Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Persistence in Massachusetts of the veined white butterfly due to use of the invasive form of cuckoo flower

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The native pierid butterfly Pieris oleracea underwent a large range reduction in New England in the twentieth century, likely due to the introduction the invasive butterfly Pieris rapae (Lep.: Pieridae) to North America in 1860, and later the oligophagous parasitoid Cotesia glomerata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in 1884. Thought extirpated from the state by the 1970s, one large dense population of the butterfly was found in the mid 1980s in a flood plain meadow along the Housatonic River in Lenox, Berkshire Co., Massachusetts. We examined how this native pierid was able to maintain a relatively dense local population by feeding on a novel, invasive host plant, Cardamine pratensis (cuckoo flower), in a meadow habitat despite known parasitoid presence. We approached this question in three ways. First, we deployed trap host plants (cuckoo flower and collards) stocked host larvae (first and second instars of either P. rapae or P. oleracea) at the Lenox site and other locations to determine current rates of C. glomerata attack, for comparison with historical information. Second, we used olfactometer experiments to determine if C. glomerata females could detect the cuckoo flower volatiles released during P. oleracea larval feeding. Third, we used field-cage experiments to determine if the plant architecture found in the flood plain meadow inhibited the ability of C. glomerata females to locate and parasitize hosts. Specifically, we asked if overtopping vegetation prevented or reduced parasitism of P. oleracea larvae feeding on the covered basal rosettes of C. pratensis, which is the physical form of host plant for three of the four butterfly generations at the site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agerbirk N, Olsen CE, Chew FS, Orgaard M (2010) Variable glucosinolate profiles of Cardamine pratensis (Brassicaceae) with equal chromosome numbers. J Agric Food Chem 58:4693–4700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Asher J, Warren M, Fox R, Harding P, Jeffcoate G, Jeffcoate S (2001) Millennium atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson J, van Driesche RG, Pasquale A, Elkinton J (2003) Introduced braconid parasitoids and range reduction of a native butterfly in New England. Biol Cont 28:197–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biever KD (1992) Distribution and occurrence of Cotesia rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasite of Artogeia rapae in Washington and Oregon. J Econ Entomol 85:739–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodeur J, Geervliet JBF, VET, LEM (1998) Effects of Pieris host species on life history parameters in a solitary specialist and gregarious generalist parasitoid (Cotesia species). Entomol Exp Appl 86:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew FS, van Driesche RG, Casagrande RA (2012) A native butterfly confronts exotic plants and parasitoids. Mass Butterflies 39:2–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen CP (1978) Introduced parasites and predators of arthropod pests and weeds: a world review. USDA Agriculture Handbook 480, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan JE (1982) Cotesia (Apanteles) rubecula [Hymenoptera: Braconidae] recovered in Ottawa, Ontario ten years after its release. Proc Entomol Soc Ontario 113:71

    Google Scholar 

  • Courant AV, Holbrook AE, van der Reijden ED, Chew FS (1994) Native pierine butterfly (Pieridae) adapting to naturalized crucifer? J Lepid Soc 48:168–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Geervliet JBF, Ariens S, Dicke M, Vet LEM (1998) Long-distance assessment of patch profitability through volatile infochemicals by the parasitoids Cotesia glomerata and C. rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Biol Cont 11:113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves SD, Shapiro AM (2003) Exotics as hosts of the California butterfly fauna. Biol Conserv 110:413–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herlihy MV, van Driesche RG (2013) Effect of Cotesia rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on survival of larval cohorts of Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) on collards: evaluation of an introduced biological control sgent. Fla Entomol 96:360–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herlihy MV, van Driesche RG, Abney MR, Brodeur J, Bryant AB, Casagrande RA, Delaney DA, Elkner TE, Fleischer SL, Groves RL, Gruner DS, Harmon JP, Heimpel GE, Hemady K, Kuhar TP, Maund CM, Olmstead RD, Seaman AM, Skinner M, Weinzierl R, Yeargan KV, Szendrei Z (2012) Occurrence of Cotesia rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and its displacement of Cotesia glomerata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in eastern North America. Fla Entomol 95:458–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera Gonzalez J (1982) La vida silvestre: ¿Se extinguen las mariposas en Chile? Santiago. Academia Superior de Ciencias Pedagogicas de Santiago, Chile

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries MJ, Lawton JH (1984) Enemy free space and the structure of ecological communities. Biol J Linn Soc 23:269–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimzadeh J, Hardie J, Wright DJ (2012) Plant resistance affects the olfactory response and parasitism success of Cotesia vestalis. J Insect Behav 25, doi 10.1007/s10905-012-9331-y

  • Keeler MS, Chew FS (2008) Escaping an evolutionary trap: preference and performance of a native insect on an exotic invasive host. Oceologia 156:559–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeler MS, Chew FS, Goodale BC, Reed JM (2006) Modeling the impacts of two exotic invasive species on a native butterfly: top-down vs. bottom-up effects. J Animal Ecol 75:777–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JC, Heimpel GE (2005) Impact of flowering buckwheat on lepidopteran cabbage pests and their parasitoids at two spatial scales. Biol Control 34:290–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattiacci L, Dicke M (1995) Host-age discrimination during host location by Cotesia glomerata, a larval parasitoid of Pieris brassicae. Entomol Exp Appl 76:37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald RC, Kok LT (1992) Colonization and hyperparasitism of Cotesia rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a newly introduced parasite of Pieris rapae, in Virginia. Entomophaga 37:223–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meiners T, Obermaier E (2004) Hide and seek on two spatial scales—vegetation structure affects herbivore oviposition and egg parasitism. Basic Appl Ecol 5:87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obermaier E, Heisswolf A, Poethke HJ, Randlkofer B, Meiners T (2008) Plant architecture and vegetation structure: two ways for insect herbivores to escape parasitism. Eur J Entomol 105:233–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohsaki N, Sato Y (1990) Avoidance mechanisms of three Pieris butterfly species against the parasitoid wasp Apantales glomeratus. Ecol Entomol 15:169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker FD, Pinnell RE (1972) Further studies of the biological control of Pieris rapae using supplemental host and parasite releases. Environ Entomol 1:150–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Puttler B, Parker FD, Pinnell RE, Thewke SE (1970) Introduction of Apanteles rubecula Marshall and other parasites of Pieris rapae in British Columbia. J Econ Entomol 63:304–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato Y, Ohsaki N (1987) Host-habitat location by Apanteles glomeratus and effect of food-plant exposure on host-parasitism. Ecol Entomol 12:291–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scudder SH (1889) The butterflies of the Eastern United States and Canada. Vol. 1. Pub. by author, Cambridge

  • Shapiro AM (2002) The California urban butterfly fauna is dependent on alien plants. Divers Distrib 8:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg S, Dicke M, Vet LEM (1993) Relative Importance of infochemicals from first and second trophic level in long-range host location by the larval parasitoid Cotesia glomerata. J Chem Ecol 19:47–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • USDA, CAPRP (2012) http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=CAPRP

  • van Driesche RG (1988) Survivorship patterns of larvae of Pieris rapae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) in Massachusetts kale, with special reference to mortality due to Apanteles glomeratus L. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Bull Entomol Res 78:397–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Driesche RG (2008) Biological control of Pieris rapae in New England: Host suppression and displacement of Cotesia glomerata by Cotesia rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Fla Entomol 91:22–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Driesche RG, Bellows TS (1988) Host and parasitoid recruitment for quantifying losses from parasitism, with reference to Pieris rapae and Cotesia glomerata. Ecol Entomol 13:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Driesche RG, Nunn C (2002) Establishment of a Chinese strain of Cotesia rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in the northeastern United States. Fla Entomol 85:386–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Driesche RG, Nunn C, Kreke N, Goldstein B, Benson J (2003) Laboratory and field host preferences of introduced Cotesia spp. parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) between native and invasive Pieris butterflies. Biol Control 28:214–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Driesche RG, Nunn C, Pasqual A (2004) Life history pattern, host plants, and habitat determinants of population survival of Pieris napi oleracea interacting with an introduced braconid parasitoid. Biol Control 29:278–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson GD (1971) Insect liberation in Canada. Parasites and predators 1970. Ag Canada (Liberation Bulletin) No. 34

  • Williamson GD (1972) Insect liberation in Canada. Parasites and predators 1971. Ag Canada (Liberation Bulletin) No. 35

  • Wold-Burkness SJ, Hutchison WD, Lee JC, Hines RL, Bolin PC, Heimpel GE (2005) A long-term survey of parasitoid species composition and parasitism of Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera : Plutellidae), and Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) in Minnesota cabbage. J Entomol Sci 40:211–221

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Richard Casagrande of the University of Rhode Island, George Boettner and Stephen Donahue of the University of Massachusetts Amherst, Patrick DeFlorio of Yankee Glassblower, Jian Duan and Craig Oppel of USDA ARS Newark, DE, Lisa Dachinger of River Valley Farm, Lenox, Massachusetts, and Emmet Van Driesche. For help with the rearing of insects and conduct of sentinel larval studies at Lenox in 2008 and 2009, we thank Alex Meleg, Sabina Perkins, April Rodd, and Ryan Wagner. This material is based upon work supported by the National Institute of food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station and the Department of Plant, Soil and Insect Sciences under Project number MAS00957.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. V. Herlihy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Herlihy, M.V., Van Driesche, R.G. & Wagner, D.L. Persistence in Massachusetts of the veined white butterfly due to use of the invasive form of cuckoo flower. Biol Invasions 16, 2713–2724 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0698-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0698-x

Keywords

Navigation