:10.2307/3868432 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caruso CM, Alfaro M (2000) Interspecific pollen transfer as a mechanism of competition: effect of Castilleja linariaefolia pollen on seed set of Ipomopsis aggregata. Can J Bot 78:600–606. doi:10.1139/cjb-78-5-600 Google Scholar
  11. Chittka L, Schurkens S (2001) Successful invasion of a floral market. Nature. doi:10.1038/35079676 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Conner JK, Neumeier R (1995) Effects of black mustard population size on the taxonomic composition of pollinators. Oecologia 104:218–224. doi:10.1007/BF00328586 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Da Silva EM, Sargent RD (2011) The effect of invasive Lythrum salicaria pollen deposition on seed set in the native species Decodon verticillatus. Botany 89:141–146. doi:10.1139/B11-001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galen C, Gregory T (1989) Interspecific pollen transfer as a mechanism of competition—consequences of foreign pollen contamination for seed set in the alpine wildflower, Polemonium-viscosum. Oecologia 81:120–123. doi:10.1007/BF00377020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gegear RJ, Laverty TM (2005) Flower constancy in bumblebees: a test of the trait variability hypothesis. Anim Behav 69:939–949. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.06.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grabas GP, Laverty TM (1999) The effect of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.; Lythraceae) on the pollination and reproductive success of sympatric co-flowering wetland plants. Ecoscience 6:230–242Google Scholar
  17. Harder LD, Cruzan MB, Thomson JD (1992) Unilateral incompatibility and the effects of interspecific pollination for Erythronium-americanum and Erythronium-albidum (Liliaceae). Can J Bot 71:353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jakobsson A, Padron B, Traveset A (2008) Pollen transfer from invasive Carpobrotus spp. to natives: a study of pollinator behaviour and reproduction success. Biol Conserv 141:136–145. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jepson Flora Project (2013) Jepson eFlora.
  20. Kanchan S, Jayachandra (1980) Pollen allelopathy—a new phenomenon. New Phytol 84:739–746. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb04786.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, NiwotGoogle Scholar
  22. Kohn JR, Waser NM (1985) The effect of Delphinium-nelsonii pollen on seed set in Ipomopsis-aggregata, a competitor for hummingbird pollination. Am J Bot 72:1144–1148. doi:10.2307/244346 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kwak MM, Jennersten O (1991) Bumblebee visitation and seedset in Melampyrum-pratense and Viscaria-vulgaris—heterospecific pollen and pollen limitation. Oecologia 86:99–104. doi:10.1007/BF00317395 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Larson DL, Royer RA, Royer MR (2006) Insect visitation and pollen deposition in an invaded prairie plant community. Biol Conserv 130:148–159. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lopezaraiza-Mikel ME, Hayes RB, Whalley MR, Memmott J (2007) The impact of an alien plant on a native plant-pollinator network: an experimental approach. Ecol Lett 10:539–550. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01055.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Matsumoto T, Takakura K-I, Nishida T (2009) Alien pollen grains interfere with the reproductive success of native congener. Biol Invasions 12:1617–1626. doi:10.1007/s10530-009-9574-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Memmott J, Waser NM (2002) Integration of alien plants into a native flower–pollinator visitation web. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 269:2395–2399. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Montgomery BR (2009) Effect of introduced Euphorbia esula on the pollination of Viola pedatifida. Bot Bot 87:283–292. doi:10.1139/B08-139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Montgomery BR, Phillips CW (2015) Breeding system of Linum rigidum and effect of heterospecific pollen from introduced Euphorbia esula. J Pollinat Ecol 16:101–107Google Scholar
  30. Moragues E, Traveset A (2005) Effect of Carpobrotus spp. on the pollination success of native plant species of the Balearic Islands. Biol Conserv 122:611–619. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.09.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morales CL, Aizen MA (2006) Invasive mutualisms and the structure of plant-pollinator interactions in the temperate forests of north-west Patagonia, Argentina. J Ecol 94:171–180. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01069.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morales CL, Traveset A (2008) Interspecific pollen transfer: magnitude, prevalence and consequences for plant fitness. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 27:221–238. doi:10.1080/07352680802205631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Murphy SD (1992) The determination of the allelopathic potential of pollen and nectar. In: Linskens HF, Jackson JF (eds) Modern methods of plant analysis. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Murphy SD, Aarssen LW (1995) Reduced seed set in Elytrigia-repens caused by allelopathic pollen from Phleum-pratense. Can J Bot 73:1417–1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pianka ER (1973) The structure of lizard communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:53–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Price MV, Waser NM (1982) Experimental studies of pollen carryover—hummingbirds and Ipomopsis-aggregata. Oecologia 54:353–358. doi:10.1007/BF00380004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thomson JD, Andrews BJ, Plowright RC (1981) The effect of a foreign pollen on ovule development in Diervilla-lonicera (caprifoliaceae). New Phytol 90:777–783. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1982.tb03286.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Traveset A, Richardson DM (2006) Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms. Trends Ecol Evol 21:208–216. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Tscheulin T, Petanidou T, Potts SG, Settele J (2009) The impact of Solanum elaeagnifolium, an invasive plant in the Mediterranean, on the flower visitation and seed set of the native co-flowering species Glaucium flavum. Plant Ecol 205:77–85. doi:10.1007/s11258-009-9599-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vila M, Bartomeus I, Dietzsch AC et al (2009) Invasive plant integration into native plant-pollinator networks across Europe. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:3887–3893. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Waser NM (1978a) Interspecific pollen transfer and competition between cooccurring plant species. Oecologia 36:223–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Waser NM (1978b) Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers. Ecology 59:934–944. doi:10.2307/1938545 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Waser NM (1986) Flower constancy—definition, cause, and measurement. Am Nat 127:593–603. doi:10.1086/284507 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Waser NM, Fugate ML (1986) Pollen precedence and stigma closure—a mechanism of competition for pollination between Delphinium-nelsonii and Ipomopsis-aggregata. Oecologia 70:573–577. doi:10.1007/Bf00379906 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Westman AL, Kresovich S, Dickson MH (1999) Regional variation in Brassica nigra and other weedy crucifers for disease reaction to Alternaria brassicicola and Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. Euphytica 106:253–259. doi:10.1023/A:1003544025146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weston LA (1996) Utilization of allelopathy for weed management in agroecosystems. Agron J 88:860–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 321 Steinhaus HallUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations