Biological Invasions

, Volume 17, Issue 10, pp 3067–3072 | Cite as

Taming the ‘New Wild’: tackling the good and the bad with invasive species

Fred Pearce: The new wild—Why invasive species will be nature’s salvation. Beacon Press, Boston, 2015, xvi + 245 pp, $26.95, ISBN: 9780807033685
  • Marc W. CadotteEmail author
Book Review

There has been a healthy debate in invasion biology about how we view, study and manage non-indigenous species (NIS). On the one side, those that argue ecologists and biologists are unduly biased against NIS see the influence of culture and bigotry infecting what should be rationale scientific enquiry (Davis et al. 2011). On the other side are ecologists who see the study of NIS as an integral part of sound ecological study and environmental management (Alyokhin 2011; Lockwood et al. 2011; Simberloff et al. 2011). What is needed to move forward is a thoughtful, nuanced and balanced treatment of this debate and the role of NIS in maintaining the ‘natural’ in a changing world. Unfortunately, the book “The New Wild” by Fred Pearce, is not that balanced treatment. Instead, Pearce presents a very one-sided treatment of the topic, where evidence counter to his thesis that NIS will save nature is most often overlooked, straw men are erected to aid in his goal, and the representation of the...



The opinions expressed in this review are completely my own, but I wish to acknowledge valuable discussion and feedback from Ben Gilbert, Stuart Livingstone, Jay Stachowicz, and Art Weis.


  1. Alyokhin A (2011) Non-natives: put biodiversity at risk. Nature 475:36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldock KC, Goddard MA, Hicks DM, Kunin WE, Mitschunas N, Osgathorpe LM, Potts SG, Robertson KM, Scott AV, Stone GN (2015) Where is the UK’s pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insects. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2849 Google Scholar
  3. Balmford A (2012) Wild hope: on the front lines of conservation success. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergstrom DM, Lucieer A, Kiefer K, Wasley J, Belbin L, Pedersen TK, Chown SL (2009) Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Island. J Appl Ecol 46:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casagrande R, Dacey J (2007) Monarch butterfly oviposition on swallow-worts (Vincetoxicum spp.). Environ Entomol 36:631–636CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis MA, Chew MK, Hobbs RJ, Lugo E et al (2011) Don’t judge species on their origins. Nature 474:153–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dornelas M, Gotelli NJ, McGill B, Shimadzu H, Moyes F, Sievers C, Magurran AE (2014) Assemblage time series reveal biodiversity change but not systematic loss. Science 344:296–299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ernst C, Cappuccino N (2005) The effect of an invasive alien vine, Vincetoxicum rossicum (Asclepiadaceae), on arthropod populations in Ontario old fields. Biol Invasions 7:417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Griffiths JL (2014) Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) tree preference and intersite movement at California overwintering sites. MSc thesis, Cal Poly San Luis ObispoGoogle Scholar
  10. Janzen H (1981) Guanacaste tree seed-swallowing by Costa Rican range horses. Ecology 62:587–592Google Scholar
  11. Lockwood JL, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP (2011) Non-natives: plusses of invasion ecology. Nature 475:36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sandiford G, Keller RP, Cadotte M (2014) Final thoughts: nature and human nature. In: Keller RP, Cadotte MW, Sandiford G (eds) Invasive species in a globalized world: ecological, social, and legal perspectives on policy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 381–394Google Scholar
  13. Shine R (2014) The ecological, evolutionary, and social impact of invasive cane toads in Australia. In: Keller RP, Cadotte MW, Sandiford G (eds) Invasive species in a globalized world: ecological, social, and legal perspectives on policy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 23–43Google Scholar
  14. Simberloff D et al (2011) Non-natives: 141 scientists object. Nature 475:36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Vellend M, Baeten L, Myers-Smith IH, Elmendorf SC, Beauséjour R, Brown CD, De Frenne P, Verheyen K, Wipf S (2013) Global meta-analysis reveals no net change in local-scale plant biodiversity over time. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 110:19456–19459PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Toronto-ScarboroughTorontoUSA
  2. 2.Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoUSA

Personalised recommendations