Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In the beginning: phenotypic change in three invasive species through their first two centuries since introduction

Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that most introduced species go through rapid phenotypic change during their first decades to centuries of being introduced to a new range. However, little is known about the trends these phenotypic changes follow through time. Using herbarium specimens we track changes in the leaf area, leaf shape and plant height of three species (Epilobium ciliatum Raf., Senecio squalidus L. and Veronica persica Poir.) through their first ~200 years since introduction to the United Kingdom. All three species showed fluctuating direction and strength of phenotypic change through time. Then, we asked whether invasive species showed an initial lag phase in phenotypic change. Contrary to some expectations, we found that none of our species underwent a lag phase for the first 100 years after introduction. This is probably because the strongest selective pressures are exerted on them at the very beginning of their invasion, when the mismatch between their traits and the optimum for the new environment is greatest. Finally, we asked whether invasive species were still changing, or whether they had reached a new equilibrium, finding that all three species were still changing in at least one trait more than a century after their introduction. Our results suggest that some invasive species are yet to demonstrate their full potential as invaders. Overall, our study shows that species are labile in the face of environmental change. Identifying the long term trajectories of invasive species’ phenotypic change during invasion provides important clues for their appropriate management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Aikio S, Duncan RP, Hulme PE (2010) Lag-phases in alien plant invasions: separating the facts from the artefacts. Oikos 119:370–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biological Records Centre (2013) Online Atlas of the British and Irish Flora. http://www.brc.ac.uk/plantatlas/. Accessed June 2013

  • Blossey B, Nötzold R (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J Ecol 83:887–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bone E, Farres A (2001) Trends and rates of microevolution in plants. Genetica 112–113:165–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L et al (2005) Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144:1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Broennimann O, Treier UA, Müller-Schärer H et al (2007) Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. Ecol Lett 10:701–709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buswell JM, Moles AT, Hartley S (2011) Is rapid evolution common in introduced plant species? J Ecol 99:214–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll SP, Dingle H, Klassen SP (1997) Genetic differentiation of fitness-associated traits among rapidly evolving populations of the soapberry bug. Evolution 51:1182–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cazelles B, Chavez M, Berteaux D et al (2008) Wavelet analysis of ecological time series. Oecologia 156:287–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E et al (2003) A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 51:335–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks JA (2005) Lag times and exotic species: the ecology. Ecoscience 12:316–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daehler CC (2009) Short lag times for invasive tropical plants : evidence from experimental plantings in Hawai’i. PLoS One 4:e4462

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daehler CC, Strong DR (1997) Reduced herbivore resistance in introduced smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) after a century of herbivore-free growth. Oecologia 110:99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple RL, Buswell JM, Moles AT (2014) Asexual plants change just as often and just as fast as do sexual plants when introduced to a new range. Oikos. doi:10.1111/oik.01582

    Google Scholar 

  • Facon B, Genton BJ, Shykoff J et al (2006) A general eco-evolutionary framework for understanding bioinvasions. Trends Ecol Evol 21:130–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Felker-Quinn E, Schweitzer JA, Bailey JK (2013) Meta-analysis reveals evolution in invasive plant species but little support for evolution of increased competitive ability (EICA). Ecol Evol 3:739–751

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher RV, Beaumont LJ, Hughes L et al (2010) Evidence for climatic niche and biome shifts between native and novel ranges in plant species introduced to Australia. J Ecol 98:790–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry AP, Kinnison MT (1999) The pace of modern life: measuring rates of contemporary microevolution. Evolution 53:1637–1653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry AP, Nosil P, Rieseberg LH (2007) The speed of ecological speciation. Funct Ecol 21:455–464

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Humphriest SE (1995) An integrated to the ecology approach invasions of plant and management. Conserv Biol 9:761–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann AA, Sgrò CM (2011) Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature 470:479–485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holt RD, Barfield M, Gomulkiewicz R (2005) Theories of niche conservatism and evolution: could exotic species be potential tests? In: Sax DF, Stachowicz JJ, Gaines SD (eds) Species invasions: insights inot ecology, evolution, and biogeography. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 259–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Huey RB (2000) Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. Science 287:308–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jump AS, Penuelas J (2005) Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. Ecol Lett 8:1010–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17:164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I (1995) Time lags in biological invasions. In: Pyšek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M and Wade M (eds) Plant invasions - general aspects and special problems. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, pp 15–38

  • Lambrinos JG (2004) How interactions between ecology and evolution influence contemporary invasion dynamics. Ecology 85(8):2061–2070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanfear R, Ho SYW, Davies JT et al (2013) Taller plants have lower rates of molecular evolution. Nat Commun 4:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CE (2002) Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol Evol 17:9–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallat S (2008) A wavelet tour of signal processing: the sparse way. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlab (2010) Matlab version 7.11.0.584 (R2010b). Natick, Massachusetts www.mathworks.com/

  • Moles AT, Warton DI, Warman L et al (2009) Global patterns in plant height. J Ecol 97:923–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney HA, Cleland EE (2001) The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98(10):5446–5451

  • Parker JD, Torchin ME, Hufbauer RA et al (2013) Do invasive species perform better in their new ranges? Ecology 94:985–994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips BL, Brown GP, Webb JK et al (2006) Invasion and the evolution of speed in toads. Nature 439:803

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preston CD, Hill MO (1997) The geographical relationships of British and Irish vascular plants. Bot J Linn Soc 124:1–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Prach K (1993) Plant invasions and the role of riparian habitats: a comparison of four species alien to central Europe. J Biogeogr 20:413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasband WS (1997-2013) ImageJ, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Bethesda, Maryland http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/

  • Reznick DN, Ghalambor CK (2001) The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica 112–113:183–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sa Smith, Donoghue MJ (2008) Rates of molecular evolution are linked to life history in flowering plants. Science 322:86–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS et al (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 32:305–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shine R (2012) Invasive species as drivers of evolutionary change: cane toads in tropical Australia. Evol Appl 5:107–116

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practices of stastistics in biological research. W.H Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss S, Lau JA, Carroll CR (2006) Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities ? Ecol Lett 9:357–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strong DR, Lawton JH, Southwood SR (1984) Insects on plants. Community patterns and mechanisms. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND (2008) The evolutionary consequences of biological invasions. Mol Ecol 17:351–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria http://www.r-project.org

  • Thompson JN (1998) Rapid evolution as an ecological process. Trends Ecol Evol 13:329–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner KG, Hufbauer RA, Rieseberg LH (2013) Rapid evolution of an invasive weed. New Phytologist. doi:10.1111/nph.12634

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vellend M, Harmon LJ, Lockwood JL et al (2007) Effects of exotic species on evolutionary diversification. Trends Ecol Evol 22:481–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westley PAH (2011) What invasive species reveal about the rate and form of contemporary phenotypic change in nature. Am Nat 177:496–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M (1998) A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant Soil 199:213–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT et al (2002) Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 33:125–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams CK, Moore RJ (1989) Phenotypic adaptation and natural selection in the wild rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus, in Australia. J Anim Ecol 58:495–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M, Pyšek P, Jarošík V et al (2005) On the rates and patterns of spread of alien plants in the Czech Republic, Britain, and Ireland. Ecoscience 12:424–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M et al (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 12:821–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zangerl AR, Stanley MC, Berenbaum MR (2008) Selection for chemical trait remixing in an invasive weed after reassociation with a coevolved specialist. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:4547–4552

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

To the curators and herbaria collections from British and Irish Herbarium Natural History Museum, The Field-Druce herbarium Oxford University, Cambridge University herbarium, University of Sheffield, Liverpool Museum herbaria, Manchester Museum herbaria and The Royal Botanical Gardens Kew, London. H.F.M. wants to thank to Dr Mark Spencer and Serena Marner for their patience and invaluable advice and to Rhiannon Dalrymple for her thoughtful comments on previous versions of this manuscript. H.F.M. was supported by a scholarship from the Evolution and Ecology Research Centre at UNSW and the Australian Research Council (DP 0984222). A.T.M. was supported by funding from the Australian Research Council (DP 0984222).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Habacuc Flores-Moreno.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Flores-Moreno, H., García-Treviño, E.S., Letten, A.D. et al. In the beginning: phenotypic change in three invasive species through their first two centuries since introduction. Biol Invasions 17, 1215–1225 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0789-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0789-8

Keywords

Navigation