Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Native North American pine attenuates the competitive effects of a European invader on native grasses

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Clearly, there is no such thing as absolute competitive ability, nor any measure…that confers competitive ability under all conditions - Huston and Smith 1987.

Abstract

Strong direct competitive interactions between two species can be attenuated or exacerbated by the asymmetric effects of other species. In this context we explored a natural pattern in which an exotic invader, Centaurea stoebe, was much less abundant under ponderosa pines than in open grassland. In a field experiment Centaurea had strong competitive effects on the native Pseudoroegneria spicata in open grassland. Pines had no effects on either Centaurea or Pseudoroegneria when they were grown alone, but the strong competitive effects of Centaurea on Pseudoroegneria found in open grassland did not occur under pine canopies. In common garden experiments we found that shade mimicking one effect of pine canopies inhibited Centaurea but did not affect the native Festuca idahoensis. Shade did not alter competitive outcomes between the native and the invader. In the same experiment, soil from under pines increased Centaurea size and its competitive effects on Festuca, the opposite of what would be predicted from natural patterns in the field. However, pine litter strongly suppressed Centaurea in field and greenhouse experiments, inhibited growth of Festuca when grown alone, and importantly also eliminated competition between Festuca and Centaurea. Overall, our results suggest that ponderosa pine may resist Centaurea invasion both directly and by attenuation of the invader’s competitive effects. This biotic resistance appears to occur in part through asymmetric direct effects of pine litter, and in part from ways in which the litter, canopy effects, and soil under pines modify interactions between Centaurea and natives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aschehoug ET, Metlen KL, Callaway RM et al (2012) Fungal endophytes directly increase the competitive effects of an invasive forb. Ecology 93:3–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aschehoug ET, Callaway RM, Newcombe G et al (2014) Fungal endophyte increases the allelopathic effects of an invasive forb. Oecologia 175:285–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes PW, Archer S (1999) Tree-shrub interactions in a subtropical savanna parkland: competition or facilitation? J Veg Sci 10:525–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barritt AR, Facelli JM (2001) Effects of Casuarina pauper litter and grove soil on emergence and growth of understorey species in arid lands of South Australia. J Arid Environ 49:569–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister D, Callaway RM (2006) Facilitation by Pinus flexilis during succession: a hierarchy of mechanisms benefits other plant species. Ecology 87:1816–1830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Besaw LM, Thelen GC, Sutherland S et al (2011) Disturbance, resource pulses and invasion: short-term shifts in competitive effects, not growth responses, favour exotic annuals. J Appl Ecol 48:998–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosy JL, Reader RJ (1995) Mechanisms underlying the suppression of forb seedling emergence by grass (Poa pratensis) litter. Funct Ecol 9:635–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooker RW, Callaway RM, Cavieres LA et al (2009) Don’t diss integration: a comment on Ricklefs’s disintegrating communities. Am Nat 174:919–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM (2007) Positive interactions and interdependence in plant communities. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Nadkarni NM (1991) Seasonal patterns of nutrient deposition in a Quercus douglasii woodland in central California. Plant Soil 137:209–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Nadkarni NM, Mahall BE (1991) Facilitation and interference of Quercus douglasii on understory productivity in central California. Ecology 72:1484–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Barth S et al (2004a) Soil fungi alter interactions between the invader Centaurea maculosa and North American natives. Ecology 85:1062–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Rodriguez A et al (2004b) Soil biota and exotic plant invasion. Nature 427:731–733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway R, Waller L, Diaconu A et al (2011) Escape from competition: neighbors reduce Centaurea stoebe performance at home but not away. Ecology 92:2208–2213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carey EV, Marler MJ, Callaway RM (2004) Mycorrhizae transfer carbon from a native grass to an invasive weed: evidence from stable isotopes and physiology. Plant Ecol 172:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Xiao S, Callaway RM (2012) Light intensity alters the allelopathic effects of an exotic invader. Plant Ecol Divers 5:521–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio CM, Mahall BE (1991) Root profiles and competition between the invasive exotic perennial, Carpobrotus edulis, and two native shrub species in California coastal scrub. Am J Bot 78:885–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas C, Hoffmann H, Schulz W et al (1987) Structure and elicitor or uv-light-stimulated expression of two 4-coumarate: CoA ligase genes in parsley. EMBO J 6:1189

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gundale MJ, Sutherland S, DeLuca TH (2008) Fire, native species, and soil resource interactions regulate the spatio-temporal invasion pattern of Bromus tectorum. Ecography 31:201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He W-M, Feng Y, Ridenour WM et al (2009) Novel weapons and invasion: biogeographic differences in the competitive effects of Centaurea maculosa and its root exudate (±)-catechin. Oecologia 159:803–815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbard KA, Archer S, Schimel DS et al (2001) Biogeochemical changes accompanying woody plant encroachment in a subtropical savanna. Ecology 82:1999–2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofland-Zijlstra JD, Berendse F (2009) The effect of nutrient supply and light intensity on tannins and mycorrhizal colonization in Dutch heathland ecosystems. Plant Ecol 201:661–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzapfel C, Mahall BE (1999) Bi-directional facilitation and interference between shrubs and associated annuals in the Mojave Desert. Ecology 80:1747–1761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston M, Smith T (1987) Plant succession: life history and competition. Am Nat 130:168–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iason GR, Lennon JJ, Pakeman RJ et al (2005) Does chemical composition of individual Scots pine trees determine the biodiversity of their associated ground vegetation? Ecol Lett 8:364–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur R, Gonzáles W, Llambi L et al (2012) Community impacts of Prosopis juliflora invasion: biogeographic and congeneric comparisons. PLoS ONE 7:e44966

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb A, Alpert P, Enters D et al (2002) Patterns of invasion within a grassland community. J Ecol 90:871–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd B, Facelli JM (2008) Priority effects produced by plant litter result in non-additive competitive effects. Oecologia 157:687–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liao C, Peng R, Luo Y et al (2008) Altered ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycles by plant invasion: a meta-analysis. New Phytol 177:706–714

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Guo C, Wang Y et al (2002) Effect of light irradiation on hairy root growth and artemisinin biosynthesis of Artemisia annua. Process Biochem 38:581–585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lodhi MAK, Killingbeck KT (1982) Effects of pine-produced chemicals on selected understory species in a Pinus ponderosa community. J Chem Ecol 8:275–283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lortie CJ, Cushman JH (2007) Effects of a directional abiotic gradient on plant community dynamics and invasion in a coastal dune system. J Ecol 95:468–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marler MJ, Zabinski CA, Callaway RM (1999) Mycorrhizae indirectly enhance competitive effects of an invasive forb on a native bunchgrass. Ecology 80:1180–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maron JL, Connors PG (1996) A native nitrogen-fixing shrub facilitates weed invasion. Oecologia 105:302–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maron JL, Marler M (2008) Field-based competitive impacts between invaders and natives at varying resource supply. J Ecol 96:1187–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May L, Baldwin L (2011) Linking field based studies with greenhouse experiments: the impact of Centaurea stoebe (C. maculosa) in British Columbia grasslands. Biol Invasions 13:919–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melbourne BA, Cornell HV, Davies KF et al (2007) Invasion in a heterogeneous world: resistance, coexistence or hostile takeover? Ecol Lett 10:77–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melgoza G, Nowak RS, Tausch RJ (1990) Soil water exploitation after fire: competition between Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass) and two native species. Oecologia 83:7–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metlen KL (2010) Using patchy plant invasions to understand how diffuse interactions modify facilitation and competition. Dissertation, The University of Montana, p 100

  • Metlen KL, Aschehoug ET, Callaway RM (2013) Competitive outcomes between two exotic invaders are modified by direct and indirect effects of a native conifer. Oikos 122:632–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosaleeyanon K, Zobayed S, Afreen F et al (2005) Relationships between net photosynthetic rate and secondary metabolite contents in St. John’s wort. Plant Sci 169:523–531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mueggler WF, Stewart WL (1980) Grassland and shrubland habitat types of western Montana. USDA, Forest Service. General Technical Report INT-66, Ogden, Utah, USA

  • Müller-Schärer H, Schroeder D (1993) The biological control of Centaurea spp. in North America: do insects solve the problem? Pestici Sci 37:343–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newingham A, Callaway M (2006) Shoot herbivory on the invasive plant, Centaurea maculosa, does not reduce its competitive effects on conspecifics and natives. Oikos 114:397–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega YK, Pearson DE (2005) Weak vs. strong invaders of natural plant communities: assessing invasibility and impact. Ecol Appl 15:651–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pages J-P, Michalet R (2003) A test of the indirect facilitation model in a temperate hardwood forest of the northern French Alps. J Ecol 91:932–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker VT, Muller CH (1979) Allelopathic dominance by a tree-associated herb in a California annual grassland. Oecologia 37:315–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich JJ, Heichen RS, Bottomley PJ et al (2003) Community composition and functioning of denitrifying bacteria from adjacent meadow and forest soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:5974–5982

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ridenour WM, Callaway RM (2001) The relative importance of allelopathy in interference: the effects of an invasive weed on a native bunchgrass. Oecologia 126:444–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Story JM, Good WR, White LJ et al (2000) Effects of the interaction of the biocontrol agent Agapeta zoegana (L.) (Lepidoptera: Cochylidae) and grass competition on spotted knapweed. Biol Control 17:182–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe AS, Archer V, DeLuca TH (2006) The invasive forb, Centaurea maculosa, increases phosphorus availability in Montana grasslands. Appl Soil Ecol 32:118–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe AS, Thelen GC, Diaconu A et al (2009) Root exudate is allelopathic in invaded community but not in native community: field evidence for the novel weapons hypothesis. J Ecol 97:641–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyser RW, Key CH (1988) Spotted knapweed in natural area fescue grasslands: an ecological assessment. Northwest Sci 62:151–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbanczyk-Wochniak E, Baxter C, Kolbe A et al (2005) Profiling of diurnal patterns of metabolite and transcript abundance in potato (Solanum tuberosum) leaves. Planta 221:891–903

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M et al (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14:702–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, D’Antonio C, Loope LL et al (1996) Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am Sci 84:469–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Holle B (2005) Biotic resistance to invader establishment of a southern Appalachian plant community is determined by environmental conditions. J Ecol 93:16–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Holle B, Delcourt HR, Simberloff D (2003) The importance of biological inertia in plant community resistance to invasion. J Veg Sci 14:425–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Callaway RM et al (2011) Terrestrial ecosystem responses to species gains and losses. Science 332:1273–1277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weidenhamer J, Romeo J (2005) Allelopathy as a mechanism for resisting invasion: the case of Polygonella myriophylla. In: Inderjit (ed) Invasive plants: ecological and agricultural aspects. Birkhäuser-Verlag AG, Basel, pp 167–177

  • White EM, Wilson JC, Clarke AR (2006) Biotic indirect effects: a neglected concept in invasion biology. Divers Distrib 12:443–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was conducted with funding from a McIntire-Stennis Cooperative Forestry Program grant to KLM and RMC. Invaluable field assistance was provided by Sarah Metlen, Chris Rota, and Oriana Grubsic. Access to research sites was generously supplied by Plum Creek Timber Co., Marilyn Marler, Missoula Parks and Recreation, Barry Bird, and the Montana Department of Fish Wildlife and Parks. David Affleck provided crucial help with the statistics and we acknowledge extensive discussion and editorial comments by Erik Aschehoug. RMC gratefully acknowledges funding from NSF EPSCoR Track-1 EPS-1101342 (INSTEP 3), DoD SERDP, and the Fire Science Laboratory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerry L. Metlen.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 282 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Metlen, K.L., Callaway, R.M. Native North American pine attenuates the competitive effects of a European invader on native grasses. Biol Invasions 17, 1227–1237 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0790-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0790-2

Keywords